Why You Can't Travel Between Hawaii's Islands by Boat

Travel Goddess
213 followers
Out of all of America's 50 states, Hawaii is arguably its most unique.
It's the only state to be geographically located outside of the North American continent.
It's America's most recent state, having only been admitted to the Union in August of 1959.
It is by far the most ethnically diverse state and the only state where Asian Americans make
up the single largest ethnic group. It's the most expensive state to live in in the country and,
most notably, it is the only state made up of an archipelago that consists entirely of islands.
And because of that, as you'd expect, transportation throughout Hawaii works very differently than it
does in other states because of the population being divided across all these different islands.
The Hawaiian archipelago is made up of 137 different islands, but there's really only
four of them that have significant numbers of people. Oahu, the most heavily populated island
that's home to Honolulu and Pearl Harbor, has around a million people that live on it,
which all on its own is about two-thirds of the state of Hawaii's entire population.
The Big Island has about another 200,000 people, Maui another 164,000 more, and Kauai about another
73,000 more, representing the four primary majorly populated islands in the state, while the islands
of Molokai and Lanai have significantly fewer numbers of people and the other islands have
either negligible or non-existent populations. And the distances between all of these islands
are larger than you'd expect. The distance between Oahu and Kauai is about 100 miles,
and the distance from Oahu to the Big Island is closer to 150 miles, about the same distance as
between New York City and Baltimore. And because of the distances involved here between all of
these islands and population centers, the only way to travel between them is by either flying
or taking a boat. But it might surprise you to learn that as of right now in 2024, there isn't
a single ferry service or regularly scheduled passenger maritime transportation option between
any of the four main Hawaiian islands. And people very rarely travel between the islands by boat.
In fact, the only regularly scheduled ferry service at all in Hawaii today just operates
between the relatively nearby islands of Maui and Lanai. And that's it. Instead, if you ever want
to travel between any other islands in the Hawaiian archipelago, your only realistic option is to fly
between them. And so virtually all travel between Hawaii's main islands is dominated by very short
haul flights run through carriers like Hawaiian Airlines. And this situation appears rather
puzzling at first glance, because ferries and maritime transit are a very common and popular
form of transportation across several other archipelagic parts of the world, including in
many areas that have significantly smaller population bases than Hawaii even has. Take the
Aegean Sea, for example, where there are dozens and dozens of great ferries that service dozens of
islands and locations across the whole region, including many ferries that service very small
islands with negligible populations, but which have very large tourism interest. Across 2023,
Hawaii received about a third as many tourists as Greece did, but their spending was roughly
equivalent, with tourists to Hawaii spending nearly $21 billion in the state across 2023,
and tourists in Greece spending nearly $23 billion through the same time period,
implying that a ferry service across Hawaii's islands could or should be at least somewhat
comparable to the very robust system of Greek ferries. Closer back to home in North America,
there are three notable examples of ferry services that seem to make the lack of ferry services in
Hawaii seem all the more puzzling. The island of Newfoundland in Canada has a small population
of only about 478,000 people, less than half the population of Oahu in Hawaii. And it's also
located about 100 miles away from the Canadian mainland in Nova Scotia, a similar distance as
between the islands of Oahu and Maui or Oahu and Kauai. And yet there are two active ferry lines
that run from the island to Nova Scotia, a shorter ferry from Port Au Basque that takes about seven
hours to complete and a longer ferry from Argentia that takes about 16 hours to complete. Lengths of
time though be comparable to ferries between the islands of Hawaii. Washington State also
operates a system of ferries across their island communities throughout the Puget Sound.
And perhaps most notably, Alaska operates a complex system of ferries across enormous distances
that link several small communities together from Bellingham, Washington, all throughout the
Alaskan Panhandle and the Aleutian Islands. A ferry system that is notable in the context of Hawaii
because the distances involved are substantially longer and Alaska's population base is only about
half that of Hawaii's. So why does Hawaii essentially not have any ferry service at all
compared to all of these other examples? And why is it that in order to travel between the
Hawaiian islands, you nearly always have to fly rather than take a boat? First of all,
it's important to note that Hawaii has actually had large-scale ferry services between their
major islands in the past. But they've all failed for a complex list of reasons that largely has to
do with the nature of Hawaii's unique geography and population patterns. The most serious attempt
at establishing a reliable ferry service connecting Hawaii's major islands together was called the
Hawaii Superferry throughout the decade of the 2000s. And it was one hell of a fiasco.
Planning for the Superferry began in 2001 by a private company that sought to offer up an
alternative way for the airlines to travel between the Hawaiian islands that would be quick,
cheap, and most importantly, would enable people to easily transport their own personal vehicles
and belongings between the islands as well. At the time, it seemed like a virtually untapped market.
Egged on by the Hawaii Superferry company's statistic that in 2001, Hawaii's own residents,
excluding tourists, took around four million flights between the islands throughout the year,
implying that the parallel demand for a ferry was there that wasn't currently being serviced.
By 2004, the company signed a contract with a shipyard in Alabama to build out the first
two of their Hawaiian ferries for a total sum of $178 million, or $89 million a piece,
which inflated to $2024, was about $332 million for the two of them. A few years later, by 2007,
the Hawaii Superferry was finally ready to begin launching its master plan that envisioned
regularly scheduled ferry service between all four of Hawaii's majorly populated islands.
But the company almost immediately began encountering significant difficulties.
First up, there were numerous environmental concerns and risks brought up surrounding
the ferry and port. Many of the ferry routes between the islands criss-crossed over well
established and mapped out routes of humpback whale migration paths, which led to concerns that
the huge sizes of the ferries could impact and kill whales and cause other environmental destruction
for Hawaii's unique marine life ecosystem. And more pressingly, there was the concern that the
ferries could spread invasive species throughout the rest of Hawaii as well.
As a series of geographically isolated islands far removed from the rest of the world,
Hawaii's ecosystem is uniquely delicate and fragile and the state is by far the most
serious about invasive species in the country. The big island has already seen several notable
invasive species like fire ants, kokui frogs, and eulex plants establish a strong enough of
a foothold there that eradicating them has effectively become impossible, leaving the
government with the unenviable goal of preventing their spread to the rest of the islands as much
as possible and containing them to the big island as much as they can. The biggest fear was that
ferries loading up people's personal vehicles could accidentally transport these kinds of
invasive species between the islands far easier than people flying between them on airplanes could.
It also didn't help that by the time the ferry finally began its operation between
Oahu and Maui in 2007, they still hadn't completed an environmental impact statement
that was required by Hawaii state law. The Hawaii Supreme Court eventually ruled that
the superferry could continue its operation while the environmental impact statement was
busy being prepared. But that did little to halt the torrent of environmental lawsuits being dumped
on the company which steadily increased the company's litigation costs and made it increasingly
difficult for them to remain financially afloat. And if all of that wasn't enough,
the superferry idea was hitting many, many other roadblocks as well. As it turned out,
another major problem for ferries in Hawaii was the fact that the waters around the islands are
notoriously rough, especially compared to the waters where those other ferries I mentioned
previously operate in Alaska and Washington state. These ferries all operate nearby to
their respective continental coastal shelves, where the waters are relatively shallow and
calmer. But Hawaii doesn't really have a continental shelf in the same kind of way
because the Hawaiian islands are all volcanic in origin and are basically just the tips of
underwater mountains that rise miles up from the seafloor to penetrate just above the ocean's
surface. As a result, the depths of the waters between the Hawaiian islands are often very high,
such as in the channel between Maui and the Big Island that's more than 6,000 feet deep,
significantly deeper than the average depth seen in even the Mediterranean Sea.
The name for this narrow and deep channel in the Hawaiian language is the Alunui-Haha Channel,
which roughly translates into English as the Great Billow Smashing Channel,
which should give you some kind of an idea as to how rough the waters here can get as the currents
surge through the deep chasm between Maui and the Big Island. The depths seen between the channels
of the other islands are similarly deep and the waters in between similarly rough as well,
which means that ferry passages between the Hawaiian islands are effectively done over
open ocean, which means that the ferries involved in the passages need to be ocean-rated,
requiring them to be larger and more sturdy and more expensive vessels than you would
otherwise see in Alaska or in Washington State. And because of the distances between the main
islands covering 100 nautical miles or more, the journeys on the superferry between the islands
would last for 6 to 8 hours or in some cases even longer through waters that were often very rough,
meaning that seasickness was a common ailment among passengers traveling aboard.
If you were a resident of Hawaii and you wanted to travel from one island to another island,
you could opt to take the ferry, which might take you up to 8 hours to complete.
It might result in you getting severely seasick along the way,
and because it would take you another 8 hours or so to get back to your home island,
you couldn't really make a day trip out of the ferry journey so once you get to the other island,
you would need to compete with all of the tourists for a hotel for the night,
which adds on to the cost and practicality of the ferry journey even more.
When you factor all of that in and then you consider that a round-trip flight between
the islands is often only a little more than $100 and takes less than an hour each way,
the price of flying between the islands is often cheaper and faster and less likely to make you
sick, which to most people still made flying between the islands the more obvious choice
to choose instead of taking the ferry. There's also just not really a big pent-up demand for
residents on the Hawaiian Islands to actually commute between the islands all that often.
Oahu, as the economic and population center of the islands, is home to most of the state's
major events like concerts and most of the state's good hospitals and medical care,
which means that for the most part the residents out on the other main islands usually only go into
Oahu at most a couple or so times a year for special events or for medical care and for
those purposes they're going to be more likely to fly than to take the ferry. As a result,
it was perceived by a lot of Hawaii's residents that the people most likely to utilize the
inter-island ferry service were going to be tourists instead of locals. Tourists who would
bring their rental cars with them from Oahu and clog up the more limited infrastructure and roads
on the less developed major islands, which led to a lot of the residents on the islands of Kauai,
Maui, and the Big Island fearing that the ferry service would contribute to further over tourism
of their islands and led to a lot of opposition against the whole concept. In the end, the Hawaii
Super Ferry originally planned to establish regular and reliable ferry service between all
four of the main Hawaiian Islands, but only managed to establish service between Oahu and Maui because
of all of these compounding difficulties. And due to all of those problems, along with potential
lobbying from Hawaiian Airlines and rental car companies who were probably concerned about losing
out on inter-island market share to the Super Ferry, the whole project wouldn't even survive
for more than a couple years. In 2009, less than two years after they began their service in 2007,
the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that their previous granting of the Super Ferry to continue
without the full environmental impact statement being completed yet had been unconstitutional,
and the ferry service was immediately halted. Up to that point, the Super Ferry had only managed
to transport about 250,000 passengers between the islands that it serviced through the 11 months
when it was allowed by the courts to operate, which was well below the ferry's break-even costs and
well below the volume of passengers flying between the islands on the airlines. For reference,
air carriers between Honolulu and Kahului, the largest city on the island of Maui, fly about
4,890 seats between them each way per day, while a 2017 ferry feasibility study conducted by the
Hawaii state government concluded that even in an optimistic scenario, a ferry would only be
capable of transporting 11% of those same numbers of seats along the same route. Shortly after the
courts ordered the Super Ferry to halt its operations over the environmental concerns in
2009, the writing for the Super Ferry was on the wall and the company immediately suspended all of
its services and let go of all of its employees. Within months, the company would declare bankruptcy
and it abandoned both of the ferries that it acquired. Eventually, both of the company's
ferries would be acquired by the U.S. Navy in a fire sale for just $35 million, a tiny fraction
of their original $180 million price tag that the company had paid for them. The entire debacle and
catastrophic failure of the Hawaii Super Ferry that saw hundreds of millions of dollars basically
lit on fire has essentially ensured that nobody else will ever try establishing another ferry
service in Hawaii for at least another one or two generations. And besides for the geographic
and economic constraints standing in the way of another Hawaiian ferry service trying,
there's also significant legal obstacles standing in the way as well. One of the strangest set of
laws that still exists on the books in the United States are the 1886 Passenger Vessel Services Act
and the 1920 Jones Act, which basically both stipulate that vessels operating within U.S.
waters that transport passengers or cargo, like ferries carrying people and vehicles,
need to have been built within the United States and also crewed by an all-American crew.
These laws have essentially established a sort of maritime protectionism scheme within the United
States for more than a century now, which forces American ferry and logistics companies to only
purchase their ships from American shipyards, which have been coddled and globally uncompetitive for
more than a century as a result, since they have a captive customer base, which means that prices
are always artificially higher. The Hawaii Super Ferry purchased their ferries in 2004 from an
Alabama shipyard for $89 million a piece, or $166 million a piece in 2024 dollars. In 2019,
the same company that built those Hawaii Super Ferries announced that it was building another
even larger ferry with double the passenger and vehicle capacity at one of its non-U.S.
shipyards for only $116 million in inflation-adjusted 2024 dollars, tens of millions of
dollars less for a ferry with double the capacity. This means that establishing ferry services
anywhere in America, and especially in Hawaii, where the additional requirements for open ocean
rated ferries are geographically costlier than they are elsewhere, are legally and artificially
more expensive than in other countries as well. That 2017 ferry feasibility study commissioned by
Hawaii state government that I mentioned previously, ultimately concluded that while
establishing a ferry service in Hawaii is still technically possible today, it's not really
economically feasible for a huge variety of reasons. Hawaii residents polled as a part of
that study showed expectations of a ferry service that don't really match up with current technologies
or economic realities. They generally expected that a ferry service between Honolulu on the
island of Oahu and Hilo on the Big Island should take no longer than three hours to complete in
order to be competitive with simply flying. But the study found that even a ferry operating at a
speed of 40 knots an hour along that route, faster than recommended for the rough oceanic conditions
in the area, would still take nearly seven hours to complete, more than twice as long as most
residents expected. The study ultimately concluded that the costs required to upgrade Hawaii's harbors
to accommodate passenger ferry terminals, the costs required to establish agricultural screenings
between the islands in order to prevent the spread of invasive species, and the costs that would be
required to acquire the ferries themselves and to maintain their operating costs for years, do not
match the limited demand for the long travel times between the islands that the ferries would provide.
The ferries would simply be uncompetitive against existing faster and cheaper air travel between the
islands and, as a result, the study concluded that if a ferry service was going to be successful in
Hawaii, it would have to be at least partially subsidized by the state government just in order
to stay afloat. A subsidized ferry service throughout Hawaii would not be without precedent
though. The Washington State Ferry Service has revenues that are about 25% subsidized by the
While there's enough pent-up demand for the short ferry journeys across the Puget Sound to cover the
remaining 75% of the ferries operating costs. This probably wouldn't be the case in Hawaii,
however, where demand for a more expensive and time-consuming ferry service would be lower.
So a better comparison would be with Alaska's Marine Highway Ferry Service, which covers very
long distances, supports very small populations, and is heavily subsidized by the Alaska state
government. The Alaska Ferry Service covers more than 3,500 miles of coastline, including dozens of
individual route segments, with many of them taking 6 hours and 10 hours and even one line
from Bellingham, Washington up to Ketchikan, Alaska that takes a whopping 38 hours to complete and
costs hundreds of dollars to travel along. However, Alaska's ferry service is highly subsidized by the
Alaska state government, to the tune of nearly 69% of its entire total revenue, while actual ticket
sales only account for about 31% of the ferry's revenues. This is the system that would be much
more comparable to Hawaii than Washington state's ferry system, but Alaska is able to heavily
subsidize its ferry service because it has something that Hawaii does not, a metric boat ton of oil.
Despite how it appears at first glance, Alaska is much more of a rich state and Hawaii is much
more of a poor state. Alaska has been geologically blessed with huge oil resources and the state
controls the fourth highest producing oil field in the entire country, at Prudhoe Bay in the far
north of the state. As a result, Alaska has a massive oil industry that generates huge revenues
for the state government to the point where an overwhelming 85% of the Alaska state government
budget simply comes from all of the state's oil revenues. And all of that oil money in the state
enables Alaska to do several things that would be impossible in other states, such as heavily
subsidizing the state's otherwise unprofitable ferry transportation system to better help its
residents. And other interesting things like establishing an oil fund that pays out every
single one of Alaska's residents an average of around $2,000 a year just for existing there.
The only form of basic income currently seen anywhere in America. On top of having no income
taxes and having the lowest overall tax burden imposed on citizens out of any of America's 50
states. Hawaii, on the other hand, is not as fortunate as Alaska. Hawaii has effectively
zero natural resources and its sheer distance away from any significant markets makes shipping costs
to and from the islands anywhere else prohibitively expensive, which makes any potential manufacturing
base in Hawaii naturally uncompetitive from the start. The only two industries that Hawaii's
geography enables it to excel at are tourism and the military. Because of the incredible strategic
value offered up by Pearl Harbor on the island of Oahu, near the dead center of the Pacific Ocean.
But for the people who actually work in these two industries, the jobs available are generally low
paid, which is why Hawaii's median income is lower than the median income seen in New Hampshire.
And yet home prices in Hawaii are nearly twice as expensive as they are in New Hampshire anyway,
despite the lower incomes. Hawaii is a fantastic state for people who move to it who are already
wealthy and possess more purchasing power than the locals do. But for those who have grown up on
Hawaii without money, finding opportunity on the islands is very difficult, which is why so many of
them leave for the mainland and which is also why Hawaii's overall tax burden is already among the
highest in the entire country. Without any natural resources or industries outside of tourism and the
military, and with the military really only interested in the island of Oahu and none of the
others, the result is that the Hawaiian state government has to fund itself primarily through
taxes rather than natural resource revenue like Alaska. And so if the Hawaii state government
wants to begin heavily subsidizing a prospective unprofitable ferry service the same way that
Alaska does, the only way it would be able to do so would be by increasing taxes in the state
even higher than they already are. Which would make the cost of living crisis in the state
already the worst in the entire country, even worse than it already is. For all intents and
purposes, that is all why a ferry service between the main Hawaiian islands doesn't currently exist,
and why one isn't likely to exist in the future either. Until ferry vessel technology and legal
reforms advance enough to carry passengers between two points much faster and for a much lower cost
than they currently can, the low market demand for the use of a ferry in Hawaii and the likelihood of
ferry service in Hawaii succeeding are each likely to continue remaining very low. And after
the massive financial disaster the last time that someone tried getting one up and running with the
Hawaii Super Ferry in the 2000s, nobody is likely to try getting another one up and running in
Hawaii for the foreseeable future. And the only way you'll be able to travel between the islands
for the most part, unless you want to charter or bring your own boat, will be to fly between them
Now Hawaii is known for a lot of things besides for their lack of good maritime transportation
options, and their food culture has absolutely got to be one of those top things. From poke bowls,
to spam musubi, to tempura shrimp, and even more. And if you're anything like me, you might always
be wondering why it still takes so much money and time to eat more healthily today. The global food
supply runs more efficiently than ever, but there still seems to be this trade-off where you have to
choose only two of the following three options with your meals. Healthiness, affordability,
and quickness. You can have a quick and healthy meal, but it'll be expensive. You can have an
affordable and quick meal, but it'll be unhealthy. Or you can have a healthy and affordable meal,
but it'll be time-consuming and inconvenient. For a long period in my life, I was really trying hard
to figure out the answer to this dilemma by discovering a reliable source of meals that
could encompass all three attributes. Healthiness, affordability, and quickness. And I eventually
discovered and became a customer of what ultimately became this video's sponsor, HelloFresh.
The concept of HelloFresh is pretty straightforward. You just visit their app or website and select
which meals you want to eat. And then the next week, an insulated box will show up on your front
doorstep filled with all of the fresh, pre-portioned, and partially prepared ingredients you need,
so that you can home cook your meals way faster than if you had wasted a bunch of time planning
your meals out, going to the grocery store and picking out ingredients, and then coming home and
prepping. You can also choose from a variety of menu options to suit all your needs and tastes.
From fit and wholesome to quick and easy, vegetarian to family-friendly, there's something
for everyone to enjoy. And HelloFresh knows that your plans might change and life can get
unexpectedly busy. That's why they let you easily customize your delivery from week to week as well,
allowing you to tailor everything to your own schedule by adjusting your delivery date or
skipping a week when you're not able to cook at home. And best of all, the meals themselves just
taste really, really good too. That's the biggest reason of all that I've been a loyal customer
myself to HelloFresh for years now, and why I've been making meals like this amazing buffalo spiced
chicken for more than three years now. They're just the best solution that I've ever found for
having regular home-cooked dinners. And if you want to see if I'm right and improve the way you eat
too, now's a great time to do so because you'll get 10 free meals at HelloFresh.com if you use
code REALLIFELORE10. Applied across seven boxes, new subscribers only, varies by plan. And again,
that's 10 free HelloFresh meals, and all you need to do is go to HelloFresh.com
with code REALLIFELORE10. And as always, thank you so much for watching.
