O mare parte din politicile trasate recent de Forumul Economic Mondial precum și de guvernul Olandei privind îngrășămintele și produsele alimentare, par să aibă ca epicentru Summitul ONU privind sistemul alimentar din 2021, spune Joshua Philipp de la emisiunea Crossroads.
Pe website-ul Summitului ONU privind sistemul alimentar din 2021 se menționează "să folosim puterea sistemelor alimentare în scopul de a atinge cele 17 obiective ale Agendei 2030".
Conform ONU, "Transformarea lumii noastre: Agenda 2030 pentru dezvoltare durabilă" stabilește o serie de obiective pentru eradicarea sărăciei, foametei, combaterii inegalităţilor şi a injustiţiei şi protejării planetei până în 2030.
Dar, Joshua Philipp spune că obiectivele enunțate in Agenda 2030 înseamnă de fapt crearea unor politici comuniste globale, programe de ajutor social, monopol masiv asupra fermelor, agriculturii și securității alimentare.
❗❗ Dacă vă plac videoclipurile noastre, nu uitați să dați like & subscribe la canalul nostru. 😊❗❗
Now, a lot of the recent developments, basically, including the World Economic Forum
and the Netherlands, all of this seemed to have come about in terms of them launching
these programs. And 2021, at the UN Food System Summit, that seemed to be like kind of the launch
pad for a lot of what we're seeing happening right now. 2021, the UN Food System Summit.
And let me actually show you the actual website of the Food System Summit 2021.
September 23rd, here you go. The UN Food System Summit, it further and it says this,
will serve as a historic opportunity to empower all people to leverage the power of food systems
to drive a recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and get us back on track to achieve all 17
sustainable development goals by 2030. Again, Agenda 2030, the 17 sustainable development
goals and the exact words, to leverage the power of the food system to do that.
That's what they're using the food for. That's the agenda with food, to leverage
the power of the food system in order to achieve these 17 goals of Agenda 2030, the SDGs.
It says, over the past 18 months, the summit has brought together all UN members,
United Nations, and constituencies around the world, including thousands of youth,
food producers, indigenous peoples, civil society, researchers, private sector,
and the UN system, to bring about tangible positive changes to the world's food system.
As a people's summit and a solution summit, it is recognized that everyone,
everywhere must take action and work together to transform the way the world produces,
consumes, and thinks about food. The summit will culminate this inclusive global process,
offering a catalystic moment for public mobilization and actionable commitments
by heads of state and governments and other consultancy leaders to take this agenda forward.
Through this people's summit, the UN will reaffirm its commitment to promote human rights for all
and ensure everyone, everywhere has the opportunity to participate.
Whether you like it or not, apparently you're going to be participating in terms of how the
role is out. They say the event is open to all through its virtual program and platform.
Let me show you this now. This is the Food Systems Summit and SDGs, the Sustainable
Development Goals. Again, from the United Nations website, because remember, they keep talking about
these SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. What are the Sustainable Development Goals? Well,
I'm going to show you right now. This is unitednations.org, UN.org. Here you go, folks.
From their summit, the exact one where WEF launched its programs, where the government
of Netherlands launched its programs. Again, you're watching the protest right now in the Netherlands.
This is where it started. These goals include, among them, there's 17 of them,
ending poverty and hunger, making food with, quote, adequate nutrition, education,
gender equality, reducing inequities. That's equity, not equality, I should note.
Industry innovation, alternate energy, fighting climate change, et cetera. Sustainable cities
and communities, climate action, partnerships, so on. Remember, they're saying that they want
to leverage the power of food to do this. How do you leverage the power of food if you don't
control it? Well, you need to create policies that give you control over it. We see them now
doing that. As they're creating policies to control it, to leverage the power of food to
achieve these goals, they're also simultaneously using their different puppets, different
stakeholders, we'll call them, to buy up the industries, to gain control of the industries.
Now, this is the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Again,
straight from the horse's mouth, folks. Under their SDG programs, again, this is on
transforming our world, the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. This isn't rumor,
this is their actual website on it. I'll go over a few of these. Goal number two, end hunger,
achieve food security, and improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture. They say by 2030,
end hunger, and ensure access by all people, in particular, the poor and people in vulnerable
situations, including infants, to safe, nutritious, and sufficient food all year round. Now, what
happens between now and 2030? Because between 2022 and 2025, they say that's the next stage of it.
Funny enough, they're doing the opposite of this. They're starving people, they're creating famine,
and they're destroying our food security. Funny, right? Seems to be going the opposite way.
Part of this as well, right? By 2030, end hunger, and ensure access by all people,
in particular, the poor and people in vulnerable situations, so on. By 2030, end all forms of
malnutrition, including achieving by 2025, the internationally agreed targets on stunting and
wasting in children under five years of age, and address the nutritional needs of adolescent girls,
pregnant and lactating women, and older persons. By 2030, double the agricultural productivity and
incomes of small-scale food producers, in particular, women, indigenous people, family farmers,
pastoralists, and fishers, including through secure and equal access to land, other productive
resources, and inputs, so on, so on. I won't go over all these. We went over the broader picture
of it. What does this really mean? What do these goals really mean? Like, what are they really
about? Let me tell you. When they say ending poverty, what they mean, folks, is global welfare programs.
What they mean is food stamps, housing subsidies, handouts, which means dependence on a massive
government. They want to create global communist policies, essentially. The same types of policies
you saw under the, you know, war against poverty here in the United States, which ironically made
poverty worse here in the United States. When they say ending hunger, what do they mean by that? Well,
here's what they mean. They mean genetically modified foods. They mean government control
of food. They mean bug meats. I'm not even joking. I'm going to show you again. They mean lab-grown
meats. Think Monsanto, what they do, just on a global scale, and having essentially a massive
monopoly on farming, agriculture, and food security. That's what that means. When they say healthy lives,
what do they mean? These are all SDG goals. SDG, right? Social, sorry, these development goals
are talking about, right? Healthy lives, sustainable development goals, universal vaccines, health
screenings, prevention programs, same types of things we see under, you know, being done under
health. That's what they mean by that. When they say they want to make sure that people are healthy,
they want to ensure the health of all citizens, that means like Fauci type stuff. That means they
want to make sure you don't have body autonomy. They need to make the health decisions for you.
That's what that really means. When they talk about race and gender equality, what they mean
is basically, you know, critical theory on race, on gender. What they mean is feminist policy and
race policy, like we see in the United States, dividing people, going global. That's what they
mean. When they talk about water sanitation and management, they mean corporate and government
monopoly over water, like what the U.S. does already right now, where even if you're a farmer
and you have a puddle on your land, that is considered a government-regulated water system.
You can't even, you know, gather rainwater in some areas, for example, because of these programs.
They want to control water. Affordable and sustainable energy sounds great. What does that
mean? Anti-gas, anti-coal, green agenda going global, like what you have in Germany right now,
where if a crisis hits you, suddenly you have to ration out electricity. Canada's having the
same thing. It means basically reliance on these unreliable systems. And of course, killing off gas,
causing prices to skyrocket, like we're seeing in the United States. That's what they're talking
about. When I say sustainable economic growth, what do they mean? They mean deeper regulations
that will push small businesses out of the market, right? Sustained economic growth. How do you
sustain the growth of an economy? How do you sustain that? You manage it. You control it.
You make it so that government subsidies and interventionism controls everything,
and you have corporate dominance of the whole system. Fascism, basically. They talk about make
cities and communities safe and resilient. What do they mean? They mean banning guns.
That's what they mean. They mean eliminating single-family homes, like they had in the,
again, the Green New Deal. They mean urbanization of everything, consolidating communities into
these housing complexes. That's the vision. And it's something they're already rolling out as
well when it comes to, again, where they identify different housing zones and so on in the U.S.
They're eliminating the single-family homes. That's part of the goal in the U.S., and that's
also a global program. Now, there's a lot of other ones, but essentially what they're talking
about is global communism. That's what Agenda 2030 is at its roots. And like all communist
systems, they always use the idea of for the people, for the health and welfare of the people,
for equality, and these types of things. And that's not what it does at all. And frankly,
they're trying to take what happened under the Soviet Union, under the Chinese Communist Party,
and make that the global regulated policy under the U.N. programs. And food, again,
is what they want to leverage for that. In the exact words of the U.N.,
leveraging the power of food for this.