The Ultimate RECESSION INDICATOR: Financing Fast Food...

Global Finance News
9 followers
#finance
#financenews
You know people are broke when DoorDash and Klarna feel the need to partner up and offer the opportunity to buy now pay later for food deliveries. If the economy was in good shape, this would never happen as people would easily be able to afford these services.
The other day I saw a funny comment that said,
Michael I'm disappointed in you.
This video is not depressing enough.
Well don't worry, I got you covered with this one
because there's lots of depressing stuff
in this video. You know,
the goal is never to make anybody depressed
by sharing this information with you.
But, I can see how
some people would interpret it that way
because a lot of it isn't really
that good. But, it is the
reality. So, how I
handle reality is
live in it and try to
navigate it as best as possible
rather than run away from it
and pretend it's not happening and let it
make me sad. But anyways,
it was funny nonetheless. Here's something
for you guys. Klarna, which
is the Buy Now Pay Later company,
they just decided to do an integration
and a partnership with
DoorDash. Well, if anybody knows what
DoorDash is, DoorDash is
a food delivery service kind of like
Uber Eats. So, what this is going to do
is it's going to offer DoorDash
customers options to
be able to pay for their food
deliveries and installments. And
it will increase the convenience
of people who are using these services.
You know, that's just what we've all been waiting for, isn't it?
Like, we've all just needed this for the
longest time. How did we ever order
food and get it delivered to our
house without even lifting a finger
or leaving our front door?
How did we ever do that without installment
payments? This signals two things.
One, that people
who are going to use this are likely going
to abuse it and spend even more
recklessly than they already are now.
And two, it signifies
how much financial
difficulties most people already have.
Because why else would they need to offer
something like this, right?
You can already pay on all these food
delivery apps with a credit card,
so why do you need to do something like Buy Now
Pay Later? Well, according to Klarna,
and they actually do have somewhat of a fair point
on this, which I'll get to in a minute, is that
using Buy Now Pay Later
is actually cheaper and better
than using a credit card. But the reason
why this matters is because
more and more Americans are already
struggling with soaring credit
card balances, which increases
the risk of defaults, and the
defaults on all kinds of debt have
been on the rise. And so what this
is doing is it's giving DoorDash
customers basically a
couple options. You can pay
with four interest-free installments,
or you can postpone
payments to a later date.
So here's a newsflash, guys.
If you are ordering $40 worth of
food on DoorDash,
and you need to put it on Buy Now Pay Later,
you are so far
away from being able to afford that.
And that is just really sad, to be
honest, that people are even resorting
to this. But, on the other
hand, which is kind of one of the points
that Klarna makes, isn't it better
to use a service
that's not going to charge you interest because
it's four interest-free installments
versus, you know,
you put it on the credit card and you miss the payment
or you have a lot of other debt racked up on
the credit card, and now you're getting charged
25% interest each month
on that $40 worth of food.
So from that point of view, I
actually agree with Klarna.
It is a more consumer-
friendly way to pay,
but it's not a good habit or
trend to get into. But the reality is,
guys, if you need to put your meal on layaway,
then things aren't doing too
good right now, both for you
and for a lot of others, because otherwise
why would they be implementing this?
Clearly they see a need for this in the
marketplace. DoorDash
and Klarna are seeing that, oh yeah,
we can probably increase our sales
volume if we do this because
we're just going to make it so that more people
who can't really afford to be ordering
food are able to do so. Somebody
wrote on X that this isn't even a
recession indicator, this is
we're about to have a second Great Depression
indicator. And I think a lot
of people who watch my channel agree
with that sentiment. But here's what
Klarna has to say about it. Because there
is no interest, our business model relies
on customers repaying us on time
unlike credit cards,
so we conduct a thorough eligibility
check before approving
a purchase. And if a customer
misses a payment, we restrict
their use of our services, something
credit card companies don't do
as they profit from late and revolving
payments. Now I don't know
if that's true because I have never used
a buy now pay later service ever in
my life. So anybody
out there who has done this, you can
tell me if that's actually how it works.
But if that is the case,
I would have to agree that it is better than
using a credit card even though
the idea behind it
is still just as sinister. You're still
buying things you can't really afford. But
if Klarna is serious and they actually
restrict their use of
Klarna services if people miss payments,
then that's an incentive to
have good behavior and continue
to make your payments on time
and you're also not racking up
interest on those payments.
So those are two actual big
benefits over a credit card if you
ask me. That doesn't mean I
endorse that you should be doing this or
condone people
performing this type of behavior.
But if you have to choose
one or the other, I guess this is better.
According to Klarna, they say that
99% of our lending is repaid
and our losses are far
below credit card industry standards.
Customers who use buy now pay
later owe less and repay
more than credit card users.
The average Klarna customer owes us
about $100 and for credit
cards it's $7,236.
So fair
point. I agree. Maybe
buy now pay later is just getting a bad rep.
Maybe, you know, just
the idea like the way that it sounds
doesn't really sound very good, right?
If you have to buy something now
and pay for it later, that
implies that you don't actually have the money.
And honestly, I don't really understand why
anybody would do this if you did have the money.
It doesn't really make any sense.
And I actually find it very rare that I
agree with any of these corporations
and their business models of how they kind
of prey on people to make money.
But from everything I've read here,
this does sound good. But like
I said, guys, I have no first-hand experience
with it. I almost feel like trying
it just as an experiment here on the channel
just to show you guys. Although
I'm not going to miss a payment on purpose.
So that's not me. That's what I would like to
do. I would like to make a purchase
and miss a payment and see what happens
if I try to use Klarna again like
two or three days later to buy something else.
Would they approve that purchase or would
they deny me? Are they going to charge me an extra
late fee? Whatever. I don't know.
Let me know what you guys have seen with this.
Because generally, I have agreed with this sentiment.
This is a barometer of
true desperation. People who are
paying for their next meal and installments have
reached the end of the line. And that
may be the case. Maybe people who are
using this, like Klarna, is
omitting the fact that the average credit
card user owes over $7,000.
But maybe those
people are one and the same. That average
credit card user is no longer
putting money on the credit card because they're either
maxed out or they can't afford the payments
to go any higher. So they're using
Klarna instead. They could
be the same person. That's something that they didn't
disclose here. But obviously,
these companies stand to make money.
How are they making money
if no one pays any
interest or no one pays any late fees?
They're making money from somewhere.
Obviously, DoorDash is probably
giving them a cut of every transaction
that people use Klarna for.
And I'm sure that Klarna does
charge people something for not
paying on time or being late
or whatever. But the fact that people are needing
to do this now just to be able to get
a meal delivered to their house is pretty
depressing, if you ask me. I've been
finding it very fascinating to read
these different stories that
finally people are waking up and
realizing and looking at different signs
around the economy that, yeah, we are
in a recession or heading towards one.
And there was a recent one that
came out that was pretty interesting.
They said that, according to
a March survey of
Bank of America fund managers,
55% of them said they
saw a global recession triggered
by a trade war as
the top risk for the market right
now. And the number of consumers who
expected a recession in the next 12
months has spiked to a 9
month high, according to the
conference board's latest consumer
confidence survey. And as
you can see here, the recession expectations
is starting to climb back up. And it was
actually much higher back in
2023. The interesting thing is
you can look at this graph and see that those
expectations came way down
when supposedly the recession
never materialized. But
what really happened is the recession
started back in 2022
when we had those two negative quarters of
GDP. But the government
has been doing an excellent
job of disguising the situation
ever since. But now it looks
like they're at the end of the road and the
Trump administration is just going to rip off the
band-aid and expose everything for what it is.
So the next sign that we are in recessionary
times is that household finances
are deteriorating. Kind of in line
with the story we just talked about, huh?
Households are struggling to keep up with inflation.
Consumer spending also makes up
two-thirds of U.S. GDP.
So as the spending continues to slow down,
so will the GDP numbers.
And also the fact that you have
only 63% of American
households that can cover
a $2,000 emergency right now.
Also not very great. In fact,
take a look at this chart right here. This is
kind of revealing. This red line
on the top is the likelihood
of somebody being able to come up with
$2,000. It has kind of been
on a slow decline recently.
But the blue line at the bottom
is the number of people saying
they may need $2,000 for an
emergency is slowly on the
uptick. So little by little, the
amount of people who can afford that emergency
is deteriorating while
simultaneously the amount of people
who say they might need that money
is increasing. Not a great sign.
You throw that in with the fact that the
CPI today is 35%
higher than it was in 2015
and that's just the CPI
lie. So the real inflation
numbers have gone up well over
50% for most people
and what they buy in their everyday life.
And households in general have higher
debt burdens than ever because
the total household debt
rose $93 billion
over the fourth quarter of 2024
hitting a record
$18 trillion. Now the next sign
that we are in a recessionary time
is small and mid-cap stocks
are doing poorly. Those types
of stocks have been struggling and
the reason why that is a sign of a recession
is because small to mid-cap
stocks are highly sensitive to economic
changes. The iShares
S&P Small Cap 600
ETF is down 16%
from its peak in November
and the S&P Mid Cap 400
is down 13%
from its high in November.
The next sign of recession, more
companies are warning of weaker earnings.
I have done several dedicated
videos on these topics
in the last few weeks.
Domino's was a big one,
Target was a big one,
FedEx just got hit with weaker
earnings, their stock price went down.
In fact, about 70% of
companies that have reported earnings
this season have cited uncertainty
around new policies
and the tariffs as one reason
the outlook could be negative this year.
Now here's the next reason we could be facing
recession. The bond market
is pricing in more risk.
Credit spreads, which measure the difference
between the yield on corporate bonds over
a benchmark like the U.S. Treasuries
have risen substantially
in the last month. This reflects
investors pricing in higher
risk that a corporate borrower could struggle
to pay back debt. As of the end
of 2024, U.S. firms
had a 9.2% chance of
defaulting on their debt
which is the highest risk of default
since the great financial crisis.
Well that's pretty alarming
and obviously companies shouldn't be
at risk of defaulting on their debt
unless they were doing pretty poorly, right?
Unless their earnings were down, their sales are down
business is not good.
Am I getting depressing enough for you yet?
Just let me know. I can dig deeper if I need to.
In fact, the worry of corporate
default on debt right now
is so large. Take a look at this chart
guys going back to pre-pandemic
that the corporate default
risk is actually higher today
than it was at the peak of the pandemic.
How is that even possible?
When we had a global shutdown
the entire economy was
completely in an unknown state. Nobody
knew what was going to happen tomorrow.
And actually the risk of corporate
debt default is higher today than it was
then. That is mind-blowing.
And some of you guys really listen to
the things I say on this channel
because one of my viewers remembered
that a few weeks back I
mentioned that I went up to Palm Coast
here in Florida
so that way my wife could get
a new driver's license because
we tried to do it here in Miami
and this was back in January
that we looked for an appointment
at the DMV here and the next
available appointment wasn't until the end of March.
So at least two months later
two and a half months later in order
to get an appointment at the local DMV
here in Miami. Absolutely ridiculous.
And they won't do walk-ins. Well now
the new Miami-Dade tax collector
just uncovered the reason
for this and they are kind of pulling
the same scam as the
ticket master scams. So
just like when you go to buy concert tickets
you know concert tickets they come out
they just got released at 12 noon right
and then by 1201
all of them are sold out or 90% of them
are sold out. How is that possible?
Because all of the bots are
buying up all of those concert
tickets and then putting them up for
resale for a profit.
Which should be illegal. And why that's
not illegal yet I have no idea.
Well it turns out they're doing the same thing
here now with DMV appointments.
At least in South Florida. I haven't heard of
this happening anywhere else. If you guys have
let me know. But this is a new thing
because the last time we had to go to the DMV
here in Miami it was a non-issue.
You could just go. You didn't even need an
appointment. But what's happening is
people can't get appointments at the DMVs
down here in South Florida and
companies and people are scooping up
time slots and then selling them
for up to $250 a piece.
I mean that is just so wrong on so
many different levels. And the Miami-Dade Tax
Collector they discovered this because
their software reportedly showed
that single phone numbers were linked
to multiple appointments and
those phone numbers were linked to various
companies. And when you run the
report you see that one phone number
has like 100 appointments
booked up with the DMV.
So they started looking into that and the
system red flagged it. So
why does the system even allow people to make
100 appointments with the same information or phone
number? I have no idea. That's a
loophole that needs to be fixed on their end as
well. But also people like this
need to be punished. Because as
of right now holding multiple appointments
with the DMV is not
illegal. But now that people are taking
advantage of others by doing
this they're proposing an ordinance that
would actually fine people
or put somebody in jail who's doing this
and the next hearing on this is
supposed to be April 1st. So we'll see
if this passes. I don't see why
it wouldn't. But you know it's absolutely insane guys
to be in a situation where you
can't get a DMV appointment for two
and a half months and we had to drive
300 miles away
or whatever it is to get an appointment.
So hopefully they fix this soon
but also just because they implement a new law
enforcing it is a whole other thing
so we'll see. Luckily I don't think
either one of us is going to be having to go to the DMV
anytime soon again. Here's something depressing
if you own a Tesla because
one of my other viewers sent me this story
saying that if you own a Tesla
it could soon be uninsurable.
I remember a year or two ago
there was another type of vehicle
that was a really hot item
that was being stolen left and right
I can't remember what kind of car it was
but basically insurance
companies were dropping people that own
these cars because they were such
a hot ticket for car
theft. Well now Teslas
are in the same position because people
are damaging Teslas left and right
on purpose, they're spray painting them
they're setting them on fire, even
shooting at them. So the increase in
vandalism towards Tesla vehicles
is causing insurance
carriers to increase premiums
on people that own these vehicles
and this is happening in Germany
the UK, other places
like that as well. And this is coming
at a time when
Tesla vehicle values are also
dropping. We talked about this a couple of weeks
ago where you know
you can see a 16% drop
in searches for used Teslas
right now and a 28%
increase in demand for
non-Tesla EVs. And also
the Tesla Model 3
is the car that has lost the
most value out of all the EVs
over the past year. And they say that Teslas
are already one of the most expensive vehicles
to insure just behind brands
like Bentley, Lamborghini and
Rolls Royce. So they're up there with
expensive insurance premiums
and this is actually going to make it worse.
They say that the average annual cost
for full coverage Tesla insurance
on a Tesla Model 3
rose by 30% in
2024 to
$4,362
which is 25%
higher than a comparable
Mercedes-Benz A-Class.
The Cybertruck annual estimated
insurance on average is about
$3,800 so not much better. And I'm
not going to say anything else about it. I'm just
reporting the facts guys. People don't like to hear
the facts. People get all upset. People
get offended with
brand loyalty because you're a Tesla driver
or whatever. They don't want to hear
these stories. But the reality is
these things are happening. People don't want the
cars. People are upset with Elon Musk.
People are damaging the cars
on purpose. And now just driving
one makes you a target. Which I
think is wrong. I'm not even happy to
hear that. I'm not a fan of electric
vehicles. But I don't think people
should be vandalizing other people's cars
that have nothing to do with the situation.
It's not fair to the
people that own the vehicle and
obviously it's going to hurt everybody
because it's not just going to be
Tesla insurance rates that go
up. It's going to be insurance rates in general
that are going to rise in areas
where the vandalism is prevalent. That's
how insurance companies work guys. They will
increase premiums for the entire
neighborhood or the entire zip code
if there's a lot of incidents.
So really all people are doing
is hurting themselves and everybody else
around them by doing
shenanigans like this. If you're not happy
with Tesla, you're not happy with Elon Musk,
don't buy the car. You don't have to
punish somebody else that decided
to get one. And all these depressing stories
were pretty much inspired by you guys
because almost everything I'm sharing with you today
was sent to me in an email by at least
somebody who watches. Here's another one.
Scott sent me this story from Reddit
about this real estate agent
that believes that they are entitled to
all of this money for a
house that went unsold. Take a look at
this. This guy listed a property
for sale eight months ago
with this real estate agent
and they both agreed
on what the selling price should be
after the agent ran her analysis
which is usually kind of rare
because most of the time the seller
wants it to be higher than what the real
estate agent says it will be. At least that was my
experience. So now fast forward eight
months later we have not had a single
offer on the house and the real
estate agent wants him to either
take a loss to sell the property
or she wants to cancel the contract
and she was going to send him
a bill of $26,000
for her cost and her time
everything that she's poured into this
property and she's billing him at
$280 an hour.
This guy says I'm not canceling the contract
and I'm not paying you anything
since the contract is for
a commission job and
now she's insulting the property
saying how it's not worth much and
the owner fought back and said
listen you did your analysis and you agreed with
the price and you listed it
at this price saying that this was a good
deal and the owner says he's already cut the
price on the house once and now
she wants him to cut the price by another
30% and he says the
contract expires in July and
does not contain anything that mentions
me paying her anything if the property
does not sell. Now the owner of this
house is correct. He doesn't have
to pay her anything. So what she's
doing is trying to extort
the owner and kind of like
you know use scare tactics of
some sort to try to get him to pay
which clearly is not going to work
and honestly any agent that's caught doing
something like this should lose their license
because this is wrong on so many
levels. You're not even allowed to do stuff like
this and yes in
our listing agreement contracts there are
cancellation fees that are clearly
outlined in that contract
but that only applies if you cancel.
If you don't cancel the listing and
you just leave the house for sale
and run it until the contract
is over you're not going to be liable for anything
as the owner. So you never want
to cancel a listing especially
if the cancellation fee is
high because then you could be on the hook
for paying that and if you don't pay it then the broker
can actually sue you and take you to court
for that money. The likelihood of that happening
probably pretty low. But this story
is very interesting, not really that
depressing, more funny than anything
mainly because the seller
and the real estate agent were so
far off base on what they
believe the house is going to sell for.
I mean look at what she said at the end there
like we want to lower your house price now
by an additional 30%
to get it sold. Think about it guys
30% that's pretty much
by how much the entire housing
market is overvalued by right now.
In general the U.S.
housing market is overvalued by about
30% and if prices just
came down tomorrow 30%
then that would mean home prices
are pretty much fairly valued
compared to what people make and what incomes
are today. So the fact that
they both missed that
and the fact that they were both that far
off base of how much the house
was worth is a joke. It's one
thing for the owner to think that the
house is worth a lot more than it is because they don't
do real estate for a living. They're
not out there seeing what every single
house is selling for and seeing what buyers
and sellers are saying but
for the real estate agent to miss that
is extremely unprofessional
and this person should never work again.
So feel free to send me all your depressing stories
they just might make it into the next video
and if you enjoyed this video
make sure you are subscribed to the channel
and if you don't want to wait for my next
video to come out check out this one on the screen
right over here and I'll see you
in the next one.
