Larry Elder REACTS to Biden's Teleprompter Gaffe

To say that President Joe Biden, the leader of the free world, is having teleprompter issues would be a monumental understatement. Watch this. It is noteworthy that the percentage of women who register to vote and cast a ballot is consistently higher than the percentage of the men who do so, end of quote. Repeat the line. Women are not without electoral and or political, or maybe precise, not and or, or political power. End of quote. Let me repeat the line. He is reading verbatim from the teleprompter and the end of quote part was supposed to be read. Repeat the line was not supposed to be read, but he read it because the man is absolutely positively clueless. Hit me again with that. It is noteworthy that the percentage of women who register to vote and cast a ballot is consistently higher than the percentage of the men who do so, end of quote. Repeat the line. Women are not without electoral and or political, or maybe precise, not and or, or political power. You stay classy, San Diego. I'm Ron Burgundy? Dammit, who typed a question mark on the teleprompter? For the last time, anything you put on that prompter, Burgundy will read. You know who I feel sorry for? The two people standing behind him, particularly Kamala Harris. They can't say anything, they can't laugh, they can't go, oh, I can't believe he just said that. They got to sit there and act like no big deal. Now, it got a little worse. As you know, Roe v. Wade has been overturned. What the Democrats do is they come up with some sort of awful, horrible scenario to suggest that women's rights are being oppressed. Women are being told what to do by these daftly men. And Biden came up with this story about a 10 year old who allegedly had to cross state lines in order to terminate her presidency. I think he meant pregnancy. Just last week, it was reported that a 10 year old girl was a rape victim in Ohio, 10 years old. And she was forced to have to travel out of the state to Indiana to seek to terminate the presidency and maybe save her life. Did he say seek to terminate the presidency? He didn't say seek to terminate the presidency. Did he? Just last week, it was reported that a 10 year old girl was a rape victim in Ohio, 10 years old. And she was forced to have to travel out of the state to Indiana to seek to terminate the presidency and maybe save her life. Before I talk about the veracity or lack thereof about this story, I'm not a doctor. Don't play one on TV. But assuming a 10 year old who gets pregnant, the pregnancy threatens the life of a 10 year old. Obviously, obviously, an abortion is permissible medically and morally. By the way, there are estimated between one and two million families ready, willing, and able to adopt for every one so-called unwanted child to be adopted. That's about 35 couples ready to adopt for every one so-called unwanted child waiting to be adopted. And there are about 3,000 to 4,000 so-called pregnancy resource centers, some call them pregnancy crisis centers, set up for counseling, for healthcare benefits, for educational benefits, for job training benefits. So to say that the pro-lifers don't talk the talk and don't walk the walk is extremely unfair. But now let's get back to the 10 year old story. One more time, here's what Joe Biden said about this alleged 10 year old who was pregnant, who had to cross state lines in order to terminate her presidency. He meant pregnancy, obviously. Just last week, it was reported that a 10 year old girl was a rape victim in Ohio, 10 years old. And she was forced to have to travel out of the state to Indiana to seek to terminate the presidency and maybe save her life. Now recall when you know who was in office, number 45, every other word was fact-checked. If he expelled gas in the White House pantry, they fact-checked it. If he burped, they fact-checked it. Biden just now said a 10 year old girl had to travel across state lines to terminate her pregnancy. Now there is an Indianapolis Star article that mentioned this. The article relied on a single source for this claim. His name is Katelyn or her name is Katelyn Bernard. Now the story got widespread coverage, not too surprising. It was picked up by the Daily Mail, by the Independent, by the Guardian, by the Jerusalem Post, by MSNBH's Madden blog, Rachel Madden blog. CNN used the story. But later on, Washington Post, not exactly a right wing rag, cast doubt on the story. Here's what their fact-checker said, quote, the only source cited for the anecdote was Bernard. She's on the record, but there's no indication that the newspaper made other attempts to confirm her account. More importantly, under Ohio law, a doc would be required to report any case of known or suspected physical, sexual, or emotional abuse or neglect of a child to their local child welfare or law enforcement agency. So this doctor would have had to made a complaint. It would have been mandatory. However, no law enforcement agencies, local, state, or fed have reported a, or on an arrest of a rape or even investigation of a suspect of a 10 year old girl. Snopes, which is a fact checker, also left wing said, and I'm quoting, as of this writing, Bernard had not returned a request for an interview. We have not been able to independently corroborate the abortion claim. Wow. The White House press secretary, Corinne Jean-Pierre, was asked about this alleged rape. The president shared that tragic story moments ago about a 10 year old girl who had to travel across state lines to receive an abortion. And I'm wondering, has the White House confirmed that local law enforcement knows the identity of this 10 year old victim? And has the president directed the DOJ to do everything it can to prosecute the abuser and protect her? So I'll say this, anything to do with the DOJ, that's a legal component. I would refer you to the DOJ. I don't have more to share on the identity of this young woman or the question you just asked me. The president spoke to that young woman just to show how extreme the decision on the Dobbs decision was and just how extreme it is now for American public, the American families. Yeah, but is the story true? That was the question. When there is no exception at all, when you have such a young girl who has to carry out the child of a rapist, that is unacceptable. He heard that from him directly. And this is why he is calling for action. One more time, a pregnancy that runs the risk of endangering the life of the mother is perfectly legally, morally, medically permissible. Even the Catholic church would agree with this. He's trying to do everything that he can from his legal authority that he has. And so he's going to continue to do that work. But again, we have to make sure Congress acts. Now, speaking of Roe v. Wade, the consequences of Roe v. Wade overturned. Vice President Harris sat down, talked about it. Back, did Democrats fail past Democratic presidents, congressional leaders to not codify Roe v. Wade over the past five decades? I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled. Certain issues are just settled. What? In other words, we just never thought that these guys, these dastardly people would overturn Roe v. Wade. We just thought it was settled. So we just thought it was settled. So... Clearly, we're not. No, that's right. And that's why I do believe that we are living, sadly, in real unsettled times. Now, Samuel Jackson questioned, what else would they do? They overturned Roe v. Wade. What about overturning Loving v. Virginia? That was the law, the Supreme Court ruling that said these so-called anti-race mixing laws in the South were unconstitutional, were a violation of the 14th Amendment.