TỪ ẾCH THÀNH HOÀNG TỬ - Những vấn đề của Thuyết tiến hóa Darwin

To turn a frog into a prince perhaps a princess's kiss is not enough Yet the story of evolution claims that amphibians like frogs could actually evolve into mammals including becoming princes Today theory of evolution is widely accepted as an obvious fact but it is not absolutely so The Book of Genesis summarizes the basic origins of species and hints at the existence of the Supreme Creator Until the distant past It had once been a widely accepted belief that few questioned until about 150 years ago When an amateur naturalist begins his journey of discovery and shakes the world with his unconventional idea After exploring the Galapagos Islands with their burning lava layers beneath Charles Darwin was fascinated by the amazing ecosystem here Observing the giant land turtles residing on various islands with a wide range of sizes and shapes He imagined that if there was enough time if this species of turtle continued to evolve it would eventually transform into a completely different species Dr Richard Dahl from Oxford University a professor of public health is the author of many best-selling books He is one of the most prominent supporters of Darwin I believe the mystery of life is explaining how the complexity of life arises The alternative expression of complexity is the information contained within it The amount of information is the measure of the complexity of life The complexity of life is not just simple complexity but it also adapts These creatures are not only complex but they also function they survive they use every possible ability to exist These creatures look like beautifully designed machines machines designed for survival But not all experts agree that the complexity of life is simply the result of accumulated random changes The more dissenting voices question Darwin's hypothesis Dr Michael Denton a molecular biologist is currently a senior researcher at the University of Otago in New Zealand He believes that Darwin's theory is a theory born out of a crisis which assumes what is called the truth of evolution but cannot explain it The process by which single-celled organisms are thought to have evolved into more complex life forms through random processes I don't think Darwin's theory of evolution is in any way similar to an accepted fact as many other biologists claim I call it a fantastic tale about the origin of the 20th century That is the viewpoint I have always held I don't think there's anything in the field of biology or even before that in science that I've seen in the past 20 years In any case I can change my mind about my fundamental belief that Darwin's theory is a poor explanation Darwin's ideas are now considered common knowledge It is considered an established fact that simple life forms evolved over millions of years Life evolved into all the complex forms and three basic types we know today without the need for any creative design And of course the question that arises here is where all these complex characteristics come from Where did this information come from Obviously it was not a coincidence It is utterly unimaginable how such complex and fully designed living organisms as birds humans or hedgehogs could have arisen by chance Completely impractical Because starting from nothing from simplicity and becoming a highly complex living organism in a single step is completely impossible Like rolling a die thousands of times And always getting the six-point face It's simply impossible But if we allow a little luck to happen in any one generation and then a little more in the next generation and then a little more in the following generation accumulating this luck bit by bit step by step You can progress from any simple level to any complex level All you need is enough time Where does it come from From the gradual process of evolution through natural selection Modern scientists believe that the ancestors of fish lived in primordial oceans Then it left the water and became an amphibian Then amphibians became reptiles Then reptiles became mammals Some early birds later lost their scales to grow feathers Then they flew into the sky becoming bird species However reptiles and birds are too different Reptiles do not have information about wings or feathers To become a bird a reptile would require an enormous amount of additional complex movement information Darwin argued that it would only take a little luck Gradual changes can even turn reptiles into birds Michael Denton definitely cannot claim this Someone could cite many examples from the world of living organisms About things that seem to go beyond the reach of the simple mechanism in Darwinian learning There are things like bird lungs feathers such as eggs with a mesh-like structure flagella bacteria A large number of systems can contain unique and complex components such as the mechanisms we find in nature Where the system actually works you need A B C D and so on to be in the correct positions As if they were connected together before they started working It is very hard to see these things achieved by chance Due to non-directed processes such as the feather it is a very complex structure With small hooks and fine fibers woven together to hold the parts of the hair in place These tiny adaptive structures on the feathers make the feathers truly adapted for flight But Darwin's evolutionary model requires intermediate species to have fully functional and perfect capabilities and I cannot imagine how those goals could be achieved without going through structures that are truly non-functional In some biological senses Sheep and birds have completely different reproductive and respiratory systems In the lungs of sheep air enters and exits through a single bronchus and lead to small air sacs But in birds air continuously flows through the lungs through various passages They all point in the same direction through a complex system of interconnected air sacs simultaneously connecting to their hollow skeleton Darwin explained that the wooly lung transforms into a bird's lung through many intermediate stages Professor Michael Denton believes that the lung which is partially formed cannot function because that transitional form could not breathe Any intermediate process would lead that species to extinction The lungs of birds are like a mass of eggs along with living cells and feathers in a sophisticated system They are extremely complex I realize that we can only imagine it functioning while the respiratory system exchanges gases If the entire structure and current order must be in place One of the harshest examples in nature of such a complex system It includes a very large number of interacting components that must all be positioned exactly like that in the lungs of each bird Before they can function Strong evidence of lung structure in birds is solid evidence But supporters of theory of evolution by natural selection find it difficult to distinguish because I can't imagine how the lungs or such delicate things could be It can also form merely through the accumulation of small random changes It requires an enormous amount of data input to transform a simple life form into a more complex one The encoded movement information in the IDMs of the quarks is equivalent to two 500-page books In humans it is equivalent to at least 1 000 books Therefore to trade in the human soul means to It must add information as a whole library Where does this data source come from Professor Werner Witt is an expert information theory and is the director of the Federal Institute of Physics and Technology in Brunwitz Germany He believes that the evolution of complex life forms from simpler ones through random improvements is futile Because there is no new source of information the biggest issue in evolution is the origin of information Where did that information come from A simple lowly creature evolving into an elephant or even a human is impossible This process requires a vast amount of new information But that information cannot come from a natural process Phan Dac Quyen believes that this new information comes from a genetic mutation passed down from one generation to the next Genetic mutations are random errors similar to errors that occur during the copying of text According to evolutionary proponents The most beneficial micro mutations are retained through natural selection Ultimately we are provided with evidence Molecular movement details The most convincing evidence that no one can deny Because the evidence is at the molecular level We can see even the smallest details as if it were a description of a person We can see the changes in each letter each word in the DNA in reality It can describe the transformation of each generation describing the anatomical changes What Darwin himself was able to see Genetic mutations occur when genetic code segments are damaged usually due to exposure to radiation or harmful chemicals Some mutations have no effect but most are harmful and often cause death Although most mutations are harmful some mutations can beneficial Darwin stated that evolution occurs When these rare beneficial mutations accumulate through natural selection The Galapagos Islands are considered the home of theory of evolution a place with a unique ecosystem studied by many international scientists Here visitors see the flightless bird as an example of evolution through beneficial mutations The Galapagos cormorant has lost the ability to fly due to missing information in its wing structure As a result it can swim and float quite well That is probably an advantage A Galapagos tour guide explained Thanks to this obvious advantage the hoopoe can raise more young birds and thus thanks to natural selection they survive While other flying birds are nearly extinct The flightless bird is indeed a species that has undergone degenerative mutation They lose the movement information needed forming wings All actual mutations are deficiencies in movement information Even with beneficial examples No new movement information has been added The examples are said to be evolving by getting involved In fact they are just variations of the same type of animal The ability to resist antibiotics pesticides or the evolution of the gypsy moth All these examples are merely a rearrangement of movement information that is either available or lost No new movement information has been added If the possibility of chance or random opportunity has been ruled out as an explanation for the biological phenomena we see on Earth There must be some form of intelligence that designed it it could only be that way When we look at the laws of nature When observing the universe we have two opposing possibilities The first hypothesis about the existence of a supreme and transcendent being As the lord of the Jews the god who created the world and established the natural laws Or we may still believe that the universe is an independent living entity a self-organizing system At the Western Wall in Jerusalem the main stream of Jews pray at dawn According to the book of Genesis the existence of all of us is not at all random The Jewish scholar Dr Lee Spetner specifically commented on the role of mutations in theory of evolution As a specialist in physics and computational mathematics he studied the signal-to-noise ratio of DNA As a member of Johns Hopkins University he publishes articles in top scientific journals on theory and mathematics of evolutionary biology He believes that the evidence found is confirming the things in the Bible that the Lord himself created the original kinds Over time they diversified to adapt to the environment I really don't think the modern Darwinian model Darwinian theory can explain large-scale evolution What they cannot actually explain is the accumulation of moving information How absurd it is when there are small evolutionary steps insignificant changes They can come together to create a big change That is not only mathematically unreasonable but also theoretically In practice no mutation has ever been found but may indicate an increase information In fact every beneficial mutation I have studied information would only decrease or be lost The Royal Show in Perth is where purebred animals are displayed If mutations and natural selection cannot demonstrate an increase in movement complexity then what about artificial selection Selective breeding creates a great diversity of breeds But does the change remain within certain limits Charles Darwin himself promoted due to animal domestication A good way to look at this is if you wanted to conduct an experiment to demonstrate through the experiment The fact that this selection process is correct what will you do What you do will be as they say a matter of thousands of years In a thousand years what I can be is for each generation I can breed for the qualities I want to have One thousand years later what we do for a generation is to naturally select by choosing to breed the fittest animals possessing the qualities we desire If it is possible to go from wolf to Pekingese in a few thousand years So then we extrapolate that process out to see how far we can go in a thousand million years You can breed dogs for thousands or millions of years but if you don 't have new information to move forward they will still just be dogs The difficulty of evolution is that it has no way of adding new movement information Natural selection and artificial selection both lead to the loss of information in the movement If we use long-haired dogs And only breed from long-haired dogs then only select long-haired puppies and breed them in the future Eventually we will have a long-haired dog breed in which all long-haired genes will concentrate But that only means That dog may never produce a short -haired offspring because it does not have the short-haired gene Thus we lose the moving information Natural selection works the same way If we take wolves from before the Ice Age both long-haired and short-haired In the extreme cold of the Ice Age the short-haired breed all died out Finally we have a dog breed Even a new species with long fur has adapted to the price controls But this adaptation does not require new movement information In reality this process results in the loss of information about short hairs A great diversity can be achieved through new combinations From existing genes Even mutations can cause recombination of chromosomes and the process of mutation that changes The loss of eye information leads to movement This creates diversity This is the fundamental issue Mutation and natural selection All of them cause loss of moving information Therefore evolution increases complexity and is impossible New moving information It is impossible to obtain it from a natural process When you look at a computer software it requires a programmer When seeing a car it needs to have a designer If we see biological information in the cell then a conclusion is that we must say it requires a creative force The person who created the programs the types of genes to form proteins forming the organs which are essential for this So we can assert that evolution is an impossible process Each student is taught about the hypothetical evolution of horses From small foals with multiple toes Become a large modern horse has one hoof If horses truly evolved many scientists doubt this There are many horse breeds But we got them through artificial insemination yet they are still just horses We can have big ones small ones Even the ones with three toes The evolutionists arranged them into a single secretion connection and placed the waste of the rock mouse At the bottom then that is evidence of evolution But by discarding the waste of the rock mouse you are left with only variations within the same type of organism A horse is born a horse that is not evolution The necessary information for large- scale evolution cannot possibly come from random mutations Darwin's model suggests that evolution accomplishes this But no one has ever done the calculation to show that it is correct I have done the calculation to show that it is impossible Professor Darwin Can you give me an example of a moving mutation or an evolutionary process that shows an increase information in the genome This is Dr Darwin's real reaction Then he asked to turn off the camera to have some time to think Before providing the following answer There is a common misunderstanding about evolution that fish turned into frogs and frogs evolved into animals with weapons Today we must be able to look around the world and look at our ancestors We must be able to find a mediator Between fish and the wax animal between the wax animal and the armed animal We must be able to see the fish that are on the way Become a buffalo Of course that was completely not what happened Fish are modern animals They are as modern as we humans are They originate from ancestors who also have their origins from 300 million years ago There are ancestors that are ancestors of modern fish and also ancestors of modern humans And with those ancestors f you were there at that time you could see the first step towards fish moving onto land And became something like amphibians But that was a long time ago you can't expect to see that anymore If one believes in Darwin 's theory of evolutio You have to say that the moving information is accumulated gradually over time And if someone uses mathematics to check whether such a thing occurs it turns out that person has to assume tha At each stage of evolution there will be a large force and some mutations may exist appear and adapt And if there were such a large number of forces we should be able to find them today And the truth is there isn't any All mutations tested at the molecular level show that organisms have lost genetic information But not additionally Description of creativity in the modern century means that almost all information is present today In the category of primitive animals Therefore diversity is feasible within each animal species but a basic type of animal en it cannot be transformed into another type Dr Michael Denton believes that the information in motion can only originate from an intelligent mind I advise thinking tha In fact the evidence suggests that it is the transcendent Lord the Creator the unique God of the Jews It creates this world and gives it order patterns and boundaries I think it is consistent with the scriptures It is inconsistent with that Like the information from the book it must come from a smart source the jinn So the vast amount of information is moving In living creatures must come from the wisdom of the creator or the creator The evidence fits the model in the Bible Where the amount of information is too large was created at the beginning allows for adaptation within the same type But from there it gradually regresses That information must be programmed into living organisms from the very beginning Living organisms do not evolve But they were created If we look in the Bible we will see that there is indeed a Creator The Creator created everything e physical processes and the information that moves Evolutionists believe that complex life forms originated from simpler life forms But random processes Together with the complete randomness it cannot be explained And it has never been observed or repeated The gradual changes of the variables due to chance have never shown an increase in movement information or an increase in complexity They believe in creationism that all evidence points to creationism Dogs can shake or stand their fur Frogs can be speckled or green but dogs will always be dogs and frogs will always be frogs Even with a kiss from a princess the frog will never become a prince