（有視頻）鍾劍華博士：防不勝防 兩會私家車撞中南海 共產黨不惜一切毀滅香港 23條惡過國安法 致命打擊 港人無險可守？軟對抗！時代廣場水靜鶴飛 #Lucy連線

The first thing the riot police did was to shout slogans, like the Communist Party is a murderer. Then suddenly, I saw some media reports that the riot police were holding firecrackers. The riot police might have been electrocuted. They might have electrocuted this person, and then so many people grabbed him. I don't know if it was a coincidence, but the video might have been recorded. The short video is like this. But now I see on Twitter, it seems that this video has disappeared. But this video was downloaded by someone else and passed on to me. Yes. To be honest, isn't this a bit of a precautionary measure from the CCP? That is, there are people expressing their opinions in such a difficult environment. In fact, these things happen in the mainland by chance. This is a fact. Of course, the official will not make a special announcement, nor will it be detailed. But sooner or later, it will be seen by the media on the Internet. There are even many videos. I believe that part of it is true. For example, a few days ago, in Jiangsu Zhangjiajie, there was also a case where someone blew up the city government door, and then said that he would stay in self-isolation, and said that he would stay in self-isolation to visit, right? Since then, the official media has not been able to report. In the past, there were different local governments in 1999 and 2000. Some of them were quite violent. For example, I have seen some people who were driving a truck and rushed to the police station, and the whole police station collapsed. It is said that several police officers died. Similar videos will appear on the mainland platform soon. Of course, it will be gone soon. The official will not report in detail, because the official is most worried that these actions will infect others. But we can believe that some people feel that they are wronged, and thus turn their grievance into a force that is very destructive to the government. They use some so-called terrifying means, even if they can't get justice, to vent their anger. This is something that has happened in many different places in China. I don't know what the reason is, and I don't think everyone knows. I don't think it's surprising that some people express their dissatisfaction when holding a meeting. This is a channel that lacks credibility. There is no media monitoring. Many officials' actions are quite excessive. I believe it is hard to avoid. In 2008, there was a young man in Shanghai, his name was Yang Jiayi. Do you remember? It seems that he rushed into the police station and killed six or seven or eight people. This has happened in many places. In the end, they used high-profile propaganda to sentence the victim to death. Officials are most afraid of these acts of infection. So sometimes they use propaganda to express their grievances. But often these grievances are related to the fact that power is not governed, and there are too many innocent grievances in Chinese society. So I forgot the case you mentioned earlier. I can only say that in the past, I have often seen such videos and reports on the Internet. I believe this is a channel that lacks credibility, there is no media monitoring, and the officials are quite overbearing. In the case of power being monopolized, it is a matter that is difficult to avoid. I think so. Do you have any feelings? Do you still remember the Peng Law, Yes, I do. I don't know how he is doing now. Yes, I am a little worried about this kind of incident, this kind of conflict. What do you think of these protesters? What do you think of their situation? Peng Law did not hurt anyone. He was just setting fire to the police station. And the fire was not very big. But after that, this person was completely lost. Later, there was a rumor that he had been shot. No one knows whether it is true or not. In short, no one knows where this person has gone. There are many similar situations. For example, at the end of last year, during the White Paper movement in December, there were a few female students who spoke very bravely. After speaking, no one knows where these students have gone. I don't know if I will hear any more of their news in the future. So, as I said earlier, if a power is not implemented, the officials are so evil, so that there is no channel to survive in society. Some people said that if he did it normally and peacefully, his personal prospects would be very good. Some people also saw this and used some very violent means. As I said earlier, in Jiangsu, Zhangjiajie, this person, said that he wanted to be a corrupt official, so he blew up the government building in Jiangsu. Before 10 o'clock, some people used cars to blow up the police station. The police were exhausted. As you said earlier, he went to the police station and killed 60 police officers. Then he was arrested and killed. Some people really went to a stage where they felt that even if they had to die, they had to vent their anger. This is a kind of oppressive society. I believe this is a very unfortunate result. This time, the two sessions did not particularly highlight the key points. Because the three sessions did not take place. If the three sessions did not take place at the end of last year, the government's five-year plan and economic development plan would not have been exposed. So this time, the two sessions did not discuss the government's five-year plan and economic development plan in a formal manner. As you can see, it is just a normal thing. The Prime Minister made a report. In fact, I think the report is not very new. The most eye-catching part is that it covers the long-term international 10,000 billion plus 39,000 billion and then increased the military spending. The government's report is even less eye-catching. So this year, after the two sessions, there will be a major announcement. I don't think I can see it yet. Maybe tomorrow. What everyone is most concerned about is whether the three sessions will be held after the two sessions. Usually, there is no specific date. Usually, it is held at the end of the first year of the current government. Now, it is already the middle of March of the second year. It is expected to be delayed for three or four months. I don't know what is the reason. According to some sources, it is because of many big local debt issues. The government has reached a compromise between the government and the local government. The government has reached a compromise between the government and the local government. I don't know whether the three sessions will be held after the two sessions. I haven't noticed any announcement yet. The situation is quite special. The cancellation of the General Press Conference is the same as what has happened in the past 30 years. Although it is a closed government, the General Press Conference is still a kind of state-of-the-art to meet with reporters and ask questions. Secondly, it highlights the role of the Prime Minister in handling the national economy. Now, the Prime Minister's press conference is not held. Thirdly, it highlights the role of the Prime Minister to be marginalized. Of course, this is the second General Press Conference since the last session last year. This is the second General Press Conference since the last session last year. This is the fifth General Press Conference since the last session last year. I don't know whether this General Press Conference will be held in the next five years or this General Press Conference will be held after the last session in the coming five years. It is just an assumption. I think that Chief Executive Li Ka-shiu and the officials have done their best. Otherwise, they wouldn't have been allowed They went to Beijing to hold a meeting, and came back the next day It's obvious that they went to Beijing to hold a meeting, and then received an order They had to do it as soon as possible Of course, I believe that after Xia Baolong came to Hong Kong Maybe they went back to Beijing and talked about it So I believe that the officials in Hong Kong knew when they went to Beijing So they came back immediately, which is quite funny This is such an important bill It's already inappropriate to hold a meeting for a month Because in the past, these important bills should have been held for three months Or even half a year Now it's been a month and a new year On the second day, March 8th On the first day of March 8th The second reading was held on the morning of the 5th Then the second reading was held on the afternoon of the 5th This really fully reflects the current legislation I believe, to be honest, I even suspect that this draft was received by Chief Executive Li Ka-shiu when he came to Beijing Maybe it wasn't written by the Hong Kong government Anyway, it might have been written by Beijing After coming down, it was obvious that the regulations were quite excessive I believe that the MPs have never had a chance to read it before And then they just went with the flow If you really want to seriously review a bill of more than 200 pages How is it possible to review it in such a short period of time? Basically, the MPs are just acting All of them are just doing the job of the government They are not subordinate to the government So, in one or two days, they can review more than 60% Just like what Li Ka-shiu said One day early, one day late Maybe by the end of March, they can vote to pass the bill And it is certain that the current legislative council will pass the bill They are basically just acting as subordinates to the administration They are not executors of the administration Those people are not even a political representative I believe this is very clear If you look at the draft, I haven't read it all But if you look at the crimes that have been known It is very ridiculous If you can get information about national security on the street You have to hand it over to the police If not, it is illegal National security information can be obtained on the street National secrets can be obtained on the street It is very ridiculous And the crimes in it are very boring Now the situation is As Peng said, Alvis may be guilty It is very risky You don't even know The so-called regulations on crimes are very vague There are even some expressions What is illegal harassment? I really don't understand what illegal harassment is There are many such questions And the punishment is very heavy Now you are saying that you will report to the prosecutor If the prosecutor doesn't report, it will be a hindrance That is to say, Hong Kong people will be frozen in the future And they don't know where the standard is It is a law that has completely destroyed Hong Kong society As I said before I even suspect that this law May not be written by the Hong Kong government I don't know if it was received in Beijing So I think it's a bit too much I think in this situation, if it is passed Hong Kong people are basically safe Anything can be said to violate the national security You don't even know what a confidentiality is What is confidentiality? What is incitement? If Apple Daily is an incitement Is there a law to explain that Apple Daily is an incitement? In the past, a lot of people left on the computer Some news reports and photos Is it called incitement? I think this is quite excessive It is quite boundless It also reflects the absence of power I think for Hong Kong society The damage will be great As far as I know, Hong Kong's situation is very bad There are several reasons First, Hong Kong people are under the current atmosphere The atmosphere of society is so oppressive So many people don't have much mood to have fun To consume, right? If the atmosphere is not good, it will naturally be like this Second, the financial effect caused by the economic downturn The stock market is not very good Although now the national team has entered the market Supporting more than 16,000 points But there is no breakthrough It is also obvious The national team's bullet consumption is about the same It's not surprising to fall back This financial effect Also reduced Hong Kong people's desire to consume There are also some reasons for the so-called distant confrontation If you don't support this government If you don't welcome this government I would rather save money to travel to Japan or Taiwan Or go back to Shenzhen to consume It's better than consuming in Hong Kong This kind of bottom-up mentality I think some people have it So it caused Hong Kong Now the market is really bad If you add the 23rd Legislation I believe it will make people try to avoid going out In order to save money I believe this is also a very obvious effect So I think The damage caused will be more serious than the National Security Law Plus the crimes are so crude So unspeakable And the definition is so empty My punishment is so heavy So I believe It will cause a very fatal blow to Hong Kong The long-term society in Hong Kong Is very optimistic Some people are doing it For example, some people are so-called on the international front They have been traveling between different international organizations and parliaments Hoping everyone will pay attention to Li Zhiying Pay attention to the Hong Kong 47-person case Pay attention to the inappropriate practices Then you will see the EU Parliament Or the US government, the British Foreign Ministry Are all focusing on the Hong Kong issue first Whether it's Li Zhiying or the National Security Law Whether it's the 23rd, there are voices But after all, if the Communist Party Doesn't know everything The effect of these voices may not be very big This is a fact But I think the important thing is If these people continue to do this At least to continue the memory Don't forget Don't let people forget this matter too quickly Continuously pay attention to this matter Also, some people in the international community Keep making these voices For example, the US has two bills every year The Secretary of State needs to submit a report The presidential administration The presidential administration has to make a decision Every year, the European Parliament will discuss the issue of Hong Kong I believe this is a way to continue the current situation It's better than completely forgetting As for what else to do I don't have any special ideas I think those who can make a voice Will continue to make a voice Or overseas Can convey the views and opinions of Hong Kong people I believe it can convey to Hong Kong people Because many people in Hong Kong Can't make a voice Thank you, Dr. Sun You're welcome, bye