“The bottom line is that 30 to 40 percent of cancers are preventable. … And there are simple things that people can do to reduce your risk of getting cancer,” says Dr. Paul Marik, a founding member of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and former chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School.
“Cancer is big business. It’s highly profitable. The average cost of chemotherapy for a patient is probably $100,000,” Dr. Marik says.
He’s the author of “Cancer Care: The Role of Repurposed Drugs and Metabolic Interventions in Treating Cancer.” In this episode, he breaks down his key findings on preventing and treating cancer.
the bottom line is that 30 to 40% of
cancers are preventable and there are
simple things that people can do to
reduce your risk of getting cancer in
this episode I sit down with Dr Paul
Merrick a founding member of the
Frontline covid-19 Critical Care
Alliance
flccc and former Chief of pulmonary and
critical care medicine at Eastern
Virginia medical school Cancer's big
business it's highly profitable the
average cost of chemotherapy for a
patient is probably
$100,000 he's the author of Cancer Care
the role of repurpose drugs and
metabolic interventions in treating
cancer in this episode he breaks down
his key findings this is American
thought leaders and I'm Yan
[Music]
Kell Dr Paul Merck such a pleasure to
have you on American thought leaders
thank you Yan thanks for inviting me
back again so when we spoke last some
months ago on a proper American thought
leaders show I'm not talking about the
quick hit we did earlier about this new
groundbreaking nature study which I'll
recommend our our viewers watch if they
haven't seen that yet you were looking
into cancer treatment cancer prevention
you had discovered that in the
scientific literature well established
there's a whole body of literature that
you you know incredibly well-published
Medical Professional um you know in the
industry for for decades we just simply
unaware of and we were talking about how
astonishing that was and you have since
turned that into a book a kind of
monograph um and and what you found is
I'll use that word again absolutely
astonishing so why don't you just tell
me what you discovered yeah so this was
by accident and I I certainly didn't
know this information 3 or four years
ago you know obviously you know Co open
up our eyes and it started this Quest
about looking at repurpose drugs and
alternative therapies so the bottom line
is that 30 to 40% of cancers are
preventable just through simple
lifestyle changes and through
supplements you can reduce your risk of
getting cancer which is really important
because about 10 million people on the
planet die of cancer every year
approximately 600,000 Americans die of
cancer every year and cancer will become
the most important cause of death it's
going to affect one in two men and one
in three women so it is a very common
disease and there are simple things that
people can do to to reduce your risk of
getting cancer and this is Well
published you know it's it's just been
hidden in the literature it's really
important and then similarly they very
simple effective measures that people
who have cancer can take to improve the
quality of their life and to to increase
the risk of their chances of going into
a remission and these are simple
Lifestyle Changes dietary changes and
the use of many o of over-the-counter
supplements you
know go I'm going to take myself back uh
some years and uh I remember I watched
this
documentary uh about a Dr berzinski from
uh Texas actually in Polish you would
say his name binski but that's how I
always thought but you know it was a
very interesting documentary because it
chronicled a doctor who's been in
practice for decades he had found
according to the documentary something
called an antineoplaston a way to treat
cancer um and he had a clinic that he
developed and which was ostensibly
successful all sorts of people in
industry government have been trying to
shut him down for decades but it were
unable to do so and he continued on and
he became this place where sort of you
know lost CA cases which were
untreatable someone might say oh you
could go and maybe you could try there
I've heard it helped a few people right
and and I guess the message of the
documentary also was that industry
didn't want to validate his findings
because he owned the patents that was
the premise and and and they didn't like
that so at the time I thought oh this
this seems very compelling and but you
know and I just kind of left it at that
but now hearing everything that you're
saying this whole picture takes on a
whole new meaning to me I mean you know
we talked about diabetes right and
there's you know basically treatments
for type two diabetes that have no side
effect or very few side effects and and
are actually also also work very well
and but again largely unknown right by
the by the broader medical community and
this how many in how many areas is this
actually the case you dug into cancer so
H how many methods are there that that
are actually could work that we've been
told are some kind of snake oil or
dangerous or problematic you know so
obviously you know Cancer's big business
uh it's highly profitable the average
cost of chemotherapy for a patient is
probably $100,000
so so you know big farmer makes a lot of
money the oncologists in this country
make a lot of money and the drugs we
talking about are cheap off-patent drugs
so you can understand why
the you can understand the narrative
it's much like Co it's it goes against
big farma and it goes against
traditional medicine which is a tragedy
because they very effective therapies
that can really improve the patient's
outcome and some of these can be used in
conjunction with standard chemotherapy
we're not saying that you know throw
away standard therapy these can use be
used as adjuncts uh and as supplements
to standard chemotherapy if patients so
choose and I was stunned recently to
discover that that MD Anderson Hospital
which is probably one of the biggest
cancer hospitals in the world indeed has
an integrative oncology program where
they they advise and they recommend and
they coach patients in comprehensive
lifestyle changes and just these
lifestyle changes you know which include
relaxation therapy sleep you know uh
improved diet improved relationships
exercise can
significantly reduce the risk of
patients dying of cancer I mean it's an
astonishing
finding well and and and there seems to
be actually applying applying it I guess
in in in isolated cases but it's somehow
in the collective understanding of how
the disease needs to be dealt with it's
just not really there no so you know you
go to a traditional oncologist and the
patient says would ask you know what
dietry advice would you give me and the
oncologist will say well diet has
nothing to do with it you can eat
whatever you want to and we know that's
just simply wrong there there's
overwhelming scientific data that
specific dietary interventions can have
a profound effect on cancer profound
effect and so this is a you know this is
this is challenging the standard
narrative um so binski is is this a real
therapy or what do you think yeah I
think it's real you know it's been
subject to to to scrutiny and I think
you know we we should be transparent and
open so from my understanding it seems
to be an effective treatment for for
cancer I don't understand all the
biochemistry but it doesn't mean we
can't study it it doesn't mean that it
should be outlawed by the FDA I think it
should be
investigated there's a lot of cancer
therapies have extreme side effects I
mean radiation chemotherapy right this
there's serious quality of life issues
with these therapies on the other hand
these antineoplastons vitamin D I'm not
say you know they may not be a Panacea I
don't know but the point is they don't
have they're not associated with these
types of dramatic reductions in in
quality of life so uh I mean that should
be part of the equation right absolutely
I mean many patients in many patients
the treatment of the disease is worse
than the disease and we know the extreme
toxicity of chemotherapy and
radiotherapy and you know these anop
plaston seem pretty benign and you know
all of the repurpose drugs that we
recommend are extremely safe and
effective what does the patient have to
lose you know the question is where you
you you have an intervention which is
cheap safe and possibly could completely
change the directory of the trajectory
of the patient's disease what do you
have to lose a few times when we talked
about covid in the past we talked about
vitamin D vitamin D seems to be this you
know Miracle vitamin I don't I don't
know if that's but it you know affects
the immune system significantly in
conjunction with some other um
supplements I suppose um but it also
seems from what you're saying seems to
have
positive impact on cancer not just covid
so yeah so so the vitamin D truly is
astonishing vitamin it more should be a
hormone As We Know It's very effective
for covid it's effective for
depression it's effective for
Alzheimer's
disease it's effective for diabetes and
it just so happens it's highly effective
in both the prevention and treatment of
cancer there's overwhelming data that
patients who are vitamin D deficient
have a much higher risk of developing
cancer and as we know as as you go
further from the equator and you get
less ultraviolet B and you get less
vitamin D your risk of cancer goes
up your risk of Alzheimer's goes up and
there's really good data if you take
patients if you give patients vitamin D
you reduce their risk of getting cancer
and patients who have cancer if you give
them high dose vitamin D it
significantly improves their chances of
going into a remission and this is a
simple over-the-counter
medication presumably some of these
things could also be used in combination
you could do a diet change you could do
uh vitamin D and you could also do chemo
at the same time that should help you
right or absolutely so what you say is
true these things work much better in
Synergy when they're done together so
for example one of the things we
recommend is intermittent fasting or Tim
restricted feeding it's been shown in
the literature in the oncology
literature if that you do Tim restricted
feeding at the same time you're doing
chemotherapy you get a much better
response so there's absolutely no reason
there's absolutely no reason that that
if patients are undergoing standard you
know chemotherapy that it should not be
combined with these supplemental or
complimentary techniques that can only
enhance the patient's response to
therapy one of the big findings in your
monograph is that or you you essentially
believe cancer to be a metabolic disease
now that is not I would say the
conventional wisdom is it yeah so what
you say is true it's so you know this is
based on the the work of Dr SE freed you
know he's done I mean this is his area
of expertise he's written you know
hundreds of papers he's written a book
on cancer as a metabolic disease which
basically challenges the conventional
wisdom that cancer is due to a
chromosomal
mutation and so that has a profound
implication because if if it's a
chromosomal disease then and the current
chemotherapy does make it fits with that
narrative but if cancer is a metabolic
disease then the standard approach is
not going to work and there's
overwhelming evidence I mean there's
overwhelming evidence in the literature
that that it's not a metab that it's not
a chromosomal disease it's a metabolic
disease in fact the um the person who
who who discovered d DNA you know the
Watson and Crick you know Dr Watson has
basically said in a in an oped that he
doesn't think cancer is a chromosomal
disease and we should look at the
metabolic changes that happen in cancer
I guess the question is couldn't it be
both like couldn't there be genetic you
know mutations I mean we I think that we
know that mut it's mutations that
actually cause cancer effectively right
but the question is how does that happen
and couldn't both mechanisms be right
yeah so you're right it is a complex
interplay between metabolism and
genetics we know there are some genetic
predisposition for example we know that
woman with the braa gene have a much
higher risk of developing cancer but
what's interesting is their risk of
getting cancer nowadays is about 60 or
70% of getting breast cancer 30 or 40
years ago it was 40% so it does
illustrate that there an interplay
between you know environmental and
lifestyle changes and genetics but most
it's current thinking is maybe 5% of
cancers are due to chromosomal or
genetic defects it appears that um most
cancers are are not genetically
determined there's been an increase
right in a variety significant increase
in a variety of metabolic diseases to my
eye I have not studied this but I mean
and and just in general you know I guess
in America there's this obesity epidemic
right I'm sure that actually has a
significant impact on on obviously on
metabolism how could it not right I
suppose but what did you find are the
kind of core kind of causes in your
understanding so there's a length
between obesity insulin resistance and
cancer probably underlies 30 or 40% of
of cancers are due to obesity and
insulin resistance there's a very strong
Association and so there's an
association between the intake of of
high glycemic index foods and sugar
Beverages and um and cancer because of
its effect on insulin resistance so so
there's overwhelming data and as the
incidence of obviously obesity is
increasing so it seems in parallel the
incidence of cancer is increasing and
then obviously there's the problem of
you know environmental
cogens just on to lay on top on top of
this problem over the past years I've
noticed um an increasing
perspective I I I suspect it must also
be in the literature but certainly among
um in
the health related discourse in media
and so forth that obesity is more more a
genetic disease than a lifestyle disease
yeah I don't think that's true because
people's genes haven't changed much over
the last 30 or 40 years but if you look
at the incidence of obesity particularly
in the US it's it's increased
exponentially so it is a lifestyle
disease you know like most things there
may be a genetic
predisposition but I think without
question of doubt that obesity is is a
lifestyle problem because we eat
processed foods and foods high high in
carbohydrates and glucose and we snack
all the time you know Western people
tend to eat all the time
rather than doing what our forefathers
did you know eat one or two meals a day
so Western people eat all the time they
eat highly processed foods high in
carbohydrates and glucose uh in essence
we have become you know processed food
addicts does it make sense to say that
you know if you just focused on the
Obesity
issue you could you would deal with a
whole bunch of these other issues
perhaps even cancer based on what you
said earlier yeah so I think
fundamentally lifestyle change which
which would start off with diet and then
exercise and then sleep if you if you
attacked those problems I think you
could eliminate almost all the chronic
diseases of Western society which would
be cancer cardiac disease Alzheimer's
disease I think all these chronic
diseases are related to bad lifestyle
and lifestyle
choices so you don't think it has to do
with you know increased radiation that's
one of the things you hear right often
or um yeah I I think obviously
environmental carcinogens are important
you know and people or families that
live near power lines or at an increased
risk of certain kinds of cancer the
problem is is it it's so pervasive that
you know pesticides and toxins are so
pervasive that it's very difficult for
any individual to to completely El
eliminate there is good data though that
people who who eat
um uh organic
food as organic as can be have a lower
risk of cancer so there is data showing
that if you eat a diet of organic food
your risk of cancer is less so there are
things that you can do but it's pretty
difficult to you know not to breathe the
air that we exposed to or drink the
water but um there's no question that
environmental carcinogens have played a
role okay so let's say you know in order
of importance you found a series of
lifestyle decisions and perhaps
supplements so let let's kind of go
through that and maybe in order of
importance based on your study of the
literature um you know because maybe
there's some things that folks watching
could like Implement right now that
would that would help them yeah so so I
can quote um a randomized control trial
which is the gold standed that the Ivory
Tower used so they did a a a simple
intervention three things to see what
would happen to the risk of cancer and
so it was vitamin D IM Three fatty acids
plus an exercise program and they show
the combination of all three reduce the
risk of cancer by
60%
60% so those are very simple things that
people can do so you know it's a matter
of
exercising taking vitamin D and
modifying your diet can significantly
reduce your risk of getting cancer I'm
just going to repeat that for a second
you're saying the combination of vitamin
D omega-3 a fatty acids and exercise
reduced cancer risk by 60% that's
correct
wow yes so that doesn't get a lot of
press um because you can't make money in
fact it's counterproductive for the
pharmaceutical industry and the medical
complex if people don't get cancer and
so you know this this was published in a
peer-reviewed paper a peer- reviewed
Journal it's a really good study it's
supported by other studies the many
studies that show that
exercise reduces your risk of
cancer there's data that show that
simple relaxation techniques and
techniques in terms of meditation yoga
relaxation
techniques improve your outcome if you
get cancer so there are some very
simple lifestyle interventions that can
reduce both your risk of getting cancer
and if you have cancer can improve the
outcome well I I'm just going to you
know comment on this given how prevalent
cancer is in our society I mean the risk
of cancer and you outlined this a little
bit earlier is high for every person if
you can reduce that by 60% I mean we
should all be rushing off and starting
this regimen never mind other things
you're going to tell us about in a
moment
yeah so it it doesn't get the attention
that it should get I mean you know
particularly vitamin D the the data on
vitamin D in preventing cancer in
preventing Alzheimer's disease in
preventing depression is overwhelming
and it's it's safe you know it's it's a
cheap intervention that has
minimal Adverse Events and so from my
perspective there's no reason that
everybody should not be taking vitamin
D um let's talk a little more briefly
about vitamin D can you overdose on
vitamin D so it is possible you know if
you take Mega doses of Vitamin D you you
can get very high levels which cause
high blood calcium levels which can
cause kidney stones but you have to take
exceedingly high levels so you know what
we recommend is 10,000 units a day which
seems to be a very safe dose that you
know it by all standards it's a very
high dose but the data suggests that
10,000 units a day is safe and does not
cause toxicity and you feel comfortable
sort of advising this on camera to a
broad group of people based on your
understanding of the literature yeah so
I think between 5 and 10,000 units a day
depending on your particular scenario
makes a lot of sense I mean there's
there's really good data for so you know
patients with cancer patients with
depression we would recommend maybe
10,000 units you know as a prophylaxis
for for people 5,000 units a day is a
very safe dose and again I'll just
mention this also is a covid prevention
even I suppose in a situation where
people have been let's say overly
boosted and therefore you know more
susceptible to being infected this this
would still help there's no problem to
take vitamin D and and protect yourself
yeah I mean vitamin D has enormous
immunological effects it affects gene
expression there are hundreds of genes
that are affected by vitamin D and
there's really you know excellent data
that um vitamin D reduces your risk of
getting covid and if you get Co it
reduces the severity of the disease so
your chances of being hospitalized or
dying or less so you know what we should
have been what we should have done you
know with the with the co pandemic if it
was a pandemic was we we should have
been boosting people's vitamin D level
particularly the elderly who you know in
old age homes or Elderly Homes so they
don't get much sunshine and are
certainly vitamin D deficient you know
instead of you know vaccinating them we
would have done a much greater service
to to the population if we just given
them vitamin D well and also what comes
to mind I've discussed this on a number
of programs is people with darker skin
in Northern climates don't synthesize as
much so they may have even lower levels
of vitamin D and not realizing it so
there's another you know very valuable
use Cas yes so you know elderly people
don't make vitamin D well um obese
people don't make vitamin D people of
dark skin don't make vitamin D so
there's certain groups that are even
it's even more important to take vitamin
D is there anything else vitamin D is
good
for well it's you know there's nothing
that it's bad for unless the only thing
is it can be bad for is if you have high
blood calcium so if you if you have
hypocalcemia for whatever reason you
wouldn't want to take vitamin D but
otherwise you know it's it's very safe
you mentioned something about addiction
to food and I suspect that a lot of
people you know I even just sort of I'll
mention this anecdotally um I actually I
was told recently a story about someone
who was working in the food industry
broadly speaking who quit at one point
because she realized that she her job
was basically to make food more
addictive yeah so there's no question
that processed food there's a pervasive
addiction to processed food and BAS
basically the sugar and fructose causes
a high that then stimulates the appetite
and it becomes selfs serving because the
more you eat the more you want to eat
and then you become your blood glucose
goes up and you develop uh insulin
resistance and so people are addicted
that there's animal data that shows that
glucose is more addictive to to mice
than cocaine or
heroin say that again yeah animal data
suggests that glucose like sugar like
sugar yeah like sweetened beverages yeah
is more addictive to to experimental
animals than cocaine it causes such a
heart and of course to be we're it we're
not allowed to run those experiments on
humans um
wow so there's no question that a large
segment of of the western population are
addicted to processed foods and just by
switching to real food and so you know
if it looks like food it's food you know
if it comes in a carton or has a wrapper
and it has a a package insert or a list
of ingredients and preservatives and
chemicals then it's not real food so
just by changing your diet to real food
can make an enormous difference you know
it's very interesting CU one of the
things that I I've done keto dieting for
a long time and you just the moment you
start doing it it actually becomes very
normal you just have to kind of
overcome the initial kind of desire to
to to eat the sugary things but after a
while it's it's it's not an issue at all
but I I've often told people I think the
reason it actually works is because you
just can't eat most processed things if
you're eating keto you just it's just
not not an option for you yeah so once
once you become
adapted to eating real
food eating processed food becomes very
difficult it's just becomes you know
unappetizing and doesn't have the same
appeal and so that that's why it's not a
difficult thing to do you know it should
be a lifestyle change not a diet and so
once you you start eating real food then
um the processed food becomes
unappetizing
I know it's still nice to have that you
know that burger once in a while yeah
it's kind to cheap now and then um let
me ask you about this so you know I I
myself do a lot of meditation it's been
incredibly helpful to me um at the same
time I can disclose I don't get a ton of
sleep and and so and what so what what
is the cost of that or or what what is
the right amount of sleep in this to Bro
of course it's going to be different for
different people but you mentioned that
as something that's important so sleep
is really important for brain
restoration and so there's something
called the glymphatic system which is
the way the brain detoxifies itself
during sleep it's it's it's it's like
the lymphatic system of the brain but
it's only active during sleep and so we
know that people that are sleep deprived
it reduces your life expectancy it
increases your risk of cancer so it's
really important that people you know
people have the idea that they can get
away with five or 6 hours of sleep and
it doesn't affect their their health
that is not true the data is clear that
people who who you know an adult needs
at least 7 hours of sleep and
interference with sleep in you know
increases your risk of many diseases
including you know dementia and there's
data that people who have cancer
who actually have um sleep dysfunction
have a much higher risk of of
demising absolutely fascinating what
about you know you mentioned some
repurposed drugs and so forth with for
use with cancer that are not generally
known yeah so there there there's a
there's there is a group called redo
which looks at repurpose drugs for the
use of cancer so so they list about 250
different drugs believe it or not that
have shown you know in experimental
models to have activity against cancer
cells in the book or monograph that I
wrote I reduced them down to the 30 that
I thought was the most effective and so
there are really good studies showing
that that um both in a test tube in a in
in a um animal model as well as in
patients that it has anti-cancer
activity and there's there's a list of
these you know so vitamin D is is is
number one but then we have
melatonin we have green
tea um the
anti-diabetic medication Metformin
actually is a very powerful anti-cancer
drug and then we have the antiparasitic
drugs there's
mebendazol I
that that have activity against um
cancer cells um the this I was going to
say the the horsey wormer so believe it
or not believe it or not the horsey
wormer is very effective against certain
Cancers and so we know of of cases of
patients who had solid tumors who were
given the horse dwma and the together
with some other drugs so you know as a
said it's not one one magical drug It's
a combination It's a combination
approach but we're given a regimen which
included the horse DW and the cancer
disappeared absolutely fascinating you
know it just it also struck me you know
there there's no reason why you you
couldn't have your vitamin D have your
matcha I love I probably drink matcha
every day you know uh you know
concentrated green tea in the powder and
and me melatonin or other things also
very kind of
innocuous um yes so you know the bottom
line is you know there are some patients
who would choose this approach rather
than undergoing chemotherapy or
radiotherapy particularly for cancers
that are not responsive to
chemotherapy but also you know you can
use them as adjuncts to chemotherapy so
that in the end you need less
chemotherapy and the data is clear that
the combination is more effective than
chemotherapy alone so you know this is
this is I think the point you kind of
have
to approach any treatment these days
skeptically any treatment regimen you
really have to I'm going to say the the
the the terrible term do your own
research right this was became something
that you're not allowed to say right
over over the last few years it be
absolutely I think the bottom line is
patients must be empowered Ed they need
to be empowered by the truth and they
should do their own research I think the
days are are gone where you trust sorry
I'm sorry to say this you trust
implicitly what the physician says
particularly the oncologist in this
country so in some European countries
the oncologists or integrative
oncologists they follow you know
particularly in Europe they'll use a
combination of standard therapy plus
unconven what would be considered
unconventional but it happens in the
same hospital um in this country there
you know almost all oncologists will
just follow chemotherapy so I think that
patients but with the with the exception
of this of this one which probably in
many cases would but has this whole
integrative yeah so it is interesting so
they they do they focus on lifestyle
interventions as part of it they don't
look at repurpose drugs or other dietary
manipulation so there is the I was
surprised that they actually do have
such a program uh which is really which
is fantastic but it should be much it
should be the standard of care their
patients should
follow in you know comprehensive
lifestyle changes as well as you know I
would say you know repurpose drugs how
many papers did you look at for this
monograph yeah so I looked at over 1,400
different peerreview
papers um so I think I have a pretty
good understanding of the literature and
this data is out there this data is
published I mean there's really good
data for example showing that um
controlling your diet if you have color
rectal cancer and have surgery and you
control your diet so that you control
your glucose you risk of getting a
metastases and d of a metastasis is much
less and this is in the oncology
literature so the the data is out there
um that's why patients have to do their
own research and you know which is what
I try to do in my book is to really
compile all the data out there in a
place that patients can read and then
decide you know what they think is would
be fit in with their lifestyle
over the last few years and our viewers
can you know look back to some of our
previous interviews you
know I mean you started out as
a you know running an emergency room a
big emergency room and of course and you
also developed this uh the vitamin C
sepsis protocol which is you know now
been Vindicated we've talked about that
before I think you've published over 500
papers but not really focused on
cancer why should people trust this
people would say stay in your lane Dr
Merck yes I have been asked a question
and that that is a good question so
firstly it was ICU not emergency
medicine just although it's a small
point so the the reason is is that I I
have no stake in the game that I'm I'm
not going to I have no conflict of
interest I can objectively look at the
literature and so that's what I've done
in most of my career is objectively
looked at the literature and come up
with treatment plans so I I'm I have no
conflicts here I can objectively look at
the scientific data and I can simulate
the data and I can compile the data and
so that's what I did you know I'm not
claiming to be an oncologist I'm just
presenting the data that's out there all
I'm doing is I compile the data that's
out there and because I have no conflict
of interest I have no skin in the game I
can be honest and objective and
transparent and so if
people don't think it's true well let
them decide for themselves but you know
obviously I've looked at the literature
and I'm presenting it as honestly and as
scientifically as I can well and the
reason I mentioned you know the number
of papers you have published and of
course you know sepsis is this huge
problem and frankly any hospital it's a
significant cause of death in any
Hospital you develop protocols that were
better and cheap and can be applied you
know almost anywhere in the world you
know in places where that don't have you
know terribly great Hospital facilities
I gu I guess I'm trying to say is you've
you've done a lot of thinking about how
to treat people and help make them
better including uh during covid in fact
that is actually what cost you your your
career is in you know running the ICU
because you refused to use these
protocols which we now know were
terrible right and and you applied you
tried to do something better which
indeed it worked yeah so I think Co
basically opened my eyes to be honest
you know I I followed the narrative
previously and then I realized that
there was another story there was
another side to the story and I think
the diabetes and the cancer treatment is
a good illustration that there is
another side the data is out there it
just needs to be brought to the surface
oh great so where can people find this
cancer monograph of yours yeah so two
places they can go to the flccc website
so that's
lccc.edu the monograph at on
amazon.com well wonderful well any final
thoughts as we finish yeah I think that
people need to be empowered to improve
their own health that I think cancer is
largely a prevent able disease and that
people should do what they can so they
don't get cancer it's as simple as that
well Dr Paul Merck it's so good to have
you on again thank you Yan it's always a
pleasure thank you all for joining Dr
Paul mer and me on this episode of
American thought leaders I'm your host
Yan Kell
[Music]