The Committee on Energy and Commerce is the oldest standing legislative committee (established 1795) in the U.S. House of Representatives and is vested with the broadest jurisdiction of any congressional authorizing committee. The Energy and Commerce Committee is at the forefront of all issues and policies powering America’s economy, including our global competitive edge in energy, technology, and health care. The committee is led by E&C Chairman Brett Guthrie (KY-02) and E&C Ranking Member Frank Pallone (NJ-06). The Subcommittee on Environment is led by Chairman Gary Palmer (AL-06) and Ranking Member Paul Tonko (NY-20).
I'd like to welcome everyone to today's hearing titled from gridlock to growth permitting reform under the Clean Air Act.
This hearing takes place at a critical moment for our country and the committee.
We want to remain globally competitive. We need meaningful permitting reform.
This cannot happen without modernizing the Clean Air Act.
The Clean Air Act now accounts for some of the most expensive and significant barriers in the modern permitting process.
What's worse and what we will hear from the witnesses today,
these outdated regulations failed to address the most significant sources of pollution
and disincentivize companies from investing in cost-efficient and effective technology.
At the core of the Clean Air Act is the idea that we can protect our environment without
sacrificing economic growth. In the decades since it passed, the act was largely successful
in accomplishing this goal, but that success is threatened by outdated provisions that do
not function well today. Clean Air Act as it stands holds outdated provisions that punish
American job creators for missions they have no control over. It discourages wildfire mitigation
measures, threatening this country's air quality. It risks our economy and national security because
of pollution that comes from outside the United States. It threatens our ability to stay competitive
in the global artificial intelligence race. Most importantly, it inhibits the United States' ability
to meet our domestic energy needs. Americans care about clean air. They also care about rising
electricity costs in our economy. They understand that excessive regulation and outdated statutes
do not equate to good or effective regulation. They care about technological advancement,
not punishing American companies who lead that advancement. The witnesses we hear from today
have extensive experience of the challenges presented by these outdated provisions and are
well-suited to explain their impact. I look forward to their testimony and their feedback
on the discussion draft. In June, we held our first hearing on the need to update the Clean
Air Act. At that hearing, we heard testimony from about the billion-dollar price tag from Clean Air
Act regulations doing little to improve air quality and the state of our economy. At that hearing,
my colleagues across the aisle were critical of the proposals discussed because reforms were
prior Congress. It challenged us to introduce novel ideas to reform the Clean Air Act.
It's feedback we took seriously. I encourage the panel of witnesses for us today to give us
their best solutions for modernizing the Clean Air Act, both novel and previously discussed.
Some of these solutions may not be novel, but our permitting problem isn't novel either,
and it is not getting better. Thirty-five years have passed since this committee meaningfully
updated the Clean Air Act. It is our job to make sure that legislation passed out of this chamber
is functioning effectively and is updated when needed. Let's take this opportunity to modernize
out-of-date legislation and create an effective permitting program that works for the American
people. I thank the members of the committee who are leading these efforts, and I hope my
colleagues take the opportunity to engage in meaningful permit reform.