The United States, Australia, India, and Japan are bolstering their cooperation to counter China, with a $20 billion plan to secure critical minerals, energy, and maritime security.
Taiwan is tracking a second Chinese military patrol around the island in just one week, calling Beijing the main source of instability in the region.
In a historic naval shift in Seoul, South Korea announces plans for its first-ever nuclear-powered submarines, aimed at countering threats from the North.
An American journalist who's lived in China for more than a decade is now facing a U.S. criminal charge, accused of acting as an unregistered agent for Beijing.
00:00 Intro 01:06 Quad to Spend $20 Billion on Cooperation to Counter China 04:19 Second Chinese 'Combat Patrol' Near Taiwan in One Week 05:55 South Korea to Launch First Nuclear Sub by Mid-2030s 07:55 Rubio: Iran Deal Could Take Days 09:35 Renewed Israel–Hezbollah Fighting Threatens Ceasefire 11:12 CENTCOM: 108 Ships Blocked From Iranian Ports 11:38 US Launches Self-Defense Strikes in Southern Iran | Analysis 21:01 American Journalist Charged as China Agent 22:08 Mexican Authorities Capture Nephew of El Chapo
Welcome to China In Focus. I'm Kevin Hogan, and for Tiffany Meyer, our top story.
The U.S., Australia, India, and Japan are bolstering their cooperation to counter China,
more on their $20 billion plan to secure critical minerals, energy, and maritime security.
Taiwan is tracking a second Chinese military patrol around the island
in just one week, calling Beijing the main source of instability in the region.
A historic naval shift in Seoul, South Korea announces plans for its first-ever
nuclear-powered submarines aimed at countering threats from the North.
And an American journalist who's lived in China for more than a decade
is now facing a U.S. criminal charge accused of acting as an unregistered agent for Beijing.
Critical minerals, energy, and maritime security are key areas where Indo-Pacific powers are
stepping up efforts to counter China. Here are the major announcements from
Tuesday's meeting of foreign ministers from the U.S., Australia, India, and Japan,
the group known as the Quad. The first is the launch of the Indo-Pacific
Maritime Surveillance Corporation initiative, which is going to leverage each of our country's
surveillance capabilities in the Indo-Pacific to enhance information sharing. Related to that
is also the expansion of the Indo-Pacific Maritime Domain Awareness Initiative,
which provides and can provide near real-time commercial maritime domain awareness data
to countries throughout the Indo-Pacific. Sixty percent of global maritime trade
passes through the Indo-Pacific. The Quad also said they remain concerned about the
situation in the East China Sea and the South China Sea. In those waters, China has been
turning disputed coral reefs into artificial islands and arming them with missile systems,
raising tensions with neighboring countries. Chinese vessels have also sprayed water cannons
at Filipino ships and entered disputed waters near Japan. Energy was also a top priority during
the meeting. And we know the consequences for our region of the Iranian closure of the Strait
of Hormuz and what that means for our energy security, for our economies, and for our people.
Rubio said the Quad will roll out an initiative aimed at securing a stable energy supply for the
Indo-Pacific. Through this initiative, the partners will work to identify areas of cooperation
in technology and management and policy and international market analysis
and emergency response exercises. Japan has released oil from its strategic reserves
to ease shortages. Australia has also turned to countries like Singapore to shore up supplies.
Meanwhile, as the Quad meeting unfolded, China said cooperation between countries
should not target third parties. The Quad is spending big to address key challenges tied
to China. The group plans to invest $20 billion to secure critical mineral supply chains.
The U.S. and India have signed a pact to strengthen rare earth supply chains.
We'll announce the Quad Critical Minerals Framework, which will guide each of us to
leverage economic policy tools and coordinated investment to strengthen critical mineral supply
chains, including in mining and processing and in critical minerals recycling. The problem is
especially severe for Japan, as China has halted exports of certain rare earth products
amid diplomatic tensions. These minerals are critical for defense and semiconductor production.
And for the first time, the Quad will also work together on a port infrastructure project.
The partners plan to work with Fiji to upgrade port infrastructure across the Pacific Islands.
Escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan says it's tracking a second Chinese
joint combat readiness patrol around the island in just one week, calling Beijing
the main source of instability in the region.
Here's a Taiwan defense ministry official speaking on the situation Tuesday.
Based on our understanding, China's joint combat readiness patrol has already ended,
and we are able to keep track of all related developments. In addition,
the Chinese Liaoning aircraft carrier is currently operating in the western Pacific,
and we are continuously utilizing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance to monitor its
activities. Taiwan's defense ministry says it detected 29 Chinese military aircraft and seven
naval vessels operating near the island. It says most of the flights cross the median line in the
Taiwan Strait. That line is an unofficial boundary in the Taiwan Strait that separates Chinese and
Taiwanese military activity. Taiwanese officials say it's the second such patrol in a week.
It comes shortly after the Trump-Xi meeting in Beijing, where Taiwan was discussed.
Over the weekend, China deployed more than 100 ships around the first island chain,
an area that stretches from Japan through Taiwan and down to the Philippines. The Chinese regime
continues to claim Taiwan as part of its territory, despite never having ruled it.
Taiwan's president has rejected Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only its people
can decide the nation's future. South Korea has unveiled an initial road map for developing
nuclear-powered submarines. The Ministry of National Defense expects the first launch
in the mid-2030s. The submarine will use low-enriched uranium fuel. It will be developed
and built in South Korea. Nuclear propulsion would allow the new submarines to stay underwater much
longer and provide greater mobility than existing submarines.
The nuclear-powered submarine, which will be built on the basis of a strong South Korea-U.S.
alliance, is a symbol of our will to take responsibility for peace and security on
the Korean Peninsula. On Tuesday, South Korea's Ministry of National Defense published the basic
plan for the development of nuclear-powered submarines in the Republic of Korea. Last
October, President Trump announced that he had signed off on a plan for South Korea to build
nuclear-powered submarines with some of the vessels to be built in the U.S.
The restoration of wartime operational control is a core element of independent national defense
and will be an opportunity to further underscore South Korea's status as the principal defender
of the Korean Peninsula. Going forward, we will finalize a detailed road map for the
restoration of wartime operational control, including the timing of the transition,
through close consultations between South Korea and the United States.
Seoul has been countering North Korea's submarine-launched nuclear and missile threats for
some time. It has also sought to join an elite group of nations operating nuclear-powered
submarines in a move that could reshape Asia's security landscape. On Tuesday, South Korea's
Joint Chiefs of Staff said North Korea fired several projectiles, including at least one
short-range ballistic missile, toward waters off the country's west coast.
The missile flew roughly 50 miles. Turning now to the Middle East,
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Tuesday that a deal with Iran could still be days away.
His comments come just a day after U.S. forces carried out defensive strikes in southern Iran.
I think like anything with something like this, it's going to take a couple of days
to settle on even down to the disagreements over a word, sentence. So we'll have to work through
that. On board his plane, Rubio spoke to reporters a day after U.S. forces carried out what Washington
called defensive strikes in southern Iran. The straits have to be open. They're going to be
open wherever they are. So they need to be open. What's happening there is unlawful,
it's illegal, it's unsustainable for the world, it's unacceptable.
Despite a ceasefire in place since early April, U.S. Central Command said on Monday
it had carried out fresh strikes designed to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian
forces. Meanwhile, Iranian news agencies reported that Iran had shot down a hostile stealth drone
using a new air defense system. The U.S. attacks came as Iran's top negotiator and its foreign
minister were in Doha for talks on a potential deal with the U.S. to end the three-month conflict.
Citing a Middle East diplomatic source, Japan's Nikkei newspaper reported that the U.S. and Iran
were discussing a plan to open the strait about 30 days after reaching a deal to end hostilities.
President Donald Trump on Monday posted on Truth Social that talks are progressing,
but warned it will be, quote, a great deal for all or no deal at all. Tensions remain high
across the region, with Israel saying it will intensify strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
The fighting between Israel and Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon is intensifying again.
The latest clashes are threatening to end a temporary ceasefire between the two sides.
NTD's international correspondent Arian Pasdar has the latest.
Smoke is seen rising into the sky above southern Lebanon on Tuesday,
as Israel strikes Hezbollah targets along a strategic river. Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday instructed his military to intensify strikes against Hezbollah
targets. This after the terrorist group kept attacking Israeli positions as well as sending
fighters and weapons into southern Lebanon despite a temporary ceasefire. The Lebanese
government thus appealed to Hezbollah to stop the attacks and respect the ceasefire agreement.
In response, the terrorist group called on the Lebanese people to take to the streets
and overthrow Lebanon's government. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday
saying Hezbollah's actions are reckless. The problem is not Lebanon and Israel,
the problem is Hezbollah. Just last night, Hezbollah put out a statement calling for
the overthrow of the Lebanese government. And it just reminds you of who you're dealing with here,
by the way, an Iranian proxy, 100 percent Iranian proxy. Israel always has a right
to protect itself. Every country in the world does. And so if Hezbollah is going to launch
missiles or launches missiles at them, Israel has every right to respond to that or to prevent that
from happening. Before the renewed strikes, the Israeli military issued multiple warnings in
Arabic urging Lebanese residents in certain areas to evacuate before the attacks. Arian Pasdar,
NTD News. And a quick update on the U.S. blockade against Iran in the Strait of Hormuz.
U.S. Central Command reports that as of Tuesday, 108 commercial vessels in total have been
redirected, blocked from entering or exiting Iranian ports. That's up from 97 last Friday.
This is part of ongoing U.S. efforts to pressure Iran economically in the broader conflict.
U.S. launches strikes in southern Iran. Targets included missile launch sites and Iranian boats
attempting to place mines, according to CENTCOM. Iran says the United States has violated the
ceasefire. The U.S. says because it was defensive in nature, it was not a violation. On the topic,
my colleague Don Ma spoke with Thomas Speciale earlier on Tuesday. He's a former senior advisor
to the DNI on counterintelligence and security and former senior intelligence collection strategist
for domestic extremism at the National Counterterrorism Center. Take a look.
Iran says the United States violated the ceasefire. The U.S. says it was defensive
in nature, so it's not a violation. Can you give us your take here, Thomas?
Yeah, I think it's important to be very clear that these were Iranian small boats. Their Navy's been,
for all intents and purposes, completely decimated except for these small Iranian speed boats that
potentially throw mines into the water. We've been planning for this type of thing for many,
many, many years. I think the other important thing to remember is that whoever the people that
the administration is negotiating with may not have complete and absolute control over
factions within the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps that may be conducting these
military operations that have to be dealt with. I expect that the negotiations will go on. I don't
think that there'll be any interruption in that. The real problem with the negotiations right now
is the actual people that are in charge of, that are probably in control of the highly
enriched uranium. That is a fundamental element of this negotiation, that Iran cannot
retain possession of the highly enriched uranium, and they can't be allowed to enrich
in the future. Trump is absolutely not going to negotiate except for the removal or the destruction
of that highly enriched uranium and preventing them from ever doing it again in the future.
Until that is negotiated, it's going to continue on this course until the Iranian
government, whoever's in charge of that highly enriched uranium, makes that negotiation.
I think it was last week, maybe earlier, there was a question posed to Secretary of State Marco
Rubio about whether he thinks the U.S. is being strung along by Iran. He said,
we don't know until we know. That's what he said. What do you think about that?
I think that's a polite way of saying that the people that they're negotiating with
don't necessarily have complete control over the IRGC or the more religious zealots in Iran that
would continue to disrupt the negotiations. I think that's a polite way of saying,
we're going to hold the line until they get control of these people, and eventually we're
going to get a negotiation. I think that's just a polite way of saying, we won't know until we
know, basically. What is your gut feeling here about the prospects of the deal? Do you think
it's closer than before? Well, like I said, I think that the IRGC or actors within the IRGC
are going to try and thwart or disrupt negotiations. And eventually the Iranian people are
going to get frustrated with that. And they're going to go to them and they're going to say,
you've got to stop doing this because you're actually working against the people of Iran.
You're not working for the people of Iran, you're working against them. And that's always been the
case. I mean, that's been the case really for 47 years. I've been working in Iran for a long time,
and one of the things that I would regularly say at every one of our planning sessions and every
one of our meetings is, we've got to remember that the regime is not the people of Iran,
and the Artesh is not the regime. The Artesh is the people and the regime is the IRGC and the
Ayatollahs. And so there is a difference. And that's something I think more Americans need
to understand. We talk about this a lot as it's like the country of Iran, we're at war with the
country of Iran. I don't think we're at war with the country of Iran. We're at war with the
fundamentalists, the Shia fundamentalists in Iran that have been a thorn in the side
of the entire Middle East. The Iranian Shia have been fighting the Arab Sunnis for decades,
for centuries really. And so because of that, when we talk about this, we've got to make a
clear distinction between the Iranian Shia fundamentalists and the Iranian people who
just want to live in peace and in harmony with their neighbors, and they don't want to be at
war with everybody all the time. Okay, so in addition to that, what do you think about
President Trump saying that Arab countries should formally recognize Israel through the
Abraham Accords? What do you think about that? What's the significance? Yeah, this is one of
those things that the president has been able to do, the Abraham Accords that he did years ago,
and that has been able to survive. And for him to go to the Iranian people and say,
you can also join the Abraham Accords as well, basically to bring sort of a harmony into the
Middle East. And these Arab countries want that. They want harmony in the Middle East.
I think they're exhausted. I think that the wars that have gone on recently over
the last several decades, the people are very exhausted, and rightly so. And the hope is that
the Abraham Accords will be expanded and incorporate other Arab countries, and ultimately,
potentially Iran, the people of Iran, to have a harmonious relationship with each other,
as opposed to these terror wars that have been going on. You know, the Sunni terrorists and
the Shia terrorists are really what are causing all the problems. It's not the people of the
Middle East. It's the Islamist fundamentalists on both sides of the debate that are fighting
among each other. And then ultimately, anybody that goes in there to try and help becomes an
enemy of one side or the other. Okay, just one final question here, Thomas.
What is your assessment, your overall view of how the U.S. has approached negotiations,
from initially bombing Iran and then having a ceasefire to this point?
What is your assessment of that in trying to get a commitment of no nuclear weapons?
Yeah, the way Iran is operating or has operated in the past, we cannot allow Iran to have
nuclear weapons, because they will literally threaten everyone. And because the fundamentalist
branch of the debate is essentially a death cult. They basically worship death. And so,
you cannot give weapons like that or allow a group of people like that to have weapons,
because they don't have the same ethics that the modern Western world does, or really,
the modern world does. They're still living in the seventh century caliphate type mentality.
I think my overall assessment is that this was something that has needed to be done for years
and years and years. In fact, I called this the Iran castration war plan back in 2011 to 2014,
where you eliminate the power projection capability of the Iranian regime.
And you essentially force the turnover from the fundamentalists into the hands of
the more, I don't want to say more peaceful, but the non-fundamentalists in Iran. And that is going
to then change the entire dynamic of the Middle East. And that's ultimately what's happening.
I am very, very happy with how things are going. I think that you're negotiating with people who
are very proud people, who have a very proud European heritage. And so, they want to feel
respected in the negotiation. And I think that that's another big thing that I think a lot of
people don't understand, is that, and I think Trump does a very good job of it, and Marco
Rubio is doing a great job of it, of respecting the Iranian people and not respecting the tyranny
and the terrorism that they've projected all around the world for all these years.
So, we've got to negotiate in sort of mutual respect. And I think Trump is doing that.
I think the only thing that's holding up these negotiations right now is the IRGC fundamentalists
and ultimately their willingness to accept that they can't have nuclear weapons and they've got
to turn over or destroy the highly enriched uranium. Once those two things are resolved,
I think you're going to see, I think our children are going to have a very different experience with
the Middle East over the next 20 years as a result of this. I'm very, very happy about what's
going on. Coming up, an American journalist who's lived in China for more than a decade
is now facing a US criminal charge, accused of acting as an unregistered agent for Beijing.
More on that after the break here on China In Focus. Welcome back to China In Focus. I'm Kevin
An American journalist and political commentator who's lived in China for more than a decade
is now facing a criminal charge in the US. He's been accused of acting as an unregistered agent
for the Chinese communist regime. Federal investigators say Thomas Paukin II prepared
confidential reports for a Chinese handler who claimed the information would be passed to Chinese
leader Xi Jinping. Court documents also say Paukin helped connect the handler with another person
seeking a role in the Trump administration. According to the FBI, Paukin told agents he
refused to provide classified information to his handler, but Paukin believed there
was a strong chance the other individual could eventually share sensitive material with China.
Paukin's attorney says the case is not about spying or mishandling classified information.
Instead, he says prosecutors are accusing Paukin of failing to properly register work tied to a
foreign government. The charge carries a potential prison sentence of up to 10 years if convicted.
Mexican authorities have captured the nephew of infamous drug kingpin Joaquin El Chapo Guzman.
Mexico's security secretary said he was arrested in Nogales. The official added that a search
warrant executed in Tapachula resulted in the seizure of 1,500 pounds of cocaine,
over 150 guns, and 18 grenades. Guzman is the former leader of Mexico's powerful Sinaloa cartel.
He's currently serving a life sentence after being convicted in 2019 on drug trafficking
conspiracy and murder charges. His nephew's capture follows the arrest of Sinaloa's former
public security secretary. He appeared in a U.S. court earlier this month after his arrest in
Arizona on charges of taking bribes from the cartel. That's all for today's China In Focus.
I'm Kevin Hogan. If you have any feedback on the show or have something you'd like to see us cover,
send us an email at chinainfocus at ntd.com. And for round-the-clock original news coverage,
visit us at ntd.com or download our NTD app. Thanks for watching. See you soon.