SD kräver folkomröstning om grundlagen – varnar för socialdemokratiskt veto

The Sweden Democrats demand a referendum on the planned constitutional amendment The party argues that the proposal risks freezing the political system and giving the Social Democrats the initiative and right to shape future reforms Now the other parties have voted for this in a first vote And now it will rest on the vote and then it will be tested in the vote And then a new majority can vote for this again But a referendum can be requested in the Riksdag And now we have requested it and we hope for an additional 45 wise members in the Riksdag Someone then needs to confirm it for it to become a vote The change that has already been approved in a first parliamentary vote It means that from now on a two-thirds majority will be required at the second decision to amend the constitution Today a simple majority is enough But there are several things that have been discussed for example within the scope of this constitutional review The question of whether citizenship should be able to be passed on from naturalized citizens Someone who commits serious crimes There is a majority for today in the chamber but as far as I know there is no qualified majority This means that the Social Democrats can block such a proposal if this constitutional amendment passes now Is this really about strengthening democracy I don't think so because then you're giving big parties too much power Opportunity to block necessary changes And I find it very hard to understand in what way it strengthens democracy It's rather how it's done in semi-democracies and authoritarian states Using the basic laws to lock down the current system This is what Orban has done in Hungary He is often blamed for it anyway So I find it very hard to understand how it strengthens democracy The party now hopes to gain sufficient support in the Riksdag for the issue to go to a referendum I understand if the Moderates become a bit supportive of this I have full respect for that I think it's necessary Because they have already agreed to this and I don't understand why That's giving the Social Democrats sense and justice over the foundation for an understandable future The title of this proposal is to strengthen the protection of democracy I don't think it's being done to weaken these And locks democracy instead And why would it be something the Moderates or the rest of the bourgeoisie think is good I really have a hard time understanding that