Return to Office Will Change the Housing Market (Not How You'd Think)

Money Mansions
1 follower
Over the last couple of months,
we've seen a lot of major employers
call employees back to the office full time.
But the data also tells us
that employees are reluctant to return
and there are a lot of hybrid situations developing as well.
What does this mean for the future of work
and how does this translate to demand for housing
and for apartments in the areas
that there are a lot of offices?
Today's expert shares his insights.
Hey friends, welcome to On The Market,
the real estate news and economic shows
for investors and real estate professionals like you.
Today, I'm here with Matt Reedy,
a director of commercial real estate economics
with Moody's Analytics.
Matt's research has led him to an insight
around a specific type of office property
that is still performing really well.
And I'm also super excited to talk to Matt
about how the activity in the office sector
is translating to demand for residential properties.
And I'm not just talking about residential multifamily
and what's going on there.
I'm just talking about how this is changing
where people want to live.
For generations, people wanted to live close
to where they were working.
The pandemic upended all of that
and the return to office trends have implications
for whether the shift to the suburbs is going to continue
or we'll start to see more demand back in downtown areas.
We'll get into that and a lot more
in my conversation with Matt.
So let's bring him on.
Matt, welcome to On The Market.
Thanks for being here.
Thanks, Dave.
Happy to be here.
I'm excited to talk to you
about this return to office situation going on
because we've been hearing about this for years.
You know, ever since the pandemic started to wind down,
you know, two years ago,
people have been saying return to office is happening
but it sort of feels like it happens in fits and starts
like where there's just like a wave
and then you don't hear about it for a while
but it feels kind of like we're in a wave.
There have been a lot of pretty high profile companies
have been calling people back to the office recently.
So what do you make of that?
Is that actually happening or is that more just headlines?
Let's start there.
Well, I mean, yes, I think it is happening or will happen.
A lot of the policies that have been announced
from companies like Amazon, you know,
don't take effect until after the new year.
So they haven't quite started going back
into the office full-time yet
but even with the announcements that you hear,
the majority of companies out there are still settling in
on a hybrid type of structure
where they're in the office two to three days a week.
Okay, and you said it will keep happening.
Why do you say that with such confidence?
Well, I just think the further we get away
from the pandemic, the more companies are going to push
to try and get people back into the office.
It seems to be that a lot of CEOs,
for one reason or another,
like to have people in the office
and there are obviously some benefits
of being in one collaborative working space
and being able to just pop your head
into the next cubicle or the next office to ask a question.
So will we continue to see where all companies go
to five days a week in the office?
No, I think the hybrid work structure is here to stay.
Got it, okay.
And I think just for our listeners,
this has a lot of implications for real estate.
I think in two primary ways.
The first is office utilization.
We've heard a lot about how offices have been vacant,
values have been plummeting.
That's have all these sort of secondary implications
for downtowns and cities.
The other thing is that over the last couple of years,
we've seen the suburbs really explode
in terms of demand for housing,
both single family homes and for rentals
because people are less tethered
to these historic economic centers
like San Francisco, New York, Chicago,
all these, LA, all these places.
So I wanna explore each of those, Matt,
but I think let's just start
with a more direct implication, which is office space.
Have we seen an uptick in office utilization
because of these policies?
We have, and there's several different sources out there
for office utilization data
and they measure and record things different ways.
Some measure it by badge swipes or security badge swipes.
When you enter the building,
some use cell phone tracking information
to pinpoint the data.
By most metrics, we're at post-pandemic highs
for utilization.
Now that said, it's still well below
where we were prior to the pandemic overall.
And Matt, what about, you know,
those are sort of measurements of leased office space.
How often is it getting used?
But are we seeing an uptick in occupancy of offices?
Yeah, we've seen positive absorption
for the last month or two,
which is where more office space becomes occupied
than becomes vacant.
So we have seen a little bit of an uptick there.
Vacancy hit, in our data, hit an all-time high
at just over 20% in third quarter.
In October, ticked back down just a little bit,
but we are sitting at all-time highs
or very near all-time highs in office vacancy.
Got it, okay.
And what is the outlook in the industry?
Is the expectation that we'll see some relief?
Because from everything you read,
it just seems like office is still,
no, I wouldn't say a free fall,
but it's sort of settled in
at this much less attractive values for investors.
Yeah, and I would say from an occupancy standpoint,
we think we're nearing a bottom if we're not there already.
We may see a little bit further uptick in vacancy,
but it won't be significant.
The bottom line is we still have office employment growth
and construction has slowed immensely in office
where there's far less new office space coming online.
So the combination of continuing
to see office employment growth
along with that drop in construction,
you'll see some positive absorption,
which will hold the line if not start to bring
the vacancy rates back down a little bit
over the next couple of years.
But we're not calling for like a strong recovery
in office either.
Yeah, right.
I don't wanna give that impression,
but yeah, sort of a slow leveling off
and maybe start to see a little bit of a turnaround.
And of course this, I assume Matt is regional, right?
Like we're talking,
what you've said so far is on a national basis,
but I would imagine that there's
significant regional variance here.
There is.
And when we're talking about return to office
for at least two days a week anyway,
New York and Miami are sort of leading the pack
from a return to office standpoint.
Finance, basically, sort of like finance hubs.
To a large extent.
But one of the things that we've seen
that's more emerged as a pattern
that we would expect to continue
is a divergence between class A office space
and lower quality class B and C office space
and the divergence between downtowns
or central business districts and suburban.
Okay.
Can you tell us more a little bit about that second part?
Because I wanna ask about class A and class B,
but our audience here is mostly
residential real estate investors.
And so I think this divide
that you're alluding to between downtown
and suburban office space has big implications,
even for people who don't invest in office.
So can you tell us more about that?
Basically, the thought behind it is
a lot of companies are trying to entice people
to come back into work.
And the two biggest levers they have to pull
to get people to come back in voluntarily at least
are to step up to much nicer office space.
That's the class A part that we can dive more into.
And then the other piece is
having offices closer to where they live.
And I often make the joke that the top two things
that people hate about coming into the office
are the commute and having to spend time
with their coworkers.
And you can fix one of those.
Now, in all serious note though,
the commute part of it is important.
And having the ability to have an office
closer to your home in the suburbs counts a lot for that.
The other piece is a lot of times suburban offices
tend to be smaller offices that are more service oriented.
So you tend to have a lot of lawyers, CPAs,
insurance firms, other things of that nature
where they're just much more attuned to being in the office
or they have to be in the office
really to service their customers.
That's why we've seen suburban office
outperform central business district,
and in particular, the class BC
in central business districts.
For me, it's hard to imagine,
and I'm sure it will happen eventually,
like what demand there's going to be
for class C and B office space in downtown areas.
Of course, there's certain markets
where it's going to be popular,
but I tend to agree that hybrid,
at least for more of the traditional office type jobs
is probably going to be here to stay.
And like you said, no one wants to go into an office
two or three days a week to be in a dated facility
in an expensive downtown area where it's hard to park
and it's hard to get to.
And I wonder if construction will start being elsewhere
and demand is just not going to come back to those areas.
Yeah, I mean, that's certainly what we've been seeing
on class B and C in central business districts
is that the demand is just not coming back.
Frankly, what we would expect for the reason that you said,
if you're going to go through the trouble
of commuting to downtown, pay the expense of parking,
the last thing you want to be doing
is sitting in an office where you've got
two foot by two foot windows every five feet
and no natural light and very dated.
Technology support in the office isn't great.
It's difficult for the company to manage, et cetera.
So we really look for a lot of those properties
to be at some point taken offline.
Oh, interesting.
All right, so there's this fundamental shift
in both total office space occupancy
and where offices are getting leased.
But I'm also curious about some of these
downstream implications of this phenomenon.
Like what does this mean for surrounding housing markets?
And we'll get into all of that right after the break.
Hey, friends, welcome back to my conversation
with economist Matt Reedy.
So, yeah, I mean, we've talked a little bit about
office to residential conversions on this show.
I, you know, at this point, it does feel unrealistic
that that's going to happen in mass.
Maybe that will change if there's some sort
of public private partnership.
But I think for the purposes of this show,
I'd like to focus more on maybe some of the
sort of secondary effects of office decline.
So we just talked about, you know,
how some of these places, demand's not coming back.
What does that mean for downtowns in general,
not the office space, but for the residential demand
or maybe retail?
Yeah, I mean, clearly it's not a great sign
for those things.
But yeah, and again, not to focus too much
on the office to residential conversion,
but that is one solution for some of this office space.
But again, we actually have seen a bit of an uptick
in occupancy in class A office space
in central business districts.
So the demand there has still been fairly strong
from a number of occupied square feet.
We're above where we were prior to the pandemic
for class A office in central business district.
So I think that will continue to support
those downtown areas.
And we agree it won't be on a large scale,
but you will see some conversions.
And we have seen some conversions
of those class BC to multifamily.
It just sometimes takes a lot of creativity
to get that done.
Best example of that is 180 Water Street in New York,
where they literally cored out the center of the building
for all 20 stories and turned it into basically
like a block O for any Ohio State fans out there
with a central courtyard.
And then because of what they cut out of the middle,
they were able to add additional floors
on top of the building
under New York's floor area ratio laws.
That's so funny.
So they actually added a few floors
at the top of the building.
Really interesting project.
This was many years ago,
but I lived literally across the street
from that building when I was in college,
when I had an internship there
and lived in an NYU apartment there.
But I digress.
So I think that that is sort of an option,
but it's super expensive, it seems.
And like doing projects like that
are more one off at this point
than being done at scale.
It seems risky to me.
Like, I don't know anything
about what this really takes,
but it does seem difficult and risky.
So I guess I'm just curious
about what this means
for the housing demand in these areas,
because if demand for this office space
isn't coming back,
does that mean places,
downtown areas are going to struggle
in terms of rent appreciation,
in terms of home demand?
Because people won't want to live
in these traditionally more expensive areas
if they're not going to work nearby.
I think you're right.
The less office space there is downtown,
the less demand there's going to be
for retail and residential.
And to the extent that you see a decline
in that office space,
yes, that will present issues.
Now, when we talk about underperformance
of the Class B, C in central business districts,
I wouldn't say that it's of a magnitude
that we would have all that strong
of concerns about downtown areas.
And it's really, it's been a long term cycle
for Class B, C in particular.
As far as the number of square feet occupied,
we're somewhere in the neighborhood
of just over 90% of where we were
coming out of the financial crisis.
If that gives a little bit of an idea
of the scale, probably about a 10% drop
really over the last 15 years
in occupancy of Class B and C,
or I should say occupied square feet.
I just make that distinction
because occupied square feet can go up
while the occupancy rate still drops
if there's more construction that comes online.
So when we're just looking at the number
of square feet that are occupied
in Class B, C, it is down,
but it's not down to an extent
that we would say that it's going
to decimate downtown areas.
I'm glad you said that because some
of the data I've been looking at
seems to suggest that some of these areas
that people assume have been hollowed out
by the pandemic and this office flight
are actually seeing some of the strongest growth.
Like New York is a great example.
It did get hit harder than most
during the pandemic.
I mean, being in a really dense urban area
like that was not very desirable during COVID
and people left en masse,
but now we're seeing the demand
for apartments in Manhattan seems
to be going up and the areas around New York
are seeing some of the fastest home price
appreciation in the country.
And I don't know if this is true
in some of the areas in California,
but I think some of the same rhetoric
was going on, you know, San Francisco,
San Jose, even LA,
like people were going to leave these markets,
but it just doesn't seem
like that's really happening.
Yeah, I mean, we definitely saw some
of that during the pandemic,
but to your point,
I think there's been some return
to those areas, even San Francisco,
where things got pretty bleak
for a little while there
with downtown office air.
Yeah.
You know, it has seen some strength,
you know, primarily driven
by large language models
and artificial intelligence,
where there's at least some pockets anyway
in downtown San Francisco
that have been very strong,
even from an office standpoint.
Yeah, I'm curious about San Francisco
just because the AI boom
is like just starting.
And it seems like San Jose,
Silicon Valley is going to be
the epicenter of that.
And in my mind,
it seems like there's likely
to be a rebound in that area.
Yeah, and it's interesting
because in my career alone,
over the last 20 years,
I think there's been three
or four different big economic events
that have caused people to say,
oh, San Francisco, the Bay Area is dead.
It's never coming back.
And it reinvents itself
with some new tech every time
and bounces back
and eventually surpasses
where it had been before.
And I think that's what you're seeing now
with AI,
is you're seeing that drive,
that recovery.
And to your point,
I think it really is pretty early
in that process or in that growth.
Yeah.
And I don't disagree about that
being sort of the epicenter.
So let's talk a little bit more
about the suburbs,
because this does seem to be
a evolving dynamic
that I have never seen in my career.
And I think from the data I've seen
is pretty unprecedented,
which is that there might be a boom
or a shift towards more office
and working in suburban areas.
So first and foremost, Matt,
is this all a product of the pandemic
or was this trend beginning
prior to 2020?
It was a trend that was beginning
prior to 2020.
Again, we track sort of the number
of occupied square feet
going back to 2009
and the financial crisis.
And for almost that entire period
of the four that I've referred to,
class A suburban,
class BC suburban,
class A downtown and BC downtown,
class A suburban has been
the strongest performer
for pretty much that entire period.
And even from 2009
to before the pandemic,
we had seen occupied square feet
in those areas climb by 15% to 17%.
Whereas now, since the pandemic,
they're up another 2% to 3%.
So not significant gains,
but positive in the face
of everything that's happening
in the office market
is pretty strong performance.
Got it. Okay.
And I don't know if this is
too ambitious a question,
but do you see a correlation
between the creation
or occupancy of office space
in suburban areas
and demand for housing
around those areas?
So we haven't done any specific,
or I haven't,
I'm not privy to any specific research
on that topic.
I know, I'm sorry.
No, it's okay.
I figured it was probably
outside your purview,
but I had to ask.
I could probably ask
one of my coworkers
and get you an answer to it,
for personal gratification
or just to know what the result
or the relationship is.
I can't help but think
that it would have some impact.
Yeah, I would,
I guess that's to me,
your statement earlier
about commute times
just makes sense, right?
I work remote
and never working at BiggerPockets
did I have a huge commute,
but I used to commute
over an hour each way.
Now I commute zero minutes.
I often genuinely
put more time into work
because of that,
but it also gives me more free time
and that is so valuable, right?
If I could cut that down,
if you could get an hour
back of your day,
I would have to believe
that there's going to be demand
for office.
That's the whole reason
there's demand in Manhattan, right?
People want to live there.
Obviously, there's a lot of cultural
and fun stuff going on there,
but mostly I would imagine
the primary reason
is because you're close to your job
and it just creates this convenience.
And that to me
feels like there's going
to be more demand.
Yeah, I totally agree.
And maybe again,
now I'm just speculating
because it's outside your purview,
but it sort of to me
feels like there's
sort of this blending now
between urban and suburban.
And like now you see
these sort of suburban areas
where there's pockets of walkability
and office space
and mixed use development
where it feels more urban,
but just on a much smaller scale.
And then you go a mile
and you're in traditional
single family zoning
and that sort of stuff.
And it makes me wonder
if those things are going to continue.
Yeah.
And those live workplay
type environments
like that that you're talking about
have tended to be the best performers
over the last couple of years.
Yeah.
And where we've seen
where we've seen the most demand
and strongest rent growth,
strongest occupancy has been
where they're combining
those different elements.
All right.
Time for one more break,
but we'll be right back
with Matt's insights for investors.
Welcome back to On The Market.
Let's jump back in.
So, Matt, from your research,
is there anything else
you think our audience should know?
Our audience of mostly
residential investors,
like how would you
putting yourself in our shoes?
Think about return to office.
Think about the situation
in office in general,
in terms of helping guide
portfolio and investing decisions
in the years to come.
Take a minute to think about that one.
Please take all the time you want.
We will edit it out
or put in Jeopardy music.
You know, I made it to
the in-person auditions
for Jeopardy at one point.
Did you?
That's so cool.
But anyway, that's
a whole different story.
So back to the question,
I think a couple of things
that I would think about
from the standpoint of,
as an investor in residential housing.
First and foremost,
most sources will tell you,
and we say the same thing.
There's a shortage
of single family homes
or places for single families to live,
whether it be homes
or apartments across the country.
Some markets might be
a little bit oversupplied
at the moment,
but on the whole,
we still have a shortage,
depending on the source
you look at of anywhere
from one to three million
single family homes.
So, yeah, the demand
is going to be there
for single family homes
and for rental property
for the foreseeable future.
Right now, it's really difficult
to get construction projects
off the ground as well.
So supply, other than projects
that were started
a couple of years ago
that may be coming online
or close to coming online,
the starts of new housing
are lower than they've been
in the last several years.
So the demand is going
to continue to be there.
The supply is not likely
to match what it has been
in the last two years, call it,
where we had just a flood
of new apartments
coming onto the market.
So we think ultimately
it's going to be supportive
of rents and occupancy
for rental properties
and for single family homes as well.
And I think that by the middle part
of next year and into 2026,
we'll probably be back
into the three-ish percent
rent growth area on rental units.
That's the backdrop that I lay.
As far as selecting from there
or the impact that office, et cetera,
is going to have on it,
clearly where there's
new development
of those live-work-play
type of environments,
where there's a new office building
with some retail component,
maybe an apartment component,
those areas are going to be
desirable to live in and around.
One, because there may be
a good chance that somebody
who's living in a single family home
half a mile away
is working at that office,
but they also want to be near shopping,
near restaurants, near other things.
So I think that'll be sort of the focus
or the epicenter of where you see
the most demand
and the strongest rent growth
and occupancy trends.
Well, thank you so much, Matt.
I tend to agree with you.
I think that's great advice for people.
And in line
with some of the other opinions
that we've heard,
and it is encouraging,
I think for people
who want to get into the market
to hear that there's probably
going to be rent growth.
I think for me, this is just,
I mean, my own selfish opinion,
but I do think that this sort of shift
to suburban investing
does take some adjustment
from an investor's opinion.
When I started, it was just like,
how close could you get to downtown?
It was sort of, you know,
for a reasonably affordable price.
And there's still,
that's still going to be true.
Like, as Matt was saying,
getting close to these economic engines,
especially with return to office,
is going to be important.
But this sort of shift
to a lot more suburban opportunity
is exciting.
There's a lot of opportunity there,
but I think it's a little bit harder
because you have to study
and try and understand
more than one just geographic area.
You can't just like draw
concentric circles
around a downtown area anymore
and say like,
these are different price tiers
and different neighborhood classes.
But I do think it creates
a lot of exciting opportunity
for investors as well.
Matt, thank you so much for joining us.
This was super helpful conversation.
Appreciate you being here.
Well, thanks for having me, Dave.
I enjoyed it as well.
And thank you all so much for listening.
We will see you next time
for another episode of On The Market.
