Corporate Landlords Are Taking Over Housing. The Consequences Are Horrifying

Invest In Realty
2 followers
Oct 26, 2024 #Business
#Business
Giant institutional investors are gobbling up thousands of homes in Atlanta, Las Vegas, Phoenix, and so many other communities around the country — making housing both more unaffordable and lower quality.
Our investigation found serious problems in how the company was maintaining its properties.
Mold, rat feces, exposed wire. There was dripping water in the garage right in front of the door
to the house. We had a water pipe that was about to burst. If you rent a single family home,
there's an increasingly larger chance that your landlord is a new breed of homeowner.
Wall Street. Giant institutional investors are grabbing up thousands of homes in Atlanta,
Las Vegas, Phoenix, and so many communities around the country, making housing both more
unaffordable and lower quality. And one of the biggest culprits is a publicly traded company
called Invitation Homes, which owns, believe it or not, 80,000 properties across the country.
Dallas-based Invitation Homes is the largest operator of rental homes in the country.
Invitation Homes, which has some 2,500 properties here in the Denver Metro.
They have more than 9,000 properties in the Phoenix Metro alone.
Invitation Homes has been deceiving consumers, violating tenant laws, and failing to keep their
properties habitable. But the Federal Trade Commission has been paying attention. They've
heard from renters across America, and for the first time ever, they have brought a case against
a major corporate landlord, fining the housing giant $48 million in a historic settlement.
We get millions of complaints every year from people reporting all sorts of abuses they are
facing in their everyday life. And one of the things we've heard in the housing sector is that
renters are facing a lot of abuses today. During its investigation, the FTC uncovered that
Invitation Homes has engaged in deceptive and exploitative business practices for years.
We alleged, I think, four really serious law violations in particular. And what we alleged
is that the company saddled renters with junk fees, hidden fees that they didn't know would
be included in their rent. We alleged that the company skimmed off people's security deposits
systematically, withholding millions of dollars from renters. We alleged that the company failed
to maintain their properties and often ignored maintenance requests from renters. And we alleged
that during the height of the COVID pandemic, the company steered people away from federal
eviction protections and initiated eviction actions in spite of those protections.
First on the list, the FTC found that Invitation Homes used a predatory fee structure that it
concealed from renters until the last possible moment. Basically, they lied about the cost of
rent. The company would advertise one rent but then saddle renters with hundreds of dollars
in junk fees that could jack up their rent more than $1,700 per year. Johnson says she's been
about $200 in unexpected fees each month. So we have the smart home fees, the home filter fees.
We also have the fee again because they don't allow you to change the water over it to your
name. So you pay an additional fee for that. Sheryl writes, she's forced to pay for extras
that I did not sign up for and do not want such as air filter subscriptions. In the course of
its investigation, the FTC wanted to better understand the motivations of the company as
engaged in these unscrupulous business practices. So it looked into what the CEO was specifically
telling his employees to do. And they found this startling admission. It was the CEO of
Invitation Homes who said we need to juice this hog. We need to squeeze renters for all of these
fees. This was not a low-level employee. This was a deliberate corporate strategy that started at
the top. And that wasn't the only corporate strategy to juice earnings. And we work with
you to schedule routine maintenance visits twice a year. And 24-7 emergency maintenance
telephone support is available as well. Invitation Homes promised quality inspections and constant
support. In reality, the company practiced what the FTC found to be a deliberate pattern of ignoring
maintenance requests, putting the health and safety of their renters at risk. I had reported
this and you can see like it's cracking across the ceiling. Water damage in here.
You can actually see how bad it is here. This is so wet it started to peel up.
The microwave didn't work. We had to repair that. Had to get a new stove. There were folks
at the company who called their maintenance procedures a train wreck. They said it was
the worst they had ever seen. What our investigation found is that more than 30,000 renters
had complaints about maintenance within one week of moving in. To boost their bottom line and meet
investor targets, Invitation Homes prioritized profits over renters' rights. Every renter knows
that if they take care of their home, they're entitled to get their security deposit back when
their lease ends. But that's not the way it worked at Invitation Homes. They said themselves when it
comes to security deposits, they knew they were upsetting tenants by withholding so much in
security deposits, but they had to hit the numbers investors needed to see. And that's why
Invitation Homes withheld 60% of the security deposits people made compared to a national
average of 36%. That's millions of dollars stolen from renters just because Invitation Homes thought
they could get away with it. And during the pandemic, while Invitation Homes publicly touted
their support for struggling tenants, they were actually finding ways to bypass the national
eviction moratorium. The way it worked is that people would fill out a declaration that the CDC
circulated, and that declaration would essentially give them the ability to stay in their homes
through the duration of the moratorium. What Invitation Homes did is create their own separate
form called a hardship affidavit, but it didn't have any effect. And then it went on to initiate
evictions against many of these folks. For those who are wronged or exploited by Invitation Homes,
an urgent question remains. When will the FTC settlement reach their bank accounts? We are not
keeping that $48 million. That money is going back to consumers. We administer redress ourselves.
We're not using a third-party contractor. And the reason we do that is we want to make sure
every dime that we can get out the door back to renters, we will get out the door to renters.
As corporate landlords increasingly control more of the housing market, renters have been saddled
with higher rents and worsening conditions. 20, 30 years ago, your landlord might have lived upstairs.
They might have lived in a store. You probably knew them. In 2022, almost a third of single-family
homes weren't sold to, you know, John and Nancy down the street. They were sold to institutional
investors. This is big business. They have investors they need to answer to. They have
numbers they need to meet. So many of the problems we see today are a direct result of that trend.
Corporate landlords have reshaped housing, but the government is pushing back. The FTC's $48 million
case against Invitation Homes marks an important start to reshaping a housing market that puts
people first. Thanks for watching. Don't forget to like and subscribe to see more videos like
this one, and if you ever have any ideas for what more Perfect Union should cover next,
please drop them in the comments. Thanks.
