25 Video Views·Nov 18, 2023
The era of panda diplomacy, characterized by China loaning pandas to other countries, appears to be ending. The recent return of pandas from the Smithsonian National Zoo in Washington, DC, marks the conclusion of over 50 years of hosting Chinese pandas in the United States. Panda diplomacy began in 1972 when China sent a pair of pandas to the U.S. following President Nixon's expressed interest. Despite its initial success, the practice faced opposition due to its impact on animal conservation. Alternatives such as touring exhibitions and leasing arrangements emerged, allowing China to capitalize on panda fame. However, recent shifts in China's diplomatic strategy, marked by assertive "wolf warrior" tactics, suggest the end of panda diplomacy and a focus on more aggressive approaches. The return of pandas and the termination of research contracts signify a departure from the iconic goodwill ambassadors. The recent APEC Summit and China's altered diplomatic stance indicate a recognition of the challenges in controlling nationalist sentiments once ignited, leading to the conclusion that panda diplomacy may indeed be coming to an end.
Connect with me:
Email: [email protected]
Telegram Group: https://t.me/DC2021301
hi thank you for watching dig into CH
I'm Don Shan if you have not done so
already please subscribe to my channel
thank you very much on November 8th CNN
reported the three giant pandas tumble
around in their enclosure at the
Smithsonian National Zoo in Washington
DC munching on bamboo shoes and leaves
climbing branches and generally looking
adorable for the steady streams of
visitors it's their last chance to see
10 May Shan and their youngest cup Shia
chii before the black and white Bears
head back to China on Wednesday their
departure marks the end of more than 50
years of Chinese pandas being housed at
the zoo which was the first US Zoo to
showcase the Bears as part of what's
been called Panda diplomacy today let's
delve into the subject of Panda's
exploring the phenomenon known as Panda
diplomacy there are some misconceptions
about panda diplomacy which has evolved
over many years first and foremost it
was not initiated by the CCP the
well-known incident dates back to
1972 when US President Nixon visited
China prior to that visit Nixon's staff
had already inquired about pandas and
during his visit Nixon himself expressed
admiration for these animals mentioning
their cuteness China interpret this as
an indication that Americans might might
be interested in pandas consequently
just two months after Nixon's visit to
China China sent a pair of pandas to the
United States marking what is commonly
recognized as initiation of panda
diplomacy so how did someone like Nixon
became so acknowledgeable and interested
in pandas in fact receiving pandas was
not a new experience for Americans in
1941 during the time of the Nationalist
government Madame Chang Kai shed the
first lady of of the Republic of China
sent two female pandas to the United
States through the United China relief
unfortunately one Panda died in 1945 and
the other in
1951 this marked the China's initial
Panda gift to the United States in 1946
the Nationalist government also sent a
female Panda to the London Zoo but it's
exact time of death is unknown as there
are no records available on this matter
it can be said that Nick harbored an
interest in pandas likely having
encountered them during his formative
years he expressed fondness for pandas
prompt the Chinese Communist party to
swiftly give to two marking the true
initiation of panda diplomacy when did
this era conclude in
1982 precisely a decade later throughout
these 10 years nine countries received a
total of 24 pandas from China
surprisingly North Korea took the lead
receiving five five pandas as gifts
Japan followed closely behind with four
pandas housed in way noou the fate of
these pandas sent to North Korea remains
sparsely documented leaving much to
speculation regarding their care and the
condition in the nation with limited
resources nevertheless the Chinese are
particularly intrigued by how Americans
handle Panda Care on February 1st 2023
the giant panda L residing in the United
States passed away at the age of 25
sparking heated the discussion on
Chinese social media many in China
criticized the Memphis Zoo where L lived
accusing it of animal abuse in response
the zoo maintained that L dis demise was
a result of old age despite subsequent
investigations by Chinese experts which
attributed the deaths to a natural
cardiac condition associated with age
the criticism persisted online the
controversy even raised concerns about
the possible early return of pandas
including yayya from the United States
to China this incident exemplified the
ccp's strategy of manipulating National
sentiments a method frequently employed
to shape public opinion by 1982 China's
Panda diplomacy encountered obstacles
due to negative impacts on animal
conservation sparking significant
opposition consequently the Chinese
Communist Party ceased the practice of
gifting pandas nevertheless Panda
diplomacy persisted through alternative
means such as touring exhibitions and
leasing Arrangements offering
opportunities for both Fame and Fortune
the annual rental fee for a panda
reached $1 million typically with a
10-year lease cting $10 million foreign
zoos recognizing the Panda's Allure
capitalized on this by selling tickets
for panda viewings in locations like way
no zoo in Japan obtaining tickets is no
longer a matter of standing in line but
involves a lottery system due to high
demand during that era a substantial
number of pandas were transported
overseas through leasing arrangements
and touring exhibitions for instance
pandas were dispatched to participate in
events like the Olympics to attract
attention while this brought Fame and
financial gain it also faced significant
opposition why because pandas are
considered an umbrella species what does
this mean if you declare the presence of
pandas in a specific area that area
essentially becomes a natural reserve
preventing other commercial developments
the panda species acting as a protective
umbrella safeguards a variety of species
throughout the entire region therefore
pandas are referred to as umbrella
species and a protecting pandas
translates to the protection of numerous
Wildlife species in the area therefore
in that period perod The numerous wild
appendant were captured and sent abroad
on lease to generate a foreign exchange
however this spared opposition from
animal rights protection organizations
the US government took a Firm Stance
declaring a ban on any further leased
pandas leading to contentious disputes
which unfolded in the 1980s as the 1990s
approached the practice of leasing Panda
evolved into collaborative research
efforts China and the foreign Nations
began joint research on Panda
reproduction and the feasibility of
their relocation this shift allowed the
Panda's leasing to continue under the
guise of scientific exploration besides
paying substantial rents Chinese
researchers were required to secure
visas making it a lucrative arrangement
for China consequently pandas were
extensively sent abroad masquerading as
research initiatives serving as an
extended form of what is known as Panda
diplomacy this strategy not only brought
in Revenue but also fostered positive
perceptions pandas with their endearing
demeanor became effective ambassadors of
goodwi upon seeing pandas foreigners
would immediately think of China
solidifying pandas as iconic symbols and
representatives of China's image why has
Panda diplomacy come to a close pandas
residing abroad are making their way
back to China and there is a cessation
of renewing Panda Research contracts
this change is associated with the
ascendancy of domestic nationalism and
the adoption of an assertive wolf
Warrior diplomatic style substituting
the panda image with that of a wolf
warrior in this scenario the wolf or
more precisely the war dog is fervently
making its presence known on the
Diplomatic front why can't China balance
both pandas and WF Warriors once the
Chinese Communist Party triggers
nationalist sentiments with the wolf
Warrior image it becomes challenging to
control the situation for instance the
domestic outcry in China demanding the
early return of panda Yaya after feuring
such a substantial opposition force and
inciting Nationalist and extreme
patriotic sentiments if the CCP were to
renew the Panda Research contract and
extend the lease for another 10 years
would it work no it wouldn't doing so
would face a backlash from the fanatical
youth cultivated by the CCP thus Panda
diplomacy concludes and the future will
follow the wolf Warrior diplomacy path
after all whether pandas or Wolves they
are just animals neither are human
currently pandas worldwide are returning
to China as their Leasing and research
contracts come to an end the leasing
Agreements are clear even if a Panda
gives birth to CBS abroad they maintain
Chinese nationality and cannot stay
outside of China pandas are exclusively
found in China with nationalism proving
to be a double-edged sword that if
mishandled can lead to self-inflicted
wounds in the recent APAC Summit held in
San Francisco there was a shift in
China's assertive diplomatic approach
when Biden met with Xi Jinping on
October 30th the people's daily
published a commentary emphasizing the
need to maintain Sino us relations it
seems that the Chinese Communist Party
aimed to easily sway public opinion
utilizing pandas or adopting a more
aggressive stance as circumstances
requires yet the CCP seems to recognize
the difficulty of quing populist
sentiments once they are ignited
consequently pandas are now returning to
mainland China so pandas will no longer
be visible to the rest of the world
what's the significance of this it's a
relatively minor loss when the CCP is
deped it results to restricting the
export of mineral raw materials in July
the CCP decided to impose export
controls on Gan and germanium related
items in October it declared export
controls on graphite while the CCP can
impose restrictions on these resources
the impact is comparable to recording
pandas can export restrictions really
strangle Western countries and the rest
of the world that's highly unlikely the
comprehensive map of a free Society is
not just a geographical layout it
involves economic and political aspects
in this world no mineral is exclusive to
China except for panda however other
minerals and natural resources are not
limited to China it's just that in those
years other countries deemed it
economically unviable to produce on
their own and China offered the coste
effective options so they chose to buy
from China once the CCP enforces
restrictions rebuilding production lines
in a free Society is not a formidable
task the only challenge may be a
temporary period of insufficient Supply
however once the supply chain is
reconstructed they can break free from
this dependency China is intertwined
with the global Community but the world
can function without China and it's just
a matter of determining the associated
costs this analogy is akin to pandas
initially intended for worldwide
research and observation although pandas
cannot be isolated from the global
Community their absence outside of China
wouldn't result in substantial losses if
Panda diplomacy has truly come to an end
then let it be thank you for watching
please leave a comment and subscribe to
my channel just click the Subscribe
button right here I'll See You Again
shortly until then be well