Chairman Latta Delivers Opening Statement at Energy Hearing on Nuclear Energy

Energy & Commerce GOP
48 followers
1 Video View·Sep 15, 2026
Meeting: Nuclear Spent Fuel Policy: Examining Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses
Subcommittee on Energy
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe Energy Subcommittee is examining the Department of Energy's (DOE) initiative to develop nuclear life cycle innovation campuses. These campuses aim to transform the nuclear fuel cycle by consolidating spent fuel from across the nation into voluntary host states for storage, recycling, and disposal, thereby reducing waste and maximizing energy recovery.
Today the Energy Subcommittee will examine the Department of Energy's work to develop
nuclear life cycle innovation campuses. These campuses represent a new effort by the DOE
and administration to quote transform the nuclear fuel cycle. The program intends to support the
nation's nuclear policy ambitions as well as begin to address federal government statutory responsibility
for disposal of nuclear waste. This involves taking spent fuel from reactors around the nation
to a state that volunteers to host the campus where the fuel can be stored, recycled, and related
waste disposed. When it comes to increasing reprocessing my view is it's about time.
Our policy should be to use our technological abilities to take full advantage of the
remaining usefulness of spent fuel and this in turn reduces the waste that must be placed in a
permanent repository. Maximizing the remaining energy and other useful isotopes from spent fuel
presents an attractive financial incentive for taking a more holistic look at the fuel cycle.
This explains why six states so far are stepping up to negotiate how to develop in partnership
with the DOE life cycle innovation campuses. Additionally may offer a workable path for
updating our nuclear waste policy. But of course there's a long way to go to develop durable state
agreements and durability is the key. The idea of consolidating spent fuel from sites under a
federal program with voluntary host states is not a new one. Congress authorized the nuclear waste
negotiated to set up something like that in the early 1990s. For various reasons that did not
work out as have other efforts with respect to attracting durable state support. What must be
done differently this what must be done differently this time around. There are also commercial and
economic realities when it comes to our fuel cycle that factor into what may eventually develop.
This hearing will help identify what Congress must do to enable continued work on these campuses
given their potential. Our focus should be on policies that complement existing law and the
designated federal disposal site at Yucca Mountain and protect the interests of rate payers and
taxpayers under this law. This means not rushing to restart fees on nuclear power generation or
irresponsibly rating the nuclear waste fund. We should not forget our bipartisan legislative work
in 2018 provided substantial changes to the law that would have incentivized completion of the
Yucca license, enhanced host state benefits and accelerated the type of program envisioned in
the current proposal. These reforms passed the house by a vote of 340 to 72. Unfortunately politics
obstructed the potential for the reforms. Perhaps the tremendous support of nuclear in recent years
means we're in a different place today. We'll take testimony from two panels. On the first panel,
we'll hear from the Department of Energy. The second is the Assistant Secretary of Energy,
Ken Garish, who heads the Office of Nuclear Energy and can explain the program,
state interactions and what Congress may do to help enable its progress forward.
Our second panel will provide perspective from key stakeholders.
We'll hear from Stacy Paradis, an Illinois Public Utility Commissioner speaking on behalf of the
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. Electric rate payers under
the law are responsible for paying for their ultimate disposal of nuclear waste and she
can speak to the importance of protecting rate payer funding and the nuclear waste fund.
We'll provide the perspective of the Nuclear Energy Institute, NEI, on the fuel cycle
and on policies surrounding storage and disposition of spent nuclear fuel.
We'll speak on behalf of the Decommissioned Plants Coalition, which represents close
nuclear plants that continue to store spent fuel. And finally, Greg White, also a former
State Utility Commissioner, will provide the perspective of the Nuclear Waste Strategy
Coalition, which represents a range of stakeholders that seek to get our nuclear
waste policy back on track. We welcome the witnesses that are with us today and really
appreciate your testifying. And I yield back the balance of my time.
