Krebs und seine 1000 Gesichter | Dr. med. Ralf Heinrich | Naturmedizin | QS24 Gesundheitsfernsehen

Are you already on Wikisana? Welcome, dear viewers, here in our format Naturmedizin. Today I have a guest from Berlin and I can hardly believe how good this doctor is, what he told me in advance. It's incredible. I still have to do a lot of shows with this gentleman because he is one of those people who can really bring a lot of hope, a lot of strength and confidence to the patient at home. Today he came all the way from Berlin for you to talk about a holistic approach within cancer therapies and I'm curious what he brought you. After the intro, let's get started. Stay tuned. Yes, here we are again and now I can introduce my guest. This is Dr. Mert Ralf Heinrich from Berlin. Welcome, dear Ralf. Thank you. What you told me in advance. I can hardly believe it. I'm looking for doctors who also work with the ECT and simply allow a different approach to cancer therapies. I'm looking for doctors who say there is individualized cancer therapy diagnostics. Do you do that too? You do detoxification, I've never heard of it. How do you get these knowledge values? How do I get these knowledge values? I feel that you are so excited about natural medicine or complementary medicine, as we call it. I'm just as excited. I've been training for 30-40 years and I've always been looking for the pearls, the treasures that really got me and I thought it can't be true that you can do that in medicine. The other medicine also has to exist. The conventional medicine is important for the basis. I can get there, but it was too boring for me. It wasn't inspiring enough for me and that's why I always let myself be inspired by these things. Then I did them in practice. I always looked for one or two teachers who have already done it and then I developed it further. I'm happy with it. But if we talk about the ECT, we had tumor patients, skin cancer, for example. We let electricity flow through for 2-3 hours and the tumor falls off, the thing is done, he went home healthy. I thought that can't be true. Is it just physics? Yes, I know. It used to be the common method before the Second World War. Two batteries and electricity. That's how it started with galvanotherapy. It was called galvanotherapy or electro-cancer therapy. That fascinated me so much. Dr. Meier in Regensburg taught me that over 10 years ago and that told me that I was 100% successful. That's crazy. Just putting two or four electrodes in a tumor or at the tumor, the electricity flows and the tumor melts. From inside to outside. That's physics and it works. It's not forbidden, you can do it. You just have to explain it to the patients and go through with them how it works. If it hurts a little, you have to give a local anesthetic and that it can also exulterate a little. Necroses discharge to the outside. I'm talking about breast cancer because I'm pointing there. It's very simple. It's the same, you just have to get it right. Then you give the needles, plus pole, minus pole and then you let the electricity flow. Galvano. It's very simple physics. Prostate, breast, skin. Excellent, suitable. Difficult in the abdomen. With needles in there, it just doesn't work. The water conducts the electricity. Yes, yes. This is actually very, very promising and also successful therapy. I have many breast cancer patients who have not seen the surgeon's knife and we have not blown or discussed. There are all kinds of methods, but this is a very pure method that you can work with. But you know, if you google a little on the Internet and look for such therapy doctors who do this, you won't find anything. It's like extinct. The knowledge is not there, or the fear is there, or you are not trained. It is difficult to find a training. I had another training with the old rabbit, Dr. Meier in Regensburg. I don't even know who else is trained. We always train without a certified training coming out of it. But I have all my colleagues hospitalized with me. I want to pass on the knowledge. I almost always have someone sitting next to me and watching. It's just networking, exchanging, networking. I find that incredibly important. Your practice has grown from 10 doctors to 40 employees in a holistic medical observation. Now, of course, many people or patients come to you with the diagnosis of cancer. How do you actually proceed with the diagnosis of cancer? Well, I look at every person all the time, individually. I look at where the causes are. First I ask, what do you want to drink? Herbal tea or water? Then I ask, where did you find me? Then I already know the direction. And then, what is your concern? I have cancer. There are different stages. There is no such thing as cancer. You have a skin cancer or you have metastasized pancreatic carcinoma. That's a big difference. What can I do? What do they expect from my treatment? I always try to think and act reasonably. I try to find out what led these people to this dilemma or to this symptomatology. Where is this person? That's clear. It's not so easy to answer. What are the causes? The causes are often spiritual. Do you treat them at the same time? Or first the body and then the soul? No, I look at what the field shows me. At the moment there is a therapeutic field. Sometimes people want to talk to me about chemotherapy and then it turns out that we are looking at the mother topic. That can happen to us. We spend one or two hours with the patients and then we find out where we want to look. Which field do we look at? We can look at all fields. We can look at the spiritual, emotional, spiritual field. We have great people in the team. Not just me, but others who can work on all levels. Or we look purely biochemically. Then I take the laboratory and then I look at micronutrients, what kind of toxins are there, what kind of food intolerances do they have, what is the gut flora, what are the teeth, what is going on at home, what is the electrosmog, what is there to look at biologically. Then we look at the causes. It's not just the elephant in the living room that we have to find. There are many small aspects that we have to illuminate and balance here and there. Disturbing fields, teeth, almonds, nasolabial folds, are the most disturbing fields in our people. In connection with cancer development? In connection with cancer. You have to think about such things. And you can find them out with a lot of experience or with gynecological investigations or gentle investigations. But if I put it in the one-sided machinery, you would never go to the nerves If you are in the one-sided machinery, then it is said they are doing the chemo now, they can eat what they want and when the chemo is over, then it's good. But then there is no further care. Then of course there is still imaging and control and so on. But there is no cause research at all. I also come from school medicine. We have not yet advised our people whether they should eat differently. Cancer patients should eat as unspecific as anything else. Or so unempathetic. It is also thought reductionist. Yes, it is too reductionist. To tell the cancer patient you have three months left, is also not possible. Or if they don't do that, then they only have three or six months left or they will die immediately. Should you bring the doctor in the study on the way then there is no humanly statement. I hear that again and again. They are really depressed and depressed. Dr. Klinner once told me exactly to this sentence, if my doctor would tell me that, I would turn around and go and say, this is the wrong doctor. It is not possible to work with fear and with pressure. And also this self-fulfilling prophecy when you really get a diagnosis of three months. Then you can't get it out of your head anymore. No, it is a Damocles sword. It is a nocebo that you put. Instead of placebo. It is always a placebo effect when the patient comes to the doctor, he has a white t-shirt on and hopes. And the diploma behind it. Only that is already healing. And the other is nocebo. So that brings suffering. Such a negative affirmation. Fear. We have been practicing in the last years. But let's leave that topic. Let's go to the personalized therapy of cancer. You told me in advance that there is the possibility to find out via laboratories what this cancer, especially in this person, how to treat it. And I think that is something exotic. Nobody talks about it. It is the 1x1 of every oncologist. You should think about it. Unfortunately not. They sometimes do gene analysis to compare certain drugs. There is such a database. Charité does such an investigation. But it is not the standard. The standard is you have the cancer. The guideline says there are these chemicals. And radiation. These are the possibilities. Then there is the immune therapy. Relatively new. And there is nothing more. And of course we want to work mainly with the gentle medicine. It is not the case that we never give an agency what chemotherapy means. We have already applied that locally. There is the insulin-potentiated chemotherapy. I am not a total fan of it. Because I know that the other substances can work just as well. Sometimes the patient absolutely wants it. And then you take it in. And then you try to harm as little as possible. That is the principle. Primum nihil nocere. First of all, do not harm. And then you can find out which chemotherapeutics and which biological substances that you can also use and that we also successfully use can also annoy or destroy the tumor. You can express that in percent. But when you say which chemo would work at all, it means the other way around. There are also many chemo that do not work. And you could have excluded it in advance. But that's ridiculous, isn't it? I don't want to put all the oncologists in a bad light. It's also about letting the patient know at home I'm asking my oncologist if we can test if the chemo he wants to give me would really be susceptible to a tumor. It takes consulting time and it costs money. It doesn't cost that little. It's between 1000 and 2000 euros what a laboratory costs to find out. And the cash register doesn't pay for it? The cash register doesn't pay for it. Even the private cash registers pay for it. But it's all still a bit off-label. There are still scientifically recognized studies. That's not the question. But it's not in the guidelines. And the cash registers, the legal cash registers anyway, but also the private cash registers, always point to the fact that it has not yet been medically proven. Because it's not in the guidelines. It's not a duty to act this way. And the patient's will is always the deciding factor for me. I would like to look beyond the edge of the plate. I would like to have a personalized medicine. I would like to get the substances that really help me, that are proven to help. We can't conjure. We can't prophesy. If we use these substances, now we have the great laboratory, it's healthy. There are many other factors. But if I use substances, I want to have a basis that the substances work for me. You've seen it here in the laboratory. In vitro, it works. In vitro, in the reagent glass. Whether it works in vivo, in humans, in the body, we have to see. There are healing obstacles. We have to get rid of them. That's why I don't just look at what would help a cancer patient, but also at heavy metals, solvents, pesticides, fungicides, borrelia, and all kinds of other polluting factors. We look at them, and they are treated, as wholeheartedly as possible. Not just talk about it, but really do it. That's our motto. How high is the causality from your point of view between environmental pollution, vaccinations, but also fear? We've been experiencing a lot of fear in the last three or four years. Hormones, PET bottles, plastic, hormones in meat. The cancer rate is rising. It's the environmental factors that are extremely promoting cancer. Without environmental factors, there are still countries or regions where there is almost no cancer. They have no environmental pollution. Okinawa, the island of the 110-year-olds, and so on. Now there is McDonald's, and the survival rate or the ageing rate is also decreasing since there is this kind of nutrition or environmental pollution in these regions. Over 80 percent. It's not the genes. I've heard that genes are about 3 percent. That you inherit certain genes and the rest is really self-made. Self-made, environmentally made, poorly processed. And how high is the probability that there is still a tooth decay in connection with the tumor? If I were to name numbers, I would guess 70-80 percent. Oh, that bad? I have Dr. Lechner here all the time who analyzes X-rays. School medicine has shown me how many studies there are in relation to breast cancer and X-rays, to rheumatism and X-rays, and to this and X-rays. Also neurodegenerative diseases and X-rays. There are also mercaptans, etioetas, there are other factors, but every patient has to show me his OPG, his autopathogram, if it's only 2D. And when it comes to cancer ... Always look at teeth. Always look at teeth and not only look at teeth, but also act consistently. That means the dead tooth has to come out? Yes, there is a study, 30,000 teeth removed, all examined on bacteria. How many percent were positive for bacterial settlement? 100. 100 percent. I just pulled out a dead tooth and we looked at it, it was black. And that's related? That's related. And the crazy thing is, these are silent inflammation. Silent inflammation is the keyword. You don't feel it, you don't notice it, the headache comes and goes. Don't think it could be the tooth. Organs. It's a somatotope. Our jaw with the teeth is a somatotope. The jaw is represented there. On these teeth, on these regions. We have many somatotopes. The palm, the soles of the feet, and so on. We can see a somatotope on the head. We can see a somatotope on the tongue. But the teeth have a very special somatotope. Because the jaw is about 1,000 times higher switched, sensorically, than other comparable muscle groups. 1,000 times higher. And that's because we are 1 to 1 in the cervical spine. Because our thinking depends on it. The muscles, the muscles of the cervical spine, musculature, have to be able to orient themselves. When we run and the tiger is behind us or something that attacks us, that's how we evolved evolutionarily, we have to be 100% sensitive. We have to be able to orient ourselves and react immediately. That's why all these muscle groups, C1, C2, C3, C4, the cervical segments, are so incredibly sensitively switched. And that's a problem. If we have inflammation, a stress impulse is triggered permanently. A signal is emitted to the spine. That's adrenaline. That's sympathicoton. Inflammation is responsible for attack, escape, defense. But if it is permanently activated, then we get problems. We can't reorganize it anymore. We can't delete it anymore. These deletion systems, the declining inhibition systems, don't work anymore because it gets too intense permanently. And then chronic diseases and thus cancer arise. Then a huge door has to be opened for you. You study medicine at school. You know a lot. And suddenly you realize that so many cancer patients have a problem with their teeth. And now you have to put your patient to the dentist. How paradoxical is that? Actually nice, holistic. I understand. And that's why I have one of the best dentists in my practice. But not as someone who drills, who makes long-term positioning rails and such things. Poison-free teeth. And then he says, second opinion on this orthopentomogram, on the X-ray, there is something wrong, the tooth has to come out, the tooth has to come out. As a complementary doctor, as a non-dentist, I don't always have the convincing power. If the tooth doesn't have to come out, then they don't get the tooth out. But if my dentist says, hey, the doctor is right, it has to come out, then the chance is greater. It's incredibly difficult to get people to let go of their teeth. It's incredibly difficult. In our practice, we also had a dentist practice integrated, a poison-free dental practice, a dentist without a dentist, that just has to be one, a front, a clarity. We have a great working group in Berlin, we call it Coffee Clutch with Procain. We are neural therapists, we go deep into some regions with needles, treat them with Procain. And there are a third, probably, of dentists there. And that's great, to have such a community that recognizes and respects the patients that I know best, to whom you can also send. The dentist I have, Sandra, Dr. Umbreit, she can't treat all the patients we have. She can't do it. In our conversation, we make a lot of bets. We would have to go into every single bet. I feel like it. Yes, me too. I can learn and ultimately it has to be done. You brought in the psyche, you brought in the detoxification, you brought in the teeth. And you also said that you can even look at chemotherapy, which is good at all. But you also told me in advance that this laboratory diagnosis is also able to show me another way how my cancer could be treated individually with natural remedies. That's right. I can have as many as I want examined, so natural substances. I could also have more chemo substances, but there is such a profile. There are 50 chemo substances, 50 biological substances. You can examine them for cytotoxicity. You need these circulating tumor cells. This is called a liquid biopsy. And then you can see, you can use these preparations. They are good. They are cytotoxic, and then you can use them orally. Or, what we do a lot, use them as infusions. I always take a few substances. Number one, curcumin, then vitamin C, artesonate, amygdalin, and so on. Dichloracetate, there are still quite a few. And we want to know, okay, we focus on certain substances. The patients spend a lot of money for this. We have to be able to buy them in the pharmacy. Then they have to be applied. It's a lot of work to give a lot of infusions. But it's very effective. And then I want to know, vitamin C only works for 5%, I don't use it. Curcumin works for 35% or more, I definitely use it. Because certain substances not only have cytotoxic properties, but also immune-stimulating properties, mitochondria-activating properties, and so on. But then the expensive diagnosis is suddenly much cheaper. Because I don't have to read a coffee set and try to make a diagnosis. Of course, we also have that. Electroacupuncture, we can test that. We have different kinesiological methods. We also work with the Klinger method. We can test that. But how certain is that if someone has this mood or that mood, or comes from the trauma or just had an argument, it changes. These kinesiological or energetic states change relatively strongly. And my experience is, what I'm testing this week doesn't have to be the same next week. It's also not 100% correct in the lab, but very much. You can rely on that a lot. If I have a circulating tumor cell, it doesn't change its genetics so quickly within a few weeks that I can't use it anymore. And we also take, like chemists, like oncologists, several drugs at the same time or one after the other. And if the patient says, I would like to somehow give up the chemical cell, would you say that this way through the individualized lab diagnostics would be a feasible way that would be just as equal as the other or even better? In many cases, because with epithelial, carcinoma, with all solid tumors, even with metastasized states, you actually don't have that many chances to really heal it. In contrast to biological medicine. You can use different aspects and not just the infusion. But chemotherapy has a few important indications. I would also use high-dose chemo. Multiple myeloma and lymphoma and so on. And Hodgkin. I would definitely include chemotherapy. You see, but I also need a person of trust who tells me from here we take this in, we work together with our colleague here and from there I continue myself. We also work together with oncologists. I also send to oncologists. I send to hospitals. We then look, it has to be operated. We can't conjure. When I see it has to be operated, then I send it away. There are indications that an operation is right first. And they are good, the people. That's important. We have to work together. Not to think, Let's come back to the lab. It's coming to the end of the show. If you would make an appeal here in this camera, where the smiley is, and directly address the doctors and therapists and explain to them what this lab diagnosis is, what can they learn here, what can the lab offer them and why do you recommend it? I mean, you've already said something. Can you say a few things directly? To the oncologists, colleagues, and also to the other physicians who follow a holistic approach, I can only say, if you have cancer patients, then make a reasonable lab diagnosis. At least this one, this chemosensitivity diagnosis. As oncologists, we get a clue, what is the tumor genetics, which substances I can use better according to the guideline. We can also check heat sensitivity in this lab. I can also use hypothermia for chemotherapy, which we also do a lot, but also for those who prefer to work with the biological, with the gentle means, I would say, it's non-plus-ultra to know who is sitting there, who is looking for help, what is exactly the right thing. And finally, as you mentioned earlier, I even save. I know I have a certain investment in my health. Cancer patients are often selling their house and hip, but then I also want to use the right substances cleanly, diagnostically. And then I also see, I gain weight again, tumor reduction, or there are no metastases, there are no metastases, they just don't come. So that's just fun, it works. This lab, that's a special one, isn't it? Research Genetic Cancer Center, RGCC. So you can google RGCC, then you can see what the lab offers and so you can involve one or the other in treating the patient. Yes, definitely. Yes, we have now looked into a small chest, what a joy, to sit together with such a tremendous knowledge, a doctor who knows so much, ladies and gentlemen. Dr. Ralf Heinrich from Berlin with his TheraPraxis in Berlin. So I wish you a lot of success and please promise me one thing, let's talk about it all day long, about all these therapeutic possibilities, especially the ECT or your version of detoxification, 3.0, I've never heard of it, but that's also something, the patient really has the success the next day. The next day he may be a little weak, but then it comes. As I said, I just did something in this direction, but what you're doing here is a little sharper. We do that too, this blood wash. Yes, but if you get so many liters through and get it really clean, but the tissue also gives up again, if you clean the blood like that, then only the next day does the tissue give up again, right? That's also a, you have to see the compartments, the compartment model. You can also get the blood clean within half an hour, with 50 milliliters per minute blood flow. And then the compartment interstitium is on it, the intercellular tissue, the connective tissue, that has less than the blood and then it diffuses there. If I stimulate with electro and also stimulate with hyperthermia, then of course there is a much higher turnover and then a lot of blood comes out of the connective tissue and then we draw 350 milliliters per minute. This comes from heart surgery, this machine. And then the cells come and they give up again. That's osmosis, that's also a physical principle again. That's why you have to do it for 4 hours, 3-4 hours and then you get 70 liters instead of 3 liters cleaned. I will discuss this with my wife, but I think we will also come to Berlin. You are welcome. Then let's do the interview in Berlin. No, no, no, I can't do the whole studio. But at least take some impressions if I let myself be washed from the inside, true beauty comes from the inside. Great. It was a great honor. Thank you very much. Have a good journey back. And also to you, dear viewers, I hope we were able to show in all clarity that the diagnosis of cancer is of course a stroke of fate, but on the other hand it simply has to be viewed in a holistic way. There are a thousand faces. We have seen that detoxification is very central. We have heard that the teeth are very central and that there is a very individual therapy approach on the own tumor and not just a 0815 solution, but an individual solution. And there is diagnostics from the lab. And I find that totally fascinating, because I have never heard of it before. Thank you very much for watching. If you have any questions, simply request this service from your doctor. Point out that there is this laboratory technology and you don't want to have any treatment, but a very, very individual one. And then we also know that the success rate is the highest. And I wish you that from the bottom of my heart. All the best, see you next time and take care of each other.