华尔街日报：东航321坠机黑匣子显示人为蓄意俯冲；党媒紧急“辟谣”：中国民航局证实，美国参与事故调查人员未发布有关调查信息；华尔街日报都报道了什么？[莫寂聊Moji Talks]

On March 21, the Oriental Airlines MU5735 flight crashed in Guangxi, and 132 people on board were all killed. The Wall Street Journal reported on the 17th that the U.S. had initially judged the black box data obtained at the site of the accident. Someone deliberately operated the cockpit before the crash, causing the plane to almost fall vertically. The Wall Street Journal reported that the Chinese chief executive who led the aircraft investigation had not yet raised the issue of whether the aircraft had mechanical or flight control. The Wall Street Journal reported that it attracted strong netizens' attention, and the party and the media immediately criticized it. The Global Times reported on the 18th that recently released by the U.S. media from the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau, related reports on the incident of the Oriental Airlines MU5735 flight. After the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau and the U.S. National Transportation Security Commission confirmed that they were involved in the incident investigation, the other party clearly stated that they had not released any information related to the investigation to any media. They strictly followed the framework requirements of the International Civil Aviation Convention, MU5735, to cooperate with the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau, and will provide professional technical support according to the need to continue to investigate the cause of the incident. Let's take a look at the Global Times' report. The Global Times reported on the 18th that recently released by the U.S. media related reports on the incident of the Oriental Airlines MU5735 flight. After the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau and the U.S. National Transportation Security Commission confirmed that they were involved in the incident investigation, the other party clearly stated that they had not released any information related to the investigation to any media. They strictly followed the framework requirements of the International Civil Aviation Convention, MU5735, to cooperate with the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau, and will provide professional technical support according to the need to continue to investigate the cause of the incident. At present, the 321 Oriental Airlines MU5735 Aviation Flight Incident Investigation Department is working on related projects, such as in-depth exploration of debris identification, classification and inspection, flight data analysis, and experiment verification. According to the relevant requirements of the International Civil Aviation Convention, the investigation department invited the U.S. National Transportation Security Commission to participate in the investigation as an investigator of the Aircraft Design and Manufacturing Department. The Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau said that it will continue to keep close communication with all parties involved in the investigation, carry out the incident investigation work in a scientific, rigorous and orderly manner, and release the incident investigation progress and related information in time according to the relevant requirements of the International Civil Aviation Convention and the government information. The party did not come out to spread rumors at the first time, but did not tell the public what the Wall Street Journal said. It's really a disaster. Netizens inside the wall strongly urged the official inside the wall to announce the facts early, after all, more than 100 lives. Let's take a look at the Chinese translation of the Wall Street Journal's report. What did the Wall Street Journal say? The topic of the Wall Street Journal's report is, the東航飛機失事黑匣子數據指向人為蓄意補充。 The original translation is as follows. According to the initial assessment of the U.S. officials on the cause of the incident, the flight data shows that earlier this year, a 東航客機墜毀器由駕駛艙內人為原因蓄意導致, This Boeing 737-800 aircraft was flying in the air at the time, and suddenly fell into a state of almost vertical descent, and fell into the mountains at a very high speed. These people said that the data of the missing aircraft black box shows that the input of the control system pushed the aircraft into a fatal overload. A person familiar with the initial assessment of the U.S. officials said that the aircraft was in the form of an instruction from a person in the cockpit. The initial assessment of the U.S. officials, including the information extracted from the flight data recorder damaged by the aircraft, was analyzed. This person also said that the Chinese authorities who led the investigation have not yet discovered the plane that crashed in Guangxi on March 21st. There is no mechanical or flight control problem. This also supports the assessment of the U.S. officials. The aircraft is the main aircraft of the global aviation industry, and is also a member of the Boeing family. The Boeing family has one of the best safety records in commercial flight. The person in charge said that according to the information collected in the current investigation by the East Airlines, the U.S. officials involved in the investigation will pay attention to the behavior of a pilot. These experts say that there is a possibility that other people on the plane broke into the cockpit and deliberately caused the crash. Experts say that neither the Boeing company nor the aviation safety supervision agency have responded to any service announcement or safety instructions on the crash. If relevant departments find that the crew members have any problems in the incident or need to repair the aircraft, they will inform the airline and the pilot. The incident investigation may find previous evidence, so as to support or change the initial assessment. A person who understands the initial assessment of the U.S. officials said that the U.S. officials have not provided all the information to the Chinese officials at present. This is the first initial assessment of U.S. officials. In April this year, the industry's official Li Hanwu News and Analysis reported that the initial reading of the flight data record of the Chinese East Airlines aircraft showed that the pilot deliberately entered the control device. The East Airlines said in a statement to the Wall Street Journal that there is no evidence to confirm that there is any problem with the aircraft involved in the accident. The airline reiterated its senior officials' statement in March, saying that the pilot's health and family are in good condition. In addition, their financial situation is also good. The airline said it was not responsible for the incident investigation and quoted the official announcement, including the preliminary report of the Chinese government on April 20. The statement said that the data recovery and analysis of the damaged black box are still in progress. The airline said that any unofficial speculation may interfere with the investigation of the accident and affect the actual progress of the global aviation transportation industry. The Chinese Aviation Safety Administration, the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau, did not respond to the request for a video recording, and did not answer the phone. The agency did not comment on any potential reasons for the crash. Last month, the authorities said that investigators will continue to investigate the accident. When asked if someone may have broken into the cockpit, the East Airlines said that this situation is unlikely to happen. The airline quoted information from the press conference on March 25. China-related departments said at the meeting that no emergency codes were sent before the plane crashed. After the crash, Boeing planes of the same model from East Airlines all stopped for about a month and then began to restore passenger services for other 737-800 aircraft. East Airlines said it continued to inspect and test planes, almost the same period of production. Boeing 737-800 is earlier than Boeing 737 MAX, and the latter is the latest version of Boeing's long-serving low-body aircraft. After two fatal crashes in other countries related to flight control system failures, MAX has not returned to China for commercial flights for more than three years. Investigators said China-related departments have not yet informed U.S.-related departments when they can publicly convey their official decision on the investigation. The Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau said it will announce any major progress in the investigation in time. According to a request from the International Aviation Treaty, the Chinese Civil Aviation Bureau has completed a preliminary investigation report on this crash. The Chinese National Aviation and Space Administration did not publish this document, but provided a sample of the investigation result, saying that the communication between the crew and the flight attendants did not show any abnormalities before the plane landed. Flight attendants tried to contact the plane after seeing the plane crash, but did not receive a response. The incident investigation agency may need a year or longer to publish the final conclusion on the cause of the incident and the cause of the incident. In some previous incident investigations, there was a difference in whether international authorities deliberately crashed the plane. The crash of the Donghang 5735 flight brought new challenges to the Chinese aviation management department. In recent years, China has maintained a good flight safety record. Before this incident, China's last fatal air crash occurred 12 years ago, and the latest air crash is China's most fatal air crash since 1994. Donghang said in a statement that the company has maintained a 18-year flight safety record. The Donghang 5735 crashed into the mountain and disintegrated, shattering into pieces in the mountains of trees and ridges. The rescue team did not find any survivors. The passengers including a 17-year-old boy who took the plane for the first time, six passengers who attended the funeral together, and a former accountant. He recently started a new job at Alibaba Group, and just married his lover. At the end of March, a firefighter team found that the flight data recorder of the plane was buried under the ground a few inches deep. The location of the plane's crash is about 130 inches away. This is the data captured by the voice recorder found by the flight attendants and earlier. It is expected to play an important role in helping the authorities determine the cause of the accident. Let's take a look at some of the comments and opinions of netizens. Some netizens left a message, which is not necessary, just said that it was not disclosed and did not deny the content of the report. Another netizen commented that in fact, you only need to answer one question, since you are still investigating, you can be sure that it is not the problem of the plane, since it is not a non-human factor, then why did the passenger plane of the model 737-800 take off on April 17th? Do you know that the 737 MAX has not taken off yet? Pure technical questions. Some netizens said that they took the initiative to make it public, so as not to spread rumors. Some netizens commented, what does this response mean? It can be understood as participating in the investigation of the accident without leaking the news, anyway, didn't we leak this news? Another netizen commented, publish the driver's cabin recording, wait for the truth, and some netizens said that no matter what the result is, it must be given to the deceased's family and the public. Some netizens commented, this response is also very strange, if you didn't investigate it clearly, you didn't investigate it clearly, this is a fake news, what does it mean not to disclose the information? Another netizen commented, so what is the situation, what did Mei Mei say? Some netizens commented, what exactly did the American media report? Can you say it? Another netizen commented, to be honest, I don't even know the rumors in the United States, and some netizens said that the people are above, life is above, investigate clearly as soon as possible, give the deceased an explanation, not for the pain of relatives. Some netizens commented, Wang Xiaohong, a relative of Baozi, immediately issued a blockade message, because Baozi messed up everything in the will, although the so-called Tata Wuyinda and related information were not found, which was seriously damaged. The State Council issued a notice on the second day to strengthen the prevention group to remind the incident. Some netizens said, it seems that the first news was right, the deputy driver committed suicide. Because of this, Wang Xiaohong immediately issued a blockade message, the deputy driver committed suicide. Because he was treated unfairly, he left with his old leader's son. Pity the more than 100 people who were buried with him. Some netizens commented, why didn't Donghang announce the reason why the deputy driver was demoted from captain to deputy driver? Another netizen commented, it was a pity that Tata didn't notice General Secretary Xi at the time, otherwise, with his own strength, Xi could reverse the trajectory of the plane crash. Some netizens said, this report increased the possibility of human factors. But the results of the aircraft investigation cannot be revealed by unofficial channels. It takes a formal report, as well as the results of the cabin recording to make a formal conclusion. Another netizen commented, the US media reported that someone entered an instruction on the flight of the plane and let the plane float automatically. If it is a human intervention, the instruction to rewrite the input I don't know the structure of the plane, but I believe that the plane has an automatic control stick that can also be manually operated. Because of the emergency, the manual control stick should be faster than the input instruction. At the same time, it can also prevent the pilot from manually operating when the automatic operation suddenly fails. There are also netizens who say that the Chinese side has long known that the reason was a human intervention that led to the crash. The report is true. The Central Propaganda Department cannot be sealed off. Another netizen commented that the war wolf did not come out to spread rumors has already explained the problem. The best thing is that everyone is no longer concerned about this matter. If you have to report, put it in the last corner. There are also netizens who say that there is no problem. NTSB did not release any news related to the media. The news from the Wall Street Journal seems to be two recorders for the NTSB. The analysis of the recorded data is normal. There is no problem with the source of the fact. China's official reply did not deny the fact. Thank you for watching. Please remember to like and subscribe to our channel. Goodbye.