Ilhan Omar under scrutiny for alleged sham marriage

Fox-KTVU
29 followers
1 Video View·Oct 31, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
New details this morning emerging about
a past investigation into Congresswoman Ilhan Omar.
The New York Times is reporting the Obama administration
was investigating her back in 2016
and found some evidence that she had entered
into a sham marriage with a man suspected of being her brother.
But that case was stalled
because of the five-year statute of limitations.
The Justice Department recently raided Omar's home in the Washington,
D.C. area as part of a federal investigation.
Now, to talk more about this, we're joined now by Michelle Swerz,
our professor of American government at Georgetown University.
Professor Swerz, thank you for being
with us this morning on Mornings on 2.
Thank you for having me.
This is a story that just won't seem to go away.
What's your feel about this information that even
the Obama administration was investigating
Ilhan Omar?
Well, the Obama administration in 2016
was also very interested in immigration enforcement.
So at that time, President Obama was pursuing the DACA program,
which was a program that was meant
to give path to citizenship, really a path.
He wanted a path to citizenship.
It was really a path to be able to work for people that were called
dreamers who had been brought into the United States by their parents.
Had entered the country illegally.
So in pursuing that, he also was pursuing immigration enforcement
with the idea that you would be able to have legislation
that would have immigration enforcement,
border security, and this idea of a path to citizenship.
So at that time, probably Ilhan Omar was under investigation
as part of their efforts to enforce immigration law.
So from your perspective,
from what you've been able to pick out, is there anything there?
So I am certainly not a lawyer,
so I couldn't say if there's something there in the case.
In terms of the reporting, the reporting was that the case was dropped
because of a statute of limitations
and not necessarily
because they decided that there was not evidence to pursue.
So the Trump administration is trying to pursue that evidence
and other issues related to immigration and her family.
And they've kind of some criticism
for that because generally they don't pursue cases related
to that could influence elections this close to an election.
And do you see Congresswoman Ilhan Omar being a drain hurting
the Democratic Party, which she's representing?
Well, in Minnesota, there is a governor's race
and there is a more competitive Senate race between.
Flanagan and Michelle Tafoya.
And so perhaps Peggy Flanagan having to defend Ilhan Omar could
have some impact on that race.
But this year is a pretty good year for Democrats because the
midterm elections are largely based off
of the president's approval rating. The president's
approval rating is quite low right now.
So at least in Minnesota, the elections look favorable
for the Democrats, but certainly Democratic candidates
are going to be asked about this
And asked to defend her.
All right. I appreciate your comments.
Michelle Swerz, our professor of American
government at Georgetown University,
thank you for being with us on Morning Talk.
Thank you so much for having me.
Thank you.
