ExclusiveTHE GLOBAL REFINING CRISIS AND RUSSIA'S EXHAUSTION

The epicenter of the global energy crisis has officially shifted from a shortage of crude oil to a severe depletion of refining capacity. This is particularly evident in Russia under the dual impact of Ukraine's drone campaign and China's policy-driven capacity cuts. Against a backdrop of rising systemic risks, the fraying dominance of the U.S. dollar, and financial sanctions imposed on reserve assets, global central banks, led by China, are quietly executing a massive gold accumulation campaign despite short-term price corrections. These actions confirm a long-term structural shift in reserve assets aimed at establishing a robust financial defense shield. The Global Refining Crisis and Russia's Exhaustion To understand the structural shift in the energy market, we must first recognize that the narrative surrounding the Strait of Hormuz remains primarily a story about crude oil supply. The next major challenge facing the global market, from JP Morgan's deep analytical perspective, no longer lies in a shortage of crude oil, but rather in an unprecedented explosion of refining margins, crack spreads, particularly the 3 to 2 to 1 crack spread between WTI and refined products. The core question now is how quickly the global refining system can process barrels of crude oil when the product supply chain is being choked. According to an analysis by Natasha Koneva, head of global commodities research at JP Morgan, the market is facing three massive variables, the extent of destruction to Middle Eastern refining infrastructure, China's timeline for restoring refining capacity, and the recovery speed of the Russian refining system in the face of Ukrainian drone strikes. Regarding the first variable in the Middle East, JP Morgan has recorded more than 30 distinct attacks targeting refineries and petroleum processing facilities across the region after months of conflict. Although the actual extent of physical damage has not yet been fully quantified, the biggest question is what percentage of the region's total refining capacity of 11.7 million barrels per day, 11.7 million barrels per day, can be restarted immediately and what portion requires large-scale repairs. The bank's base case scenario assumes that only about 250,000 barrels per day, 250,000 barrels per day, of refining capacity will remain offline until the end of this year. However, the reliability of this estimate is extremely low due to the continuously escalating conflict. The second notable point is the severe drop in the operating capacity of Chinese refineries, which has fallen by up to 3 million barrels per day, 3.0 million barrels per day. This decline stems primarily from Beijing's policy decisions rather than pure economic factors. Bringing refining operations back to normal requires much more than simply reopening the Strait of Hormuz. China needs a firm guarantee that shipping flows have completely stabilized and are no longer subject to constant disruption. Only then will Beijing ease export quotas on refined petroleum products, allowing large state-owned refining conglomerates to raise operating rates and boost crude imports. J.P. Morgan forecasts that this process is unlikely to be completed before September. However, the largest and least appreciated source of risk is the refining system of the Russian Federation. Over the past three months, Russia's refining capacity has been repeatedly devastated by Ukrainian drone strikes, causing severe damage to plants, storage facilities, and particularly complex secondary conversion units that dictate finished product yields. Russia's refining capacity plummeted to just 3.8 million barrels per day, 3.8 million barrels per day, in June, representing a drop of up to 1.5 million barrels per day, 1.5 million barrels per year. This makes Russia the single largest drag on global refining activity, accounting for 20%, 20% of the total 8.2 million barrels per day, 8.2 million barrels per day, reduction in world refining capacity this year. In terms of the internal impact within Russia, the domestic fuel crisis has escalated from a mere nuisance for consumers into a severe operational challenge for the economy. Gasoline shortages are spreading even to regions with local refineries, as the government is forced to prioritize redirecting supply to Moscow. This is a direct result of Ukraine's tactical shift. Refineries supplying the capital city of Moscow accounted for 39%, 39% of all attacks in 2026, up sharply from 22%, 22% in 2025. Entering the peak summer travel season, the Dacha season, Russia's gasoline shortage has become even more acute. In many regions, citizens have to queue for days to buy gasoline, major gas stations have implemented rationing, and many stations have run completely dry. Retail gasoline prices at independent service stations have surged by more than 50%, 50% above normal levels. This disruption has spilled over into agriculture, public transit, utility services, and logistics. Concerns over diesel supply will also rise to an absolute peak when the agricultural harvest begins in southern Russia in August, a period when demand for this product line reaches its annual zenith. In response, the Kremlin has had to adopt short-term makeshift measures rather than focusing on restoring long-term refining capacity. Russia has begun importing gasoline from Belarus and India, while modifying tax regulations to incentivize higher gasoline output through low-quality blending, even permitting refineries to produce and circulate Euro-3 standard gasoline instead of Euro-5 to utilize cheaper blending components. Moscow has also tightened export controls on gasoline, jet fuel, and diesel to protect the domestic market. The consequences of this exhaustion do not stop at the Russian border. Unable to process crude oil domestically, Russia has been forced to ramp up crude exports to international markets, driving its crude exports to record highs and exacerbating the global crude glut. Conversely, Russia's exports of refined products have plummeted, particularly middle distillates. Russia's exports of diesel and heating oil have fallen by two-thirds, choking a global distillate market that was already highly strained and pushing refining margins to record highs. This is extremely critical because Russia is the world's second-largest exporter of diesel, accounting for 12 percent—12 percent equivalent to 0.8 million barrels per day—of the global market share, and the world's largest exporter of heating oil with 16 percent—16 percent equivalent to 0.9 million barrels per day—of the market share. Looking ahead, J.P. Morgan's base case scenario projects that Russia's refining system is unlikely to recover quickly and will instead have to accept a new, lower-equilibrium state as technology sanctions prevent the repair of complex equipment. Prior to Ukraine's attack campaign in April, Russian refineries processed approximately 5.3 million barrels per day—5.3 million barrels per day—of crude oil, producing 2.0 million barrels of diesel—2.0 million barrels per day—1.0 million barrels of gasoline—1.0 million barrels per day—0.9 million barrels of heating oil—0.9 million barrels per day—0.3 million barrels of jet fuel—0.3 million barrels per day—and 1.1 million barrels of other finished products—1.1 million barrels per day. J.P. Morgan expects Russia's refining capacity to recover gradually from its current level of 3.6 million barrels per day—3.6 million barrels per day—to 4.5 million barrels per day—4.5 million barrels per day—by early 2027, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day—4.7 million barrels per day—for the entirety of 2027. This recovery assumes that the intensity of Ukrainian drone attacks will subside after Russia's September elections and ahead of winter so that Ukraine can protect its own energy infrastructure. Regarding Russia's upstream crude production, J.P. Morgan forecasts very limited recovery as downstream bottlenecks reshape capital expenditure. With current crude production holding at 8.7 million barrels per day—8.7 million barrels per day—down 0.6 million barrels per day—0.6 million barrels per day—from the start of the year, Russia has hit physical limits on crude export infrastructure. Russian oil and gas conglomerates must now shift capital away from extraction to prioritize refinery repairs and domestic energy security, leaving upstream investments stagnant. Upstream production is projected to reach just 9.0 million barrels per day—9.0 million barrels per day—by the end of this year and stabilize around 9.2 million barrels per day—9.2 million barrels per day—in 2027. Why Central Banks Always Welcome Gold Sell-offs Another striking aspect of the global financial market is the deep disconnect between the retail investors and the strategic behavior of the world's largest financial institutions toward gold as a defensive asset. On July 7, Bloomberg ran a highly eye-catching headline, The Gold Bull Market Is Over And Now All Eyes Are On The Bears, depicting a massive wave of capital flight by retail investors out of the market. Yet on that very same day, the People's Bank of China—PBOC—the nation's central bank—reported its largest monthly net gold purchase since 2023. Notably, this June marked the 20th consecutive month that China added gold to its national reserves. This behavior proves that central banks are entirely insensitive to short-term price fluctuations, they accumulate gold as a long-term store of value to replace paper assets, and they are fully capitalizing on this downturn to scoop up cheap inventory. Looking back at price action, gold reached a historic peak of $5,589 per ounce—$5,589 per ounce—on January 28 and is currently trading around the $4,000 mark—$4,000 per ounce—representing a decline of approximately 28 percent—28 percent from its peak. The second quarter also recorded the precious metal's worst performance since 2013. Retail investors have pulled approximately $18 billion out of gold ETFs since the price peaked. This was primarily late-stage speculative capital that rushed in during last year's frenzy and quickly fled as soon as gold's upward momentum was broken. However, short-term price volatility is not the core story of the market. Rather, the actions of central banks are the decisive factor shaping the long-term landscape. Central banks have emerged as the dominant net-buying force in the gold market since 2022—the year Russia launched its military campaign in Ukraine—and the U.S. decided to freeze $300 billion—$300 billion—of the Russian central bank's foreign exchange reserves. This event sent a shocking warning message to every ministry of finance across the globe that U.S. dollar-denominated assets are no longer the safe haven they once believed. In 2024, central banks purchased a record 1,090 tons—1,090 tons—of gold. This massive demand pushed gold prices to extremely high levels, nearly doubling them compared to the lows of 2025. To maintain price discipline, central banks subsequently slowed their buying pace to 863 tons—863 tons—a 21 percent—21 percent decrease compared to the previous year. This decision to slow the buying pace by no means reflects a decline in confidence in gold but is simply a capital management principle of long-term accumulators. They buy less when the asset becomes expensive and immediately accelerate purchases when the asset is offered at a deep discount. Clear proof of this is that in the first quarter of this year, central banks snapped up 244 tons—244 tons—of gold, higher than the previous quarter and well above the five-year average. Looking at China alone, the country added approximately 40 tons—40 tons—of gold in the first half of 2026, far exceeding the 27 tons—27 tons—added in the entirety of 2025. The PBOC bought more gold last month when the gold price was discounted nearly 30 percent—30 percent—from its peak than in any single month during the preceding period of overheating prices. The core reason behind this strategy is incredibly simple. The macroeconomic factors driving them to buy gold have not changed in the slightest. The World Gold Council—WGC—conducted a survey of 76 global central banks this year. The results showed that 74 percent—74 percent—of these institutions project that the U.S. dollar share of global foreign exchange reserves will fall significantly over the next five years. This is an official declaration from the very organizations that directly manage the world's reserves regarding their plans for de-dollarization. Every reason driving this trend remains present. U.S. national debt continues to balloon by trillions of dollars. The U.S. Congress has no fiscal solution other than to keep borrowing. And Washington repeatedly demonstrates its willingness to weaponize the U.S. dollar's monopoly status to punish geopolitical rivals. For a central bank, holding the U.S. dollar means holding the debt obligation of a government that is overspending and unpredictable. Conversely, physical gold stored securely in national vaults carries absolutely no counterparty risk or political risk. This financial logic holds perfectly true whether the gold price is at $5,589 or falls to $4,000. A short-term speculator might panic when their account evaporates by 28 percent—28 percent. For a nation with a strategy to accumulate reserve assets over the next 10 years, this downturn is simply an opportunity to acquire inventory at a much cheaper price. This price correction has also spread to the shares of gold mining enterprises. Even gold producers with healthy financial fundamentals and no debt pressure are currently trading up to 50 percent—50 percent—below their peaks from earlier this year. However, much like the physical metal, the long-term profitability outlook for these businesses remains virtually unaffected. They still generate massive profit margins even when the gold price remains at $4,000—a price level that is still far higher than the conservative scenarios they had originally planned for. Many high-quality gold mining companies currently maintain an all-in sustaining cost of production of just $1,000 per ounce, yielding a colossal operating margin of up to $3,000 for every ounce of gold sold. The rule of conduct for central banks and large-scale value funds around the world during this period is remarkably consistent. Resolutely scale back purchases when assets become too expensive, increase allocation when asset prices fall into deep discount territory, and absolutely never confuse a short-term technical price correction with the shifting of a historic long-term structural trend. No one can predict the exact path of gold prices over the coming weeks, but the giants steering the global financial game have just shown the world exactly what they do when gold prices fall—they keep buying in larger volumes. Cost remains a complex puzzle for medium-term economic growth prospects. You've been watching Unseen Ledger, where we turn data into insight and insight into advantage. Tell us in the comments what stories or topics you'd like us to explore next. Your perspective helps shape our next episode.