+++ Die Nachricht von der Fussball-WM und dem Ausscheiden der deutschen Mannschaft +++ Warum brauchen wir immer eine Erklärung - vorzugsweise eine, bei der jemand anderes schuld ist? Und was treibt die Berichterstattung über den Fussball wirklich an? --- Der Podcast zum Buch "Wir informieren uns zu Tode"
Hirnforscher Gerald Hüther und Publizist Robert Burdy schauen auf aktuelle Nachrichten und fragen "Ist das Information oder kann das weg?". Basierend auf ihrem Buch "Wir informieren uns zu Tode" stellen sie die entscheidenden Fragen, um uns durch die Informationsflut zu bringen: 1. Löst diese Information in mir irgendetwas aus? 2. Ist das, was sie in meinem Hirn auslöst, für mich hilfreich? 3. Ist sie deshalb hilfreich, weil sie mir hilft, etwas besser zu verstehen und das dabei als sinnvoll Empfundene durch eigenes Handeln umzusetzen? Wenn nicht, kann sie weg! 4. Ist sie deshalb hilfreich, weil sie bisherige Vorstellungen und Überzeugungen von mir in Frage stellt und mir hilft, diese zu erweitern oder loszulassen? Wenn nicht, kann sie weg! 5. Welche Absicht verfolgt der Verbreiter dieser Information? Will er mir helfen, mein Leben und mein Zusammenleben mit anderen besser zu meistern? Oder versteckt sich hinter dieser Information noch eine andere, nicht mitgeteilte, also verborgene Absicht?
Is that information or can it go away? The podcast with Robert Bode and Gerald Hüther.
The news. News.
Yes, is that information or can it go away? Our podcast Gerald Hüther and Robert Bode for you today
with the topic, with the message about the departure of the football national team from the World Cup in Qatar.
An exciting football adventure, certainly for everyone who is interested in football.
But of course we also received a lot of messages.
Was that all information? What went away? We want to take a closer look at that today.
I greet you and everyone who is listening to us now.
It is so that it was of course a catastrophe and some people feel it like the end of the world.
That has had an effect on most people, and let alone that they were terribly excited.
I find it exciting, reports that say that Germany was betrayed by the Spaniards.
So that should mean that the Spaniards lost on purpose, so that they don't have to play against Brazil.
That's quite an understatement.
That doesn't really have much to do with information anymore.
But then I can also ask myself, what does that actually do to me?
Or something nice like, that fits in the same direction, that it was only about such a millimeter drama in the Japan game.
Because whether the fire was somehow on the outline or not.
And that should now be responsible for the German team having to leave and go home.
The information in there means, we were actually good.
But unfortunately we lost because we were pulled over by others.
Or because the referee didn't pay attention. So others are to blame.
That's a completely normal human impulse.
We are looking for explanations.
And of course we prefer to have the explanation that it wasn't our fault.
In other words, everyone who played with the team doesn't necessarily want this team to have played badly.
We are looking for the culprits in all possible corners.
From swearing Spaniards and Japanese, to a German coach who may have failed.
But he didn't play along, he couldn't have been alone either.
To the question of whether the discussion about the armband of the team captain
ultimately distracted and shamed the team so much that it couldn't win anymore.
Do we need these backdoors from the conflict that arises because our team has lost?
Yes, I think we can now determine this from all possible excuses that you have listed.
But it will be clearer for what we are doing here if we just choose one.
For example, Spain is to blame.
This is still the most neutral, we don't lose ourselves too much in all possible other areas.
So Spain is to blame. I have now received the information.
It doesn't do that much with me now.
I take it for granted that someone wrote it.
But I find it pretty unimportant and I wouldn't pass it on to anyone.
So that's information that can go away from my point of view.
Because it doesn't mean anything to me.
But you are a bigger football fan than I am.
It may be that it means more to you.
And that it has an effect on you when you are offered this wonderful explanation
that it is not the German team's fault, but the Spaniards.
So it only has one effect on me, namely the resentment against conspiracy theories.
Ultimately, this is a classic conspiracy theory.
I have an event that I don't like.
So I'm looking for an excuse and I'm looking for it as far away as possible.
In this case, just on the next place.
That's what it does to me.
But that has nothing to do with the information itself.
Okay, but it moved you, yes?
Yes.
And it also helped you.
Not that you could do anything now that the German team comes back into the game.
But you have found that it has broadened your horizon.
In any case, it has broadened my horizon.
Because it has shown me with exemplary clarity
how easy this path to such conspiracy theories is.
Exactly. And we can go one step further and say
since the makers of this information know how many Germans would like it to go on,
it is of course very beneficial to offer something to these disappointed expectations.
So to speak, an enemy who is to blame.
Yes.
The Spaniards are to blame.
And with that we have a very interesting situation
that really has a lot to do with what we have experienced in the last two years.
Although such conspiracy theories have repeatedly emerged
in the most diverse contexts, from migration to Corona.
This is not a new concept.
But of course there are these seemingly factual things
that we also heard when the German team left.
The coach didn't manage to set up the team properly.
If the ball had been a millimeter further across the line in the Japan game,
everything would have been different.
These are not conspiracy theories.
These are searches for causes.
Is that so?
Are these really searches for causes?
Or are these just ...
I'll say it now, Flaps.
I'm just trying to explain something to you
that we don't want to deal with so easily as an event.
I don't know how our listeners are doing now.
But what you're saying is all attempts to maintain our belief
that the German team is the best team in the world.
If you believe that,
for you this is a sign that there are those to blame
and that it was actually undeserved.
For you this is convincing.
In terms of brain technology, it comes to a coherence.
Now he's still very excited.
But now he gets an explanation.
Ah, they are to blame.
And already there is peace in the brain.
And then he pussies it out himself, possibly everywhere.
And not only calms himself with it.
The belief that the Germans are the greatest in football
remains upheld.
He pussies it out and tells everyone else he meets
that the Germans actually lost because some forces,
to put it so generally, played a trick on us
and we are not to blame.
So that was caused by others.
Wonderful strategy.
By the way, we do it all day.
We are very close to our everyday life now.
I don't like it either when my wife accuses me
that I don't take care of the household.
Then I always have a good explanation
why I don't do that.
Why it just didn't work.
And you are actually the one who is to blame.
It was something else to blame, for example,
that I am now having such a conversation with you.
Let's look at our last question.
What intentions does the informant pursue?
That's very exciting.
Because we actually assume
that the information about the sport is also news.
In the classical sense, we learn something new.
Obviously, this is extremely relative.
If the Spaniards had won the last round of the group games
against the Japanese,
then we would have had a completely different narrative.
Then we wouldn't have needed all these explanations.
Yes, we all know that.
That something completely different would have been in the newspaper.
Then German football would have been the biggest again.
And we even managed to work out of our own strength
from such a miserable situation.
So we would have celebrated ourselves.
That's self-defeating, yes.
Now there are experts sitting there.
There are sports journalists who have been observing football for decades.
There are football world champions sitting at the table
who inform us.
And in the same scenario,
Germany wins 4-2 against Costa Rica.
But in other circumstances,
they would have told us something completely different.
Is that selective perception?
Is that what we also explained in the book,
with confirmation bias,
that we basically always look for the information
that confirms our opinion, our situation?
You wouldn't believe it
that you can get to such a smooth terrain
just by watching a football game.
Yes, these are experts.
They know their way around football.
And depending on how the game goes,
we get this and that kind of explanation.
That's difficult.
Because then I have to ask myself
if he's really an expert who explains something.
And that's why I would say
that such information, which is so random in the end
and comes from an expert,
oh, wonderful, get out of here.
But that also means,
if I look at it as a journalist,
that we ultimately only have to deal
with two factual information
on this football evening.
Namely, 4-2,
the result of Germany against Costa Rica.
And 1-2,
the result of Spain against Japan.
And everything else,
if you want to look at it strictly,
is actually entertainment.
Because emotions are picked up
and strengthened.
Yes, but that's the business in football.
It doesn't seem to be about
simply being happy
that a football game took place
in which one or the other
scored more goals.
But it's almost a kind of
fight or war situation
where you have to defeat the other.
And where you have to present yourself
as the great fighter
who won the game.
That is highly problematic.
And then you see that
this has been going on for years.
Maybe since the media coverage
about sports events exists.
Such a self-proclaimed
self-proclaimed
who cannot be prevented.
They can only like to
and again and again
report about such games
to the spectators
who deal with it.
And you can't feed them
how the game turned out.
You have to emotionalize.
You have to emotionally
charge the message.
And then suddenly the whole game
and this whole world championship
is so charged that suddenly people
I would say they lose
their common sense.
They are part of this whole event.
It's almost as if they're
part of it.
And you know that sometimes
even your own leg twitches
when someone shoots.
That has nothing to do with
information at all,
but that is the attempt
to get people to
deal with something.
And now comes the bad sentence
that you can make money with.
Ultimately, it goes beyond that.
Is there a possibility?
Many people love this football
and want to be part of it.
Can you do that
if you answer these four questions
that we have now asked?
Is there a way
to just watch football
without getting into this loop?
Yes, that would be
such a meaning
of the information that
Germany was eliminated.
And how that
and under what circumstances
it was then brought
can also lead
to the idea of what
football is about
and why people
play football at all
and want to watch it.
You can question that again.
That would be this opening.
So far I've always thought
it depends on my team winning.
And that made me highly emotional.
And then it's enough
that I've joined a hooligan group
that shoots fireworks
and does all kinds of things
where I have to say
how can that happen just because of a football game?
And now the view opens
and I can think again
why people play football at all.
That's a nice question.
If you come back that far
and can ask this question
then I think that's great
because then it suddenly becomes clear
people have always been playing team games.
So that's such a basic feature
that we as people
have to experiment
in a playful way
how something works.
And we also have to experiment
how living together
or playing together works.
And that's why we invented
team sports.
It's something where
a representative group
on the pitch
tries to find out
how playing together,
living together,
works.
And that's why it's good
that we still call it a game
because that's the basis
for us as people
running such team games.
So we try
on the pitch
how playing together works
and with that we learn a lot
about life
because then we see
if the team game works
the team life outside
is a big expansion
of our possibilities.
It just doesn't work
if this wonderful football game
is abused to make money.
That's how hard I have to
formulate it now.
Then it's not about playing together
but about winning.
And that's another dimension
and then the world collapses
if your own team doesn't win.
And then the view is lost
that it's actually about playing together.
And still, I notice that
when I talk to real footballers
who are in the business
they all know that.
They know that
in the end it comes down
to playing together
and that by playing together
you almost automatically win.
So winning
is a side effect
of a successful team game.
To our world today
and our life and today
and everything you do today
is about
if your life together
with other people
can also be designed
to succeed.
Maybe then it's much more fun.
Instead of falling over each other
and wanting to defeat each other
we could also try to find out
how we not only get along
but how we grow together
and together
and that would be football.
That's a positive aspect.
I would like to add one more thing.
You just talked about a representative group
that is on the pitch.
It's also about letting go.
I identify myself as a spectator
with my team
and write them down.
I have to let go.
We have to do that in life often
and it's rarely easy for us.
The positive, maybe,
about football
to find reconciliation
with football fans
is that it always works.
Most people don't stop
watching football
just because the Germans are eliminated.
They watch it and get excited
for one or the other team.
So, on the whole,
letting go,
identifying with one team
works quite well, doesn't it?
That's definitely the case
and what happens
in the Bundesliga
is, so to speak,
only a small part
of what football is.
Football takes place
every weekend
on thousands of football pitches
everywhere in our country
and everywhere in this country
people try to give their best
in their little club
where they play
so that the team play works.
And they learn
better and better
how to organize themselves.
And in this respect,
the real root of football
and what football actually does
is to look for
where it's not primarily about winning
but about the beauty of the game.
And then money doesn't matter anymore.
Then the importance of money
comes back, yes.
Yes, definitely.
Gerhard, that was the first episode
of our podcast
Is that information or can it go away?
In the next episode we'll deal
with the Christmas message.
One of the oldest
and perhaps most effective
messages that
at least the younger human history
has heard.
We want to ask our four questions again
What does it actually do to us?
Does it move us?
Does it help us to understand something?
Does it help us to act differently?
And what are the actual
interests behind it?
I'm looking forward to the next conversation, Gerhard.
Yes, I'm also looking forward to this topic
very much.
It's not just about
looking at current information
but we also want to know
how information works and how
you can deal with information.
And there's a 2,000-year-old
piece of information
that came into the world.
It's exciting. You can take a look at it.
So what was the original
reason it came into the world
and what did it turn out to be?
Exactly. Gerhard, we'll keep talking.
Thank you to everyone who listened.
We'll hear from you again.