8 Video Views·Jan 30, 2024
In a groundbreaking move, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is stepping into the real estate arena, transforming itself into a major landlord. With 100 billion yuan allocated by the central bank, eight second-tier cities, including Tianjin, Chengdu, Qingdao, Chongqing, Fuzhou, Changchun, Zhengzhou, and Jinan, are set to acquire commercial properties for long-term rentals. The CCP's involvement as a landlord, backed by low-interest policy loans, could reshape the rental market, impacting housing prices and raising questions about the government's role in citizens' lives. This bold strategy, aimed at stabilizing local debts, signifies a significant shift in the CCP's economic approach.
Connect with me:
Email: [email protected]
Telegram Group: https://t.me/DC2021301
hi thank you for watching diing to
channel I'm D Shan if you have not done
so already please subscribe to my
channel thank you very much in
comparison to the approach taken for the
stock market it is clear that the
Chinese Communist party is more actively
involved in addressing the real estate
sector first tier cities like a guango
and shanan have recently embarked on
Urban Village Renovations with support
from the Central Bank introducing a
housing te ticket system following this
trend second tier cities have also
received attention from the Central Bank
The People's Bank of China recently
approved a 100 billion yen housing
rental group purchasing loan backing
eight pilot cities in acquiring
commercial housing for long-term rental
purposes these eight pilot cities
include tenin Chu ch ch F CH and Gan all
exclusively second tier cities in
simpler terms the central bank has
allocated 100 billion yen to the local
governments of these eight cities
enabling them to purchase commercial
housing for long-term rental use the
policy loans offered by the Central Bank
features remarkably low interest rate
with a maximum of just 3% and an
extended repayment period for up to 30
years consequently if local governments
can generate a rental return of over 3%
on the purchase to properties the annual
interest will suffice to cover the
expenses making the repayment of the
principal amount unnecessary given the
30-year term it can be seen as akin to a
Perpetual Bond what consequences might
arise in the real estate market due to
the central bank's policy will housing
prices find stability or is a further
decline expected how will local
governments creatively utilizing their
roles as landlords additionally what
potential risks are concealed behind
implementation of this
policy initially it's essential to grasp
the rationale behind the central bank's
introduction of this policy essentially
the central bank's mindset is a
straightforward with its ultimate
objective consistently centered on
preventing systemic Financial risks the
livelihood of the general public is not
the primary concern at the present the
real estate sector is is still grappling
with issues primarily stemming from the
difficulty real estate companies face in
selling their properties it's likely
still fresh in everyone's memory that
the Central Bank continuously urged the
banks last year to treat all entities
equally and provide loans to real estate
companies as needed however Banks had
already become cautious about the real
estate companies due to risk control
measures they were hesitant to invest
further in the real estate sector faced
with this situation the Central Bank
realized that mere appeals were in
effective considering banks are not
charitable institutions so what was the
solution change the borrower if banks
were unwilling to land to real estate
companies the alternative was to extend
loans to local governments with these
loans local governments could acquire
unsold properties from real estate
companies leasing them out generate a
rental income and use that income to
repay the long interest following this
trend of thoughts the central bank has
introduced a dedicated leasing loan when
commercial Banks borrow funds from the
Central Bank the associated cost is
1.75% following this when the Central
Bank extends loans to local governments
the interest rate can reach up to 3%
with a maximum repayment period of 30
years the Lan amount is kept at 80% of
the assessed project value resulting in
an exceptionally High mortgage rate it's
clear that the central bank has
conducted calculations based on rental
yield with 3% representing the rate at
which the Central Bank believes local
government should be able to achieve in
terms of rental returns the 30-year
long-term implies that the Central Bank
may not have intended for local
governments to for repay the principal
amount let's explore how these eight
pilot cities might employ this loan to
obtain this loan the initial step is
certainly to identify a project the
local government's primary focus for
acquisition would be the properties
developed by its own investment platform
companies if you explore cities across
China you will likely find many
developments by these City investment
companies which serve as a financing
platforms for local governments when
seeking this leasing loan from the
Central Bank these companies would be
the entities involved thus the first
priority is to address the properties
held by these companies now let's tackle
the second question how to go about
acquiring these inventory properties and
at what pricing strategy will it be
based on Market rates cost price or
perhaps selling at a loss this presents
an opportunity for analysis let's delve
into a hypothetical scenario if City A's
Municipal investment company has limited
inventory properties and it needs to
procure houses from other developers
would they engage in tough negotiations
possibly driving a hard bargain I
believe they would and there might even
be dual contract contracts in play the
officially stated acquisition price may
be one figure but in practice developers
could find them themselves returning a
portion of the received funds the
purpose of these dual contracts is
likely for long deception the funds
returned by the developer could then be
redirected by the local governments to
settle debts constituting the first
situation another scenario unfolds in
City B where the municipal invest
company holds a substantial inventory of
properties over the past couple of years
CB strategically had its Investment
Company acquir numerous plots at high
prices to support land values this has
led to an overflow of properties in the
possessions of City Investment Company
creating a challenge in selling them in
response City B will spare no effort to
assist its Investment Company in
clearing the Surplus inventory they
would seek as much funding from the bank
as possible aiming for a substantial
amount however this approach comes with
a drawback aside from the local local
governments Investment Company other
real estate developers receive no Aid
and may still face Financial
challenges now let's contemplate the
impact of local governments transition
into landlords on housing prices firstly
focusing on the rental market the influx
of properties into the hands of local
governments for leasing purposes is
bound to increased available housing
stock consequently this surge in supp is
likely to exert downward pressure on
rental prices considering the existing
challenges in the job market rental
rates are expected to decline it's
crucial to acknowledge the significant
Authority held by the Chinese government
once it intervenes in the rental market
or in the citizens May face formidable
competition given the government's
substantial influence and resources
allow me to provide an example to
illustrate local governments have the
authority to mandate that all public
servants employees in public
institutions and the staff of
state-owned Enterprises must rent
government-owned housing if they seek
accommodation the rent could be deducted
directly from their salaries or units
could receive a modest subsidy from
their respective organizations
implementing such measures is within the
government's reach and it can even
allocate the rental targets for various
units for instance a particular Hospital
might be required to achieve a target of
renting out 100 units while another
department must fulfill a target of 200
units therefore when local governments
transition into the role of landlords
this kind of approach becomes quite
feasible although the government's
properties are likely to attract tants
it could spell bad news for ordinary
citizens in the future IND individuals
may find it a challenging to secure
tenants for their own properties as the
government has essentially monopolized
the rental market if people are unable
to earn rental income from their
properties there may be an increased
tendency to sell contributing to a
further decline in housing
prices if you find the previous ex
explanation unclear there is a broader
perspective to consider the future
demographic Trends in China over the
next two decades as we are aware the
number of newborns has been on the
decline in recent years contributing to
an aging population many young
individuals are embracing a more
laidback lifestyle opting not to marry
and have children this shift is not
solely a response to economic conditions
but also reflects a prevalent social
attitude perhaps even a trend despite
current government initiatives in terms
of promotion in encouragement and
policies they appear to have limited
impact on altering this
trajectory so what can we anticipate in
the next 20 years as the baby boomer
generation gradually diminishes their
children the Millennials who are often
the only CH child in their families will
inherit at least two or three properties
from their parents even if these
individuals can reside in homes beefed
by their grandparents each Urban Family
is a like to have one or two vacant
properties without occupants peering to
the Future the generation she the
Generation X is increasingly opting not
to marry and have children in an era
where nearly every family possesses
vacant properties if the government
assumes the role of a landlord will your
house still command a good selling or
rental price with an existing surplus of
houses and taking into account the
anticipated decline in China's total
population two decades from now it's a
matter worth contemplating let's revisit
the central bank's policy in this
instance the central bank has allocated
a loan quarter of 100 billion yen to
eight pilot cities how many houses can
this sum actually purchase unfortunately
the funds are quite limited akin to a
drop in the ocean these eight pilot
cities are predominantly second tier
cities with relatively High property
prices let's take Jung Joe as an example
given its prevailance of Unfinished
property projects and comparatively
lower prices how many houses could 100
billion yen Buy in Jung assuming a rate
of 10,000 Yen per square meter it would
be roughly around 100,000 units however
Jung Joo has approximately 106
unfinished property projects and over
200,000 families have acquired these
incomplete property
thus even if the entire 100 billion un
is directed to Jung Jo it only it can
only address half of the unfinished
homes not to mention other unsold
properties additionally there are seven
more cities sharing this 800 billion yen
therefore the allocated funds fall
significantly short it can only be seen
as an experimental Endeavor if expanded
Nationwide the central bank's printing
press might need to operate
incessantly h I speculate That central
bank has likely collaborated with local
governments the funds are primarily
aimed at resolving issues with local
city investment companies ultimately
assisting local governments in
stabilizing their local debts other real
estate companies facing insolvency might
not be the central bank's primary
concern as long as local debts remain
manageable the reputations of local
governments can be upheld fulfilling the
central bank's objectives finally fin
considering the banking perspective
let's explore an additional aspect for
contemplation typically Banks evaluate
the value of a property based on two
Dimensions one being its potential
resale value however for government own
the long-term rental properties
explicitly designated as a nons salable
attention shifts to the rental yield it
might not be widely known that when
Banks use properties like commercial
space
or offices as collateral their
assessment is more focused on the rental
income generated rather than the
potential sale value the loan amount
provided by bank is generally around 10
times the rental income therefore in the
case of government long-term rental
properties assuming a rental yield of 3%
even though 3% could be an optimistic
estimate considering China's rental
market conditions the property's
manageable value the the property's
mortgageable value in the eyes of the
bank would be around 30% to illustrate
for a property the government acquired
for 1 million the bank would typically
extend a loan of approximately
300,000 yet examining the special loans
issued by the Central Bank reviews a
requirement for banks to extend loans
with an 80% loan to value ratio a loan
initially set at 300,000 is promptly
increased to 800,000 consequently this
essentially amounts to providing funds
to the local government without taking
risks into account the central bank has
earmarked funds for this purpose
precisely because banks are typically
reluctant to undertake such high-risk
transactions I aim to illustrate the
significance of the long to uh the long
to Value ratio highlighting the
substantial risk exposure inherent in
the business Banks drawing from their
extensive Landing experience have
established a 30% loan to value ratio
with a solid foundation however once
elevated to 80% the likelihood of these
loans resulting in losses becomes
notably high in essence this specialized
loan serves as a gift to the local
government with a considerable chance
that they may not even consider repaying
the interest commercial Banks already
hold a significant volume of loans from
local governments that have a history of
not paying interest and adding another
potentially non-performing loan doesn't
bother them for commercial Banks given
that this money originates from the
Central Bank the outcome of the loan has
minimal impact on them they won't
directly bear the losses so they are
unlikely to be overly concerned by now
you should have gained an understanding
of the constrain the repayment capacity
of local governments essentially the
central bank's policy represents a CO
form of fiscal deficit monetization
merely taking a different route and
adopting a different guise anticipate
more instances of this nature in the
future leading to an increased frequency
of money printing by the central bank
this year China's economic regulation
leans heavily on fiscal policy Rel NE
ating the central bank to the role of a
money printing machine for fiscal
purposes signaling a considerable
decline in its
standing thank you for watching please
leave a comment and subscribe to my
channel just click the Subscribe button
right here I'll See You Again shortly
until then be well