ELON MUSK Just Exposed Ilhan Omar! (2026)

Ilhan Omar's corruption is massive here and the evidence I'm sharing will destroy the narrative like she's built around herself entirely. The evidence shows theft, deception and enrichment while pretending to serve the people, you know, serving herself instead. The corruption just got exposed, not suspected anymore, not alleged. It's all exposed. You can see it in the documents like evidence that was concealed now laid bare for everyone. And people demand accountability immediately. But there's this anger building as the scale becomes undeniable. Because if corruption, this deep state hidden, then how many others are still concealed? Look, the cover up just collapsed completely. That's the problem that I see with all this doge stuff, because everybody should be celebrating that we've found a way to cut out fraud and waste. If you pay taxes and you don't like that you have to pay so much in taxes and then you find out that there's significant fraud and waste that's been exposed, you should be celebrating it. This shouldn't be, oh no, the wrong people found this fact and now it's a bad thing. And then there's the propaganda, the mind of calling it USAID instead of the United States Agency for International Development. It sounds like it's feeding hungry people. People are going to starve, Elon. This is horrible. And then you find out, actually, it's like $250 million for transgender animal studies. Yes, literally animals. Animals in demented studies that are like the worst thing you could possibly imagine from a horror show. I guess the real threat here is to the bureaucracy. So you probably saw, let's say Trump is a threat to our democracy, which is ironic since he was elected with the majority of the popular vote, they started saying I was a threat to democracy. But if you just replace threat to democracy with threat to bureaucracy, it makes total sense. I mean, the reality is that our elected officials have very, very little power relative to the bureaucracy until Doge. So Doge is a threat to the bureaucracy. It's the first threat to the bureaucracy, but normally the bureaucracy eats revolutions for breakfast. This is the first time that they're not, that the revolution might actually succeed, that we could restore power to the people instead of power to the bureaucracy. Small decisions result in multi-billion dollar outcomes. So we'd see, there was a case where we saw one person was getting $1.9 billion sent to their NGO, which basically got formed about a year ago and had no prior activity. So they just stand up an NGO. The whole NGO thing is a nightmare and it's a misnomer because if you have a government funded non-governmental organization, you're simply a government funded organization. It's an oxymoron. Right. It's a loophole. Yes. It basically, the government funded NGOs are a way to do things that would be illegal if they were the government, but are somehow made legal if it's sent to a so-called non-profit. But these non-profits are then used to, people cash out these non-profits, they become very wealthy through non-profits. They pay themselves enormous sums through these non-profits. It's so insane that that's been going on for so long. It's a gigantic scam, like one of the biggest, maybe the biggest scam ever. And how many NGOs? I think there's a total number of NGOs, probably millions, but in terms of large NGOs, tens of thousands. I mean, it's actually, it's kind of a hack to the system where, you know, someone can get an NGO stood up for a fairly small amount of money. Like George Soros was really good at this. Like he really, George Soros is like a system hacker. Like he figured out how to hack the system. He's a genius at arbitrage. I mean, these days he's pretty old, but a genius at arbitrage. So he figured out that you could leverage a small amount of money to create a non-profit, then lobby the politicians to send a ton of money to that non-profit. So you can take what might be, you know, a $10 million donation to a non-profit to create a non-profit and leverage that into a billion dollar NGO. A non-profit is a weird word. It's just a non-governmental organization. And then you can, the government continues to fund that every year and it'll have a nice sounding name, like the Institute for Peace or something like that. But really it's a graphing machine. And what are their requirements with that money? What do they have to do? Just really no requirements at all. So they just get grants and the government just assumes that they're doing good work? I think a lot of people in the government know that they're not doing good work. But they, it's a giant graph machine. I mean, people online are like unpacking this. It almost seems fake. Like when you're seeing how, we were covering this article that said 55,000 Democrat NGOs were discovered that had been contributing to campaigns and moving things around and pushing propaganda. And they were all connected and they found it through AI. But you have to go through steps and steps and steps to figure out where the money's coming from. Oh, it's all funneling down to this group and this group does that. It's a giant propaganda machine, a giant regime change machine. Yes. Yeah. Yes. I mean. But doesn't it, does it do some good as well? No, it does some good. So it's like, it's not like 0% good. If it was, if it was like, if it was really 0% good, it'd be much easier to attack. So there's going to be some percent good that they add in there, but it's like, it might be 5% or 10% good, but 90, 95% not. We have continued to fund things that appear to be legitimate, even with the flimsiest, if there's even the flimsiest excuse, like I just say like, send me a picture of the thing. Like you could literally have AI generate the picture, but if you're not even willing to try to trick me, then we're like not going to send the money. Okay. So what restrictions were put on? There was some, some things set aside, like medicine and there's, what was, what was set aside that there wasn't going to be a freeze on? Yeah, there was like a work for like Ebola prevention. I actually don't even know if this work is even effective. It may or may not be. Like it could be the kind of thing where you, you sort of fund Ebola prevention, but it turns out that actually you're funding a lab that develops new Ebola, you know, recipes or something, you know? And they claim it's Ebola prevention, but it's actually Ebola creation. So some of these things, I don't know. I mean, just, but it just seems like we shouldn't be sending taxpayer money to dubious enterprises overseas. Also, we just have a real issue with the budget deficit. It's gigantic. So like if, you know, all things being equal, if, if we didn't have a gigantic budget deficit where interest payments, the interest on the national debt exceeds the defense department budget which is truly astounding, which means, so we're paying over a trillion dollars of interest on the national debt. Then okay, we would have more room for wasting money basically. But when we're spending so much money that the country's going bankrupt, then we really need to stop spending money unless we're sure it is good value. So if you're handling the government like a business, you're going to have to go through all of these departments and do the exact same thing that you're doing with USAID. So how does that scale up? Like how many people do you need to do something like that? Well, we started off with about 40 people, maybe 100 people. And we're really just going through, doing very basic things here. As bad as Twitter was, the federal government as much was. So you know, in the case of Twitter, it wasn't a profitable company, it was like basically a breakeven company. But at least it was breakeven and it had to pass an audit. The federal government is not breakeven, it's literally losing $2 trillion a year. And it does not pass its audits, it fails its own audits. So like, there was a case where, I think Senator Collins was telling me about how she gave the Navy $12 billion for more submarines, got no extra submarines, and then held a hearing to say where'd the $12 billion go, and they were like, we don't know. That was it. I mean, basically the stuff is so crazy, only the federal government can get away with this level of waste. It's mostly waste, it's mostly not for, it's mostly waste, it's mostly just ridiculous things happening. Because they've been able to do it this way for so long, and they've become accustomed to it. Yeah, I mean, it's like Milton Friedman said, like, money is most poorly spent when you're spending someone else's money on people you don't know. How much are you going to care? And that's the federal government. So they're spending someone else's money on people they don't know. I just found out who's behind the fraud, and you won't believe it, trust me, like, this is massive. What I discovered proves this isn't random. It's organized at the highest levels, you know, coordinated completely. What's behind the fraud just surfaced. Not random opportunism, not isolated greed. You can see it in the patterns, like infrastructure built specifically to enable theft at massive scale. People assumed it was disorganization. But there's this cold recognition emerging from investigators now. Because if systemic fraud has actual architecture behind it, then who designed the system this way? So it was never a bug, always a feature. When people say, like, this is fake, I'm like, actually, well, let's look at, you know, Ilhan Omar, who literally was voted into power, voted into Congress by, you know, a large group of people from Somalia, who are in Minnesota, which is really far from Somalia. Or Mamdani, who was voted to be mayor. But by a majority of people who are not born in America. Maul Bowman saying someone's incompetent in their position. Didn't you lose your seat to George Latimer? Oh, yeah, that happened. Well, now Musk says he is done with this, and he shot back at Bowman's comments, posting I've had enough. Lawsuit inbound. And Attorney General Pam Bondi also sending a warning to Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett after this remark. I am truly here for very selfish reasons, starting with on March 29th. It's my birthday. And all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Ilhan to be taken down. Yes. This is domestic. And Maria, now you have this congresswoman, Crockett, who is calling for attacks on Ilhan Musk on her birthday. Let's take him out on my birthday, she says. And yet she turns and says, oh, I'm not calling for violence. Well, she is an elected public official. And so she needs to tread very carefully because nothing will happen to Ilhan Musk. As I look at this, you know, Jasmine Crockett insisted, you know, she was not encouraging any sort of violence. I still don't know why you would make a remark like that. But putting her aside and looking broadly at what's happening with Tesla, the FBI, I was looking at their website about what domestic is. You can see this when you intend to intimidate or coerce the civilian population, influence the policy of government. Several of these acts clearly are intended to do just that. The problem is we don't have a domestic law at the federal level because in the world federally you have to have a connection to a foreign power. So when we say a domestic incident, it can be without actually charging it. And that's why something like I think it's about up to 35 states have laws so that they can do just that. You remember the walk? He should pray to Christmas parade. The guy drove through. Pray. Everybody wanted that to be. There's not a federal statute that's on point. And the reason for that is that on the right, the fear is that it would be weaponized against the right. And that's generally the debate you see in legal circles. So that's just sort of the framework. But what you can do, what you can do is, number one, follow the money. And that goes to some of the stuff that goes on on these campuses. There's been significant reporting, responsible reporting that there is Iranian money going into some of these groups that act on campuses. Well, now you have a tie to a foreign nation. OK, so that's potentially a charge at the federal level. But what you can also do is what Musk is talking about, which is so some of this stuff is blatantly defamatory. It's encouraging violence in my mind. Some of the things that we're seeing in the media, it's extremely irresponsible. And I think Bowman's way over Elon Musk sat down for an exclusive interview alongside seven members of the Doge team giving a behind the scenes look, a lift of the curtain up of President Trump's cost cutting department. The team consists of a wide range of experts, including a former rocket scientist and one of the co-founders of the rental site Airbnb. The Doge team also consists of engineers and all have the same goal to slash wasteful government spending. They think something is under their bed and they think is very and then you pull it out of the bed and it's just a little toy. And that's what happened yesterday. We haven't seen their faces. And so the media and the Democrats have been saying, oh, this is the boogeyman. They're trying to take things away from you. These are accomplished individuals that love the country and want to make life better for the American people. They're trying to create a user friendly government essentially. And I love my favorite quote was creating the Apple experience for these government workers. Imagine they were talking about creating that Apple experience in the context of the fact that they came in and said, we want to fix Social Security. And they're like, yeah, well, we can only do eight thousand cases, you know, a month. And then they said, well, that's because there's a mine. And they're like, what do you mean? There's a mine or a day. I think. What do you mean there's a mine? They thought it was like a like a symbol for something else. No, it's a literal mine. There's so much paperwork. Our government bought a mine and they're doing everything by hand. And to your point, far from taking anything away, these guys are giving our money back. I mean, Brian, we're up on we're really close to tax day to when everyone pays their taxes. They take almost half of my money. When I saw what was going on, the amount of waste, the things that they said they're finding a billion dollars here, a billion dollars there. You know, we heard about the two billion dollars going to Stacey Abrams. This is so infuriating. People say they do using buzz terms like he's going to cut your Social Security. No, it's reforming Social Security. Get the fraud out. Now, I want to see what is actually in our three cuts. And then I'll respond to it after. The thing that struck me is these serious people, no interest in politics, their version of service, that rental guy, that Airbnb guy, a multibillionaire. He runs into Elon Musk at a party and he says, can you help us out? He goes, how? And he said, can you start reforming, start reforming some of our systems? Let me go take a look. And they see so many things that are ripe for reform. And some of the term that keeps on jumping out is care. It's almost impossible to care about taxpayer money like you do your own. It's not real. We don't know what was coming in, where it's and we don't know where it's going. And it doesn't matter because it's not theirs. And then California is a big time situation. So I don't know, we just don't want to turn into a, you know, communist hellhole, basically. Our goal is to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars. You technically are a special government employee and you're supposed to be 130 days. Are you going to continue past that or do you think that's what you're going to do? I think we will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars within that time frame. We actually want to be careful in the cuts. So we want to measure twice, if not thrice, and cut once. And actually, that is that is our approach. They may characterize it as shooting from the hip, but it is anything but that. Some people say this shouldn't take a rocket scientist. Steve Davis, you are a rocket scientist. Used to be. That all of us are willing to kind of put our lives on hold in order to do. I think the thing that's special right now is we actually believe there's a chance to succeed. We really believe that the government can have an Apple Store-like experience, beautifully designed, great user experience, modern systems. The sheer amount of waste and fraud in the government, it is astonishing. It's mind-blowing. We routinely encounter wastes of a billion dollars or more, casually. The first thing that got me really excited about Doge was learning basically the state of government computers. By some estimates, government IT costs about $100 billion. And it's funding systems that are over 50 years old. The amount of issues that were the Social Security system are enormous. As an example, there are over 15 million people that are over the age of 120 that are marked as alive in the Social Security system. Under the Biden administration, there was no departmental oversight within the Department of Interior whatsoever. None. Well, I think a great wrong is being done to the people of Tesla and to our customers. I mean, Tesla is a peaceful company that has made great cars, great products. That's all it's done. Hasn't harmed anyone. And yet people are committing violence. They're firing Tesla dealerships. They're burning Tesla dealerships into stores. They're threatening people. Threats against me and another Tesla personnel. What are they doing this for? Why? And what's happening, it seems to me, is they're being fed propaganda by the far left. Senior Trump advisor Elon Musk has faced repeated and very personal attacks since he's teamed up with President Trump and started Doge. The left has called him everything from a con man to an oligarch and even worse than that. Elon Musk is incompetent in his position. And how do we know? Because they fired tens of thousands of people, was challenged in court. The court said the people have to go back and now the people are coming back. He's incompetent. He's a thief. He's a and people don't trust him.