A look back on Lindsay Clancy's trial and the media's role

WBUR
30 followers
1 Video View·Sep 11, 2026
WBUR reporter Deborah Becker has covered the Lindsay Clancy trial since 2023. She joins WBUR's All Things Considered to reflect on the trial, the media's role and why Clancy's case resonated nationally.
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe trial of Lindsay Clancy, accused of killing her three children in 2023, ended in a mistrial. The case centers on a clash between the prosecution's claim of a methodical murder and the defense's argument that Clancy suffered from postpartum psychosis. District Attorney Timothy Cruz must now decide whether to retry the case or pursue lesser charges.
I'm Lisa Mullins in Boston. A warning. Our next story mentions violence toward
Children. The Plymouth County District Attorney has the fate of accused
murderer Lindsay Clancy in his hands. Timothy Cruz must decide whether to
retry the case that ended Friday in a mistrial. Lindsay Clancy was charged
with killing her three young Children at their home in Duxbury in 2023. Clancy
admitted to the killing. Her defense attorney argued she was in the throes
of postpartum psychosis. At the time, she reached out to everybody and
anybody that would listen to it and kept saying, I am not good. I am not
well and it was ignored. The prosecution claimed Clancy was
thinking rationally and methodically plotted to kill her Children. She left
them discarded on the basement floor like broken toys because she was done
playing the game. Just after the killing, Clancy tried to take her life.
She's now confined to a wheelchair. W. B. R. S. Deborah Becker covered the
seven week trial and has been following the case from the start. We asked her
to tell us about the experience. Hi, Deb. Hi, Lisa. So back in 2023 after the
killings, you noted something during the arraignment that made you realize
this case was not a standard criminal case. Tell us about that. Right at the
arraignment, which Lindsay Clancy had to appear at virtually because she was
hospitalized at the time, there were a few people in the courtroom who said
that her case was about postpartum mental health. And I thought that was
really interesting. Now, her attorney had raised the question about the
medication she was taking at the time, but we certainly didn't know anywhere
near the details about postpartum mental health that we later learned from this
trial. And so it was as much a health story as a criminal story, I thought. So
from the time the trial began to the time it ended, the case grew in coverage
and the awareness of postpartum depression and how it manifests itself
became the spotlight. That's right. I think it was hearing Lindsay Clancy's
medical providers testify about the care she received that really drew a lot of
attention. The defense here, as you mentioned, was arguing that she should
not be held criminally responsible for killing her children because of her
postpartum mental health. And so these providers testified that she repeatedly,
that Clancy repeatedly sought help. She was prescribed 13 different medications
in four months, and she wasn't getting the help she needed. She called suicide
hotlines. She was hospitalized at McLean Hospital inpatient for five days, just
three weeks before the killings. And I think that galvanized people to say, we
don't feel like we are often heard in this system, or we didn't feel that we
were heard when we were new mothers. And they thought that this trial was really
showing the holes in the mental health care system, especially for new moms.
And how did the prosecution respond to that?
It was interesting because I would say the prosecution shifted gears. In the
beginning, prosecutors said that Lindsay Clancy was a manipulative, controlling
woman who wanted to end her life and was tired of it. By the end, by their closing
arguments, they acknowledged that she had a serious mental illness and she was
trying to get help. But they said she was still of rational mind and capable of
carrying out these murders. So actually at the closing arguments, the prosecutor
said, knowing that this case had galvanized so much attention, this isn't
about the health care system or about the maternal health care system. This is
about a murder case involving three young children.
You were there when the 911 call was played. This is the call that went from
Patrick Clancy, Lindsay Clancy's husband at the time, when he came home and looked
for his wife, found her outside on the ground, and reported this. The jurors
heard the tape, you heard the tape. It has not been released publicly. What was
that day like?
I will never forget that 911 call. It was so emotional of Patrick Clancy,
Lindsay Clancy's former husband arriving home, finding her on the ground. He
calls 911 and waits until the responders arrive. The dispatcher is telling him
not to move her. You can hear her moaning. And then when the first
responders arrive, he goes in the house. You hear him running. He's still got the
phone on. And the howling, blood-curling scream that you hear from him when he
discovers his children. I don't think there was a dry eye in the courtroom when
that tape was played. And I think the judge was very wise to not release that
because it would just be played over and over again, all over social media.
What other moments were there that'll stay with you?
I think seeing Lindsay Clancy's reaction was also really emotional. At times she
would really sob. I think that will obviously always stay with me. But also
the people who wanted to watch this trial, as the tension grew, the courtroom
became full. The lines outside to get into the Plymouth courthouse, you had to
get there about an hour and a half early if you were going to get in. And they
turned people away who couldn't fit in the courtroom. The interest in it was
unbelievable. People came from all over. Maine, people flew from Tennessee. They
wanted to be at that courthouse.
As the DA in Plymouth County decides whether to retry this case, what is he
considering? What are the pressures in both directions?
Well, Plymouth County District Attorney Tim Cruz has held that post for 25 years.
He's known as a tough-on-crime prosecutor, and he's an elected prosecutor. He's
up for election in November, running unopposed. But there are political
considerations. And then there are considerations about this particular case.
He claims that he started out by seeking first-degree murder charges because three
children were violently killed. And he feels that he needs to seek justice for
those children. And so I think he'll be considering that, but also considering the
backlash of what's happened here. And he'll make a decision accordingly. If he
decides to pursue lesser charges, say second-degree murder or manslaughter, they
could waive a jury. Only first-degree murder requires a jury, so it could be heard
before a judge. And a judge could then determine to send Lindsay Clancy to
treatment instead of having to serve prison time.
Deb Becker, senior correspondent for WBUR. Read her coverage at WBUR.org. Thanks a
lot, Deb.
You're welcome.
If you or someone you know is in crisis, you can reach the National Suicide
Prevention Lifeline at 988. The National Maternal Mental Health Hotline can be
reached at 1-833-TLC-MAMA.
