Was in aller Welt ist passiert? - Teil 4/13 - DeeTube

Just as the application of the laws of perspective and escape point on the horizon shows us that our earth is actually flat, the same principle applies for our sunset. The scientists of the world tell us that the sun has the 109 times the diameter of the earth and that it is 150 million kilometers away. They claim that day and night are due to the fact that the earth rotates. And when we see the sunset, we witness the rotation and our entry into the dark phase of the rotation, which is called night and makes our moon visible. Similar to the claimed curvature of our world and the theory of gravity, this is also absolute nonsense. But before we turn to the sun, we want to look at two examples that contradict the heliocentric model of our rotating sphere-shaped earth. The first example is the skyline of New York City, which can be seen from the 97 km away Harriman State Park Beer Mountain. If the earth were a rotating sphere with a radius of 6,370 km, then this view from the 390 m high peak of the Bear Mountain would be impossible. If we draw the sentence of Pythagoras, who says that the distance to the horizon is 3.57 times the square root of the height in meters, then a large part of this skyline would have to be covered by an earth's curvature of 53 m. It would have to be below the horizon. It behaves similarly when ships pass the oceans, which should actually disappear behind the earth's curvature. However, a strong camera lens has proven that this is wrong. The ships do not disappear beyond the earth's curvature, but beyond our perspective boundaries. The laws of perspective state on a flat plane that a distant object decreases in viewing angle and height until it converges in its escape point, the so-called horizon, so that the object seems to disappear. Scientists claim that the sun actually goes behind the earth's curvature and disappears. However, this is nothing more than the movement of the sun beyond the escape point of our field of view, which is determined by the boundaries of our eyes, other objects and the weather. The same laws determine how we perceive the course of the sun and its rise and fall. The sun never rises or sets, it is an optical illusion caused by the laws of perspective. We believe that the sun rises and sets because it converges and diverges with the escape point of our field of view. For example, this series of street lamps seems to get smaller in perspective before it disappears completely, although all street lamps actually have the same height and illuminate the path far beyond the escape point. The same is true for this series of HP bottles. They are all the same size and do not change their size. It is only our perspective that gives the impression that they do. And that's exactly what we experience when we watch the sun rise and set and its journey over our flat earth. I'm going away for a long time Closest wound Light my heart burn Far away NASA and many other lie magicians tell us that our sun is 150 million kilometers away from the earth and 109 times larger than the earth. Amateur balloon shots from the clouds prove, however, that the sun is not 150 million kilometers away or larger than the earth. What the recordings show is a locally illuminating sun that throws a local hotspot over the earth. If the sun were millions of kilometers away, this local hotspot would not be possible. And if the sun were not a local source of light, we would not experience clouds or lightning. The angle of the sun's rays, which we see when the light breaks through the clouds, would not be possible. But we have thousands of photographic empirical evidence that the sunlight behaves exactly like that. If the sun were 150 million kilometers away, the light would only have to form straight rays instead of different angles. And if the sun is so far away, why does it rise so strongly at a low altitude on earth? At a distance of 150 million kilometers, this rise in altitude should be negligible or not exist. The change in its size indicates a locally illuminating sun, which is not unimaginably 150 million kilometers away, but is actually relatively close to the earth and only barely over the clouds. And it is not 109 times larger than the earth, instead it is much smaller. Our first-hand experience with the sun and the moon is that they are almost the same size and also circular buildings, similar to circular tracks, run over our flat, stationary plane. The science magicians invent these complicated theories about perfect spherical rock bodies and gigantic balls of hot plasma, which are waiting for us with incomprehensible distances and calculations, which make us dizzy. Everyone can see with their common sense that the sun and the moon are similar in size and the moon is not a ball of stone. Many have studied the light of the sun and the moon. The light of the sun is warm and drying, it preserves matter and prevents mold. If you leave fruits in the sun, they become durable, as with sun-dried tomatoes and raisins, it is antiseptic and healing. The light of the moon, on the other hand, is cold, moist, causes mold and decay and is septic. According to slow sunbeams, the combustion of a campfire while the moonlight accelerates it. The temperature of the moonlight was examined and it was surprisingly found that the temperature of the direct moonlight is colder at night than the temperature of the shadow. This proves that these two light sources are unique and opposite in nature. It also supports the claim of NASA that the moon reflects the sunlight. If this were the case, the moonlight would have to show a certain residual heat and not be colder than its shadow at night. In addition, the moon cannot be a spherical body and a reflector of sunlight at the same time. When light falls on a spherical body, it produces this. Reflectors must be flat or curved inward to actually reflect. A spherical, outwardly curved surface leads to no reflection. Here, too, fundamental, repeatable and verifiable scientific findings speak against the space saga whirlwind of the scientists. Numerous photos and film recordings also prove that the moon is semi-transparent. If the increasing or decreasing moon can be seen during the day, you can sometimes see the blue sky directly through the moon. At night it is sometimes even possible to see stars directly through the moon's surface. The Royal Astronomical Society has documented many of these cases. Loyal followers of the pseudoscience of the rotating globe often use the moon's surface as evidence for the heliocentric model, because the moon is on the southern hemisphere on the head, but not in the north. But this is just another proof for the motionless earth. Time-lapse recordings show that it is the moon that rotates like a rotating disc in the clockwise direction over the earth. And this is only possible when the earth stands still and the moon moves by itself. It is like this, our sun and moon revolve on our flat disc, similar to how the hands of a clock turn. They determine the time and seasons, the fluctuating equilibrium of light and darkness, as well as preservation and decay. In fact, our flat earth is the oldest clock of all. And only in this way are sun and moon glimpses possible. The heliocentric model fails completely when examining lunar glimpses. In order for a lunar glimpse to take place according to the globe model, the sun must reflect the earth's shadow on the moon. For this, all three must be aligned in a straight 180-degree symmetry. But since the beginning of time, however, lunar glimpses have been observed, where both the sun and the moon can be seen at the same time in the sky. And if you look at the mechanisms of a lunar glimpse, the heliocentric lie collapses once again. As this film material shows, the sun and the moon must be about the same size so that a corona can form at all. Okay, now I have a penny a lot closer to the camera. Okay, where it's about the same size as the flashlight in perspective. Okay, now that doesn't look right. You can't see the corona, and it just doesn't eclipse. You can still see the light all around. It's not a total blackout. Okay, now I have a side light on the side of this flashlight that just so happens to be the exact same size and diameter as the penny, which is perfect for our next test because the sun and the moon are the same size on a flat earth. And we'll bring the sun in closer to us as it would be on a flat earth. Now let's try our eclipse with the moon right underneath the sun. And wow, there's the... If the sun were 400 times larger than the moon, then its light would literally devour the moon, and we wouldn't be able to see a corona at all. And if the earth were a rotating ball heated up by a sun 150 million kilometers away, then it would be impossible to have a boiling hot summer on a continent like Africa. On the other hand, a few thousand kilometers away, absolutely icy conditions in the Antarctic, no heat from the sun. As Eric Dubay notes, if the heat has receded 150 million kilometers to the Sahara Desert, then it is absurd to believe that it could not recede another 6,500 kilometers to Antarctica. The difference is 0.004 percent. If the earth were a globe, then the polar regions of the Arctic and Antarctica would have to show similar conditions due to their comparable latitude. However, this is not the case. The Antarctic is the coldest place on earth, with an average annual temperature of minus 57 degrees Celsius and a record low of minus 135.8. The average annual temperature on the North Pole is 4 degrees in contrast. In the northern Arctic there are mild, warm summers and bearable winters. In the Antarctic it is so cold and rough that the ice never melts. This would be impossible on a rotating earth that also wobbles around its own axis. Eric Dubay also points out that Iceland is located on the 65th latitude north of the equator and despite everything 870 species of native plants and a lot of animals. On the South Pole, however, as Captain Cook wrote, not a tree was to be seen. The countries in the south are condemned to eternal cold by nature, never to feel the warmth of the sunbeams, whose terrible and wild appearance I cannot describe with words. Even marine life is in certain areas of great extensibility, and the seabird is only rarely observed when flying over these lonely deserts. The contrasts between the borders of organic life in the Arctic and Antarctic zones are very remarkable and significant. The annual movement of the sun from turning circle to turning circle, from turning sun to turning sun determines the length of the days and nights and the appearance of the seasons. For this reason, in the regions on the equator, almost the whole year is over summer. In the northern and southern latitudes, however, there are more pronounced seasons with winters. Sun and moon move on our flat earth not in a single large circle, but in a series of circles, or rather in a spiral rotation, which determines the change of seasons and the length of the days. Therefore, it is possible to see the midnight sun in the Arctic and time-lapse recordings show that the sun does not go down, but encircles the pole. The preachers of science lie and say that this can be traced back to the pole at both ends of the spherical globe, and that there is also a midnight sun in the Antarctic. Of course, we do not have amateur recordings of it, because no one is allowed to explore this region. And all official film material is highly suspicious, either photoshopped or manipulated. Besides, if there is such a phenomenon in the Antarctic, why does nothing grow there? NASA claims that the earth rotates 1,600 km per hour around its central axis, 108,000 km per hour around the sun and 800,000 km per hour in a spiral around the Milky Way, while some galaxies move through the universe with 1 billion km per hour. If this were the case, then the north star, or also called polar star and polaris, would not be fixed constantly in the night sky. Despite all these movements and journeys, it always stays perfectly positioned above the North Pole. The word planet comes from the ancient Greek planetes, which means to walk or to move around. And the Greeks were right. It is the stars above us that move, not us with our flat, motionless earth. Look! As you can see, the polar star remains a fixed constant in the middle and all other stars rotate perfectly around it. If the earth would rotate 1,600 km per hour, then you would see the stars more or less horizontally hovering over the sky. However, this is not the case. The stars form perfect circles above us, which originate from the polar star. And this can be observed up to the constellation Steinbock. The reason why the polar star never moves is that the North Pole is the center of our flat and motionless earth, as it is shown on Gleason's map and in the logo of the United Nations. So what are the stars above our heads? And if NASA lies about the composition of our earth, the sun and the moon, does that mean that space and the universe are also a fabrication and not what we think they are? In short, yes. Space, as we know it, is a swindle. Our flat and motionless earth does not just sit in space like this. We will take a closer look at what the stars are and what space looks like in which our flat earth is located. But first we have to get into another bunny wagon. We have come a long way, but we have only scratched the surface. The next bunny wagon is deep and dark, but it is necessary. And I promise you the following. On the other hand, there is an understanding of things that are so incredible that you would never have thought possible. Now follow me to part 5, because it is time to find out the real WHY of all this lying.