一戰/二戰/冷戰/現代軍事 解析美國陸軍超輕型叢林偵查編制

這是Polaris M RZR 像它那樣的車輛 可能是美國軍隊的輕型兵器的未來 Hawaii的美軍25th Infantry Division 正在測試新的超級輕型兵器概念 將輕型兵器的關鍵優勢 偷襲和玩在荒地上 我獲得了一些新資訊 關於這個概念 從空軍士兵測試 但是我們會再回到 首先 這個概念會添加什麼 美國輕型兵器隊 目前有兩個主要元素 一種是機動元素 包括兩個公司規模的軍隊 安裝在Humvee 帶有少量脫離裝備的軍官 以及一種脫離裝備的元素 代表一隊軍隊 這提供了一種混合的機動軍官 能夠快速地覆蓋地面 並帶來重型武器 同時還有脫離裝備的軍官 能夠進行強勢探測 潛入 運作在複雜的地面 和人類脫離裝備的觀察站 超廣角概念 並沒有被規定為 一個完整的替代 對於重型輕型車輛 如同Humvee 但更多是一個增加 脫離裝備的軍官 在機動元素中 25號軍隊測試 使用了四座 Polaris M-Razor 和Polaris Dagger 理論上可以坐在 八座或九座 裝備在雙平臺上 是不存在的 而火力是限於 乘客的個人武器 或未來的裝備MGs 如果美國軍隊的輕型車輛 接受了這個概念 他們甚至不會是 美國最先進的 重型軍事組織 美國海軍 偵察部隊 就是海軍的 輕型特殊偵察部隊 使用了M-Razor 超過半個世紀 理論上是 裝載脫離裝備的軍官 在強勢的超廣角車輛 分別從Humvee 讓他們能夠開車 在路上 在粗糙的地面 無法被發現 能夠在粗糙的地面上 開啟範圍 敵人可能不認為 能夠擁有 並能夠提供更多的覆蓋 從直接觀察 一個關鍵的例子 是二十五號軍事部隊 是與 印度太平洋相連 有著 大量的森林 所以在地面上玩耍 是非常重要的 雖然純粹脫離裝備的軍官 有更低的標誌 而且能夠操作 在更粗糙的地面上 超廣角車輛的速度 能夠讓軍官 能夠達到他們的目標 在更有時間的方式 可能進入敵人的地區 使用盾牌 這不僅會增加 時間和空間 之間的友善力量 和敵人接觸 但也會開啟 否則隱藏的 後面區域目標 例如敵人的指揮和控制 盾牌和飛彈 到地面觀察 超廣角車輛 甚至可以避免 一些問題 未來的脫離裝備 重製隊伍將要面對 例如重量負擔 飛彈 電池 和其他有趣的裝備 例如可操作的 電子戰鬥系統 來擊敗敵人的 自己的飛彈 而這只是 新鮮的東西 相同的東西 也適用於經典裝備 例如砲彈 中型MG 雷電 和光學裝置 能夠在地面 避免的範圍內 在體系組織上 我會覆蓋 2022年的一個組織 和2023年的重製 兩項組織是由 3rd Platoon Blackfoot Troop of 3-4 Cavalry Mounted Cav Troop Part of the 25th Infantry Division's 3rd Brigade The other platoons in the troop retained a conventional motorized configuration with 50 cals and tow missiles The 2022 configuration was referenced in this armor article written by the platoon leader at the time But I've personally gotten further clarification from another soldier in the platoon Initially, the platoon retained a regular scalp platoon structure There was a platoon HQ with two humvees one for the PL and one for the platoon sergeant Alpha Section had one of the larger Polaris daggers and one humvee While Bravo Section replaced one of their humvees with a four-seat Polaris M-Razor They were given one of each type of vehicle to determine which one the squadron should purchase more of The PL described it as a split-section concept The Polaris vehicles would basically get the dismounted scouts to within 75 meters of their dismounted observation post While the humvees referred to as gun trucks occupied a support-by-fire position 250 meters to the rear Once in contact the dismounted scouts would retrograde back to the gun trucks which would engage the enemy infantry They then used the ultralight vehicles to occupy a secondary site so as to continue observing the enemy Following that initial period the platoon received a second dagger but kept the M-Razor The platoon leader traded their humvee for the M-Razor and the sections dropped their humvees to be mounted in one dagger each The platoon sergeant's humvee also gained a trailer to rectify sustainment issues In terms of personnel this platoon was actually running under strength So while the doctrinal platoon has 24 soldiers they only had 16 In the M-Razor sat the PL and a three-man team which could man an M-240 Lima Medium MG or a Javelin Anti-Tank Guided Missile System In practice usually only the M-240 was taken out unless the platoon was occupying a static position for long periods or there was an armor threat In the humvee sat the platoon sergeant driver gunner for the M-250 Cal and medic With the other humvees put out to pasture the platoon sergeant's vehicle would also be the platoon's most substantial fire support platform In each section the daggers sat the section leader and three scouts They manned an M-249 Carl Gustav Recoilless Rifle An M-110 Designated Marksman Rifle I've been told that unlike the Javelin these weapons were carried at all times They actually originally had an M-240 instead of an M-249 But it encumbered the section too much especially with the lack of an assisting gunner The section leader and Carl Gustav Gunner would carry rounds for the Carl G While the DMR guy carried the laser target locator module a multipurpose sensor including a laser rangefinder cameras, magnetic compass and an anti-spoof GPS as well as a PAS-35 which is an infrared imager for mounting on weapons Generally, when the scouts dismounted and the vehicles were left at a hide site the passengers of the platoon sergeant's humvee it would act as a security element This would not eat into the scout section's manpower which is fairly critical because the platoon only had 8 dismounted scouts Although the dagger can theoretically seat 8 or 9 they were only employing the seats up front Their daggers lacked roll bars over the bed in the back where those additional 4 would sit so it would probably be unsafe to do so But if the roll bar attachment was procured two daggers could fit the doctrinal 24-man platoon potentially at the expense of bed space for gear In practice, the understrength platoon could man one long-term dismounted observation post which are OPs manned for 12 hours or longer or multiple short-term OPs Same as the regular motorized scout platoon But if the platoon was at full strength with 24 troopers they theoretically have superior dismount strength due to not needing to leave a skeleton cruise to man vehicles when stationary In terms of trade-offs, the advantages of this equipment are lower signature than a Humvee, superior mobility in denser terrain, and potentially more dismount strength if manning is equal. With a lower signature and better mobility, the vehicles could get the scouts closer to the enemy than a Humvee, and quicker than purely dismounted scouts. However, the ultralight platoon also has less combat power than the motorized scout platoon with its Humvees, and they lack protection from even light small arms fire. So fighting for information, which involves destroying the enemy's reconnaissance and possibly advanced guards to observe the main body is probably off the table even against light forces. They would probably also be vulnerable to counter reconnaissance efforts in a similar way to dismounted CAV troops if discovered. Rather than forceful recon methods, the ultralights would focus on infiltration behind enemy lines, stealthy dismounted recon in support of the mounted CAV, setting up ambushes, and traversing the harsh terrain of the Indo-Pacific. How this will fit in the Army 2030 reform, I don't know. Even if the test unit recommends it for general adoption, doesn't mean the doctrine proponents will agree, and it could stay a localized technique specific to the 25th's jungle warfare reputation, but it could also augment select light units in the future. If you want to look at other countries' cavalry, check out this video on why the French use light scout cars to support their tanks. I'll see you over there.