Liberal DEI Hire Judges Are Hacks And Don't Even Know The Law!

World News Report Today
27 followers
World News Report Today
May 7th 2025!
Liberal DEI Hire Judges Are Hacks And Don't Even Know The Law!
#massdeportations #tomhoman #ice #dhs #illegalaliens #illegalimmigrants #deportation
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-msnbc-admits-trump-right
https://assets.zerohedge.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/Joe.jpg?itok=Iuy_oBLh
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1919778856732360908
Please share and Subscribe and help the channel by purchasing a cup of coffee for WNRT to help us keep pushing to get real news to you!
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/worldnewsreport
James Kaufman, World News Report, today, May 7th, 2025.
God bless you and yours, no matter where you are in the world.
Please subscribe, give us a thumbs up,
ring that bell for critical future updates.
The liberal judges don't know or care about the law.
Illegal aliens are not protected from immediate deportation.
It's actually just the opposite, and just as Trump has said.
Everyone needs to know that Trump has deported somewhere
in the region of 150,000 illegal aliens so far in his second term.
Barack Obama deported over 5 million people
who were here illegally, including entire families.
And the same process
was employed using expedited removal to the DHS and ICE.
How is that not a violation of the Fifth Amendment,
but suddenly it's a violation of the Fifth
Amendment if the Trump administration does it.
Well, the short answer back then, we're talking about immigration law.
The Alien Enemy Act is actually not part of immigration law.
So we have three things, and as we said,
excuse me for interrupting, but we have an Alien Enemy
Act, which the South Texas judges said is illegal.
We have what's happened in Venezuela,
then we have general deportation, which I'm talking
about right here.
Federal law allows for even broader
and speedy removal than has been used in the past.
And expedited removal, as you talked about, allows for summary removal.
That means...
No entitlement even to a hearing, possibly within 24 hours.
It hasn't been used as broadly as, say,
the Trump administration might want to use it,
but under the statute,
it is permissible to remove aliens who arrive at the border,
and even those who have been here for two years,
although that two-year provision you talked about
is the lesser used in practice.
But just because it isn't used very often doesn't mean it's
not a part of federal law that can be used.
And it will be used because it's permitted under federal law.
The Congress, in its infinite wisdom,
decided that aliens who arrive at the border,
and they define people who arrive at the border as people
who have even been here two years,
if they have fraudulent documents,
if they don't have sufficient documents,
they can be removed in an expedited fashion unless they seek asylum.
So you don't run into those due process concerns, at least...
Presumably because that statute, as it exists today, is still valid.
Now, that's not what's at stake with the Venezuelans
and the Alien Enemies Act,
but the government's argument is that, hey, court,
listen, you're telling us we need to provide notice.
Well, take a look at this federal law.
It says that we don't even need to have a hearing.
It can happen within 24 hours.
So if that's good enough for people who arrive here who are aliens,
it's certainly okay for people
that the president has deemed to be alien enemies.
And of course, that's been the problem, a lot of the problems
with the court is, they didn't just go the way Barack Obama did,
they did Alien Enemies Act, they went back a couple hundred years
for an act, it doesn't even apply now because we're not at war
with Venezuela, first of all, and then secondly, again,
it's one thing to deport somebody back to their home in Honduras,
it's quite another to send them to the most.
The most heinous prison in El Salvador.
And the president has said again and again in the last couple of days,
what are we going to do, have 20 million trials,
Danny, for these illegal immigrants?
The point you're making is there won't be trials
in the sense that we view criminal defense trials.
You're going to get the OJ trial 20 million times over
if you try to deport people.
So let's take a Gregor Garcia, for example.
If Garcia comes back to the United States
and stands trial or has a hearing,
what does that look like as an example of what others might face?
Yeah, Garcia's a little different. He wasn't removed under
the Alien Enemies Act because he's not a Venezuelan.
And so that whole argument about Venezuela being the enemy
or Tren de Aragua being the enemy doesn't apply.
But you're absolutely right. If he comes back...
What due process is he even entitled to?
Well, probably the government will go back to the immigration court
and challenge or reopen this case.
Because remember, the only thing that kept him here
was a withholding of removal order from, I believe, 2019.
So they can go back to that court, try to reopen that case and say,
hey, since then, he's done some bad things.
Now, factually, you can argue.
Hey, no, he didn't do any of these bad things.
But, Dad, he's fine.
But even that's just limited to don't send him back to El Salvador.
That could deport him to Honduras.
Exactly.
You make a really good point, which is, again,
everyone's saying, hey, bring him back.
Give him due process.
But that due process may mean he can go to any of the other,
what, 200 or so countries?
Right.
Other than El Salvador.
And that's why I'm cautioning folks.
This whole idea of due process, everyone's saying,
well, this is what they're entitled to.
The Supreme Court said.
As a criminal defense attorney,
I can tell you the due process sometimes feels a little hollow.
Going to your point about habeas, I file habeas petitions all the time.
It's a slightly different statute
because I'm usually dealing with criminal defendants.
These are detainees.
But the vast majority of habeas petitions
are denied without even an evidentiary hearing.
In fact, where is the case where you get an evidentiary hearing?
For criminal defense attorneys,
any of you watching now, you're thinking,
oh my gosh, I got a hearing on my habeas petition
because most of the time they get tossed.
And it makes sense because...
Anyone who does, anyone who knows prisoners or the way they litigate,
they file a lot of habeas petitions.
And your point is spot on.
If there was a hearing for every habeas petition,
the courts would shut down.
All right, MSNBC.
We have to ask you one final question.
So there it was, folks.
Morning Joe.
Trump was right the entire time.
He's able to deport these people immediately,
just like Barack Obama did.
Unless they try to claim asylum.
Which would mean that they were in fear for their life
or their life would be in danger
in their home country, which I don't see any of.
God bless you and yours, folks.
Let's get these people out of here.
You know, 150,000 people deported so far,
and no one even knew Barack Obama was deporting
families.
Five million of them.
This has turned into another Democratic shitshow.
God bless you and yours, folks.
Please share and subscribe.
Always remember, anything's possible in Bizarro World.
