The Tartarian Hypothesis: Excerpts from Anacalypsis (1836) Saca, Saxons, Tartars - The First Kings

Howdy y'all, welcome back. My research commenced what feels like ages ago with the lost country or kingdom of Tartary or Tartaria. What began as simply seeing photographs of different castles and cities beyond my imagination and different palaces beyond my recognition and coming to the realization that these cities no longer existed today was really the fuel that started this fire into looking into the old world. Many of these cities themselves had been severely rebuilt after disasters that occurred throughout the 1800s and early 1900s and seeing the outcry of people who were interested in learning the truth and the comments of others, I decided to proceed with my own research and to produce my own videos on the subject. Now, over a year later and after 100 videos with you, we have looked through countless accounts of what we have labeled the old world, cities that have shaped the history of mankind and buildings which redefine our understanding of architecture and yet, one thing we do not and seemingly will not have is an answer to how all these things are related. When we look into the ancient history of these buildings, especially of the infrastructure of these ancient cities, one thing comes to mind for me right off the bat and that is a CIA document that was released to the public in recent years but the document itself comes to us from right after World War II. It details how the Soviet Union was rewriting the history of a land known as Tartary. At one time, this was a massive disclosure which led many of us to strive for further proofs of this lost empire. However, that document, in my opinion, is just a small morsel or crumb compared to the overarching narrative which is being hidden behind closed doors. With that in mind, in today's video, we will be looking at Anakalypsis by Godfrey Higgins. More specifically, we will be focusing on Chapter 1 of this immense work, which I will read you a excerpt from. Before that, however, I'd like to show you how this might just be one of the most important books you will read this year and how the information contained within can provide you not only with a better perspective, a clearer view, but also, with its thousands of references contained, will establish a basis for you to further your research on Tartary and the ancient world. But first, let us establish what Anakalypsis is. Written in the early 1800s and all but completed in 1833, but not published until 1836, Anakalypsis is essentially the history of the world as decoded and written over a 20-year period of research by religious historian Godfrey Higgins. Godfrey Higgins was born in Great Britain and passed away in 1833 while still meticulously researching and working on the Anakalypsis. Some would say that his death could be attributed to his research and plans to distribute this work. Higgins is written as being an antiquarian, a reformist, and also a chosen chief, or the highest-ranking member of the Order of Druids, as well as being a member of the original Druid Order. This becomes especially fascinating when we consider that Anakalypsis has over 1,000 references to earlier pre-1833 works. However, today, Anakalypsis is considered by modern scientists and modern historians to be pseudoscience and pseudohistory at best. Even though it does contain all of these citations, they are considered to be discredited by modern-day historians. In the work as a whole, Anakalypsis appears to have been tucked under the proverbial rug. Looking at Anakalypsis by the numbers, it is 1,436 pages long. The author, Godfrey Higgins, died in 1833 while still conducting research for the final chapters. The book, Anakalypsis in its entirety, was published in 1836, three years after Higgins' passing. It was published only in a very limited fashion, with 200 initial copies. According to the current narrative, Anakalypsis remained relatively unknown, as Godfrey Higgins was neither famous before his death nor was Anakalypsis initially well-received. However, at some point, depending on the history you read and the accounts you believe, this hidden manuscript of Anakalypsis was found by a group of scholars who would use the principles contained within to develop the Theosophical Society headed by one Helena Blavatsky in 1875. Their new belief or religion, known as Theosophy, in a nutshell states that the world is run by a sort of deceptive shadow state which looks to deviate people from the true hidden knowledge. This knowledge being once widespread all around the world, controlled now by spiritual adepts who contain the knowledge and are sometimes referred to as Ascended Masters. In the late 1870s, when Theosophy began to gather a small cult following, Anakalypsis was finally published for a second time, albeit in highly reduced numbers and edited for content. Anakalypsis was then reprinted in 1927 and again for a final official printing in 1965, when 500 copies were printed for the United States and 500 for Britain, respectively. This marks a total of 1,500 to 1,900 official copies of Anakalypsis ever being printed. However, in the age of the internet, this manuscript has become more readily available, and I will provide a full link to this unedited version of this book down below. Tying this back into Tartary, the title, Anakalypsis, literally means the analyzation of the upcoming apocalypse, also known by the author Higgins as lifting the veil. Our author goes through a who's who of the myths, the religions, and the characters within, to present us with an essentially irrefutable argument about the nature of such things as language and religion itself, and would you believe it, in Higgins' opinion, they all stem back to the ancient land of Tartary. The first chapter will make a great explanation of this, so let us get right into it. Book 1, Chapter 1, Saka, Saxons, Tartars. I shall, in this chapter, submit to my reader some observations relating to the ancient Sakai of Tartary or North India. These observations will be of importance in the discussion of the origin of letters, which will be contained in a future book, and also of the first importance in the two following books, the object of which will be to show that a real, not a poetical, age of gold, an age of learning, peace, and civilization once existed, and that this was under the rule of a sacerdotal caste or order which governed the whole world and which originated the feudal system. I shall also show that all of the sacred numbers and cycles were intimately connected with, and indeed partly arose out of, a microcosmic theory named by Plato and his Timaeus, which was a part of the secret doctrine of Genesis, and the whole of this, I shall also show, was intimately connected with, the feudal system. I fear the extracts from Georgias will be found by many of my readers to be tedious, but as proofs of my system from an unwilling witness, they are of the first importance and cannot be dispensed with. We have seen, Volume 1, page 153, that one of the most common names of Buddha was Sakya, the name of the Lama of Tibet, and Saka or Sakasa. From this name of Buddha, it was that the tribes who inhabited an extensive country east of the Caspian Sea and north of Tibet were called Sakai, Vide, Ptolemy. This was the hive whose castes are yet found in the west, called Saxons, having, as Dr. Gaudet says, the Hebrew language amongst them. They were the Belgic Sousans of Gaul. They were called Sousan by the Welsh, Sakon by the Scotch, and Sassanach or Saxonach by the Irish. They are the people said to be the same as the Scythians. Dr. Scheller maintains that the whole of Europe was occupied by the Saxons before the arrival of the Celts, but they were, in fact, both tribes of the same people. Scythians, Celts, Saxons, were successive castes or swarms from the same hive. If there were any difference, it was merely in the time of their arrival to the west. But it is probable that they were only different names for the same people, as the Brightons are called English, Scotch, Welsh, Albanians, Caledonians, Cambrians, etc., etc. The difference in their dialects is only what one would naturally expect to arise in unwritten languages in the space of four to five hundred years. They were castes or swarms sent out in succession from a great and excessively populous hive in Tartary or North India, the country of a thousand cities as written by Strabo. They were exactly like the tribes that are sent out in Britain in modern times. They were the subjects of the only civilized nation on the earth. They took with them, everywhere, their manners, their government, their language, their religion, and their allegiance to their supreme head, just as our colonies all retain their allegiance to their mother country. They at first, nowhere, found any of their own high caste, none in fact but such persons as we find in America, indigenous. They met with no resistance, however, but by degree, as the world became more peopled with the successors of the previous tribes of their own countrymen and the land became scarce, wars for possession began to arise. And thus, the feudal system was born. The word Saka is the same as the Hebrew word skah. Once came the word skill, wisdom. Saka means sacks or sakhul, skill, cunning, knowledge, science, or wisdom. The word Saka also has great influence over ancient Greek dialect as well. The word is often confounded with the Greek word for wisdom and the Siakom, as written about by Georgius, is probably the Saka Akin. I have no doubt that the root sk is in fact the same as the Hebrew sk. Whence comes the Latin sagio, a witch, the English sage, the Roman officer called a sagart, who was the sacrificer, and the Hebrew sagon, the assistant or advisor of the high priest. From this early Hebrew, we also have the name Skalet, the name given to Joseph in Egypt and the meaning of which was wise man. Joseph was called a savior and this word is the same as Salus, Saludes, Vitae book 10 chapter 5 section 6. The barbarian who marched from the north and plundered Jerusalem was a Scythian or Tatar or Tartar. He was called Shesak. This is nothing but Saxon or Saxona. Tat is another name for Buddha. Muhammad was called a Saka or Sakaswara. These are all merely descriptive epitaphs and from the fact named above, we find the reason why the Muslims spared the statues of Buddha in India. It strongly confirms the doctrine of the secret religion of the Muslims, stating that Muhammad was thought to be a renewed incarnation of divine wisdom and of course of Buddha himself in his 10th avatar. In the time of the pharaohs, the Egyptians had a class of person called a sage or a wise man. Considering that Saka means Buddha, the god of wisdom, I cannot much doubt that the Irish, Sagan, a priest, the Scandinavian, Saga, and the Hebrew, Sagan, noble or great man, are all one in the same. The Sagan or Sagan Kohenia was the highest position in the ancient world. The Kohenia or Kohena was the Hebrew word for priest, a Kohen, and it is not unlikely that the Kaons, who are said by the Indians and the Persians to have erected the Druidical circles, had their names derived from this word. I think it also probable that the Kohen had a near relation to the Kaan. There is scarcely a corner of the globe where the doctrines of this wisdom may not, as a mythos, be found. My learned friend, Usebe de Sauverte, has clearly proved that, by the Sagas of the Scandinavians, the books of wisdom are men, the word Saga being the same as the French Sagae and the Latin Saga. From the same author on page 395, it appears that the Razanay or Razanu can be nothing but the children of Raz or the children of wisdom. Thus, it is evident that to speak of the Sakai or the Saxons was the same as to speak of the Buddhists. It was a general name, just as today we call many sects of Catholics and Protestants, Christians. From this, the Sakai's ancient books were called Sakas or Sagas, as we call the books of the Indians Vidas or Bidas or Buddhas or books of wisdom. This all agrees very well with the learned language of Kashmir or Kashmir having been Chaldi. It accounts for Dr. G'day having found that exact language to be ancient Hebrew. The Norwegian kings were called Hakim. This is but Hakim or the Hebrew Hakim and the substitute for the Jewish high priest was a Sagin or Sagan. Closely allied to these is the Hebrew root word Kasp, an enchanter. Kasp is literally two words meaning sp or wise and k as in a wise person. Anciently, all of the Sakin or Sagin or priests were all considered to be physicians and they were known collectively as Hakim, as physicians are yet called in the East. But this word, always conveyed with it a sacredness of character. This is all in keeping with their gods, Odin, Wodin, Thor, with the Buddhas, Trigiranyos in Wales and the Old Man Buddha in Scotland. All of these came with the first or second tribe of Saxons to the north of Germany and to Great Britain. Strabo says all the tribes eastward of the Caspian Sea are called Scythic. The Dai, next to the sea. The Sakai, more eastward. But every tribe has a particular name. All are nomadic. It is inattention to this which causes all of our confusion. We have here in Britain, the clans of Scotland and the tribes of the Bedouin Arabs. The Sakai, pronounced in Sanskrit like our Sakhai, have made in Asia, eruptions, similar to those of the Sumerians. Thus, they possessed themselves of Bactria and the district of Armenia, called after them, Sakasina. This word, I believe, is actually Saka-ana, country of the Sakas. I have no doubt that when nomadic tribes were driven out of the lands which they loosely settled, they passed, just like the Israelites from Egypt, through countries occupied by other tribes, in search of new habitations till they could go no further. Then, in a struggle, they took possession of the extreme country. Thus, Saxons arrived in Germany and in Britain from countries the most remote. Tartary. And that just about wraps up chapter 1 of Anakalypsis. Now, if you enjoyed that, definitely hit that thumbs up button. And following that, I would love to hear from you in the comments down below. This was one of my most intriguing videos, especially for me to make, just because reading through the work of Anakalypsis, I found so many references to things that I have already discussed in my videos. And I found it very profound to understand that someone nearly 200 years ago was making the same connections that we are making today, and his work seemingly was silenced up until this time. So, I'm just happy to be able to uncover this and rediscover this and to be able to share it with you. And I would love to hear your opinion about it down below. If anything specific within this video, within this narrative, stood out to you, definitely leave a timestamp down below. We can check that part of the video together. We can discuss it in the comments. And furthermore, if you want to reach out to me or support the channel, you can do so here. But for now, I'm going to wrap up the video. We'll discuss this a lot deeper in part two. Please leave your most intriguing thoughts and ideas in the comments section down below. And I look forward to catching up with you on the next one. Cheers!