Evidence That Nord Stream Was Intentionally Destroyed; Energy Crisis Sparks New Hostilities | CLIP

Hey, welcome back everyone. Good morning. Happy Monday. Some big news today. I'm going to be going over what's been happening with the Nord Stream pipelines because I think everybody's wondering, were they destroyed by Russia? Were they destroyed by the United States? Was NATO involved? I want to go over the actual evidence. So I want to show you all, we're going to go over SOSIS and what SOSIS is, which is an undersea tracking system. We're going to go over some air traffic data showing a very interesting picture of a certain military plane that just so happened to fly over that pipeline right at the time when it was bombed or right at the time it was destroyed. We'll have to see what happened with it. Some very strange incidents such as Ukrainian, what they call kamikaze undersea drones, one of them washing up on shore right next to a Russian military base, and a lot of other weird stuff that I think hasn't been widely talked about. Taking all this together, I hope that we can paint at least some circumstantial evidence to give some real evidence on what may have taken place with the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline. For those who are not familiar with it, basically a lot of Europe gets its energy from Russia. This was understood during the Obama administration when Russia was trying to, according to US intelligence at that time, use the control of energy as a way to control other countries. That was one of the reasons why when Hillary Clinton was involved with selling off America's energy independence with the Uranium One deal, that was why it was so controversial. Now, Russia has, in fact, gained a large portion of control of the global energy market, especially over Europe, to the point where they can use it essentially as a pressure point to mess with politics throughout Europe. Now, Europe right now is facing an energy crisis. They need that energy, they need that natural gas, they need oil, they don't have enough, and so the destruction of these pipelines is very significant because of that. Also, this is a big blow as well to Russian influence as, again, the Ukraine war looks like it's expanding, and at the same time gives Russia some additional ammunition in terms of propaganda as a rallying call for its own troops. This is actually a very important piece, not widely discussed enough in my opinion. They're talking about limited nuclear war now, and they recently started conscripting people. You know, they have a travel ban from Russia to other countries of men of certain age groups, and one of the problems they have is morale. They need a rallying call. This has now provided that rallying call. All right, folks, let's go over some details because, again, I don't want to draw hard conclusions. I will tell you right now the circumstantial evidence looks a whole lot like the U.S. was involved with this, but I'm not going to draw any hard conclusions on that beyond just showing what the evidence suggests. That said, folks, let's jump into the first part of this. Oh, real quick. Okay, the border documentary is now out. That came out last week on Thursday. I know a lot of you may have missed it because I thought it was coming out this week. It was my badge because I got the dates mixed up. The border documentary, the one where I'm at the U.S.-Mexico border. I'm on the U.S. side and the Mexico side. That is now out. That's on the Crossroads channel. You can watch it on Epic TV. This is where I look into and uncover how the United Nations is running the border crisis and how the United States, through the State Department, is financing it. I think this is a pretty impactful. It's a special feature. It's not a full documentary. Maybe a mini-docu, you call it. That is now out. Please watch it. Please share it. Helps get the word out. Again, I'll show you a trailer in a bit, but let's go over to the end of the first story. I want to start by kind of the big picture. Really, just kind of what the media is talking about. Right now, the legacy news outlets are mostly claiming, well, at least on the Democrat side, they're mostly claiming that Russia did it. You see this across even some of the conservative media. I think maybe with the exception of Fox and the exception of a few independent media, most of them are blaming it on Russia. Fox has suggested that the U.S. may have been involved, and so there is speculation on that side. Let me just kind of give you a big picture first. This is Forbes. Forbes is saying this. NATO says sabotage behind destruction of natural gas pipelines. It says NATO's Secretary General said the leaks of the Nord Stream pipeline for sending natural gas from Russia to Europe were the result of sabotage. There you have the bubbling up of where the pipelines were destroyed. It says discussed the sabotage on the Nord Stream pipelines with Defense Minister Morten Bodskev, said Jens Stolzberg on Twitter. He said, critical infrastructure being any kind of infrastructure that is necessary for a country to function. That could be energy infrastructure, that could be roads, that could be water supplies, and so on. So they're looking to protect now, in the wake of this, critical infrastructure in NATO allied countries. And it says Nord Stream 1 and 2, because both were destroyed. Both of these pipelines were destroyed. They lay on the bed of the Baltic Sea and bring gas from Russia to Germany. Nord Stream 2 was finished last year, but Germany never opened it, because Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24th. That was kind of a lifeline that Germany had. If things get really bad this winter, that lifeline is now lost. It says according to German security officials, Nord Stream 1 may be permanently damaged by salt water that could corrode the inside of the pipes, because they were destroyed and water is now leaking in. It says some speculated that Russia was behind the attack on its own pipelines. The attack was, quote, probably premeditated and planned for several weeks before it occurred. An anonymous British military official told the Times of London, this is not some casual terrorist attack, it has to be a government. That's according to Michael Clark, a British military expert. And it says privately, everyone is convinced, everyone is convinced this is a Kremlin-inspired piece of sabotage. It says spokespersons for the governments of Ukraine and Poland agreed that Russia was behind the attacks. In other words, NATO, the UK, Poland, Ukraine, they're blaming Russia, and a lot of the US media is blaming Russia. Now on the other side, this is what's happening. TRT World Now on Twitter said this, they have a video of Putin, Vladimir Putin speaking, I won't play because he's speaking Russian. But they're saying this, that basically Ukrainian grain goes to Europe. He's saying Anglo-Saxons blew up the Nord Stream pipelines, suggesting again, it's the ancient enemies of Russia, the Anglo-Saxons, who are behind the destruction of this. He's blaming, in other words, NATO countries. Putin is pointing the finger the other way and he's saying, I did not blow it up, you guys blew it up. And it says the West wants to see Russia as its colony to plunder its national resources and exploit Russians as a crowd of soulless slaves. That's according to Putin. Putin is really using this as a rallying call right now. And again, you really see the divide. You see the makings of the Ukraine-Russia war expanding now into a European war, with the United States as a proxy actor in that. And this is really something, it looks like it is expanding. And Russia does now have some additional fuel for its rallying call to raise troop morale, which allegedly, according to a lot of reports, was really where they were falling short.