Hilary Clinton BOMBSHELL Comments About October 7th

Earlier this week, Haaretz published an explosive expose revealing Netanyahu was warned about Hamas attacks before October the 7th and did, essentially, nothing. That report has grabbed the attention of critics of Netanyahu inside and outside Israel, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. And this is a really extraordinary clip, I have to say. Look, I have said repeatedly, I love Israel and I hate Netanyahu's government and his policies. I love America and I hate Trump's government and policies. I think it's bad in the first case for Israel, what's happening, and I think it's really bad for the United States, what's happening. So I think we've got to be very clear of the messages we send, hopefully the Israeli people, especially after this bombshell that came out in the Israeli press, where Netanyahu who had been literally called by Sheikh Mohammed MBZ from UAE and warned that Hamas was planning something. And either he didn't believe it or he, it's horrible to say, he wanted to see what they could plan so that then he could come down hard and it would enhance his position. I don't know what his thinking was, but the bottom line, talk about a failure of imagination. This was a failure of leadership. This was a failure of protecting the people of Israel. He'd been told what was going to happen. So if the Israelis want to vote for that again, then I think the United States has to take a very tough position. So two years ago, if someone had even entertained the idea that Netanyahu not only knew that Hamas were planning something, not the details of October 7th, but knew that Hamas were planning something big, and then didn't act because he kind of wanted them to cause a lot of damage as a excuse to, I suppose, crush the Palestinians, but also shore up his support in Israel. If that was so much as put forward as even a possibility by like anyone in the Labour Party, that would have been kicked out within about four minutes. Anyone who tweeted that on Twitter, there'd be this huge pile on saying this is disgusting. We're in September 2026, Hillary Clinton is saying maybe Netanyahu let it happen. Not again, I don't think anyone's suggesting he knew the precise details of October 7th, but I mean, some people are, but that article wasn't necessarily the precise, but he knew that something big was about to happen, and he didn't even tell any of his security officials. Hillary Clinton is not only saying that was a failure, she's suggesting, putting out there that she takes seriously the idea that maybe he let this happen for his own political gain. That's explosive, no? That's Hillary Clinton. Yeah. I think that's what's crazy about it. It's bloody Hillary Clinton, who is, yes, she's responding to this article in Haaretz, which reported that there was a 45-minute phone call between the president of the UAE, MBZ, and Trump, in which MBZ warned him that something was going to happen. Apparently, that phone call also took place late September, so it was very, very close to October 7th. People have been saying it from the beginning, people were speculating from the beginning because they were saying, wait a second, how could an operation that complex involving that many people be planned and the Israeli security establishment wouldn't know about it? Or, yeah, indeed, the security services of an Arab country wouldn't necessarily know about it. How could this happen without people knowing about it? Especially considering that the Israelis knew exactly where all of their other enemies were, so they could talk to them in an instant, right? Their intelligence is good. Yeah, of course, and so, yeah, remarkably, disastrously good, enabling them to wipe people out at the touch of a button. So people were saying it, but it was considered an absolute fringe conspiracy theory. As you say, you would be kicked out of the Labour Party, or the Dems, if you said it, you will be denounced as anti-Semitic, and now Hillary Clinton is saying it. But I do think that there's something behind it, right? Which is that what it shows is the US establishment dumping Netanyahu, right? It shows the establishment Dems, these sort of liberal Zionists, or whatever, dumping Netanyahu and feeding into that argument that they like to make when Israel goes too far, which is to pin it all on Netanyahu, to say that Netanyahu is somehow the problem, the Israeli government is not the problem, the IDF is not the problem, other Israeli ministers are not the problem, the Israeli voters who keep putting these parties back into power are not the problem, Netanyahu's the problem. And I think that's incredibly convenient. And so it might be the case that as Netanyahu becomes more toxic, it becomes easier for people in the establishment to attack him like this, although that is still extraordinary, you know? Yeah, I mean, I was shocked when I saw it. And she got really head up about it, like she went off on one then. And she explicitly said as well, like, I don't know, you know, or if he wanted to see what they could do so that he could then, you know, respond, and so that he could build up his political support. Like, it was quite explicit, again, she wasn't saying that necessarily, but she's definitely publicly putting that forward as a plausible hypothesis of what happened, and that is unimaginable to the Israeli government. She's a pro-Israel hawk. She's a hawk. Like, let's not forget what she did in Libya, you know? She was one of the architects of the destruction of Libya, who was captured on camera when she heard that Gaddafi was killed, saying, we came, we saw, he died. You know, this is not some shrinking violet who does not like war or is frightened of war. And so, you know, for her to be saying it is just, it's just remarkable. I think they're dumping it on Yahoo.