To start comparing quotes and simplify insurance-buying check out Policygenius: https://policygenius.com/healthcaretriage Thanks to Policygenius for sponsoring this video!
Dark chocolate has gained a health food reputation, but is the hype too good to be true? Is it possible that a daily dose of something so delicious can improve cognitive function and heart disease risk? Let’s take a look at the science - both the studies and how they were funded - and let’s take on the question of how most dark chocolate products are processed and what that means in terms of health.
Other Healthcare Triage Links: 1. Support the channel on Patreon: http://vid.io/xqXr 2. Check out our Facebook page: http://goo.gl/LnOq5z 3. We still have merchandise available at http://www.hctmerch.com 4. Aaron's book "The Bad Food Bible: How and Why to Eat Sinfully" is available wherever books are sold, such as Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hGvhKw Credits: Aaron Carroll -- Writer Meredith Danko – Social Media Tiffany Doherty -- Writer and Script Editor John Green -- Executive Producer Stan Muller -- Director, Producer Mark Olsen – Art Director, Producer
this episode is supported by policy
genius you could save 50
or more on life insurance by comparing
quotes with policy genius
head to policygenius.com healthcare
triage to learn more
there are a handful of foods on which a
health halo of sorts has been bestowed
these are so-called superfoods like
avocados quinoa and chia seeds
the evidence for these as for most
nutritional claims is scant
but one thing we do know is the candy's
not a health food right
but thanks to some typically poor
nutrition data media hype and crafty
marketing
dark chocolate has somehow escaped the
candy stigma
to join the ranks of health food in the
public mind what is up with that
that's the topic of this week's
healthcare triage
[Music]
if you type is dark chocolate good for
you into the google search bar
the results will likely have you
believing that dark chocolate is the new
kale
and while i don't know if kale is a
superfood either it at least has the
benefit of being a vegetable
healthline.com touts the 7 proven health
benefits of dark chocolate while webmd
says dark chocolate is healthy chocolate
given the evidence we have that
excessive sugar is bad for us and given
that most chocolate makes fast friends
with added sugar
something's up with these claims so what
happened
how has this narrative become so
embedded in public perception
group over at vox did a deep dive on
this issue starting with how a large
number of
chocolate related scientific grants and
studies have been funded by
major chocolate producers like nestle
mars and hershey's
perhaps not surprisingly the majority of
these studies reported outcomes that
could be used favorably
in these companies marketing campaigns
to transform their product into a health
food
in the public mind's eye and beyond
funding and conducting chocolate studies
these companies endowed shares at
various research institutions and
sponsor research conferences
that focus on subjects related to
chocolate and health
i'd say these were genius moves if i
weren't more horrified by the deception
than i am impressed by the marketing
outcomes
some of the claims supported by all this
chocolate funded research that now seem
to be ubiquitous in public circles
are that chocolate is good for cognitive
outcomes like mood
and memory and cardiovascular outcomes
like blood pressure
and cardiovascular disease risk the
media plays a large role in the spread
of these claims mainly because
these are the kinds of things people
want to read headlines promising that a
daily dose of chocolate will stave off
age-related memory decline or attractive
the content underneath these headlines
is rarely devoted to examining the
quality
and or funding of the research that
prompted it
and most of that research is low quality
and or can't be easily translated to
relevant human outcomes
sometimes that's because it was funded
and or conducted by chocolate companies
sometimes it's because the research came
from animal studies and rats just aren't
humans
the studies could be observational
nutrition studies we've talked
extensively about how problematic these
are
or other issues like including way too
few people
looking at short-term or overall
irrelevant outcomes
or playing dirty with statistics but
none of that's communicated to the
public
at least not well and definitely not
often the vox article points out there
are some studies of reasonable quality
not funded by industry that have found
associations between
chocolate eating and cardiovascular
health but
as mentioned these are observational
meaning
none of the evidence directly links
chocolate to a lower risk of
cardiovascular events
there are so many things that could
account for this association
and without running a large randomized
controlled trial we can't know for sure
what's actually going on
there is one of those in the works right
now it's called cosmos and it's
investigating daily supplements of cocoa
flavonols
participants just ended their pill
taking in december of 2020
so data should be forthcoming but we
should mention that mars did have a hand
in funding this study
along with pfizer and the nih and we
should emphasize that cocoa flavonol
supplements
shouldn't be equated with eating
chocolate though they often are
that is a big issue that rarely if ever
gets mentioned
a lot of the research linking chocolate
to health is actually based on research
with flavonols
compounds with a high presence in plant
foods that are thought to have
antioxidant and other potentially
beneficial properties
but even in studies using chocolate
rather than supplements
no one mentions that a significant loss
of flavonols occurs in the processing
required to decrease the bitter taste of
cocoa
a lot of chocolate has been subject to
treatment with alkali
a process also known as dutching one
study conducted on natural cocoa powder
found that lightly dutched cocoa
retained about 40 percent of its
flavonol antioxidants
medium dutch cocoas retained only 25
percent
and heavily dutched cocos retained only
10
and since you aren't likely to find
information on how heavily dutched your
cocoa is
or what the actual flavonol content of
your chocolate is
keep in mind the cocoa content is not a
good indicator of that
your guess is as good as mine on whether
you'll be getting any useful flavonol
levels in your dark chocolate
okay fine you say i'll just choose dark
chocolate that hasn't been processed
with alkali
and such options are definitely
available to you
but to reduce that seriously bitter
flavor
chocolate generally has to be as one
scientific article puts it
aggressively processed and adulterated
with other flavors
making the health claims pretty dubious
if you've had the opportunity to taste
chocolate without all these additives
you'll know what i mean when i say it
ain't no hershey bar as an editorial on
the lancet points out
the devil in the dark chocolate is all
the fat sugar
and calories it contains to make it
tasty so even if you consume
flavonol rich dark chocolate you're also
likely over
consuming calories and sugar both of
which are culprits and many negative
health conditions the vox article has a
handy chart of how much chocolate you
need to eat for a
heart-healthy dose of flavanols for dark
chocolate this is about four and three
quarter ounces which is 750 calories
if you're aiming for about a 2000 on
average calories per day
that nearly five ounces of chocolate
accounts for almost a fourth of your
caloric
intake in a day a fourth and if you eat
four and three quarter ounces of a dark
chocolate hershey's bar which is almost
four servings you'll be eating around 67
grams of sugar that is somewhere around
16 teaspoons of sugar and is far more
than
any adult should be eating in a day let
alone in your mid-afternoon chocolate
snack
so the overall message here is that
there is no high quality research to
support the claim that dark chocolate
has long-term
health benefits let me emphasize high
quality because as we've pointed out
there's a lot of studies making the
connection
mostly in the short term but none that
i'd place any bets on
and even if there are potential benefits
the amount of sugar
fat and calories consumed would quickly
outweigh them
thanks again to policy genius for
sponsoring this episode
why do we spend so much time and energy
and money on things like superfoods
it's because so many of us are searching
for ways to improve our health outcomes
and ultimately extend our lives
while no one food can change the fact
that human beings are mortal
life insurance is one way to plan for
the inevitable and policy genius makes
getting life insurance easier
you could save 1300 or more per year by
using policy genius to compare life
insurance policies
policy genius is an insurance
marketplace not an insurance company
in minutes you can work out how much
coverage you need and compare
personalized quotes to find your best
price
and since their license experts work for
you not the insurance companies
you can trust them to offer unbiased
advice you could save 50
or more on life insurance by comparing
quotes with policy genius
and then you can spend those savings in
all the dark chocolate and avocados and
vitamin d supplements you want head to
policygenius.com healthcare triage to
learn more
hey do you enjoy this episode you might
enjoy this recently completed series
funded by the nihcm
foundation on vaccines we'd also
appreciate it if you'd like
and subscribe to the show down below and
consider going on over to patreon.com
healthcare triage where you can make the
show bigger and better
even during a global pandemic we'd
especially like to thank our research
associates
james glasgow joe sevitz josh kister and
michael chin
and of course our surgeon admiral sam