►川普如何挺過十年獵巫？時間線揭開陰謀！◄(中英對照-即時新聞)

We have no concern about that. If it's uncomfortable for him, he shouldn't have been involved in overseeing this, which is what it appears to us has happened. There's a lot of allegations on the table. Our job is to go and follow each of those trails and to find out the truth. So those are very serious allegations with very serious implications, but we're going to have very serious people working on it, and we will get the answers. And earlier today, the Department of Justice confirmed that it received Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's criminal referral on bombshell claims that members of the Obama administration manufactured the Russia, Russia, Russia collusion hoax. After she released documents on Friday, we had her on Friday night, that reportedly show overwhelming evidence that Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for the entire Russia collusion hoax. Now, here now with the latest, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan. This means a lot to all three of us. I probably annoyed the two of you more than any two people on earth for three long years trying to get information about the truth on that story. It turns out our ensemble cast, and I won't mention everybody, but John Solomon and Greg Jarrett and Sarah Carter and others, we all got it right. There were a very small number of people that wanted to get it right. You two were leading the effort. Here we are, Mark Meadows, what does this mean? Well, I think it's a big day, but I think the other thing is, is that there's going to be all kinds of postmortems to suggest, well, what we knew back then and what you were willing to cover, Sean, actually wasn't the case. And so what we're know? We know that candidate Donald Trump and candidate Hillary Clinton were treated differently. We also know that Clapper, Brennan and Comey met outside the workplace. We know that according to text messages. And we also know that in August of 2016, they were actually meeting at the White House. And so does this come as a surprise to Jim, you or me? No, not at all. But here's what should be told tonight is they need to go after all the people that they shared in the legacy media that covered this up, including Adam Schiff. That's a great point. Jim Jordan, I'll go to you. To me, this grand conspiracy investigation that Kash Patel has now opened a number of weeks ago. I think a lot of this is going to come down to whether or not what we refer to as the deep state, and there is one. And whether or not there were people within our government knowingly lying to the American people, spreading propaganda for the purposes of tipping an election to one side over the other. You can say, for example, the Russia hoax would be one example for 2016, but also the double standard with top secret classified information with Hillary or, of course, the the Russian disinformation dossier that Hillary Clinton paid for. Then you go to 2020, the laptop from hell. Fifty one former intel agents that knew nothing about that laptop. Boy, they all sounded like experts. Looks like Russian interference. None of them looked at it. And then you could take it to law fair in twenty twenty four. They they they went after Donald Trump with a vengeance so they could call him a convict. Mugshot him. They wanted to put him in jail. They never thought he would be able to beat the system. But this is this is a 10 year period of time that we're talking about here. Right. And it all started back in 2016. And it wasn't just to keep him from winning the election in 2016. It was to undermine his presidency after he had already won. I want you to think of three dates in the interim between Election Day and Inauguration Day back in 2016, 2017, December 9th. Obama calls a meeting in the White House. All the intelligence communities there, plus the Justice Department. You got Obama says we're not going to go with the intelligence community assessment. We're going to put that on hold. And they put together a new one. Three and a half weeks later, January 3rd, Chuck Schumer's on one of the Sunday shows. And he says, if you mess with the intelligence community, going talking to President-elect Donald Trump, if you mess with the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you. You take on the intelligence community. They have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. Three days later, Sean, three days later, January 6th at Trump Tower, the intelligence community, Comey, Brennan, Clapper go up there to give President Trump what he believes is the defensive briefing all incoming presidents get. So he's expecting just the normal briefing. Instead, it's a setup. They go up there and brief him and then they tell him the dossier that they already know is false. And then it gets leaked to the press and thereby giving it credibility when the press reports that Jim Comey, FBI director, briefed Donald Trump on the Russian dossier. It was all garbage, but it was all designed to undermine. This is where it began. The whole weaponization of government began here. And to your first point, Sean, you're right. We had figured this out several years ago and we're covering this. And the only thing we had wrong was it was worse than we thought. That's the only thing we get wrong when we dig into these investigations. It's always worse than we thought. OK, now there was that final moment. They had this meeting. I believe it was January 5th. And in just the final minutes of Obama's presidency, Susan Rice, that infamous memo by the book, Barack Obama said by the book, James Comey said by the book. Why would you write that weeks after a meeting only two minutes before Donald Trump's inaugurated Mark Meadows? Well, you would do it to try to change the narrative. And Jim was exactly right. They had spent the preceding days actually leaking to the press so that the press could write a story to actually create suspicion. And in doing so, they created the very story that supposedly they were giving a defensive briefing to the president about. Listen, they knew it would last. They're the best leakers in Washington, D.C. And then when they leak, they investigate their own leaks. And so this is what has got to stop. And hopefully it will. Jim. Good. Well, I was going to say by the book was just a C.Y.A. That's all they were doing. Everyone understands that. But this is what they did was a template because three weeks after they go up and try to set up President Trump on January 6th, 2017, three weeks later, they were successful with General Flynn. They go in and set him up. Remember, Comey testified later or spoke later at a big forum. He said, yeah, we knew it was a new administration. We should have called the White House counsel. But we thought we could get away with it. They set up Michael Flynn and took him out. Same playbook. That is why what Tulsi did, referring this to the Justice Department. God bless her and God bless the Justice Department. They should look into this as a conspiracy for what it is. Thank goodness Cassius said the same thing. This has to happen because this is where it all began. All right. The dynamic duo, Jim Jordan and Mark. Johnson told CBN that he found Gabbard's revelations deeply problematic. Presidential testimony before Congress is rarely sought and requests are often challenged due to separation of powers concerns. The two most recent former presidents to appear before Congress were Harry Truman in 1955 and Gerald Ford in 1983. There's a lot of allegations on the table. Our job is to go and follow each of those trails and to find out the truth. Johnson added. If you enjoy this content, please consider subscribing to my channel to stay up to date with future videos. Thank you for watching.