The Hostile Environment as Greek Tragedy (with Kamila Shamsie)

Pen & Chapter
37 followers
2 Video Views·Mar 5, 2024
In this online talk from the Language, Literature and Politics Research Group’s seminar series on 'Resisting the Hostile Environment' author Kamila Shamsie discusses and presents a reading from her novel Home Fire.
(Speakers include: Emma Sweeney)
🔗 Home Fire by Kamila Shamsie - Amazon link: https://tinyurl.com/amazon-home-fire
um well it's a really a great pleasure
and privilege to be able to introduce
you all to KLA shami uh KLA sham is the
author of eight novels as well as a
non-fiction book and a book for children
she's been nominated for pretty much
every literary award going including the
man Booker the Welter Scott the Costa
and the women's prize which she won in
2018 for home fire um it's a novel that
features very prominently in the open
University's ma in English literature um
and I think uh we might have actually
the author of that unit here today which
is uh wonderful um it's also home fire
that we'll be focusing on in today's
seminar on the hostile environment as
Greek tragedy so a very warm welcome
Cara I'm going to be handing over to
carela initially um who's going to be
talking on the topic of hostile
environment is Greek tragedy and then
I'll ask some questions and we'll at the
end open up to questions from you so
do note down any questions that come to
you as we're talking so without further
Ado KLA I'm going to hand over to you
thank
you thank you very much Emma um and to
all of you who are here and particularly
anyone involved in teaching home fire
and it does um really just Delight me so
much whenever I hear that's happening um
I thought I would speak a little
about um how this novel came to be and
really how it it does in many ways come
out of the hostile environment um
whenever I tell the story of how I came
to write home fire I started in August
2014 um but I think I want to actually
start it much earlier as I talk to you
um I'm going to start it
around
77 um London I wasn't living in London
in at that time I didn't move here until
2007 but I was in and out of London
quite a lot um I'd already had several
books published here and I think I
started quite early on thinking of it as
a place where I might one day live um
which meant I was very aware as I was
moving from Pakistan to here with
occasional bouts in America I was very
aware of a rapidly changing discourse
around
migrants first and second generation and
particularly around Muslims um the term
hostile environment itself didn't come
to be coined until much later but I was
very aware of it um from an early point
and I remember I was here when 77
happened when when the London T bombings
happened and I remember going onto
Google to look up specifically the
phrase British
terrorist and the reason I was looking
it up was because I was very aware that
that phrase wasn't used in talking about
the suicide bombers um and the London
Tube
attacks and as my Googling sort of
basically confirmed what I had thought
was that the phrasing used to describe
the men the terrorists who had committed
um those acts was very interesting in
what it revealed about Britain's own
discomfort with its Muslim citizens um
so the phrases they that we used to
describe them was sometimes quite often
Muslim terrorists occasionally British
Muslim terrorists um at one point it was
even this may have been the daily mail
it may not have been um British passport
holders as so there's something
different between being a British
Citizen and being a British British
passport holder um British born was
often um brought up as well and it
seemed to me there was a real anxiety
and around this time as well and again I
would come in and out and every time I
sort of left the country and I came back
a few months later it struck me the way
this discourse had really flourished
about this question of what is
britishness there seemed a need to
identify this rather amorphous thing and
whenever there's a need to identify
something you know it's because there's
a desire to exclude to say there is a
definition that is not just
about which passport do you carry
there's something else that is um that
there's an anxiety around and it is an
anxiety of exclusion and inclusion um
and there were the question of can you
be both British and Muslim at the same
time was weirdly to me a question that
was actually a subject of serious de
debate as though britishness required
one set of values and muslimness
required another and these two could
couldn't be
reconciled um so that was one kind of
conversation that I was very aware of
um and I was aware of that before I ever
came to live here but it wasn't that
long after 2007 I moved to Britain I
moved here under um a Visa category that
existed at the time which was writers
artists and composers um most people now
don't know this existed it was really a
rather lovely category which sort of
acknowledged that if you were a writer
artist or composer you had something of
value that Britain might quite like um
and therefore it was a root in you
didn't have to be a Booker prize winning
or Nobel prizewinning writer artist
composer all you needed to do was show
that you had you know a career in this
line um that you were earning some kind
of living from it and that would have
been enough to get you into the country
um and to eventually get a
passport I came in under that category
not long after I heard that there were
plans to change visa rules um and
someone said you must you should go and
talk to an immigration lawyer about it
because it might be relevant to your
case I went to see an immigration lawyer
who said oh yes there are new there are
changes coming around around things are
being moved to a point-based system um
but there there's no way they'll be able
to fit writers artists and composers and
our understanding is there's a whole
category um of you know sort of current
um well the whole bunch of Visa current
Visa categories that will simply remain
as they are don't worry nothing to do
with you so I didn't worry about it I
read all this stuff about a points-based
system but I felt assured that the
immigration lawyers I'd spoken to were
correct when they
said it's not relevant to you and so
some time went by and and it was coming
up to the time that I needed to reapply
to extend the category to extend the
Visa and I went online to the home
office Department this was before they
were called
ukba um and found to my great dismay
that the category I was in didn't exist
anymore
and the wording there simply said that I
had to find another category I could
move into or else leave the country when
my Visa ran out um I had been in in
Britain for about a year and a half at
the time um it's not that I didn't have
anywhere else to go to I could go back
to Pakistan um I wasn't a refugee there
was nothing to stop me from living in
Pakistan there was no great horror there
at
all but I had come to britainy thinking
it was a place that I was going to be
living in and I had started to make a
life there um and I loved it I loved my
life in Britain I love being a Londoner
um it had given me a great feeling of
satisfaction the day I got a National
Insurance number um and so I did feel
rather miserable at the thought of
having to leave um it so turned out that
it happened that I did find out that
there was another category I could move
into and I was able to stay but a
certain disqual quiet set within me um I
didn't feel safe after that I kept think
I would sort of routinely every few
months I just have this moment of panic
what if the rules have changed again and
I have to leave and the longer I stayed
in the more of a life I created here the
greater that feeling of panic was
because I really didn't want to leave um
and I realized I didn't trust the system
I didn't trust it to be fair or
Equitable um I thought at any moment a
whole new set of rules could come in
play and I could once again be faced
with a screen
saying if you don't fulfill the new
rules you're going to have to go um and
so it was with an enormous sense of
relief that I
finally got 5 years down the line
indefinitely to remain and a year after
that uh
citizenship and when I had citizenship I
remember my my overwhelming feeling
really was a really Bel you know no
matter what rules come into play now and
how things change I have this I can't be
asked to leave it is
irrevocable um and then one day I was
reading the newspaper and it was 2014 I
believe and the news stories were
suddenly in a fairly short period of
time filled with all these articles
about young men it later became women as
well but and it wasn't only young but
the stories at that point were primarily
young men who were leaving Britain to go
and join Isis and Theresa May was then
the Home Secretary and I read her saying
wherever possible we will strip them of
citizenship and I thought hang
on what's
this I had thought once I had
citizenship I had it I didn't know it
was a thing that could be removed um and
so I went around reading more and
discovered that actually if like me you
were a dual p pport holder or indeed if
you were a naturalized citizen with a
claim to another passport uh you could
in fact have your British citizenship
taken away from me uh taken away from
you that possibility had always existed
but the British government started using
it um to a degree that was absolutely
unprecedented and kept trying to F to to
expand the ways in which it could use it
it kept trying to extend Its Right of
taking taking away citizenship from its
citizens including it turned out those
who were born in Britain and had never
lived anywhere else or had another home
um all this stuff to do with the hostile
environment was very deep within me the
day I turned up in sometime in September
2014 um to have a meeting with a man
called jender Verma who I didn't know at
all but who had sent me an email to say
I ran thara theater in South London will
you come in and have a chat um so I went
to have a chat and J said look I really
like your novels and I like the way you
use dialogue will you write a play for
me um I said I have no idea how to write
a play he said yeah I thought you might
say that so why don't you adapt a play
because then someone else has done all
the hard work um and he was the one to
say you know Greek tragedy having a real
moment of Revival something like Antony
or the orista in a contemporary Asian or
British Asian context might be
interesting I knew the orti but for some
reason I just didn't pay much attention
to it and and I sort of immediately
glommed on to antigon and what I thought
about Antony was oh God I know I've read
it once I have absolutely no memory
about what it's about but what I said to
him was Antony that's interesting let me
think about it um so I went off and
literally on the train going home I read
the Wikipedia summary of Antony and
although I was reading about a play that
was more than 2,000 years
old I read that in all these things that
were already very deep inside me and
which I'd been thinking about um which
had to do with citizenship and
britishness and the hostile environment
and Britain's sort of Crisis around um
its Muslim citizens all of these things
seem to Overlay
themselves with absolute Ease on this
very very ancient story um until that
point I hadn't thought these are things
I'm going to write about particularly
the the the Isis story which was only
beginning to unfold and I was sort of
consuming it as a news reader I didn't
think I was you know
consuming it as the
novelist but there was such an immediacy
to the way that I
thought this ancient story is a story of
now it's a story of British Muslims um
and Isis and
government um and I pretended for a
while that I was going to write it as a
as a play but I really don't know how to
write a play and I was at that point a
novelist in search of my next novel and
um it just became very clear to me that
this was that um that Antony and Isis
and the hostile environment were going
to be this novel which I didn't for a
long time know was going to be called
home fire so that's how it all
started um Emma if you want to jump in
um go off that wonderful thank you cara
um so it it's really Apparent from what
you've been saying about the way in
which the political narrative impacted
your own personal story and I just
wonder if you could share with us a
little bit about in the drafting process
of Home Fire how you tried to navigate
the personal stories uh with the
political uh themes that you might have
been
exploring I get ask this question a lot
and and it's always asked as though
there is something to navigate and I've
never SE SE what there to navigate
because um you
know to me and this probably has to do
with growing up in Pakistan everyone's
lives are always you know to say how do
you navigate the person with the
political is to me like saying how do
you navigate the personal with the
emotional I don't understand the
question you know it is a very basic
fact that you know and I think even
people who didn't see it before we saw
it in Co didn't we the extent to which
we we really live with the illusion that
the political is something very separate
and it's you know then you come on these
moments where you realize actually
whether or not you can leave your
house is a political matter it doesn't
only mean that when you can't leave your
house it's political but when you can
leave your house it is also political
you just don't think of it in that way
um I remember some years ago talking to
a group of of American University
students who asked me a similar question
and I said it's only that youth right
now have the illusion that the political
is not very deeply personally entwined
with every single thing you do but there
will come a day and this was sort of
around I think 2004 and I was really
just sort of trying to come up with an
example that I thought might appeal to a
young woman at American University and I
said I mean if Row versus Wade is ever
overturned you'll stop asking how the
political and person come together you
know um so so I there there was never
anything to navigate really there were
there were characters who were leading
certain lives and and what was happening
at the very
day-to-day level with them um was not
separate and because they were British
Muslims they had always known it was not
separate from how they were seen and
what they could do and what they
felt I suppose there's something that uh
people might think of as overtly
political in home fire in the sense that
there is a politician who's one of the
main characters um and I wonder whether
that was something that was always going
to be the case in this novel or was this
something that evolved and that seems uh
perhaps something that might need need
need navigating in a different way from
the way in which the political might
also be
passal well I mean it was all Antony's
fault you know I mean because with antiy
the primary characters there are the two
sisters there is their brother the
traitor and well there is their Uncle
who is the ruler and his
son um and when I was thinking about how
I was going to make a contemporary story
I thought well so obviously the person
who is passing down the the ruling about
the stripping of citizenship I thought
well I can't have him be the uncle you
can have that in Greek tragedy but you
know I'm working within the world of
realism so I thought I don't want so but
there does have to be someone who takes
the figure of who takes on the the role
of crayon um you know of the person who
can pass down the political role and I
thought well I don't want that to be
their uncle but I like that idea that in
antigon there's some kind of personal
connection which makes all feel more
fraud um and I thought well maybe he
should also be a British Muslim like
them um this was I I start think this I
mean you know we didn't even have sadik
Khan as London mayor let alone sa Javed
as Home Secretary so it felt like a bit
of a stretch but it didn't feel like too
much of a stretch um I thought it could
that kind of thing could happen not
knowing we were going to be Unleashed
you know or we would have Unleashed upon
us a series of um Asian home
secretaries enacting really racist
policies so that's another story that
came later um but I knew that that that
I would have this figure but again that
I what I was most interested with him
was the personal story you know which
included his personal Ambitions to be
prime minister but it was also the
personal question of how he felt um
about his own muslimness and what he
said about it and how he felt about his
son becoming involved with this family
that was sort of to him the wrong kind
of Muslim um so it's always you always
do it you always find the personal in
because that is where the novel lives
and dies is with your characters um and
so you you start with sort of the
intimate lives and then you see well
what else you know comes into the
story I I noticed that the epigraph uh
comes from shein's translation of Antony
uh the ones we love uh enemies of the
state and um I just wondered if you
could tell us a little bit more about
how you engage enged with antigon maybe
different translations adaptations the
extent to which it was at the Forefront
of your mind throughout the
process or not when I started I thought
look Antony
doesn't need
me has been around for a very long time
which was wonderful and it's so large
and and has such a role in culture that
it was very liberating to me that I
thought I don't owe antigon anything in
terms of getting it right so I thought
I'm going to read the play and then I'm
going to put it aside and anything in
that play which isn't useful to me in
writing a 21st century novel I'm just
going to throw out the window I was
surprised In The End by how little I
threw out the window I mean I threw out
the second brother you know because he
was of no use but I was amazed actually
by the the way in which that play really
did become the marrow of not just the
skeleton but the marrow of the of the
novel um it's an extraordinary piece of
work really um but also I don't read
Greek so I thought well I'll read a few
few translations because I knew that you
know I know enough about translation to
know that different things come up or
are obscured in different ones and I
thought I'll read a few um and then I'll
just put them aside um and so I read
some you know God I don't know whichever
one I'd had at univers which I pulled
out um and then I read the Sheamus Haney
which of course had in it you know you
can hear the echo of the troubles um but
there's also echo of of 9 911 stuff I
mean there's one point where anyy has
crayon say that line which George Bush
said you're either with us or against us
um and that but the one that actually
was most useful to me in some way was
the an Carson um because I was looking
for again the human way to get into the
character and it's very easy I think a
lot of the conversation around the play
Antony and the character anony um really
like to make it make her into a set of
ideas rather than a girl um and it
becomes these two sisters antigonis many
become contrasting ideas and so Antony
becomes Civil Disobedience and becomes
you know speaking truth to power and as
many becomes
compliance and I thought this doesn't
seem really very fair to me um and it
was as I was reading the Ancon that I
really understood where for me the story
lay with these two women um and it's
very early on and Antony the Two Sisters
let me for anyone who's as vague or hazy
on Antony as I had been when I had that
conversation with jender Verma um the
play starts with these two sisters and
they've just discovered that their
brother who has di just died
as a traitor um that their Uncle the
Tyrant has said his body will not be
buried that's his punishment even after
death his body will not be buried um
he'll be left above the ground for the
birds to Beck at and
the you know dogs to pull apart and he
will not have the religious rights
either that are necessary to you know uh
necessary
really for death to happen properly and
for you to get into the underworld um
and is many says basically paraphrasing
um God this is terrible but there's
nothing we can do we're girls and our
family name is already stained in all
kinds of ways um we need to stay out of
trouble and her sister Antony says I
will bury that
body um but then the conversation goes
on and as many is saying I don't want
you to get into more trouble
and Antony says well what do you and by
trouble she does mean that she knows
that if if Antony goes against the law
she will be put to death as well um and
Antony says something to the effect of
well you've already chosen against me
you're not going to help me you're not
taking my side so what difference does
it make now to you what I do or what
happens to
me and as many in an Carson's version
has four
words I'll be so
lonely and that's where I saw the story
which is here are two sisters who have
just undergone devastating loss they
both lost both their brothers and Antony
is now imagining that the the last thing
you can do for someone which is bury
them properly that she won't be able to
do that and that that beloved body is
going to be ripped apart by animals and
she says no it is the most human no
because it is the most unbearable thing
to think of this but her sister's
looking at her and
thinking if you do what you say you'll
do you'll be dead
too and then I'll be so lonely and it's
about to me in that moment it became
about love and grief and I thought now I
see the human beings now I can write it
so the was really important to me in
that that's fascinating I I was thinking
as you talking about the form of Greek
tragedy and the title of your talk uh
the hostile environment as Greek tragedy
uh I was just wondering the extent to
which you consider your novel home fire
um to be a
tragedy I think absolutely you know when
I was writing it I
um I thought I could write it into a
different kind of ending um interesting
I thought it right all the way up to
writing the last
page when it just became clear appear to
me
that there was no
other way in which it could go and seem
right because the whole situation is
Greek tragedy um by which I mean not
only the antigon situation um but the
situation of what was going on with
families at the time with with families
who you know were losing people because
they were being brainwashed or groomed
or whatever was going on with them um
and and they went and couldn't come back
um and there were these families then
left with
this loss in horror um in a country that
really didn't know how to treat the
people who went away as human beings um
so when 13 14 15 16 year old girls were
going they weren't being treated as
minors they were going and getting
married to 15y olds were going an immed
L marrying men in their 20s and no one
was talking about statutory rape no one
was talking about grooming no one was
talking about brainwashing it was just
terrorism um and that was a deep tragedy
as well you know so so yeah it it it
very much the the tragic form seemed to
me the only mode in which you could tell
that story or the only mode which I
could tell that
story yeah and um a a tragedy that
continu news off the page um I think
maybe now would be a nice time to hear
you read a little bit from home fire if
you wouldn't mind
KLA
um I'm going to read just from the
beginning and I won't read very much
because I know some questions are coming
in um but this
is the very start all you need to know
is it's at hro and the woman in question
is a British citizen who's leaving
isma was going to miss her
flight the ticket wouldn't be refunded
because the airline took no
responsibility for passengers who
arrived at the airport 3 hours ahead of
the departure time and were escorted to
an interrogation room she had expected
the
interrogation but not the hours of
waiting that would precede it nor that
it would feel so humiliating to have the
contents of her suitcase
inspected she' made sure not to pack
anything that would invite comment or
questions no Quran no family pictures no
books on her areas of academic interest
but even so the officer took hold of
every item of isma's clothing and ran it
between thumb and for fingers not so
much searching for hidden pockets as
judging the quality of the
material finally she reached for the
designer labeled down jacket that isma
had folded over a chair back when she
entered and held it up one hand pinching
each shoulder this isn't you she said
and isma was sure she didn't mean
because it's at least a size too large
but rather it's too nice for someone
like
you I used to work in a dry cleaning
shop the woman who brought this in said
she didn't want it when we couldn't get
rid of the stain she pointed to the
grease mark on the pocket does the
manager know you took it I was the
manager you were the manager of a dry
cleaning shop and now you're on your way
to a PhD program program in sociology in
Amherst
Massachusetts yes and how did that
happen my siblings and I were orphan
just after I finished uni they were 12
years old twins I took the first job I
could find now they've grown up I can go
back to my
life you're going back to your
life in Amherst
Massachusetts I meant the academic life
the woman dropped the jacket into the
jumble of clothes and shoes and told
isma to wait that had been a while ago
the plane would be boarding now isma
looked over at the suitcase she'd
repacked when the woman left the room
and spent the time since worrying if
doing that without permission
constituted an offense should she empty
the clothes out into a halfhazard pile
or would that make things even worse she
stood up unzipped the suitcase and
flipped it open so its contents were
visible
a man entered the office carrying isma's
passport laptop and
phone she allowed herself to Hope but he
sat down gestured for her to do the same
and placed a voice recorder between them
do you consider yourself British the man
said I am
British but do you consider yourself
British I lived here all my life she
meant there was no other country of
which you could feel herself apart but
the words came out sounding
evasive thank
you thank you so much Carla for sharing
that
