Trump accused of 'sabotaging' Ukraine's drones
Oct 19, 2026
Donald Trump promised, of course, in the 2024 presidential election
to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, then by Easter,
then by the summer and then at some unspecified point in the future.
This week in among repeatedly admiring the physique
of some of his own congressional candidates,
repeatedly calling a Muslim Democrat Mohammed when his name is Abdul
and claiming to have resurrected Christopher Columbus.
the most important real question
in American politics indeed global politics is whether
Donald Trump is in fact making it harder
for Ukraine to survive the war at all Ukraine's
military satellite service has been restricted via
the Starlink network hampering their drones
used to intercept Russian attacks Reuters have reported
the order came from inside the White
House President Trump denies responsibility
The Telegraph meanwhile is reporting it was all
Elon Musk's idea. Now, we should
be precise about what remains disputed, but what is beyond dispute
are that these systems help Ukraine defend themselves against
an invading army. Restricting
them has consequences. It is a price paid in blood.
Meanwhile, Trump has eased pressure on
Russian oil sales and suggested that Ukraine needs
a different president altogether. Think
about that message. The country being invaded should change its leader.
The country doing the
invading gets economic relief.
Trump's schtick has always been the art of the deal. What kind of deal
is that from the great negotiator?
What incentive does that give to Putin to compromise? If he can
keep fighting while the relationship between Ukraine
and America deteriorates, why wouldn't
he just wait for the next concession for the next prize gifted
in the seal of the president there's
a warning here for us in Europe
as well we talk about sovereignty defense spending standing on
our own two feet projecting power
but Ukraine's battlefield communications still depend on
American decisions and Elon Musk's tech their fate
in the hands of some of the most bizarre people
on earth Europe can't keep calling itself
a great power if indeed it can at all if it needs
permission to defend itself
and that let's be blunt is the situation we're in entering 18 months
where half of the continent goes to the polls
do you think it's time to finally look at unfreezing
European Russian assets to help fund the Ukrainian war effort
so we argued for this for a long time
was to make sure we could use the frozen Russian assets
to be able to support Ukraine.
So that's been a long-standing UK policy.
There have been different approaches to this.
We wanted to work with European colleagues on how to do this.
So those discussions are going to be...
Is it an idea whose time do you think has finally come?
I know the British government have been pushing it for a long time.
We've been pushing it for a long time.
And so, look, I know those discussions continue to take place.
You need to do it alongside other countries
for it to have maximum impact.
So I'm sure those discussions are continuing.
But, you know, we want to do everything
we can to keep supporting Ukraine.
President Zelensky has said that the speed caps
on Starlink operations in Ukraine remain in place,
which are hindering efforts to counter Russian jet-powered drones.
Is that the British government's understanding, too?
So you'll appreciate I'm not currently the foreign secretary
and nor can I comment on intelligence issues either.
So I would leave that most up-to-date.
Pretty disturbing.
Zelensky's right.
I'll leave that most up-to-date assessment to them.
But let me make the broader point,
which is we obviously deeply concerned you've seen what's happened
with Putin is increasingly targeting civilians.
I think that is a reflection
of Putin's desperation that he is doing so.
And the fact that actually he has failed
in many areas on the battlefront and is doing that.
However, that means we have to keep standing with the Ukrainian people
who are facing these continued.
We know who is Ukraine's security is our security.
But we know who isn't standing with the Ukrainian
people, don't we, Health Secretary?
And that's the White House. It's Donald Trump.
I mean, it has been reported that this slowdown in Starlink operations,
which, let's just remind people,
this is the thing which is protecting Ukrainian civilians
in shooting down these Russian jets, came at the White House's request.
Does Donald Trump have blood on his hands?
So I can't comment on the detail on the Starlink,
and you wouldn't expect me to do so.
I think there's a wider issue about we want
to keep going further in terms of the sanctions on Russia.
Which Trump has also blocked this week.
Yeah, that is a different approach to some
of the things we've seen from the US.
But we've also seen the US approach has evolved over time.
And actually, as part of the NATO alliance,
as part of the NATO alliance,
I think we've got still strong support continuing for Ukraine.
It's really important that that continues.
So we're going to keep working.
You've seen the prime minister hosting President Zelensky.
You've spoken to Trump.
You've spoken to Marco Rubio in the past.
We're going to keep working in order to be able to support Ukraine.
and to bring the NATO alliance together to do so.
Why would they hinder the Ukrainians
from protecting their own populace?
I mean, do you understand it?
You've seen the war up close.
I think listeners and viewers will be deeply, deeply bewildered
as to why an American administration,
OK, they're not a normal American administration,
but why would they actively hinder the Ukrainians
from protecting their own people?
So we've seen sort of different positions
and different discussions take place.
What I've also seen is I've seen a lot of support
at different stages from the US for Ukrainian capabilities,
including technology,
including support for their armed forces and so on.
So we've seen that through the years
and I think that's been really important.
We saw President Zelensky furious this
week with Trump in the administration.
Do you understand his anger?
I think President Zelensky has shown
huge leadership throughout this crisis
and the strength that he's shown,
the strength that the Ukrainian people have shown is immense.
we've had a ukrainian family staying with us since
the beginning of the conflict some of whom have
gone back so i feel this personally as well
the importance of us continuing to support the
ukrainian people and the role that the uk has to play in this is to try
and pull the whole of the
NATO alliance together to keep supporting Ukraine well
to reconnect you or just finally to reconnect
your um your old job with with a new one we've seen
this week with Starlink um potentially the
vulnerability when you hand over some of your national resilience
and capacities to a foreign
country foreign companies
when you see stories like that does it make you reconsider handing
over some of our critical national infrastructure
to companies with close ties to Trump i'm thinking
in particular of perhaps your big call to make
on whether to exercise the NHS's break
clause with Palantir the controversial US company have
this week's events given you
cause to reconsider Palantir's role in the NHS?
So you'll appreciate where there are contract
processes those have a proper process
and always are followed and I'm not going to comment on any
individual contract let me just make a broader point about resilience
and capability it is right
that we do more to strengthen UK resilience UK
capability including some some of the issues
around AI where we want to develop UK capabilities around
the US company are you comfortable with
i'm going to finish this point it's really important
that we expand our AI capability
including here in the UK
and we are very well placed to do so of course we have always worked
with other countries of course we have always
developed capabilities with other countries
but we also recognize the importance of supporting
that British sovereign strength and that's
something both the Prime Minister
and the Chancellor have highlighted i am just going to
say to you with contracts you don't cut across
just about contracts i just wonder what you think
of Palantir as a company it's a very controversial
company Labour Party members at Labour Party
conference were voting on whether to take Palantir out
of the NHS i just think as a british labour
health secretary you might have a view about
this company that is a nice try uh Lewis is a way of
just finding a different way to ask me another question
as a health secretary i have a responsibility
on a contracting process to make sure
that it goes through the proper processes.

