Name: Xu Xinrui was detained for eight years: the doors of the psychiatric hospital did not lock in "patients," but a systemic black hole. | Videos | Gan Jing World - Technology for Humanity | Video & Movie Streaming
Uploaded: 2025-11-17T15:27:15.315Z
Duration: 9 min 57 s
Description: Xu Xinrui's case is not an isolated tragedy but a mirror reflecting the deep structures of local gov... | Videos | Gan Jing World - Technology for Humanity | Video & Movie Streaming

今日質疑網

https://video1-us-east.cloudokyo.cloud/video/v13/e4/56/b8/e456b844-395b-472a-8e3d-38bbd21ba640/master.m3u8

Xu Xinrui's case is not an isolated tragedy but a mirror reflecting the deep structures of local governance in China. A ordinary young woman, merely for reporting a community official's gambling activities under her real name, was placed in a psychiatric hospital within a day, losing her freedom, voice, and normal social connections over eight years. These eight years were not a medical process, but the result of the combined operation of administrative power and stability maintenance logic. In this case, the report did not enter the normal procedures, the disciplinary inspection commission did not conduct an investigation, the community officials were not held accountable, while the whistleblower was quickly "dealt with."This is the first warning sign: the supervision mechanism has been replaced by an exclusion mechanism. The absurdity of the medical transport process is even more shocking. From the police station to the community, from staff to the hospital, no link conducted an independent medical assessment or legal review. Xu Xinrui's status as an only child allowed administrative forces to quickly advance the entire process without family supervision. This environment lacking checks and balances made the medical transport seem like an "arbitrary execution." The more "black hole-like" aspect lies in the discharge mechanism. DeKang Hospital admitted she met the discharge criteria, but she had to be picked up by the community or the police station.The community said, "It's not us who sent her," the police said, "It's not within our jurisdiction," and the hospital said, "We need to wait for instructions." The three parties avoided responsibility, leaving a person completely trapped in the ward. This is not a procedural loophole, but a structural deadlock. Inside the ward, she was forced to take medication, and if she didn't comply, she was restrained; she was electrocuted; she had to speak in a low voice when making calls, as medical staff were right behind her. She once asked visitors to take out a note to seek help from the outside, but none received a response. The hospital even refused to accept clean clothes sent by outsiders - a completely closed system makes it impossible to tell whether it is a medical institution or a detention space set up by power.In addition, the operational structure of Dekang Hospital is also worth attention. It belongs to the civil affairs system, its funding comes from the public welfare lottery, and the number of beds is linked to subsidies. Long-term detention means long-term income, and a vulnerable person without family becomes the most "ideal" source of income. This interest structure has turned psychiatric hospitals into an extension of the stability-maintenance system in some areas. The deeper issue lies in the fact that the reporting system is activated in reverse in reality. A tool originally intended to correct power has become a means for power to deal with reporters. Once such a pattern is formed, all potential reporters in the future will face fear: reporting is equivalent to self-destruction.Xu Xinrui's eight-year ordeal is a complete process of institutional black holes devouring individuals. We call on the Sichuan Provincial and Chengdu authorities to immediately disclose the investigation, the medical referral basis, the discharge obstruction chain, the financial structure, and the administrative evasion, hold relevant officials accountable, and establish an independent medical evaluation system and a whistleblower protection mechanism. Because one whistleblower being confined for eight years is not just her personal experience—it is a risk for all ordinary people. #InstitutionalTrial #Today'sQuestioning #FailureOfSupervision #BeingLabeledAsMentallyIll #WhistleblowerProtection #HumanRightsInChina