Pushing Cinestill 400d +2 Stops

grainydays
196 followers
2 Video Views·Apr 30, 2026
Sign up for Frames at https://joinframes.com/ and use code "grainydays" for 10% off both yearly and monthly membership plans.
prints: https://graincheck.darkroom.tech/
podcast: @mamiyamigos
instagram: @50_shades_of_jason
substack: https://substack.com/@grainydays
tunes: http://share.epidemicsound.com/grainydays
business inquiries: [email protected]
Today's episode is sponsored by Frames.
Ever wonder what Cinestill 400D looks like
pushed two stops?
Me neither.
Cinestill 400D was released in 2022
and is a totally brand new formulation
if you believe everything Cinestill says.
But you know, I think most of us kind of just see it as,
you know, Kodak Vision 3 250D on the rocks.
Add two thirds of a stop, hold the rim jet, purple back.
A lot of people shoot amazing work with that stock,
but not me.
I don't know why I said that like I'm bragging.
My time with it has yielded nothing of the sort
over the years, which makes it seem like I'm the problem,
but that's probably not it, right?
Recently, I started to wonder about doing some downright
drippy and freaky things to Cinestill 400D,
like pushing it.
Traditionally, pushing your film is to intentionally
underexpose in camera and then boil your film
a little bit longer in development to compensate.
And also traditionally, this is more common
for black and white film stocks as color film,
like the 400D that we're shooting with today,
tends to produce dramatic color shifts.
However, on the canister itself,
Cinestill is basically begging us to test their gangster.
Just off of the side, it says push one, two, or three.
And boy, do I fear the souls that push it three stops.
But I guess technically it is possible,
just like how it's possible to keep transferring debt
between credit cards forever.
Anyway, because I'm a coward,
today I'll only be pushing it two stops
because I'm still holding onto some semblance of hope
that we can have a color negative at 1600 ISO film stock,
like what we used to have with Fuji Natura 1600.
May it rest peacefully in beautiful Valhalla.
I'll see you again one day, my brother.
Actually, probably not.
Is Cinestill 400D push two stops the new Natura 1600?
Let's find out.
I was able to get away from my parole officer
just long enough to head out to New Orleans,
the city of partying, at least at this time of year,
with Mardi Gras just on the horizon.
And no, before you ask,
sadly we did not get our asses beat by Shia LaBeouf.
I was in town with Ian and Tim, two Chicago nights
who live and die by the creed of Chicago-based liquor
that's more, you know, horse dewormer than actual alcohol.
And wouldn't you know it,
they brought that same energy with them,
so we would definitely need to stock up on snacks.
I'm just gonna eat the marshmallows.
Whatever, let's get this show on the road
before I delete the next five days of existence
from my own memory.
I grabbed my party camera, the Budweiser,
I mean, the Contax T2,
and did the only thing that I know how to do well.
I loaded up a bakery-fresh roll of a Cinestill 400D
and then changed the exposure compensation dial
to minus two to simulate a 1600 ISO film stock,
two stops under the box speed of Cinestill's 400 ISO.
So what better way to start off the roll
than a mirror selfie at 3 a.m.
in a dingy New Orleans toilet?
Gotta stay on brand sometimes.
I'll say 400D looks surprisingly okay in this process.
It's usable and not too ugly, I suppose,
which is more than I can say
about most pushed color negative film stocks,
or my own reflection.
Freshman.
Freshman Street.
You mean Surrender Street?
We're out there looking like a total
******* loser with no beads.
I decided to show the girls to some strangers on a balcony
and finally be rewarded with jewels.
I just wish they weren't super sticky.
Anyway, like usual, there we were,
feeling like ---- after a long late night of sobriety.
And it was only day two,
so I don't know why we always do this to ourselves.
Whatever, we headed out on the town
during the less crazy part of the day to get breakfast,
where we discovered the god loaf of pure intestinal clog
that should finally put to rest all those rumors
about me being on Ozempic.
A king cake French toast with cinnamon butt interior.
It was better than crack cocaine, from what I've heard.
That's so ridiculous.
I can't, like, I can't fix my braids.
You got this, big dog.
I don't understand this one.
Ha ha ha.
Ow.
I guess the reason that you'd wanna consider pushing 400D
is to just open up your options.
1600 ISO is pretty great in low light.
It'll give you shutter speeds that, you know,
don't give you drag.
And in an overabundance of light,
it allows you to close down the lens
to increase your depth of field.
However, I do think it is important to acknowledge yet again
that we are not actually physically increasing the speed
of the film by pushing it.
By doing this, it's still only as sensitive
as a 400 ISO film.
It's just that we can more or less get away
with underexposing it two stops.
Regardless, I can see this technique actually working
pretty well for street photography, you know?
Prioritizing the extra stops to increase your zone of focus
may go quite a long way.
Speaking of street photography,
when I mentioned it like an hour ago,
this shot is really solid.
Sure, yeah, these guys pepper sprayed us later that night,
but at least we got free drinks from the whole ordeal.
There is layering and the depth of field is nice and clean
because the lens is closed down and sharp.
And best of all,
this stock doesn't produce a muddy mess of shadow fall-off.
I pushed some Cinestill 50D three stops a couple of years ago
and the shadow fall-off on that got pretty gnarly
from what I remember.
But comparatively, 400D holds itself together pretty well,
especially during a nice orange sunset.
However, to be fair,
I am still seeing the typical purple color cast
that 400D delivers on a usual basis at box speed,
which I guess can be interpreted as a good sign
that the stock is relatively stable.
Jazz bars that evening,
Ian jammed with the band till 4 a.m. arrived again
and we somehow made it back home.
I don't know, I can't remember.
I swear they put magic forgetful juice in those hurricanes.
Next day was a Mardi Gras itself
and the costumes were definitely out.
Even Tim thought I was dressed up
as some dude from some movie.
Jason's dressed like Steve Zissou.
To counter those purplish 400D overtones
and pretend like this film stock
is the ghost of Fuji Natura 1600,
I used the Fuji Frontier setting in Naked Vlab Pro
and leaned some of these shots a bit greener
as Natura and most Fuji films
were known for the color green.
But I wouldn't really say that it got there, to be honest.
Maybe I shouldn't really be trying to smash a square peg
into a round hole
and just let Sinistil 400D be what it is.
This must be what it's like to be a parent.
But apparently, I'd like to first take a moment
and thank today's sponsor, Frames, for their support.
Looking for the next place
to experience the joy of photography?
Look no further than Frames,
an aptly named photography publication
that can take your photographic journey to the next level.
The small team over at Frames
curates a plethora of content
about the oftentimes challenging art of photography.
Every quarter, they release a physical magazine
covering a wide range of topics
that highlights the work of contemporary photographers
from all around the world
in a very detailed and meaningful experience,
which reminds all of us that at the end of the day,
photography is still a very profound creative practice.
If you're like me at all,
you can find yourself getting swept up
in things like the gear, the technicalities,
or the fast trends that seem to blow through our field
pretty quickly sometimes.
Finding a chair, some quiet time,
and flipping through frames
has recently become my own approach
to not only finding inspiration again
amongst the publication's smorgasbord
of incredible photographers,
but it has also invited me to slow down,
be more intentional, and more thoughtful about my work.
Recently, the coverage of Moving Sands by Kate Barkley
drew my interest, not only because the work is stunning
and definitely speaks for itself,
seriously, a 20 by 24 print of this on the wall
would be insane,
but I could all too well relate to being in the field
and shooting under challenging conditions.
Flipping through Frames,
whether the monthly digital edition
or the quarterly physical print edition,
feels like a stroll through a museum or a gallery
with the artist right there beside you.
Frames isn't about noise, it's about beauty, substance,
and a lasting connection to photography.
So what are you waiting for?
Go to readframes.com
and join the thousands of people already enjoying Frames
and use code GRANNYDAYS for 10% off
both yearly and monthly membership plans.
Anyways, pushing Cinestill 400D two stops
a viable replacement for Fuji Natura 1600?
Yes and no, mostly no.
Yes, in the sense that color negative 1600 ISO film
can be done with this technique.
Present from the chemical push
are the typical things that plague color negative film.
Perhaps that's because this film stock
comes from Kodak's Vision 3 Cinema line.
In my own experience, that Cinema line is far more high-end
and seems to handle a push a little bit better
than some of Kodak's photographic lines.
As an added bonus,
depending on your view of glowy orange blobs,
the classic Cinestill halation is still present,
but because you're underexposing the film,
that halation is likely to be less prominent.
Will I use this technique again in the future?
Probably not.
I was getting a little hung up on the colors to be honest.
400D is definitely a film stock
that benefits from certain scanners over others
and I cannot afford a Fuji Frontier,
much less afford one breaking down on me.
I already drive a 30-year-old car and that's bad enough.
Not all is lost though.
I can see this technique being valuable
for people who shoot medium format film
where the amount of light required
to cover a bigger format
oftentimes results in slower lens speeds.
You can thank Sir Isaac Newton
and his stupid laws of physics for that.
At 1600 ISO, you can kind of offset the slower lens speeds
and that's a powerful tool.
Anyway, yeah, this isn't a carbon copy of Fuji Natura 1600,
but I think we all knew it wouldn't be, right?
I surely never convinced myself completely
that it would be the exact same thing.
I guess in the end, it's kind of like being on a diet.
Not that I would really know what that's like,
but picture it, you're on a diet
and you're really craving ice cream.
So you get the low carb stuff.
You eat the whole gallon because you have no self-control
and bam, you yourself.
Again, that's Cinestill 400D pushed two stops.
