許銳宇：共產黨操控「選舉」有一手，公務員已失去不投票的自由

Yes, let's start. Hello everyone, I am Lily. Today's guest is a former Hong Kong resident, Mr. Huy Rui-Yu. Huy-san, hello. Hello everyone, I am Huy Rui-Yu. I am now in the UK. It is now 11 o'clock in the UK. It should be 8 o'clock in the evening in Hong Kong. I am now in the UK. Let me say good morning to everyone. Yes. The famous artist, Zhou Haimei, has passed away. The government has been saying that her death was caused by the coronavirus. But in order to promote this policy, she has been vaccinated. Her medical history has been exposed on the Internet. It shows that she has contracted the new coronavirus. This is one thing. Another thing is that during the 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill, Zhou Haimei and Jackie Chan were on the side of the CCP. They filmed a video on the CCP's official website to publicly stand up for the Hong Kong police, to stand up for the CCP. Many Hong Kong people were killed by the CCP police. In 2021, Zhou Haimei filmed a video. This video has now been posted on the Internet by netizens. Everyone can see it. Many netizens said that she died of retribution for standing up for the CCP. There is good and evil. Everyone must stand up for the CCP. I believe in this. Dr. Hsueh, what do you think? We must stand up for the CCP. If it wasn't for Jackie Chan and Zhou Haimei, if it wasn't for them, whether it was for their own interests, or for further development, to do some pro-communist remarks and actions, these people's previous works of art, the films they made, are a very important memory for Hong Kong people, and even for the entire Chinese community. However, because of some of their political remarks in recent years, the efforts they have made over the years have been completely wasted. And these people don't have no money. They have a lot of money. I heard that Zhou Haimei has billions of dollars. And she has no children. Why? If a person is greedy, it is a big deal. Basically, if you look at it objectively, if she had not been involved in politics, most Hong Kong people would miss her. But because of some of her political remarks in the past, she has suffered a lot over the years. She has become very positive, just like a country tree. In fact, this is a warning to all of us. Is it worth it? Because as a person, these people are already living a life of luxury, living a life of luxury, but they still have to vote for China. I actually can't understand it. Yes. Hsueh-Sung, you are a Hong Kong MP. You are very clear about the election details. Hsueh-Sung, please tell us about the election of this Hong Kong MP. Yes, let me tell you about the 2023 district council election. I will definitely not call it an election. It's not an election, and there will be no voting. From my point of view, I think it proves that this is very important. That is to say, you have a correct understanding of it. This will determine your future. In fact, this so-called district council election is actually just a political organization to produce this thing. To produce this thing, but the government used a so-called similar form of election voting to produce this thing. Whether this thing will succeed or not, there are a lot of opinions in the room that the 30% voting rate is not enough, that is a failure, or the CCP will not be satisfied. I don't think so. On the contrary, if you look at it from the perspective of the CCP, or the perspective of the SAR government, in fact, this district council election, and even the 2021 Legislative Council election, I think they have been very successful in manipulating voting. I think this time the media, the central government set the 30% voting rate. There is no evidence, but there is evidence. And now it can do 28%, that is, the 28% voting rate. In fact, the central government, the SAR government, are also very satisfied. From their perspective, they feel that the so-called election this time is very successful. Why? You see, why is it successful? Because the 2021 Legislative Council election and the 2023 district council election, both are not elections. The two are just a political organization how to produce, is a political organization. Its production is similar, similar to an election method. The number of people voting in 2021, that is, those who support the pro-establishment camp, is 1.23 million votes. And this time in 2023, it is 1.19 million votes. This number of votes is actually equivalent to or close to the number of votes won by the pro-establishment camp in the first district council election after the anti-extradition bill in 2019. In 2019, the number of votes won by the pro-establishment camp was 1.2 million. After a few years, after the anti-extradition bill has passed, the Hong Kong government or the pro-establishment camp can still maintain, look at the numbers, can maintain such a close-knit atmosphere during the anti-extradition bill, they got the votes of the pro-establishment camp. This thing, in controlling the election, can retain the so-called basic rights, he did it quite successfully. I don't know how he did it. Theoretically, I don't think he can do it. Because after a few years, the economy of Hong Kong has deteriorated. Many people, even the pro-establishment camp, began to oppose the Hong Kong government. In theory, the district council elections in 2021 and 2023, the so-called district council elections this year, in theory, the number of votes should fall back before the anti-extradition bill, the general立法會選舉, the pro-establishment camp of the district council election will get the votes. In general, if it is the district council and the立法會選舉, we look back, in 2015, the district council election, the pro-establishment camp got a vote, only 790,000 votes. In 2016, the立法會選舉, the pro-establishment camp got a vote, only 870,000 votes. After a few years, this year's so-called立法會選舉 and the 2021 立法會選舉, I think, because the anti-extradition bill has passed, in theory, before, some people, because of the anti-extradition bill, came out to vote for the pro-establishment camp, I think, now, the votes of the pro-establishment camp, should go back to, before the anti-extradition bill in 2019, they will get the votes, but no, they still got, during the anti-extradition bill, that time, in 2019, the district council election, they got the votes. In fact, this is very scary. That is, he must have done something, and it was done quite successfully, he can keep this vote. That is, I share, why in 2019, we all have experience, whether the district council election, whether it is the pro-establishment camp, or the pro-democracy camp, in fact, the voting rate is very high. Our pro-democracy camp, I heard, many examples, the whole family, has already settled, in different parts of the world, because, they came back to vote, to vote for our pro-establishment camp, no, to vote for our pro-democracy camp, sorry. And, the pro-establishment camp, those people, will also come back from the mainland, to vote. Even, some, for example, the pro-democracy camp, will also come back from the mainland, to vote. Even, some, for example, some rich people, or, directly, in the anti-extradition movement, those people whose interests are affected, before, they did not vote, they also deliberately, in 2019, came out to vote, to support the pro-establishment camp. So, because of this phenomenon, the voting rate was pushed to more than 70%, and, the pro-establishment camp, and the pro-democracy camp, also supported, it is a new high. That time, in 2019, the pro-establishment camp, although it lost a lot of seats, but, the voting rate, was very exaggerated, compared to what they could get before. They also got more than a few hundred thousand votes. So, in 2019, the pro-establishment camp, the votes they got, were 1.2 million votes. It was a new high. And, in the election of the Legislative Council, in 2021, in this year's district election, they were able to retain, these votes. they were able to retain, these votes. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, they were very successful. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, I don't know why they were able to do it. From this perspective, This vote is meaningless. Especially, the 1.23 million people who came out to vote Especially, the 1.23 million people who came out to vote are meaningless. Basically, you are voting for a political organization. You are voting for a political organization. In fact, the organization that you voted for still exists. In fact, the organization that you voted for still exists. However, this organization is basically betraying your interests. However, this organization is basically betraying your interests. You still have to vote for this organization to betray your interests. This is the point where it is meaningless.