許銳宇：2蚊刀削麵 搞到幾乎要執笠 #信燕訪談

Hello everyone, welcome to the live broadcast of Believer in Hong Kong I am Lily Cheung Today's guest is also a member of the former Hong Kong Sha Tin District Mr. Ho Yiu-Yi Hello, Mr. Ho Hello everyone, nice to meet you again Today, I will talk to you about a very hot issue in Hong Kong recently which has become a hot topic I will share with you what the public trial is Are the two sides, the students and the shops doing a public trial? How to define a public trial? What should a public trial be done? What should not be done? I will share my opinion Because to be honest, after entering the online community everyone has a mobile phone Everyone can be a web browser I often see people at the subway station drinking a cup of bubble tea can be posted online This can make the person who drinks bubble tea under a lot of pressure from the public So what is he doing? Is it really necessary to go to such an extent? To publicly criticize him and make him under such great pressure? Everyone has a mobile phone in this era In fact, if this thing is not well controlled it will cause a lot of harm to others And the person who wants to do a public trial cannot be controlled So today we are going to focus on this topic and share this issue with everyone Yes, the recent hot topic on social media is that there is a loss of control in Tuen Mun City Some netizens commented that the whole family is so bad It's really rare Dr. Ho, please comment on this The whole family is like this It's really rare Basically, the whole family will be in the same state Because this is related to family education OK, let's talk about the story It's about a young couple One or two of them are students They went to a noodle shop to eat noodles When they paid the bill they told the boss that they are students and asked if there was a 2 yuan discount Then the boss looked at the students He felt that they were not students So he refused to give them a 2 yuan discount As for why the boss didn't give them a 2 yuan discount There may be two reasons No one knows about this There are two reasons One is that he deliberately did not give He knew he was a student He deliberately did not give The second reason is that he couldn't tell if he was a student So he decided not to give a 2 yuan discount according to the store's final decision As for the young couple they were not satisfied So they went to Google Review and left a comment They left a comment on the store I think I need to read this comment Let's analyze whether this comment is a fair comment or not Let me read it The young couple's comment is like this The service attitude is bad This is not a problem This is his subjective feeling He said that he has always been a street vendor He refused to give students a 2 yuan discount He deliberately pretended to be a student and wanted to cheat you This statement is rather strange I believe the student wanted to express that he was not happy when he was deceived by the store owner Although this statement is a bit complicated but it is not a problem if it is interpreted in this way Let's continue He asked me which school pretended to be blind and couldn't see and said that he had never heard of it and said that it was not a Tuen Mun school and refused to give I believe that in the process of the interaction the store owner couldn't tell whether he was a student through his clothes so he asked him which school In this comment the young couple made an assumption The store owner knew he was a student but he pretended to be blind and pretended that he was not a student As I said earlier the store owner refused to give a 2 yuan discount There are two possibilities One is that he knew he was a student so he refused to give The other is that he couldn't tell so he decided not to give according to their final decision Through this student's comment the student's comment felt that the store owner knew he was a student He saw his school uniform but the store owner pretended to be blind This is what I saw in the comment He continued At first, he should have written Tuen Mun School's Discount To put it simply He was right If the store owner had said that only Tuen Mun students could get a discount he should have written it in the menu because the menu only said that only students could get a discount This is also a reasonable comment The young man and woman Then he continued After watching the movie he might not have any business but he still wanted to get a 2 yuan discount so he left it for you to ride a bike I think there is a small problem He still insisted on the judgment that he thought the store owner knew he was a student so he refused to give a 2 yuan discount This was a deliberate action so he left it for you to ride a bike This is a negative comment In my opinion the young man and woman's comment is also a fair comment But there is one thing that is not perfect He might have his own subjective judgment so he thought it was a first-come, first-served basis The store owner knew that he was a student so he deliberately refused to give him a 2 yuan discount This is his speculation He can have his own speculation But this speculation Is it true that you can be the only one who can be the only one But looking at the whole comment in the Google review I think it is very reasonable After leaving this comment the store owner started to respond to this comment How did he respond? He said This store has a minimum consumption of 40 yuan per person and you two have a total consumption of 54 yuan So this store has no minimum consumption This statement is meaningless Because this store actually has a minimum consumption But your store has decided not to accept the minimum consumption You have already decided This does not mean you can not give a 2 yuan student discount at the same time Unless you make it clear in the process I won't accept your minimum consumption this time But at the same time I won't give you a 2 yuan student discount So these three statements are meaningless Your store owner decided not to accept his minimum consumption You don't make it clear This is your problem It has nothing to do with whether you give a 2 yuan student discount These three are nonsense So you don't have to watch The store owner continues to explain Plus, it doesn't look like a student It doesn't look like wearing a school uniform The name of the restaurant is on the menu The store retains the final right to decide In the response The store also put the photo of the young man and the young woman on the Internet Of course, he was blinded by his appearance Okay, from the store's response Everyone can see In fact, they think The store's response is They don't give this 2 yuan discount Because he can't judge that student They didn't mean to not give this 2 yuan discount He can't judge the student Plus, the store used the final right to decide It was decided that in the absence of judgment I didn't give that 2 yuan discount This is the store's response After watching these two conversations First of all, many people will think about one thing Is it that these two people are judging each other? In my opinion, yes This is a public trial In fact, let's take a look at what is called a public trial Because there are many public trials now Because everyone has a mobile phone Everyone can become a network Can fight for other people's support After this is simple and easy Many people will put what happened to him And another person's private incident Will put this on the Internet Then make this matter public From my personal point of view What is a public trial? If you think something Someone did something wrong And you don't like it You make this matter public Hope others can be in the same position as you To accuse that person In fact, this is a public trial Look at this definition You make a public trial in Google Review Of course, the store does not agree with the student's speech Speak out his opinion In this case He also hopes to lead the speech to that side To support him Not to support the student In fact, his two actions In fact, there is no need to argue Both are public trials But public trial is also a matter of agreement and disagreement As a store You open the door to do business Plus you marked your store on Google Map In this case In fact, you are inviting people To make a comment on your store The comment must be good or bad All bad comments must be public trials So you say Basically from the student's point of view He made this comment In fact, he is conducting a public trial against you This public trial is agreed in advance Because you went to Google Map to make a store It must be a review like this So you say He made this public trial In theory, it is a definition It is something that has been confirmed This public trial behavior is not a problem Is this thing right? He can't get this two-dollar discount Is he wrong? Or the student is right? Or the store owner is right? This thing needs to be considered Both sides are public trials against each other In that principle But it can be distinguished between right and wrong Plus Plus as a store You are facing the audience In the case of serving the audience In fact, you should have a psychological preparation Plus you are in the Google Review You put this label on If you really have a psychological preparation You will often be criticized You have such a psychological preparation So you are expected to have a public trial In this case Even if he judges this right or wrong Even if I look at it from the store's point of view The store's point of view is that He can't judge Is he a student? So he retains the final right to decide Decide not to give him a two-dollar discount The store's statement He has no ability He didn't say they were not students They just said they couldn't judge They can't be sure It's just that these two people are not students He can't judge In this case You are in a store In fact, because it serves the public You have a reputation Otherwise, you won't respond So in this case, you open a store In a situation where you are suspicious You can't judge if he is a student In a situation where you are suspicious There is only one principle You would rather lose yourself Don't let the other party lose So it's hard to argue In the store's point of view The best approach must be him If you really can't judge if that person is a student Unless you are really very clear That person must not be a student You don't give it reasonable But if you can't judge Is that person a student? The most basic approach is You would rather lose yourself It's better than losing the other party So if the store After he said that Can't judge students Then make a mistake Your judgment may be right or wrong But since the student insists Under the circumstances of his own student He is willing to admit his mistake And correct this mistake Welcome him back to consume Give some benefits Even give him a free treatment In fact, up to this part This matter can be handled very well The biggest problem The biggest problem is that The restaurant took the student Through CCTV Took the student's photo Revealed Although there is a barrier What is the problem with this? Because the problem is that Many people don't like their identity If they are involved in a dispute He doesn't like his identity Is being publicized Especially he is a minor So in this situation If that minor Tell you You show his photo Although there is a barrier Also makes him very uncomfortable You as a service provider You as an adult In fact, you should delete the photo immediately This is not related to Whether the photo was taken from CCTV Because many lawyers have said You took a photo from CCTV May violate some privacy regulations But I think even if your shopper Didn't use CCTV to take the photo You just took the photo with your phone Without the problem of CCTV If the other party is a minor He is a customer of yours He feels uncomfortable in this dispute He hopes you delete his photo I think you should do this without hesitation This is very clear Because many times Just now I said Yes, even if you think the student's comment Is really unbearable Even if you don't agree But what they did wrong I am now looking at it from the perspective of the shopper Even if you really don't like the student's comment If you want to punish him The punishment should be Put his face in the public domain To make him uncomfortable I think it's not up to him You should think about it Because one of the things of public prosecution Is that you put a certain person In a private dispute with you Or a certain person What he did in a certain scene You put his behavior online Then the pressure he received The degree of discomfort he felt Will be far beyond what he did wrong at the beginning So if the shopper Even if you really think The student's comment is wrong Do you need to put a student's photo online Then make him in such an unhappy Such a stressful situation I don't think it should be A person with a normal conscience Actually shouldn't do that Especially when the student Under the circumstances of your request You should delete it Whether this photo is from the CCTV You took it yourself There is no problem with the privacy In fact, you should also delete that photo The whole story is like this Because the flow of the story is like this This matter is also Because many times, many legal issues Will you violate the product description regulations? Will you violate the privacy regulations? These things You really hit the official until the last moment I don't know who is right and who is wrong But from a common sense perspective It can be judged that In fact, the handling of this shop is problematic Because you are a service provider You are a good go-mad place You put the shop in Then you must have invited some people Come to make a comment This comment must be very bad There must be some bad comments in this situation There must be some bad comments It must be a public trial Of course you can respond But your response It really needs to be very rational And based on the facts In this case Unless you think that person He deliberately did something Is a very big harm to you The damage is so great that you need to put his personal information online Let others be alert This person has a problem Everyone recognizes him Otherwise, I think you are in a restaurant You respond to a customer's comment You don't need to pay attention to the identity of the customer Even if you just blur his photo I think a lot of times We have to put a certain person's behavior That is, some interpersonal interactions with you Put it online Let others have a chance to talk about that matter Or that person Unless that person's matter is really serious To the extent that the whole society Must be alert to that person's matter You will do this But now a lot of times We go to interrogate a person It's very casual Sometimes he may be at the subway station Maybe have a drink Eat something You won't go and tell him Don't do this But he is But people already like to secretly take pictures Then put it online Then a lot of people criticize him And the person And that record is forever Maybe he ate that thing It's just a moment If there is a benefit for the Hong Kong Railway You can handle this case You go to report to the Hong Kong Railway Maybe pay a few hundred dollars His punishment should be Pay a few hundred dollars to the Hong Kong Railway Is it to the extent that You want to put it online To make this forever a record His children will see It will make his family embarrassed I think a lot of times For these people The identity That person's identity To be public in the public We have no boundary From this case Put that student's photo online We can see that many times In fact, a lot of times Are doing similar things Like once It happened in Hong Kong There was a grandpa Because his grandson was very tired He was in a wheelchair Riding a bus next to the grandpa He was sleeping Then the grandpa Maybe he loved his grandson Maybe he touched his grandson Then the passenger sitting opposite Put this scene online Then said The old man That grandpa Was molesting his grandson This behavior is very unusual If you see a molestation Happened You don't stop You just take a picture online And make that person Under the pressure of public opinion Plus that thing It's not true It's just a relationship between a grandpa and a grandson A lot of times I think our public Now there is a mobile phone After a network In fact, a lot of times Unconsciously To carry out these so-called public prosecution actions To make some people Even if he really did something wrong He was punished with an unspeakable punishment So I hope Through this case To talk about What is the public trial In what situation is it right In what situation is it wrong I think if you really want to Your private disputes Or in a public arena See some people doing something wrong If you want to put this thing online To prosecute him Unless that thing There is really a very good public interest issue If the public interest issue is so big You feel that the whole society Is to warn this person To this matter I think that On the knife of Yi Pin There is a student who left two comments I really don't want to To take someone's photo And post it on the Internet To make him bear Such an unnecessary pressure So I think Don't talk about legal issues Let's talk about common sense I think this case It must be On the knife of Yi Pin That's wrong Needless to say But of course It's the same thing It's wrong On the knife is wrong But as for On the knife is wrong Under the circumstances What level of punishment do they need to bear In the society This is something we have to take care of I can't tell you now Our whole society Public opinion How deep is their love for him Because I see some Sometimes the public opinion on the Internet is very bad Saying that this family Should not continue to live in the world The whole gang should go to commit suicide I can buy charcoal for him I think these remarks are problematic So we think Of course We have to criticize things that are not right We have to be reasonable To say where he is wrong But I also have my own boundary To be honest Now the whole society is attacking this shop Not only Google Review But they are wrong It's wrong in this matter But to their punishment Where did it go? Of course If they have some ordinary clashes Violation of private law Then you call the police Make the law punish him But outside the law We have some public opinion pressure There are some social deaths It has appeared now But where has our whole society gone? This is also our warning Because now this society After a while Everyone is a judge Everyone is judging people You are very happy when you talk But how much harm have you done to others? And the person who made the mistake That punishment And the degree of his crime Is it relative? This is something we have to be very careful So even if there is no need Don't just Put your own personal grudges with others Or you see some small things in public If you are very dissatisfied Just take it out Put it online Then find a lot of supporters Stand in the same line with you Together to make that person In this society Die without any grudges I think this is in this online society It's a very dangerous thing Then I will share a little more When I was a district councillor A lot of neighbors Foreign men Come over and talk Threaten me and so on But I never put them My store is also closed My former office is also closed When I see someone coming in to make trouble Actually I have taken pictures I can be there at any time I can legally post their faces online Then make all the neighbors blame him Because our district councillors Have influence in the community If you want to make a person Social death is easier But I am very careful I never put these neighbors If you come in to make trouble Of course he can't do anything He dare not hit me At most it's just a verbal insult But I don't think so Because I am a district councillor I can open the door and do business I have prepared for this Just like opening a store I have also prepared for this So some people Even if they attack you on the Internet This is what we are willing to do We will not casually Put a person who has broken up with us The identity of the person who has dissatisfaction with us Is public Because to be honest He came in and scolded me a few words Actually, I don't hate, don't want, and don't feel pain I am not afraid Under no circumstances I want to put you online Speaking of which, I seem to be very afraid Speaking of which, I seem to be very concerned Because I hope that many people will come to support me To make trouble for the neighbors I think this is a punishment for him It's beyond his knowledge of me So I have a lot in my previous office There are a lot more serious things than these complaints Come in to make trouble But we never put a photo of a neighbor Whether it's a fight or not We never put these things on the Internet To be told So in this era I think we really need to be careful when judging people Because I now see some so-called good YouTubers Even go to someone else's store Go into the store to take pictures to provoke them I hope they make that person angry Then they can make money I think this is actually immoral So this matter To be honest, from my personal point of view This kind of family, this kind of store In fact, there are a lot in Hong Kong It's just that they appeared in the U.S. So many people scold him It's a mess But I think our boundary must be there Some people did something wrong We should blame them Even the previous media In the absence of approval Take a camera and go into someone else's store to interrogate Is this reasonable? I think there is a problem here So at a certain stage You can distinguish between right and wrong But it doesn't mean that after that person makes a mistake You can do anything to him I think this is We hope to learn from this Lily, finish Yes, I think this store Should pay more attention to customers After all, it's a business Don't have to pay two dollars You give two dollars to the student The student himself has nothing to do He is also a consumer So there is no loss, right? Other neighbors will come to visit you next time We actually have comments from the audience One of the audience said Is it that evil can be great? Of course evil is not great You can do this kind of service industry In fact, it's the same sentence The point is If you can't judge one thing He is not a student You can't judge Should he be given a discount? We do food business You only have one solution I would rather lose myself than lose the other person We do the same thing in each district When that thing We can't judge Is it my fault or your fault? You try not to offend people But if that thing is really his fault It's ridiculous Then you don't need to blame him Right or wrong Right? But to be honest There is a law on this Suspended for 2.0 In the service industry I think 2.0 is about customers Right? I think this is a very reasonable business approach But there is no way That family That emotion is obviously problematic Everyone, right? There are so many people like this In fact, in our Hong Kong society The Chinese society is very common But it is obvious In this family The father is the head of the family His wife is also very afraid of her husband Even if he Maybe he Because his wife is a caretaker There is no way She is also afraid that her husband may lose control And so on Under such circumstances She will make that lady That is, her wife Will also produce some aggressive behavior Hope to take that Maybe her intention is Don't want her husband to continue Continue to be stimulated Will lose control Under such circumstances She hopes to get rid of the reporter as soon as possible Or those two students And some aggressive behavior His wife His two sons In the whole family I think To some extent Maybe it's his father's Unable to control his own emotions That is, the knowledge of the matter is not very good In a situation where the cultural level is not very good A product In fact, I think this is a tragedy Right? I think this is a tragedy Then I won't have a good To be honest, a child With this personality It's hard Only a very small number of people Can grow up in a bad family environment Then he can Can walk a line with their parents Is Is very different Or a better way Very few Generally, children How is your family growing up You are probably like this So my family In fact, I think This type of family Actually in our Chinese society Hong Kong society It's not very good Yes Then there must be an emotional problem This is also a tragedy I don't have much to say This is for you to see a psychiatrist This is our program It's also a problem that can't be solved for you The problem we can solve is If this is a public trial Then how should we look at this incident And what is our opinion on this incident Because many times We often only go to the public trial The extent of our public trial To the extent that the client He was subjected to The mistake he made at the beginning Is a very appropriate punishment Because it makes the person under a lot of pressure Especially in this cyber society This thing We hope from this incident What can be learned What can be warned Many people do such things Share the biggest example My friend She has a son Then she went to pick up her My friend has a son When she went to school Because other parents are willing to Free car Take my son's friend to school Once there was an accident When her friend was driving her son An accident occurred That accident is basically You can say It's her friend's responsibility Then the driver, her friend She thinks The child's parents That is, another friend of mine Should bear part of the loss of the accident Of course The child's parents are not willing But the biggest problem She posted this on the Internet Posted on a different group To blame the driver Right? In this case In fact Of course, the person driving must bear the greatest responsibility But if it's in terms of humanity Even if you don't pay It's not as if you're going to do this Private, 9-minute private Posted on the Internet Then make the driver Originally, he was going to do a good thing Will make him Suffer such an unsuitable punishment A social condemnation This thing is Because we are often Now everyone can do In the case of three seconds hero We often take these public trials Will do it It's unknown You have to feel very good after doing it So I believe some British friends Also know about this The problem of the second-hand driver I think this is something we need to be aware of Yes, from a good perspective The netizen just commented He said, is this evil too big? If it's from a good point of view That is, the shopkeeper is more concerned about the customer Think about it from this aspect He may handle it well If not, he will do it from the evil side Is not handled well For example, this is two dollars, right? Then give it to the customer Then next time when he comes back Come back to visit He makes money He doesn't think so In fact, he is very evil Thought to be evil to bully people Thought to be evil If you are evil, you will handle this matter well In fact, it's not If you are really evil, it's not handled well Yes, Huisheng I think knowledge is power Logic is also power In fact, any public relations crisis You can also become a public relations Because there are public relations crises A lot of people are talking about this If you do it well You can turn the image 180 degrees Make you get a lot of points Because you get a lot of points, a lot of people know You get a lot of points, a lot of people know So this family This family really has no cultural background So he doesn't even know where he is sitting It's just that he doesn't want to be shamed He doesn't want to lose face In this case, he uses this kind of thinking to do people As a normal person You should use a fact and logic to do people In this matter If I were him, what would I do? First of all, I won't take out the minimum fee of 40 yuan Because I decided not to train you at that time I don't want it anymore This is my own choice I don't want In this case It has nothing to do with the 2 yuan discount I gave you You decided not to take the minimum fee It's one thing But if someone else has this student discount You have to give it to someone OK In this case I was the shopkeeper I couldn't judge you as a student at the beginning I decided not to give you this discount It's my fault Because as a normal shop If I can't judge Are you a student? In this case, I would rather be at a loss Don't be at the mercy of others At the mercy of customers So our behavior at the beginning We made a mistake We are willing to pay a compensation to your student Even if we are willing to entertain you for free Come to my shop Eat a bowl of noodles To be honest, how much does it cost to eat a bowl of noodles? But your public relations The processing can be Because you have been criticized by a lot of people A lot of people know this If you do well A lot of people know That bowl of noodles is not enough You can treat the whole family to eat Treat the whole class to eat No problem That day I didn't entertain Don't entertain other customers Or entertain your classmates I want to apologize This thing In fact, if one has logic People with thinking will do this OK At the beginning You put the student's photo on You are not too malicious But you The student thinks he is uncomfortable You are willing to delete the photo Because He gave a comment at the beginning To do something Although this comment I disagree Because I didn't give you two dollars It's not because I want to take the initiative to cheat you It's just that I can't judge So Of course, your comment at the beginning I disagree with this But I don't think Your comment Is necessary to make your identity exposed And make you feel the pressure So I put the photo on the Internet at the beginning Without thinking so much Willing to apologize And immediately delete the photo And invite him back to dinner The whole thing is over The shop owner can also Can get a lot of points Can get a lot of people's affirmation Because it's not a public relations company Because a public relations company You have to know where you are wrong Know where the expectations of the society are Then you can take care of the expectations of the society So a public relations crisis Becomes a public relations crisis A lot of people know If you handle it well People will think your company is reliable Have their own thoughts Will know where they are wrong So I used to be in a lot of trouble Whether it's doing a show Whether it's doing a show with you Sometimes I'm in a hurry Must be scolded You must know if the person who scolded you is right Where is it right If it's not right, you must say it's not right If it's right, you have to say sorry to him Then you have a compensation plan Then you stand up and say goodbye People will never make mistakes But at the moment of mistake The more people know The more people will agree So a public relations disaster is not a problem Of course it can be avoided But when this happens This is also an opportunity Because the lower you are The better you are It's that simple This is a good way to show your ability to deal with crises In fact, you don't need to be afraid of public relations Public relations disaster Handle it well Willing to listen to others' opinions This is definitely a good opportunity I hope you can really think about it Don't morally kidnap people A small shop If you keep chasing him He will fall It's useless to talk about these Emotional kidnapping It's useless to ask others to sympathize with you These can't help you The most helpful thing is to recognize the fact Recognize the mistake Make a good compensation This is the best way to deal with it The student or reporter The reporter was beaten by the shop owner Maybe they were afraid I think they just want to apologize to the store owner I don't think it's necessary to be in such a bad mood because there are still good people in this world. If you hit someone and don't apologize, if you put someone online and yell at them, this evil side will show up. I think if this store is like Huisun said, apologize to others, I think it will be fine. I think what we see is very objective. There must be something wrong with that person's emotions. But the media, in the absence of approval, suddenly rushed into someone else's store, took a picture of a person, from a very hostile perspective. To be honest, no one will like the question he asked. Of course, their reaction is too aggressive. But do you think the media in this case did a good job? I don't think so. So as human beings, we shouldn't stand on someone else's side and think we have to take care of that person. It's not necessary. The right person can also make mistakes in the process of doing the right thing. Then you will see it clearly. But Huisun said that when the store was not open, he felt that he did something wrong. But he was hit by the female store owner. I didn't say that. Huisun, in the absence of approval, you are just a child. I don't think you should be too aggressive. I said once that there was a media. The student brought a media and suddenly, without the store owner's notice, began to take pictures, rushed into someone else's store. Then the store owner, that is, the son, sat there. Then they used a more confrontational method to do a shooting, a so-called interview. I think this was not done well enough. I'm talking about this. I'm talking about the little girl who went into the store before it was open and asked him to do this. I think this is... You say, you say, you say, someone is closing the door, you are an outsider, you rushed in without permission. Is this the best thing you can do? No. But did you really pose a great threat to the store? No. A student went in. You are two adults. How did he threaten you? So, the other party also went to war. Of course, you suddenly rushed in. When you hadn't opened the door, you still had a problem. But he really had a mission. He wanted to go in and ask you for something. He didn't threaten you. That's not a problem. A student, one day, when he hadn't opened the store, went into the store and made a request. This is a big deal. Yes, in fact, he just asked for an apology. I don't think this is a threat to the store owner. But if you are a media, a few people, holding a camera, doing business in a store, because honestly, in private, you have to get permission from the store owner to take a photo. Yes, you have to get permission from the store owner. In this case, you are a media, you rushed in, and took a photo of him. This made him very emotional. Of course, I'm not saying that his emotion was right. But I think this is what a media should do. I don't think this is the best thing to do. Even now, there are some people, I'm telling you, a lot of YouTubers, in order to make money, will go to the store to take photos, to challenge the store owner, even hoping that he can make the store owner angry, and make the channel go viral. These actions are absolutely unacceptable. This is immoral. So let's not say I have a bad habit, no matter what others do to him, it's okay. We don't have this idea. Otherwise, everyone will change. You don't support others to do certain things, but you do the same thing. I think we have to be very calm and look at the whole thing. This is our correct way of thinking. It's not that you are bad, so what about others? You jump off the building and commit suicide. It's okay. Do you want me to buy a guitar for you? I don't think we should think like that. Yes, that's right. Do you have any supplementary questions? No. I have talked to everyone for 40 minutes today. I hope I can help everyone. In this age full of netizens, we have to ask ourselves from time to time to protect ourselves. See you next time. I hope I won't see you on YouTube next time. Bye-bye. Okay. That's all for today's live broadcast. Thank you, everyone. Thank you, Dr. Ho. See you next time. Bye-bye.