紅二代爆驚人消息！習近平現身山東 遭軍人包圍！習突然轉向？　 #看風雲

Hello everyone, welcome to Kanfeng Yun. I'm Meiling. Today I'm going to talk to you about the Taiwan Nationalist Party and the Democratic People's Party jointly pushing for the Reform of the Congress Act, which has caused great controversy. Is there any way to abolish this new bill? If there is a controversial bill in the Taiwan Legislative Yuan, why should hundreds of millions of citizens take to the streets to correct it? What is the difference between Taiwan's democratic system and the United States? The Chinese Communist Party of China broke the news that the Chinese Communist Party was behind the chaos in the Taiwan Legislative Yuan. The Chinese Communist Party's economic collapse may be a sign of a disaster. Xi Jinping recently held a forum for entrepreneurs in Shandong during an investigation. Suddenly, he changed his face. Taiwan Legislative Yuan No. 24 continues to review the bill proposed by the Blue and White Parties. In the Legislative Yuan, the number of protesters exceeded 100,000. This is when the people of the Democratic People's Party launched the Green Bird Act to protest against the expansion of black boxes. Originally, the police only opened the Zhongshan South Road expressway to protest against the people walking. However, after work in the evening, more and more people stormed Zhongshan South Road. The police had to open the expressway. Because the Qingdao East Road was already full in the afternoon. The staff led the people to turn to Zhongxiao East Road. The Kuomintang also applied for road rights on the east side of Qingdao East Road. Then, no one gathered all afternoon. Only propaganda cars played videos. Fans of Han Kuo-yu in the dead are alone. A man is waving the flag next to the propaganda car. The organizer announced at 9.38 p.m. that the scene had reached 100,000 people. The demonstrators raised their slogans and slogans. Opposed the abuse of power by the Legislative Yuan. Rejected the black box work. No discussion, not democracy. So why do Taiwanese people think that the Legislative Yuan is using the new bill to expand power? According to the current law in Taiwan, the Executive Yuan will submit a policy report to the Legislative Yuan and receive an inquiry. But the new law stipulates that the president must submit a national security report to the Legislative Yuan every February. And submit a national security report to the Legislative Yuan on March 1. Although the U.S. and France have similar systems, they all emphasize that the president only makes reports and does not accept inquiries. The new law and regulations passed by Taiwan require the president to accept an inquiry. Taiwan law researcher Huang Chengyi told the American News Agency. This article is to undermine Taiwan's power-separation system, which was established during the 1997 coup. Analysts believe that Taiwan's president is democratically elected, and has a direct public-private relationship. So the president does not need to be responsible to the Legislative Yuan. Since the president is not appointed by the Legislative Yuan, the president certainly does not need to accept an inquiry from the Legislative Yuan. Otherwise, he will become a legislator above the president. This violates the principle of power-separation in the Taiwan Constitution. In addition, if the president fails to satisfy the Legislative Yuan in the process of answering questions, he will be put on the hat of despising the Congress. After the president takes office, he may face a lawsuit. Let me give you another example. The new bill stipulates that the Legislative Yuan can directly call on the vice-president of the case in question to express his opinion. In other words, the Legislative Yuan has the right to intervene in a case under investigation. The power of the Legislative Yuan has been expanded to the judicial department. Commentator Fang Fei believes that this is the power that all countries in the world do not have. If a case is closed after investigation, if there is a problem and a complaint is made, legislators or members of Congress can review it. But it is not allowed to do so during the investigation. Fang Fei said, The new bill stipulates that only the chairman of the Legislative Yuan can ask for a lawyer. That is to say, if the chairman does not agree, the person being questioned must face the question without a lawyer. If the answer is wrong, either be fined or go to prison. Many people are very concerned. What should we do next? What can be done to abolish this power expansion bill? Commentator Tang Jiyuan said, There is a way, that is, you can apply for a judge to review the constitution. The explanation is the Constitutional Constitution. It is the judge who explains this constitutional provision. Because many of the provisions in this proposal do involve the constitutional constitution. She said, The threshold for starting an application to review the constitution is not high. It can be raised directly by the president himself or by more than one-fourth of the legislators. The DPP can completely reach this threshold. Commentator Dr. Jason mentioned in Jason's View. There is another way, which is also feasible, which is to solve it through a public referendum. He said, As long as the number of people who joined the last election reaches 1.5%, that is, about 290,000 people joined, it can be used in a public referendum to decide the fate of the new bill. According to the Taiwan Citizens' Voting Act, a referendum can be held once every two years. The deadline is Saturday, August 4th. Therefore, the next public referendum will be in August next year. However, The DPP believes that the shortcoming of this method is that it is difficult to solve it through a public referendum. It can only be held after more than a year. By that time, the threshold for this event may have dropped. Is there such a huge public opinion force to start a public referendum to abolish this bill? It is also unknown. Speaking of which, everyone may think of a question. In the Legislative Yuan of Taiwan, there is a big bill of justice. Why do we have to rely on hundreds of thousands of citizens to take to the streets in order to correct it? This cost is actually very high. Ten years ago, the Fomalhaut Agreement triggered a solar snowstorm. Hundreds of thousands of people participated in the parade. Finally, the Fomalhaut Agreement was blocked. Now, even if 100,000 people walk out, I'm afraid it's hard to block this new bill. The U.S. has basically never had this situation. What is the difference between Taiwan's democratic system and the U.S.? Tang Jingyuan believes that the biggest problem in Taiwan's constitutional system design is that the president's power is a bit small. He can't effectively question a certain bill. This is a fundamental reason. He said, if a bad law is introduced in the U.S., there are three levels that the U.S. can block. The first level is that the U.S. is a two-party system. There are Senate and House of Representatives. Taiwan is just a one-party system. It's a one-party system. The second level is that the U.S. president can directly deny the bill. He doesn't have to sign it. Taiwan's president has no right to deny it. The third level is that the U.S. president can return the bill to Congress. Congress will vote again. The threshold for voting again is relatively high. More than two-thirds of the votes can overturn the president's denial. Taiwan's president also has the right to return the bill to the Legislative Yuan. But this right can't stop anything. Because when the Legislative Yuan reviews again, as long as it gets more than half the votes, the bill can be passed, and the president has to sign it. So, Taiwan's president's power is relatively small. This is a shortcoming. Professor Lin Zhijie, a special professor at Taiwan Yangming University, said that it is worrisome that the camp that promotes the new bill will not cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party. At the end of last month, Fu Qikun, the head of the Kuomintang party group, led a group to visit China. After coming back, he vigorously promoted the new bill. If it doesn't go through the legal process, it can pass this messy bill. In the future, it may also pass other bills that harm Taiwan society or affect Taiwan's national security. Researcher Yuan Hongbin once broke the news in February that Xi Jinping tried to use the Taiwan Legislative Yuan and the party's power to completely disrupt and infiltrate Taiwan, and use foreign money to occupy Taiwan. Yuan Hongbin confirmed to CCTV on the 24th that the news above was provided by a red-eared generation, and this red-eared generation was not encouraged by Xi Jinping. Yuan Hongbin analyzed that in addition to threatening Taiwan through foreign military actions, he also used three ways to try to mess up Taiwan's internal affairs, including using public opinion to intimidate Taiwan, and using the word of mouth to infuse Taiwan's internal terror, establish the CCP's agent in Taiwan, weaken Lai Qingde's administrative team efficiency, and use the Kuomintang's power in the Legislative Yuan to expand the legislative power in exchange for administrative power. He said that the CCP's intention is to create the Kuomintang into a new head of the Communist Army and eventually completely occupy Taiwan. Recently, during the Shandong Inspection, Xi Jinping hosted a meeting of entrepreneurs to release the signal that the central government values enterprise development and economic priority. However, the outside world is not optimistic about the reform Some analysts believe that China's economy is in great trouble, and Xi Jinping re-opens the reform as a sign. On the 23rd, Xi Jinping held a meeting and said that he would further deepen the reform and also emphasize the need to stick to the Party's leadership. He said that no matter how the reform is changed, it must stick to the Party's comprehensive leadership and at the same time be innovative. He said that the reform should be changed in the best way possible. Nine representatives from state-owned enterprises, private enterprises, foreign investment enterprises, individual business representatives and expert scholars attended the meeting. One of the important backgrounds of this forum is that the 20th Sino-Chinese General Assembly is about to be held again and a new reform agenda is about to be set up. The South China Morning Post reported that this forum is the latest information issued by the highest leadership of the Chinese Communist Party before the Sino-Chinese General Assembly. However, a Beijing scholar said that Xi Jinping still emphasizes the leadership of the Party in his speech, so the Chinese economy will not change. Gao Weibang, Chairman of the Association of Chinese Victims of Taiwan Investment, said that China has too many problems now, but the root of the problem is Xi Jinping himself. Now the economy is getting worse and worse. Xi Jinping said how to reform, how to open up. What he said is different from what he did. Professor Feng Congyi of Sydney University believes that what Xi Jinping said is all nonsense. He said that what Xi Jinping said was to solve the problems and to review the words of the Hu Wen era. After Xi Jinping came to power, he basically did not say these words. He engaged in totalitarianism, but the result was a collapse. China's economy is in a dire straitjacket. Now he wants to lure foreign capital into the country again. He wants to lure Chinese capital not to stay abroad, but to stay in China to help him fill the national treasury. All these reform words are all bluffing. Xi Jinping has to clear the field On the 22nd, Xi Jinping went to Shandong Province for a sunrise. You can see from the video played by CCTV that the official not only arranged people riding bicycles by the sea, but also arranged couples taking wedding photos. A scene full of enthusiasm. Commentator Chen Pekong said, it was obviously fake. When everyone goes out to play, they usually carry a mobile phone or a bottle of water in their hands. If you are a tourist, you usually have a backpack. Look at the people Xi Jinping accidentally met. None of these three things. No mobile phone, no backpack, no bottle of water. Is this normal? Think about it. What would it be like in a democratic country? In the United States, if Trump appeared, everyone would raise their mobile phones to take this rare shot. But those people by the sea no one took a picture with a mobile phone. They are all actors. They are all acting. On the same day, Xi Jinping also went to the port of Japan to inspect. From the photos issued by CCTV, we can also see that the people around Xi Jinping are all actors. The so-called workers at the scene were all hammered with both hands, stuck on both sides of the body. It's very unnatural. It's more like a group of soldiers in gold. Especially behind Xi Jinping, a man in a red uniform with his feet apart by about 60 degrees. Especially his fingers, the second finger shows the standard posture of a CCP soldier. Obviously he has been trained. Okay, that's all for today. Please remember to like, subscribe, leave a comment and share with your friends. The world is changing. See you next time. Bye.