NEW Clues for Building the Great Pyramid of Giza Found in a Mastaba

mysterious nature
12 followers
Comments are disabled for this video.
Hello everybody and welcome to Ancient Architects. Please subscribe to the channel for regular
content on ancient architecture as well as all the latest news from the world of archaeology.
At the beginning of the week I was reading the works of George Fitzclarence, the first
Earl of Munster, a man who was one of the first to enter the Pyramid of Caphrae, just
after Italian explorer Giovanni Belzoni first gained entry to the inner passages in 1818.
And whilst that was the main reason for reading his memoirs, I ended up reading the entire
section on his visit to the Giza Plateau, a man who witnessed the Sphinx being excavated
by Giovanni Caviglia and he was offering details I'd never read before.
And I've also got to show you this amazing picture of the Great Pyramid's subterranean
chamber. I love the detail that's shown on this picture, I've never seen it before
and this is why I love looking back through the old sources.
But anyway, I then read the following intriguing passage.
Having dressed ourselves, we proceeded, attended by a whole troop of Arabs, to the buildings
of masonry situated to the west of the Great Pyramid.
So for those that need a little extra help, he's basically saying that he went into
the Western Cemetery right next to the Great Pyramid. There we find many mastabas of important
Old Kingdom figures. He continues.
The paintings in the interior of one of these are particularly curious, representing, among
other things, the mode by which large stones were transported both by land and by water.
In the former of these, the stone is placed on a sledge drawn by bullocks with collars,
which at the present period are not used in the country.
And then I wondered, did the ancient Egyptians use animals in the buildings of pyramids,
temples and mastabas? And why isn't the possibility more widely discussed?
Because it makes complete sense. And we even have the eyewitness account of Old Kingdom artwork
showing cattle being used to pull stone, meaning people did use animals for the grunt work.
We always see the reconstructions of dozens of people pulling heavy stones,
both across the plateau and up the pyramid ramps. But why do we assume this? Because there are
images of oxen doing this hard graft. How much easier would they make the pyramid project?
Apparently, a single ox can pull anything from 2,000 to 5,000 pounds, depending on terrain
and training, and this equates to between 1 and 2.5 tonnes on average.
And, leaving aside the large granite stones in and around the king's chamber of the Great Pyramid,
what do the experts say the average limestone block of the Great Pyramid actually weighs?
The answer is 2.5 tonnes, and the vast, vast majority of the Great Pyramid is made from this
limestone. So, with that in mind, technically a single well-trained ox could pull a single
pyramid stone by itself, maybe with one or two men guiding it, and a pair of oxen could do it
with ease, especially if this is what they were bred to do. So, is this really a feasible option
when considering the building of the Great Pyramid? Well, of course, we don't actually know
how the pyramids were built with any certainty. There are many aspects that need to be taken
into account, but one of these aspects is certainly transportation. Getting the limestone from the
quarry to the building site, and also getting the limestone casing and the granite from the
boats to the site. And I do think that animal power, the utilisation of beasts of burden,
is something we should consider, especially if scenes are painted inside Old Kingdom of
right next to the Great Pyramid showing such work being done.
With a basic Google search on the subject of oxen being used in pyramid building,
a couple of message boards and websites dismiss the idea because, and I quote,
there's no record of domesticated oxen being used in that way.
Well, although I haven't seen the mural observed by George Fitzclarence with my own eyes,
I have no reason to doubt his words, especially when his overall account of the Giza Plateau
is quite accurate. For me personally, this is some pretty convincing evidence that oxen were
used to pull stone. But somebody else commented that oxen would not be precise enough,
and whilst of course this is true, I'm not saying that cattle are physically laying the blocks of
stone into their final positions, I'm saying that they're doing the grunt work, moving the
blocks to the building site, and hence preserving manpower for the more precise jobs. Someone else
commented that such animals were too valuable to risk on such work, which is quite strange
because what's more important than building a pyramid for a king? And another person said
that these animals would be too hard to train. But I'm not so sure. Oxen were already being
used in farming practices. They were used to pull the plough, and as we can see in the 5th
Dynasty Tomb of Ti, there are two sets of yoked oxen working in an agricultural setting. In the
Old Kingdom, oxen were working animals, and I don't think that pulling would be too hard a job
to train, as they were doing it already, albeit in a different context. According to a study by
Richard Redding, Chief Research Officer at the AERA, during the Pyramid Building and the Giza
Plateau, enough cattle, sheep and goats were kept at Giza and slaughtered every day to produce,
on average, 4,000 pounds of meat. And with that information, we know that animals were brought in.
They came from sites across the Nile Delta, and archaeology shows they were kept in a corral
until they were slaughtered. And whilst I'm sure this is true, surely some of the cattle brought in
would be put to use, especially because oxen can pull anything from 1 to 2.5 tonnes in weight,
and apparently, a yoked pair of oxen can pull between 6 and 7.5 tonnes. If nothing else,
the Ancient Egyptians were efficient, and I can't imagine they would have just kept the
oxen on the plateau for food, and not put them to work before they were slaughtered.
But what about the murals seen by Fitzclarence in the cemetery? Where are they? Well, I have
been looking for pictures, and so far I've not been able to find what he saw. And so, right now,
I just have to take his word for it. I'm sure somebody must know the tomb he's referring to.
It's inside the Western Cemetery right next to the Great Pyramid. So if you know and have pictures,
please do get in touch. But I did find another mural at Giza, in the tomb of Iddu in Giza's
Eastern Field. Iddu was a 6th Dynasty official. Inside his tomb, above a doorway, we find this
piece of art. It shows two oxen being guided by six men pulling a sledge. A 7th man is pouring
water on the floor in front of the sledge and this was to lower the friction, because apparently,
what's on the sledge is a stone sarcophagus. This is showing the funeral of Iddu.
So we have more evidence of oxen with the guidance of men being used to pull stone,
and this time in a funerary procession. I'm sure there must be many more scenes in the Giza
Mastabas and I'll continue searching any and every archive I can to gather the evidence.
But now jumping ahead to the New Kingdom, and we find more evidence of oxen being used in the
transport of stone. This famous picture is something you may have seen before. It's from
the bottom of a stele that dates back to the beginning of the 18th Dynasty, during the reign
of King Amos I. Known as the Stele of Neferperet, it celebrates the reopening of the limestone quarries
at Massara, to supply building stones for the temples of Ptah at Memphis and Amun at Karnak.
The block of stone that's being drawn is estimated to be 1m x 1 x 2 in size,
weighing approximately 5 tons. It's on a sledge being pulled by three pairs of yoked humpback
oxen, guided by three drivers, and this is evidence that in later history,
oxen were used to pull stone. Whilst there is no specific documentation for the building of
the pyramids, no murals or writings to work from, we have to think logically and practically with
regards to how such feats were accomplished. According to Frank Mueller-Romer, transport
ramps from the Giza quarries to the pyramid construction sites had a maximum slope of just
7 to 8 degrees, which would prevent the stones that were being moved from sliding back. It would
also allow the hauling crews or teams of oxen to take breaks. Static friction would be higher than
the downhill slope force. He is one expert that acknowledges the use of oxen in his 2017 paper,
Basic Considerations on the Construction of the Pyramids in the Old Kingdom.
He does say that if there were ramps wrapped around the pyramids during construction,
the angle of inclination would be significantly more than 7 to 8 degrees, but hauling breaks
were likely unnecessary as the distances were so short. You could have also added stoppers onto
the sledges if breaks were required. I think with good organisation, the use of oxen makes
the job of transporting stone a lot easier and a lot more efficient. To me it makes total sense
and it's something we should all think about when considering how the pyramids were built.
And looking at the models for the building of the Great Pyramid, and one of the best
models comes from Jean-Pierre Houdin. Oxen could certainly have been used on these long
shallow ramps, bringing stone right into the heart of the building site. And as for the Great Pyramid
granite that came from Aswan, while some say each stone weighs 80 tonnes, most of them are actually
more like 40 to 50 tonnes. Houdin speculates they came off the boats in front of the Sphinx,
they were taken all the way to where the Khafre Pyramid would one day be built, transported along
a shallow natural ramp of bedrock, the bedrock on which the Khafre Causeway would one day be built,
and then turned onto a shallow ramp to the heart of the Great Pyramid, like this. It's unlikely
that oxen would be used for the giant stones, but when you consider that one ox can pull up to 2.5
tonnes, and a pair of oxen can pull up to 7.5 tonnes, well, how many would you need for 40 tonnes?
To me, it doesn't seem impossible, especially if spurred on by a team of men guiding them to
the construction site. No, the work isn't easy, I'm not saying it is, I'm just saying that using
oxen doesn't make it impossible. Houdin believes that some sort of counterweight system was
implemented to get the granite to the pyramid, and although he could well be correct, it's also
possible we're overthinking the task. The ancient Egyptians had been using oxen for agricultural
labour for generations already, for pulling very heavy loads of ploughing the fields.
People knew how to handle these animals. They knew their capabilities when yoked together,
and how multiple yoked pairs could pull even heavier loads. Whatever their specific function
in the building of the pyramids, I'm sure they would have been used, making each project a lot
easier than we often imagine. Right now, yes, the evidence for their use is lacking, but I have to
admit, I really haven't been looking for it. But after reading the words of George FitzClarence,
the search is now on, and any assistance from you, the viewers, is of course greatly appreciated.
Thank you very much for watching this episode of Ancient Architects. If you enjoyed the video,
please subscribe to the channel, please like the video and please leave a comment below.
