【謝田時間】支付寶為何被媒體說成是去「馬雲」化？ 無實際控制人的螞蟻集團上市比較容易？ 實際控制人會浮出？ 對使用支付寶人有影響嗎？ 政府政府完成支付寶收割對其它私企的震懾？

Hello, Professor Xie. Hello, everyone. Recently, there has been a lot of attention on China Ant Group's Alipay. We all know that Ma Yun was behind it. Now, Alipay has become a virtual controller. This is a message from the central bank. Why did the central bank suddenly turn Alipay into a virtual controller? What do you think about this? Obviously, we know that the CCP has been forcing Ma Yun to turn Alipay into Alipay. The CCP wants to fully control China's financial system. It wants to deprive the Internet of financial assets. Ma Yun has been a bit of a detractor in the past year. Basically, he wants the CCP to win. In fact, he still has to give in. Now, in the end, the CCP has achieved its goal. What is it called? There is no real controller. This is a ridiculous thing. Any company or property cannot be without a controller. He is just saying that Ma Yun is not a controller. There is no one in the front desk to admit that he is a controller. But we know that in the end, if there is no controller, it is the central bank of China that controls. So basically, the CCP has successfully won. But I saw a report that Alipay is being used by 1.1 billion people. It seems that there was news that the CCP wanted to replace Alipay with other ways. It seems that it did not succeed. Now this practice, I saw the media saying that it was to de-Ma Yun. What do you think of this statement? De-Ma Yun, this is misleading. It feels like this is just a Ma Yun that has not been controlled. Maybe it's someone else or someone else. Actually not. This is actually a pretext for the CCP. As a person, this is not a de-Ma Yun. It is the right of private enterprises to own financial companies, financial networks, and Alipay. This is actually a public defense of private property rights. It was robbed by the Chinese state-owned enterprise or the Chinese central bank. It should not be said that it is a de-Ma Yun. What you just mentioned is that the CCP may indeed want to use other ways to replace Alipay and other companies to replace Alipay. This is really difficult. First of all, there is a so-called first mover advantage. Even if the company has a first mover advantage, people are already used to using this system. It is very convenient. Many people have installed it and used it. It is very familiar. I don't want to turn it into anything else. It is troublesome to switch. And there is no way to replace Alipay. I don't want to say that the CCP can't pay other companies to replace Alipay. It's just a matter of grabbing it directly. It's just a matter of force. In addition, I read a report from the mainland media that this approach at least contains three layers of meaning. What is the need for reality, the need for national supervision, and the need for a safe environment? What do you think of this statement? This is a deterrent for the CCP to grab private property as a cover. What is the need for reality? The need for reality is that the CCP wants to rob private companies and rob private assets. This is reality. This is the reality of the CCP. The CCP's government has no money. Without money, it has lost control of online payment and financial technology. This is reality. What is the need for national supervision? This is nonsense. Because Alipay and Alipay do not have supervision. Alipay is still under the supervision of the Chinese national financial institution. The Chinese financial institution can supervise at any time. Not only can it be supervised, but it can also be robbed. It is also unreasonable to adapt to the needs of supervision. The third is that Alipay needs a safer environment. This is even more nonsense. The whole thing has gone further. First of all, the biggest threat to Alipay is the CCP regime. Alipay is actually very safe and effective. It has been running for so many years. It is very convenient for 1 billion people to use. It can solve its own security problems. It can completely solve other network and financial security problems. It has effectively solved these problems. In fact, the biggest insecurity comes from the CCP. And the political insecurity actually comes from the CCP regime. In addition, I saw that the mainland media also reported that Alipay has now become an impractical controller. Then it is possible to be approved to be listed. It is said that the day of listing will not be far away. What do you think? Yes, it is possible to be listed. It is also possible to be listed in Shanghai or Shenzhen. It is possible to be listed in Beijing Stock Exchange. It is also possible to be listed in Beijing Stock Exchange. In fact, it is because the CCP has not robbed it yet. The CCP has not robbed it yet. The CCP has not given all the property rights and property to Alipay. Now that it is listed, it has been robbed. There is no controller. But now that it is listed, it may be approved soon. After approval, we will know who is the last actual controller in terms of the disclosure of the company's shares. Of course, the CCP is likely to cover it in some way. But one thing we can be sure of is that the biggest shareholder of the stock will be the CCP's regular reporter. Now I read a report that the general public is still more concerned about whether Alipay will have any impact on their own use. What do you think? Will it have an impact? It should not have any impact. Originally, some of the data on Alipay, Ma Yun could not completely keep it private. It is only in his Alipay. When the CCP needs it, the CCP can still get it. Now the CCP can do it directly. In terms of financial security, the Chinese people may be able to pay attention to it. In fact, the CCP will not make it difficult to use. So the people who use it may not feel it. But the security of their financial data and information must have deteriorated. Because the CCP is more convenient, it can directly monitor the transactions of these people on Alipay. Do you think this trend will have any effect on the people? Of course. I think everyone has already observed it. It's just a warning. It's not a warning, it's just a threat. Now it's a matter of self-sufficiency or self-protection. Or find a way to escape. This is the biggest lesson for the people. But now it seems that it is also difficult to escape. First of all, these private enterprises are now in a bad economic situation. Can this enterprise be defunct? Can the money you get after selling it be transferred and left China? These are all difficult and difficult to do. I think the CCP's second time to engage in this kind of proletariat revolution Expropriation of private assets is now in a hurry. This should be a lesson for the owners of these private enterprises. Is it true that other large private enterprises are also facing the problem of being confiscated? It should be. But those private enterprises are basically real estate companies. Now they are also burning the treasury. I don't think they have anything too big. The national scope and nationality can affect many people. These are now getting less and less. Aren't there some online technology companies? Those online technology companies are basically already obeying the CCP. Or sharing these data with the public. Or some content. None of them can be in a financial field like Alipay. Alipay is not able to threaten the CCP. The CCP's national monopoly, or the monopoly of key areas. Alipay doesn't seem to have a company that can reach this level yet. Alipay is the biggest one. Too big. It's too successful. It's a direct threat to the Chinese bank. Not to mention its industries.