How Nikola Tesla invented the electrified modern age, failed because of it—and why his dream is making a comeback in the era of artificial intelligence.
New York, the morning of January 8, 1943. Chambermaid Alice Monaghan ignores the sign on the door of Room 3327 at the Hotel New Yorker. A "Do Not Disturb" sign has been hanging there for two days, and everyone in the building knows that the elderly gentleman on the 33rd floor insists his instructions be followed to the letter. Yet the silence beyond the door has taken on a different quality. Monaghan opens the door and finds a dead man: gaunt and tall, his white hair carefully parted, as if he had groomed himself for a final reception. The medical examiner records coronary thrombosis; there are no suspicious circumstances. The deceased is Nikola Tesla; he was 86 years old and leaves behind debts, pigeon feed, and dozens of boxes filled with papers that the FBI will soon confiscate. The man who invented the electrified modern age dies in a rented room, unable to pay the bill.
This scene must be placed at the beginning, for it marks the end of a trajectory that rose more steeply and fell further than almost any other biography of the technological age. This Friday would have marked Tesla’s 170th birthday. Today, his name is ubiquitous: it adorns millions of automobiles; it is a stock ticker symbol, a brand, a myth. Yet the man behind the name has remained strangely invisible. It is time to pay him a visit.
Child of the Thunderstorm
Legend has it that Nikola Tesla was born on the night of July 9–10, 1856, while a thunderstorm raged over the Croatian village of Smiljan. The midwife, as the family later recounted, interpreted the lightning as an evil omen—a child of the storm. His mother replied: "No, a child of light." Whether the scene actually unfolded this way is immaterial; origin myths are truths that select their own facts. What matters is that, throughout his life, Tesla acted as though he had accepted the mission of that night. The son of a Serbian Orthodox priest—who studied engineering in Graz but never graduated—arrived in New York in 1884 with a few coins and a letter of recommendation; it was the city where, six decades later, he would die. Upon his arrival, legend holds, he had four cents in his pocket—exactly the same amount, as was later bitterly noted, that he possessed at the end of his life.
A charming footnote in cultural history: on that very same calendar day—July 10—but fifteen years later, Marcel Proust was born. One man buried himself in a cork-lined room to reclaim lost time; the other sought to outpace time and force the future into being. Proust remembered; Tesla anticipated. Both were insomniacs, men possessed, bachelors of the absolute. And both paid the same price for their obsession: becoming lost to the world they sought to penetrate.
The War of Currents
The young engineer did not last a year in Edison’s workshop. The rift between the two men became the founding drama of the electrical age: on one side, Edison—the empiricist of direct current, the inventor-entrepreneur who viewed the patent as a weapon; on the other, Tesla—the visionary of alternating current, for whom machines appeared in his mind’s eye as fully realized devices before he even sketched them. The "War of Currents" in the 1880s was a battle over technical standards—and, at the same time, the first major disinformation campaign in industrial history. Edison’s camp publicly killed dogs and horses using alternating current to demonstrate its danger and ensured that the first electric chair, in 1890, was powered by Tesla’s electricity. It was to no avail. In 1893, generators from Tesla and Westinghouse illuminated the World’s Fair in Chicago; three years later, power from Niagara Falls flowed to Buffalo. Alternating current had triumphed, and with it, a principle: energy traveling over vast distances—invisible, silent, and universally available. What we have since casually termed a "wall outlet" is, in fact, Tesla’s imagination made manifest. The crucial patents for his polyphase system had been granted to Tesla in May 1888—the year the future received its license to operate.
Yet the victor walked away empty-handed. To relieve the financial burden on George Westinghouse, who was struggling to keep his company afloat, Tesla tore up the very licensing agreement that would have made him one of America’s wealthiest men. It was a gesture of princely generosity—and economic suicide. One might view it as naivety. But one can also recognize in it the resolve of a man for whom technology was never merely a commodity, but a promise.
The Wardenclyffe Tower
Around 1900, Tesla stood at the pinnacle of his fame, and he did what tragic heroes do at such heights: he did not look down, but up. On Long Island, he had a 57-meter-high tower erected, crowned by a copper hemisphere—Wardenclyffe, conceived as the first node of a global system designed to transmit messages, images, and ultimately energy itself wirelessly around the globe. Electricity for everyone, everywhere, at any time: this was not a business idea; it was an eschatology. The dream was financed—of all people—by J. P. Morgan, Wall Street’s coldest calculator. When Morgan grasped the implications of the project, he reportedly asked the question that has hung over the history of technology like an epitaph ever since: If everyone can draw energy from the air—where do we attach the meter? He cut off the funding. The tower rusted away for a decade; in 1917, it was demolished and sold as scrap metal.
At Wardenclyffe, the two ancient figures between whom Tesla’s existence oscillated converged. Prometheus stole fire from the gods to bestow it upon humanity—and was chained to a rock for his transgression. Icarus flew toward the sun because he refused to acknowledge the limits imposed on wings made of wax. Tesla was both at once: a giver and a fallen figure, a benefactor and a transgressor of boundaries. His failure was not technical. It was the failure of a gift in a world that recognizes only commodities.
The Re-enchantment of the World
In 1917, while Wardenclyffe was being demolished, Max Weber delivered his lecture "Science as a Vocation" in Munich and coined the phrase "the disenchantment of the world." Modernity, according to Weber, no longer believes in mysterious forces but rather that all things can—in principle—be mastered through calculation. Tesla stands as a living rebuttal to this diagnosis—or, more precisely, as its dialectical counterpoint. For no one calculated the world more thoroughly than he did, yet no one re-enchanted it more thoroughly either. When he made lightning leap from his fingertips on stage, or when glass bulbs in his hands began to glow without wires, the audience experienced precise physics as magic. Electricity became the final epiphany of the rational age: invisible like the Holy Spirit, omnipresent like grace, deadly like the wrath of God.
Walter Benjamin later described how technical reproducibility destroys the aura of the work of art—that unique "here and now" which lends the original its authority. With Tesla, one observes the opposite movement: technology itself generates a new aura. The electric current that flows identically from wall sockets by the millions remains as far beyond most people's comprehension as the mystery of transubstantiation once was. We live, without realizing it, inside a cathedral of copper wire. Tesla was its master builder—and its first martyr.
The Principle of Hope, Enframing, and Danger
Had Ernst Bloch discussed Tesla at greater length in *The Principle of Hope*, he would have found a prime example in him. For Bloch’s central conceptual figures—the *Vor-Schein* (anticipatory glimmer), the *Noch-Nicht* (Not-Yet), and the concrete utopia that flashes within the existing reality—precisely describe Tesla’s relationship to technology. Wireless energy for all: this is utopia not as a pipe dream, but as a tendency inherent in the thing itself—a real possibility slumbering in the material, waiting to be unleashed. Tesla conceived of technology as a process of redemption, as the overcoming of scarcity and toil. The fact that this very dream foundered on the electricity meter—on the simple question of billing—is the bitterest confirmation of Bloch’s insight: utopias do not die because they are impossible, but because of the interests of those who profit from the status quo.
Martin Heidegger, the technology skeptic from the Black Forest, provides the antidote to such enthusiasm. In his 1953 lecture "The Question Concerning Technology," he defines the essence of modern technology as *Gestell* (Enframing): a mode of revealing that causes all reality—the river, the forest, and ultimately human beings themselves—to appear merely as "standing-reserve" (*Bestand*), as a resource to be accessed, stored, and accounted for. Morgan’s question about the meter represents Enframing in its purest form: the electricity of the heavens is of interest only insofar as it can be monetized. Tesla’s tragedy can be understood in Heideggerian terms: he sought to transcend Enframing using the very means of Enframing. He dreamed of technology as a gift, only to see it organized as standing-reserve. In his lecture, Heidegger quotes Hölderlin: "But where danger threatens, that which saves / Also grows." In Tesla’s case, both grew within the same tower.
The Borrowed Name
Posterity has compensated Tesla in its own way—with the most dubious currency it knows: a brand name. When two California engineers founded an electric car company in 2003, they named it after the man whose AC motor continues to operate inside every one of their vehicles. Elon Musk, who joined shortly thereafter and molded the firm into his own empire, has definitively appropriated the name. The irony is complete: the man who tore up a licensing agreement to help a friend now lends his name to the world’s most valuable automaker; the inventor who wanted to give away energy for free has become the emblem of hyper-capitalism. One suspects Tesla would have laughed at this twist—unlike the current steward of his name, he possessed the gift of self-irony.
Yet the contemporary relevance runs deeper than the anecdote. "AI is the new electricity" is the catchphrase of our time, and the parallel extends further than its apostles might like. Once again, a universal technology promises to permeate every aspect of life; once again, people waver between hopes of salvation and fears of doom; once again, a "war of currents" rages—this time over data centers, chips, and models. And once again, Morgan’s question arises, albeit in a new guise: Who owns the flow of intelligence? Will it become—as Tesla dreamed for energy—a freely flowing resource for humanity, or a managed asset belonging to a handful of corporations, complete with meters? Electrification yielded both answers: it brought light to humble homes and power to monopolies. There is little reason to assume the new electricity will behave any differently than the old—unless we remember in time that technology is not merely destiny, but a choice.
The Late Light
On June 21, 1943—five months after Tesla’s death—the United States Supreme Court declared Marconi’s fundamental radio patents invalid and restored the priority of Tesla’s inventions. The Nobel Prize that American newspapers had announced for him and Edison jointly in 1915 was never actually awarded; he did not live to see this belated legal vindication. It is as if the world had waited for the creditor to die before acknowledging the debt. This, too, is part of the signature of the "Enframing" (*Gestell*): recognition is granted only when it no longer costs anything.
There remains one final scene that must be told, for it is truer than any ledger. In his final years, Tesla fed the pigeons in Bryant Park every day; one of them—a white dove—he loved, as he confided to his biographer, "as a man loves a woman." When she died, he recounted, a light shone from her eyes—brighter than all the lamps in his laboratory—and with her, something departed from his life. One might interpret this as a symptom, a tale of the decline of a solitary mind. Yet one can also see in it the ultimate consequence of a life that never acknowledged the boundary between physics and revelation. The child of the thunderstorm—destined to be a child of light—never abandoned his element until the very end. In the end, he simply could no longer sustain the voltage. Yet the current he tamed flows on—through every wall, every city, every sentence that appears on a screen. Including this one.
Sapere aude!
S.
Your support keeps ideas alive — and stories in motion. 👉 https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5NGG6XB67BZ4N 🙏
🇩🇪 My lyrical thoughts between two book covers: blau pause zimmerlautstärke - lyrik über die zeit - zurzeit
BoD Bookshop: https://buchshop.bod.de/blau-pause-zimmerlautstaerke-stefan-noir-9783695118779
Amazon-Shop: https://amzn.eu/d/1TvOBUO
🇺🇸 / 🏴 / 🏴 My lyrical thoughts between two book covers: blue pause room volume: poetry about time – currently
Amazon (English edition): https://amzn.eu/d/3b3GUF4
Comments