Georgia Admits It Posted Trump Indictment Before the Indictment

Good morning everybody. Well, as to be expected, the Georgia case is running into some, well, let's call them issues. The thing, the very first thing they did, which was, quote, unquote, accidentally published the indictment before Trump was indicted. Now, I don't know how, what people deciding on what you would be indicted about deciding the charges and so on, how you would know what the indictment is, let alone have it ready to publish, but they did, and they've now admitted they did it. I'll give you some updates on this. We'll go to some stories. Thanks for being here, folks. Let's get started. Let me show you right here. Georgia admits it post the Trump indictment before the indictment is that Fulton County, who leaked a document or sorry, a fictitious document, the same area of the court, right? The, um, the court, the clerk that said previously it was a fictitious document is now admitting they lied to everybody. Fulton County clerk who leaked Trump charges, she accidentally send instead of save. It says the Fulton County clerk of court admitted to accidentally releasing the fourth indictment for president Donald Trump. She said she pressed send instead of the, instead of save on the document. I am human. Shea Alexander told channel two's Tom Jones on Tuesday. She was apparently under a lot of pressure to make the process, make sure the process went smoothly. May the oncoming indictment. Alexander told Jones not have the miss and tell them this. You just cited, she wanted to make sure everybody could see it. She went out there as soon as possible and she's human. And she accidentally released the indictment while the grand jury was still hearing for witnesses on the indictment and had not yet decided on the charges, but apparently they had decided on the charge and she released and then said it was fake. Instead of welcome to Georgia folks. Oh my gosh. This, this thing's about as legit as a Georgia election. You know, take that for what you will. Let me show you a bit more. Epic times has it that the premature posting of the Trump charges in Georgia case could give the defense a line of it. It says the premature posting of charges in the Georgia case against former President Donald Trump threats to further complicate these controversial proceedings. Legal analysts say, as Mike Allen, a former prosecutor and current defense lawyer in Ohio, told the Epoch Times that he has never seen anything in his 43 years as an attorney. Never seen anything like this 43 years. I would assume that every other court clerk was also human. Every other court clerk also wanted people to see the indictments. And no other clerk in the entire history of this guy's career, 43 years, has ever seen anything like this. No, this is not normal. It's all he said. Dang serious. Does it others experiencing corals would allow such a mistake? But Mr. I read that three. I preaching to get leave. Be ocean Smith. Um, well. for the connection issues, folks. We all better now? Things good? Let's see. All right, that being said, there's a few other things going on right now that in addition to the issue with the, of course, charges being leaked early, while they were still deciding on the charges, the George DA now has asked for a court date, and what did she choose? She's asking for March 2024. She wants March 2024 as the court date, when Trump's gonna stand trial. What is also in March 2024? Well, that's one week before the Georgia primary election. Now, I don't know how they could argue that this is not about interfering with the elections. Ironically, in a trial, alleging that Trump tried interfering with the elections by investigating interference in the elections. Oh my gosh, this is the purest form of clown world. This is in its purity. They want to have the Trump, now, first of all, they released the charges while Trump is still, while the grand jury is still deciding on the charges, right? They released the indictment before they decide on the indictment. They said she's only human. 43 years, a guy's never seen anything like it in his entire life. It's totally not normal. Then they ask for the court date. They choose March 2024, one week before the Georgia presidential election, which would definitely interfere with the election, by the way, without a doubt that will interfere with the election. To put him on trial for interfering with the election by trying to investigate interference in the elections. Like you can't make this stuff up. If someone were to tell me like eight years ago that I would ever see anything like this, I would not believe them. I would not believe it. If you were to tell me eight years ago that we would witness something like this, I would laugh in your face. What a time to be alive, folks. Oh my gosh, there's another thing happening too, by the way, in Georgia, which is they're also asking to have the trial moved out of state for obvious reasons, of course. One of the big issues, but you have a few issues with this. One of the issues is that the aggrieved party are the one bringing the charges. The aggrieved party in Fulton County, they're the elected officials brought into power through the election system which Trump is making allegations against. Now, if he's calling into question the legitimacy of the election systems in Fulton County, Georgia, what does that mean? It means he's calling into question the legitimacy of every elected official in Georgia. How do you have the elected officials in Georgia then decide to bring charges against him and 18 others who they want to have standing trial with him at the same exact time? How do you do that without having a conflict of interest? Well, you don't. Not to mention this happened while Trump was still president, meaning he had executive privilege. Also, Trump did it through his election committee which was done through a legal process. There's a lot of issues with this, not to mention the fact that they dropped off like 120,000 ballots at 4 a.m. in three different vehicles. Most of the witnesses say that almost every one of those 120,000, 130,000, something along those lines, ballots was all for Joe Biden. And then of course, he had the Biden bump of a vertical spike in votes at 4 a.m. in the morning after they said pipes burst which we found out later they didn't. After Trump was wiped out from a 160,000 vote lead or something along those lines. Yeah, totally normal. Totally normal, yep. And then they win the election by like a couple thousand votes or something. Not that many votes, let's put it that way. Wild times, folks. Again, though, back on the point that Trump team is trying to get the trial moved out of Georgia and it looks like they might be able to do it. Again, we'll see because at this point, at this point, I don't think many people believe in the integrity of the court system. Let's just put it that way. And so, we'll see if the court can demonstrate some degree of integrity on this. Trump does, of course, have a strong case on getting it moved out. And also because they're charging 18 others alongside him at the same time and they want them all to stand trial at the same time alongside each other. I don't know how you have 18 or 19 defendants like during a trial like that. I don't know how you would even do that. But I guess it's because they're going after him with a RICO charge. And so, they're charging them as basically like a mafia. And so, that's how they want to do it. If I remember right, even when they were charging like the mafia, like actual organized criminal organizations, typically you don't have them standing trial together, at least not this many of them. And so, it's a little bizarre from that standpoint as well. I think it's one of those cases where, one thing you find, one thing you often find is when police are investigating something, the person who is over adamantly claiming innocence tends to be the one who's a suspect of being guilty. If you go to a place and like you're, let's say there's a murder and there's like five different neighbors and you interview four of the neighbors and they're like, man, that was a real tragedy. Was this such a nice guy? And the fifth neighbor is like, I'm totally innocent. He like looks all nervous. I'm innocent. What are you here for? I'm innocent. Can I help you investigate officers? Like the officers are gonna look at that fifth guy and be like, you know, I think he might be the guy. When you try too hard to make a case, you look guilty. When you try, when you're overly invested in something, you make yourself look like you did it, frankly. And I would argue that the overzealotry, the overly zealous nature in which they're going after Trump especially for anything related to January 6th or the elections, makes it look like they're guilty. You know, normally if you're a legitimate government and there's people concerned about fraud, you'll take steps to alleviate the disbelief. You'll show them evidence. You'll open the books. You'll be transparent. You want to dispel misunderstandings. And that's of course the normal process for dealing with doubt. If for example, someone suspects you of, let's say, doing something dishonest and you really want to prove otherwise, you know, you're gonna show them the evidence. Be like, look, okay, I understand you might not believe me. This is where I was Saturday night. These are my text messages. You know, maybe you want to go to that degree. And you're like, look, you know, I understand that you're concerned, but I hope you can believe me now that you've seen the evidence. They're not doing that with the elections. People are like, there is no evidence of election fraud. The courts have decided it. The courts threw out almost every single case because they argued it had no standing. In other words, the courts didn't decide anything. The courts didn't even look at the evidence in most cases. Of the cases, the very few cases they did look into, the overwhelming majority did in fact prove that fraud had taken place, by the way. Most of the cases, again, were tossed out on no standing. And I would say that's a problem with the court systems, not properly investigating something when you had massive, wide-scale claims of fraud and videos showing extremely suspicious activity, not to mention, you know, like Scooby-Doo level antics on election night. I think any normal country, you'd be a little dang suspicious, not to mention the fact that Joe Biden himself goes on camera. Joe Biden himself goes on camera, not his exact words, and says they've created the most comprehensive election fraud system in history. Now, look, Trump is being indicted for text messages, telling people to turn on the TV, telling people he's watching TV, for tweeting that, you know, making fun of Mike Pence. Trump's words, to an extreme degree, a fine-tooth comb going through everything he said, every single word he said is being used as a legal statement. And so when Joe Biden says that they created the most comprehensive election fraud system in history, why is that not being taken as evidence in admission of guilt? When Trump was, of course, giving a public speech back when he was president, and he's making allegations, you know, people are asking him, what do you say about Russia hacking Hillary Clinton's emails, you know, what do you say about this? And Trump's like, why are we talking about this? Why are we not talking about the fact that she deleted her server? Why are we not talking about the fact that her team was destroying cell phones with hammers? Why are we not talking about the fact she used BleachBit to wipe clean all the data when she was, of course, asked to provide it as evidence? Why are we not talking about this? Why are we talking about Russia allegedly hacking her things? They're like, what do you say, Mr., yeah, the press was like, what do you say, Mr. Trump? He goes, fine. He goes, hey, Russia, if you're listening, I hope you can find Hillary Clinton's, like, you know, 10,000 missing emails or whatever it was. You know, I think the American press would be very grateful for you, right? That's what he says. They take that out of context and they publish everywhere, all over the media, Trump asks Russia to hack Hillary Clinton and they use that as evidence to go after him. Trump, they did that to Trump, out of context. Obviously, he was joking. It was in context of him, of course, saying, hey, why are you guys paying attention to this and not the deleted information? And again, they made it a scandal. Then Joe Biden goes up and says they created the most comprehensive election fraud system in history. And like, they're like, oh, he doesn't mean anything he says. Also, he's completely cognizant. So, you know, believe everything he says, but don't believe everything he says, but believe it. You know, like, do they think we're that stupid? Honestly, do they actually like look at the American people and think that we don't get this stuff? Like, do they actually believe that we can look at these things and not connect those two little synapses and have a logical conclusion of the information we're watching? I think they think we're stupid. And I would argue, people are not, you know, like most people are not. Ironically, I'd say the ivory tower is probably the ones who have some real issues going on, but I think the average person gets it. Folks, all right. So let's jump over to Epic TV and we'll talk about another scandal, a real scandal, and a scandal that's probably going to get swept under the great rug of history, which is the FTX chief, Sam Bankman-Fried. He was one of the biggest Democrat donors, and it turns out he was making those donations using stolen money, $100 million. You'd think that would be a bigger scandal. Let's talk about it. Let's jump over to Epic TV for that. Before we jump over though, let me show you a trailer, which YouTube will, I cannot show you the full video. And in fact, I'm always walking a fine line with it with YouTube, but whatever. Let me show you a trailer of the unreleased January 6 footage that we've gotten ahold of. And we've put together a special feature showing a very different side of what you've been told. That said, of course, as well, this is on Epic TV. Be sure to watch it. And also we have a flash sale going on right now, 25 cents a week. Watch it, check it out, and I'll see you on Epic TV. We'll go over the Sam Bankman-Fried story. We'll go into questions. I'll see you there. What was the process of actually putting this all together? Many, many hours of finding the right camera angles and watching it. The first trouble started just after one o'clock. 45 pages, here it is right here. Donald Trump has been indicted. Somber day for the country. This all happened before President Trump's speech was over. The founder of the Oath Keepers Militia Group is headed to prison for more than 18 years. His lawyers didn't have this video. The video we're watching right now, his own lawyers did not have. There was a big question of what did the people do who actually did enter the building. This is where we picked it up with the security footage that is new. At this point, the story dramatically changes. The New Jersey man who assaulted a Capitol police officer on January 6th has been sentenced. So this was withheld. This was not shown to the defense. That could be considered exculpatory evidence. This doesn't seem like what a lot of the media is showing. It's going to change narratives no matter what your political perspective is. What we're after is the truth. folks that says jump over to epoch TV or I'm going to call epic TV now I'm trying to trying to get rid of the British pronunciation epic TV. epoch tv.com I'll see you there. That said, let's talk about FTX the