Did Hater Try to Flash Charlie Kirk to Get Him Banned on YouTube? I Charlie Kirk

Do you feel, uh, proud of yourself for debating college kids, um, who are unprepared to speak in front of an audience like yourself? Uh, hold on, hold on, hold on, um, you're 30 years old. We can agree you're 30 years old, right? Do you think that's a little bit silly? Are you a voter? I am a voter. Oh, so I vote and you vote. So I'm talking to voters of this country that will determine the future of Western civilization. That's what I'm doing here today. Yeah? Wait, hold on, how is it any different than a professor talking to you? Than a professor talking to you? Who, who are you? Well, enough, important enough for you to come up to a microphone. Actually, when I first saw this ad, I thought it was like, uh, like an improv comedy thing. It looked so ridiculous that I didn't even think it was real. Um. Well, no, you can see, look how popular Trump is on your campus. How does that make you feel? That's not comedy. That is a five alarm fire for Kamala Harris because she's probably going to lose Pennsylvania. Look. No, I just want to be clear. Is there something wrong with talking to voters? No, there's nothing wrong with talking to voters. Well, that's what we're doing here today. It's an open mic. I think that you push a dangerous agenda. Such as? Your stance on, uh, abortion rights, for example. Here we go. Okay, so. Let me ask a question. What is, what is your name? Jean. And what is your understanding of the current Republican Party's stance on federal intervention in abortion? Well, I know that they want to bring it back to the states, right? So, it sounds like you do know that the Republican Party's current stance on abortion is they're against a federal ban on abortion. I do understand that, yes. And we're talking about a presidential election as the important election that we're talking about here. I understand that, yes. Great. So, again, I think this open dialogue is great. I think it's great you're here challenging Charlie. And I think it's great that he's willing to travel campuses across this country to talk to the next generation. We need more conversation. Now, where's the disagreement, though, on content? Because you could criticize style or why you're talking to people. Listen, my. Or dunk on someone personally. But where do you actually disagree with the substance? I agree with the way that you edit content and specifically frame it so that people look bad talking to you. You, the way that you edit your content. We post unedited content. Let me just ask you one thing, though, because personal insults can fly in all directions. Where is an area where you have a disagreement with the conservative movement, with Donald Trump, with Charlie Kirk, perhaps with myself? I was a presidential candidate last year. I think we need to talk about that more in the open. And the more we do, the stronger our country is going to be. We've got a long line of people, but I want to hear from you one substantive area where you have an authentic disagreement. And I'd be glad to address it. I'm sure Charlie would, too. Just in any. Anything. Any political. Relating to any political topic where you have a disagreement. Let's air it. OK. I disagree with some of the laws that are being pushed in Congress that are against the LGBTQ community and the trans community. So let's talk about that. I'm going to give you my view, and then I want to hear yours. OK. My view is that if you're a fully grown adult, 18 or above, you're free to live how you want, dress how you want, marry who you want if you want, if you're over the age of 18. I agree. But you are not free to indoctrinate children in schools who are not yet of the age of consent. You are not free. Just as a 17-year-old or a 15-year-old can't get a tattoo on their own, I don't think that you should be able to go to the gym until the age of 18. And so the lines that I draw here is that men are free to claim to be women and swim in swimming pools. You're not free to claim trophies in a women's sports competition. You're not free to enter a women's locker room. You're not free to change a language. And you're not free to actually indoctrinate our children who are under the age of 5 in schools. Do we agree on the fact that adults should be able to live freely while still treating children differently? If so, we're on the same side of this issue. Listen, I agree with the majority of what you said. However, I don't think that you're understanding the implications of the laws that are trying to be passed. Look, we got a head start on the conversation. We got a long line behind you. But my only ask is, forget the personal attacks or the stylistic attacks. Focus on substance. The more we debate that, the stronger we're going to be as a country. Thank you for coming. Thank you. I don't think you're focusing on substance, though. That's the issue. Hold on. He intentionally tried to provoke substance out of you. And you said, well, I'm worried about some laws Congress should pass. I have to ask, what laws are you talking about? Can you be specific? I'm sorry. I'm very nervous. But this is what you do. This is what you do. You take people and you put them under the spotlight. Well, hold on. I didn't ask you to come up here. You voluntarily came to the front of the line. You didn't have to do that. You're purposely antagonizing people on campus, asking people to come up by spreading your weird agenda. How? What agenda is that? I'm confused, though. Charlie, I'll say this. We'll end on this and we'll go to the next question. When I was 18, and I'm not going to blame you for this, I also took for granted a lot of the stuff that the media force fed me. Because that's what you know at the age of 18. You say there are some vague laws making their way through Congress that are hostile to the trans community. I don't think those laws actually exist. But I don't blame you if that's what the cable media is feeding you. But let's get to the specifics and then we're able to actually have an open dialogue. That's one of the things I've learned over the last 20 years. I think that the issue is we're getting our media from different sources. Both people are getting media from these skewed sources. The facts that you're presenting are not always correct. And that's why we're here with no TV screens between us. So people who have policy-based substantive disagreements, we invite those. I think that's how we're going to get our country back. And as it relates to trans, which you brought up, 18 or above, you're free to live how you want. You're not free to force that onto somebody else or especially kids. And if we agree on that, we make some progress. Thank you. Disagreements, yeah.