Best Exercises for Overall Health & Longevity | Dr. Peter Attia & Dr. Andrew Huberman

Smart Insurance Choices
22 followers
6 Video Views·Sep 30, 2025
Dr. Peter Attia and Dr. Andrew Huberman discuss the best exercises for health and longevity.
Dr. Peter Attia is the host of The Drive podcast and is a world expert on behavioral approaches, nutritional interventions, supplementation and pharmacological techniques to improve lifespan, healthspan and athletic performance. Dr. Andrew Huberman is a tenured professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford University School of Medicine and host of the Huberman Lab Podcast.
Comments are disabled for this video.
I've heard you talk before about some of the prime movers for longevity and all risk mortality,
and I'd love for you to review a little bit of that for us. I think we all know that we shouldn't
smoke because it's very likely that we'll die earlier if we smoke nicotine. I'm neither a
marijuana nor a nicotine smoker, so I feel on stable ground there, but anytime we see smoking
nowadays, people really want to distinguish between cannabis and nicotine. So I am curious about any
differences there in terms of impact on longevity. But in that context, what are the things that
anyone and everyone can do, should do to live longer, basically? How long you got? Well, you tell me.
You tell me. I'd like to live to be, I'd like my final decade to be between 90 and 100. Oh,
no, I meant how long do you, but yeah, I'm just kidding. And will we spend from now until you're
90 talking about this? Well, there's a risk of that. So let's start with a couple of the things
that you've already highlighted. So smoking, how much does smoking increase your risk of all-cause
mortality? And the reason we like to talk about what's called ACM or all-cause mortality is it's
really agnostic to how you die. And that doesn't always make sense. I mean, if you're talking about,
you know, a very specific intervention, like a anti-cancer therapeutic, you really care about
cancer-specific mortality or heart-specific mortality. But when we talk about these sort
of broad things, we like to talk about ACM. So, you know, using smoking, smoking is approximately
a 40% increase in the risk of ACM. And what does that translate to? And, um, that means I'm,
I'm shortening my life by 40%. No, it means at any point in time, there's a 40%
greater risk that you're going to die relative to a non-smoker and a never smoker. Yeah. Yeah.
So it's important to distinguish. It doesn't mean your lifespan is going to be 40% less. It means
at any point in time standing there, your risk of death is 40% higher. Um, and by the way, that'll
catch up with you, right? At some point that, that catches up, um, high blood pressure. It's
about a 20 to 25% increase in all-cause mortality. Um, you take something really extreme like
end-stage kidney disease. So these are patients that are on dialysis waiting for an organ. And
again, there's a confounder there because there's what's the underlying condition that leads you to
that it's, you know, profound hypertension, you know, significant type two diabetes that's been
uncontrolled. You know, that's enormous. That's about 175% increase in ACM. So the hazard ratio
is like 2.75. Um, type two diabetes is probably about a 1.25 as well. So 25% increase. So now
the question is like, how do you improve? So what are the things that improve those? So now here we
do this by comparing low to high achievers and other metrics. So if you look at low muscle mass
versus high muscle mass, what is the improvement? And it's pretty significant. It's about 3x.
So if you compare low muscle mass people to high muscle mass people, as they age,
the low muscle mass people have about a 3x hazard ratio or 200% increase in all-cause mortality.
Now, if you look at the data more carefully, you realize that it's probably less the muscle mass
fully doing that. And it's more the high association with strength. And when you start to
tease out strength, you can realize that strength could be probably three and a half x as a hazard
ratio, meaning about 250% greater risk if you have low strength to high strength.
High strength is the ability to move loads at 80 to 90% of one repetition.
It's all defined by given studies. So some, the most common things that are used are actually,
you know, they're used for the purposes of experiments that make it easy to do. And I
don't even think they're the best metrics. So they're usually using like grip strength,
leg extensions, and like wall sits, squats, things like that. So how long can you sit in a squatted
position at 90 degrees without support would be a great demonstration of quad strength,
a leg extension, you know, how much weight can you hold for how long relative to body weight,
things like that. You know, we, we have a whole strength program that we do with our patients.
We have something called the SMA. So it's the strength metrics assessment. And we put them
through 11 tests that are really difficult. You know, like a dead hang is one of them. Like how
long can you dead hang your body weight, stuff like that. So we're trying to be more granular
in that insight, but tie it back to these principles. If you look at cardio respiratory
fitness, it's even more profound. So if you look at people who are in the bottom 25% for their age
and sex in terms of VO two max, and you compare them to the people that are just at the 50th to
75th percentile, um, you're talking about a two X difference roughly in, um, in, in, in the risk
of ACM. If you compare the bottom 25% to the top 2.5%. So you're talking about, you know, bottom
quarter to the elite for a given age. Um, you're talking about five X, 400% difference in all cause
mortality. That's probably the single strongest association I've seen for any modifiable behavior.
Incredible. So, uh, when you say elite, these are, uh, people that are running
marathons at a pretty rapid clip. Not necessarily. It's just like what the VO two max is for that.
Like my VO two max would be in the elite for my age group. Uh, my VO two max, you know, but,
but again, it's, I'm training very deliberately to make sure that it's in that. So I wouldn't
consider myself elite at anything anymore, but I still maintain a VO two max that is elite for my
age. I consider you an elite physician and guy all around, but true. Um, but in terms of,
okay. So for the point is like, you don't have to be a world-class athlete to be elite here. Yeah.
Got it. Um, so maybe we can talk a little bit about the specifics around the training to get
into that, um, you know, top two tiers there, because it seems that those are enormous positive
effects of cardiovascular exercise, uh, far greater than the sorts of numbers that I see around
let's just say supplement a or supplement B. And that's, you know, like, this is my whole
pet peeve in life, right? It's like, I just can't get enough of the machinating and arguing about
this supplement versus that supplement. And I feel like you shouldn't be having those arguments
until you have your exercise house in order. Um, you know, you shouldn't be arguing about your,
this nuance of your carnivore diet versus this nuance of your paleo diet versus this nuance of
your vegan diet. Like until you can deadlift your body weight for 10 reps, like then,
then you can come and talk about those things or something like, let's just start with some
metrics. Like until your VO two max is at least to the 75th percentile and you're able to dead
hang for at least a minute and you're able to wall sit for at least two, like we could rattle
off a bunch of relatively low hanging fruit. I wish there was a rule that said like, you couldn't
talk about anything else health related, but you just, we can make that rule. No one will listen
to it. I don't know about that. We can make whatever rules we want. We can call it a Tia's
rule. One thing I've done before on this podcast and on social media is just borrowing from the
tradition in science, which is it's inappropriate to name something after yourself unless you were
a scientist before 1950. Um, but it's totally appropriate to name things after other people.
So I'm going to call it a Tia's rule until you can do the following things. Um, don't talk about
please refrain from talking about supplements and nutrition here. It is here after thought of
and referenced as a Tia's rule. I coined the phrase, not him. So there's no ego involved,
but it is now a Tia's rule. Watch out. Hashtag a Tia's rule. Um, Wikipedia entry, a Tia's rule
in all seriousness. And I am serious about that. Um, dead hang for about a minute. Seems like a
really good goal for a lot of people. At least that's our, that's our goal. I think we have a
minute and a half is the goal for a 40 year old woman. Two minutes is the goal for 40 year old
man. So we adjust them up and down based on, uh, age and gender. Great. And then, uh, the wall
sit. What's, what are some, we don't use a wall sit. We do as, as just a straight squat, air squat
at 90 degrees. Um, and I believe two minutes is the standard for both men and women at 40.
Great. And then, uh, because for some people thinking in terms of EO2 max is a little more
complicated, they might not have access to the equipment or the, to measure it, et cetera. Um,
what can we talk about, think about in terms of cardiovascular? So run a mile at, uh, seven
minutes or less, eight minutes. That's a good question. So there are VO two, there are really
good VO two max estimators online, and you can plug in your activity du jour. So be at a bike
run or rowing machine, and it can give you a sense of, of that. And I don't remember. I used to know
all of those, but now that I just actually do the testing, I don't recall them, but it's exactly
that line of thinking. Like, can you run a mile in this time? If you can, your VO two max is
approximately this great. And, and, and I think somewhere in my podcast realm, I've got all those
charts, charts posted of like, this is by age by sex. This is what the VO two max is in each of
those buckets. Terrific. We'll provide links to those. We'll have our people find those links.
And then, um, you mentioned deadlifting body weight 10 times. I just made that one up. We
include, but, but something, something like that. Um, we use, we use farmer carries. So we'll say
for a male, you should be able to farmer carry your body weight for, uh, I think we have two
minutes. So that's half your body weight in each hand. Um, you should be able to walk with that
for, for two minutes. Um, for women, I think we're doing 75% of body weight or something like that.
Yeah. Great. I love it. Um, as indirect measures of how healthy and how long we're going to live.
It's basically grip strength. It's mobility. I mean, again, walking with that much weight for,
for some people initially is really hard. Um, you know, we use different things like vertical jump,
ground contact time, if you're jumping off a box, things like that. So it's, it's really trying to
capture and it's, it's an evolution, right? Like I think the, the test is going to get only more
and more involved as we, as we, as we get involved, cause it took us about a year. Beth Lewis did the
majority of the work to develop this. Um, Beth runs our strength and stability program in the
practice. And, you know, basically I just tasked her with like, Hey, go out to the literature and
come up with all of the best movements that we think are proxies for what you need to be like
the most kick-ass, you know, what we call centenarian decathlete, which is the person
living in their marginal decade at the best.
