Are Arsenal actually playing better WITHOUT Saka in the team?!

Without Saka, we'd play better. That's it, that's what we've got to say. We'll go back to the top question before we close. Without Saka? What, we're playing in cruise control? Champagne football? I don't know. Champagne football? Without Saka? Finish the sentence. I don't know. But is that because we rely so much on Saka that we kind of play for Saka? We utilise that right hand side a lot more because he's like our star boy. So we just try to utilise him as much as possible, despite him being off form. Maybe we'll just put it down to that. Without Saka, we'd play better. That's it. That's what we've got to say. Without Saka, the team looks good, but can you really judge them playing against teams like Everton? There could be an argument to say, well, Bayern Munich was good. I think it'll be very interesting to see how Arsenal do play in the coming weeks without Bukayo Saka. There shouldn't be no slight on Saka, because Saka has got credit in the bank. Laurie always goes on and says it. I agree. He is a star man. I can't think of one other boy. but we have to do without him and we have today so so speedy recovery to Bukayo Saka