CAN'T DECELERATION Blue Origin revealed Why New Glenn Booster Landing Failed...

CAN'T DECELERATION Blue Origin revealed Why New Glenn Booster Landing Failed...
===
#greatspacex #elonmusk #spacex #nasa #starship
==
Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: [email protected]
===
SpaceX Starship SN
Be the first to sponsor us Thank you.
https://www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?fan_landing=true
===
CAN'T DECELERATION Blue Origin revealed Why New Glenn Booster Landing Failed...
What went wrong with Blue Origin’s New Glenn booster during its landing attempt?
Blue Origin has finally revealed the cause of the failure, shedding light on what happened and its implications for the company’s future—especially in the race against SpaceX.
Let’s dive into the details in today’s episode of Great SpaceX!

After numerous delays, Blue Origin’s determination to launch New Glenn was evident. The debut flight began with great success—reaching orbit and deploying the payload. However, the outcome took a drastic turn when the booster’s landing attempt failed. While the launch was a triumph, the booster’s status quickly became unknown, and it was later confirmed to have been lost.
CAN'T DECELERATION Blue Origin revealed Why New Glenn Booster Landing Failed...
This outcome, though disappointing, was not entirely unexpected. Landing a booster on a droneship on its first flight is an extraordinarily challenging feat. But the question still lingers: what exactly went wrong?
Recently, a detailed analysis has provided a plausible explanation for the failure. According to the findings, the booster failed to execute a successful landing burn, which impacted both deceleration and navigation. As a result, the booster collided with the ocean at high speed. This breakdown likely involved multiple systems, including the engine, the control system, and operational procedures during landing.
CAN'T DECELERATION Blue Origin revealed Why New Glenn Booster Landing Failed...
Let’s start with the engines. The seven BE-4 engines performed admirably during the initial phase of the flight, helping to propel the rocket into space. However, toward the end of the mission, they failed to deliver the necessary performance. Some engines may have been damaged due to high temperatures and pressures, a common risk for complex systems like the BE-4, which features an intricate upper structure with many delicate components. Given the stress placed on these engines, this failure wasn’t entirely surprising.
Next, the control system may have been at fault. It's possible that the connection was poorly established, preventing the landing burn command from being properly executed. Some speculate that this miscommunication caused the BE-4’s landing burn to be 15 seconds shorter than planned, a crucial loss that would have severely affected deceleration and hindered the booster’s ability to slow down in time for a safe landing.

----
We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines: https://www.youtube.com/intl/en/about/copyright/fair-use/
Any questions about copyright please send us via Gmail: [email protected]
To be resolved, thank you.