What a potential Hegseth impeachment means for Iran War

Fox - 35 Orlando
10 followers
Nov 9, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis discussion explores the potential impeachment of Secretary of War Hegseth and its implications for the conflict with Iran. Dr. Homan Sadri analyzes the political pressures from both Democrats and Republicans, the influence of Israeli interests on regime change efforts, and the concerns regarding Hegseth's restructuring of the Department of Defense and the removal of experienced military leadership.
This morning, talking about some updates in the war with Iran.
This, of course, coming amid rumors of an impending impeachment
that will be set against him by rival Democrats.
Now, there is a lot going on in this situation, a lot to parse through.
And it's lucky for us that we have Dr. Homan Sadri here. He's
the educational director at the Information and Policy Analysis Center.
Dr. Sadri, thank you, as always, for joining us.
It's always such a pleasure.
Thank you very much, Hayden.
So as we're kind of looking at a lot
of the things that are going on here with
Hegseth, all of these rumors of impeachment,
just kind of off the bat, what are the potential
impeachment of Secretary of War Hegseth mean
for the Iran war as a whole here?
Well, as you know, Secretary Hicks said has
been under a lot of pressure from the Democrats.
Democrats, you know, were obviously the minority party.
So they had their own, you know,
complaints about him and the way he has conducted the war,
the way the war has been, you know, going on.
And, you know, some criticism here
and there in terms of how it should have been going on.
Secretary Hicks said it's not making the final decision.
The final decision of war
or peace goes back to the hands of our own president.
And, of course, there were a number of factors
that affected the decision of our president.
Obviously, our ally in the region, Israel,
has had something to do with it because, as
you know, Prime Minister Netanyahu, he's a wonderful,
loving person for leader of Israel.
At the same time, he's focusing on the interest of his country,
which sometimes goes along with ours.
Sometimes it doesn't.
He was able to convince the president this time to let's go ahead
and do it and change the regime
because he thought Iran was at a very weak point.
But that has not happened the way it was.
And then now Secretary Hegseth is basically getting
to be under a lot of pressure.
I'm not sure what's going to happen.
And some of my sources,
In Pentagon, they say that he might end up becoming
the sacrificial lamb because the
president has to, from January,
he has to start working with, you know, Congress that,
you know, the Democrats are the majority
in both houses, no matter what.
And he still has two more years to go.
You know, he can't just sit on his hand and do nothing.
You know, he's coming from business background.
He's very task oriented.
He likes things to be done.
fast, and our system is not set up to do that.
That's not the way founding fathers established
our system. They, you know, decisions,
they make a long time to, you know, be made, and then also
to be implemented. And that was done by the founding father,
just to make sure that every
single, you know, interest group would have some kind of saying,
so the decision would be to the
benefit of the general public, as opposed to a particular group.
So we are going to be looking
Looking at a very interesting period of time between now
And January, well, all these, you know,
haggling between different groups and, you know,
some kind of, you know, deals behind the scene that,
of course, general public like us, we would
not know about it until the last minute or when it's announced.
Sure. And, you know, something
that I find very interesting about this, Dr. Sadri,
is the fact that this impeachment was introduced by a Republican.
That was Thomas Massie.
Eight articles, you know, alleging misconduct.
This is a GOP-led effort that Democrats have backed,
including Hakeem Jeffries.
What do you make of that, the fact
that this is being introduced by the GOP,
who Pete Hegseth has traditionally kind of aligned himself with?
Exactly. I'm so glad you said that,
because people have a tendency to look at politics in a very,
very clear black and white day and night.
No, you know, Democrats versus Republicans.
There were a number of members of the Republican Party
who had their own reservation about Secretary Hegseth.
It was not just, and it hasn't been just about the war.
For example, the way he has been restructuring the entire,
you know, Department of Defense
or Department of War, as he likes to call it.
So this has been very significant.
Look at what he has done in terms of basically retiring a lot of the...
Top generals, these are some of the most experienced officers,
top officers we have had.
It takes a long time to train those people
to get their job done and to make sure that
our institutions are working properly.
It's a very, very different system from much
of third world countries that you put a nice
leader over there, things go well.
You put some ineffective leader, things go down.
We in the West, we focus on the quality
of our institution to provide our policy with continuity.
And as a superpower, we cannot afford just focusing on short-term,
you know, issues here and there.
So there are, yes, you are absolutely right,
there are a number of Republicans who have not been happy with him.
Dr. Sadri, as always, thank you
so much for providing some insight into what exactly is
going on. I know there have been a lot
of questions from people. I've been seeing it
on social media, wondering what kind of the impact
of this would be should that impeachment
go through, especially as it pertains to the Iran war.
So thank you so much for providing
us a little bit more insight into that. Thank you for inviting me.
