Trump Indictment Will Put 2020 Election on Trial

you Good morning everyone and good to see you all here again. Checking the link for the site. Look, is it down or something? We will see. Regardless, there's a lot to talk about. Sorry I've been out. I had a strange thing with my eye for a couple days. But as you can see, it's all better now. So everything's okay. One sec. Yeah, checking the Epic TV link. It's down, I think, for some reason. Well, folks, here we are again. Trump is being indicted. No, you're not living in Groundhog Day. No, you don't need to make the right choices to go to the next day and get out of the cycle we're in. No, they're just doing the same thing over and over again, unfortunately. And this time, they might actually get him this time. Now, I'm not saying that tongue in cheek. I think they found a way where they can prosecute Trump, which is they basically cobble together fake charges. I think this whole thing is a bunch of nonsense. I'll explain to you how they're doing it. They're gonna put it in a DC court. The judge is a total political hack who has obvious bias against Trump, who should recuse herself if this had any semblance of legitimacy or any semblance of actual law and order, which it does not. The judge is probably not gonna recuse herself. The judge is known to be one of the toughest, one of the toughest on the J6 defendants. And just like with other people who try to defend themselves, people in other cases were forbidden from showing certain types of evidence. People in other cases were unable to get exculpatory evidence. People in other cases were unable to even show their side of the story. And I know that Trump's saying, hey, I'm gonna, he's saying, hey, there we are. Trump's saying now that, hey, he's gonna, of course, he's gonna try to show his side of the evidence. It's really doubtful whether the judge is gonna allow it because the judge is a corrupt political hack. I'm just saying it. Anyways, let's jump into what's happening because regardless of anything, ironically, this is probably gonna help Trump, ironically. Trump could campaign from prison. They might try to throw him in prison. I don't know how they're gonna do it, given the fact that a former president has to have Secret Service detail, which means either they'd have to put him in house arrest or they'd have to put him in solitary or some kind of protective custody with a Secret Service detail outside of the room, like Secret Service prison guards. He's gonna be like Napoleon on his island and just like Napoleon on his island, who, of course, swam and then became leader once again, Trump actually can still campaign even from behind bars if it comes down to it. Let me explain. Start from the top. Let's go over the charges first. This is the indictment. He's gonna face charges today, just so y'all know. One of them is conspiracy to defraud the United States and I'll, stick with me. I'll explain what all these mean. We'll dig into this, I'll explain it all. Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, which is a ridiculous charge. That was the charge they rolled out for Enron. It was about destroying evidence, not about like interfering with the electoral college. It's a cobbled together fake charge that has never been used in this, nor was it ever designed to be used like this. They're making up charges basically, but this is of course what they were using to go after the J6ers. Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding. Sorry. These are previously non-existent crime. Nobody has ever been charged with this stuff. Like this is again, stuff they made around Enron. This was designed around corrupt businesses trying to destroy evidence, not people interrupting, you know, because they're protesting, interrupting a government proceeding of some kind. Like you could argue that people interrupting a city hall meeting could be hit with this charge because it was never meant to be used like this, nor has it ever been used like this. This is the Democrats making something illegal that was never illegal, basically. This is them faking a charge, and they've of course used it to go after the J6ers, but stick with me. Obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights. Let me explain. The irony with this is actually, if Trump ever comes back into power, if we ever get a actual law and order leader, the Democrats have actually committed to all these crimes. Technically, most of them could go to prison for the rest of their lives, as they're trying to do to Trump. Barack Obama, Joe Biden, most of their cabinets, even some members of the media, possibly. Many of them, a ridiculous number of them, could go to prison for like 400, 500 years if someone were to replicate the same charges against them. Because with Trump-Russia, the whole faking of the Trump-Russia thing, with the incitement, for example, of protests all around the nation, BLM and Antifa, with, for example, even their attempts to get electors with the Electoral College to cast opposite votes to what they had been elected to do, which is what the conspiracy against rights charge is. It's about the dueling electors. They did all of that. Hollywood actors, mainstream news outlets, most leaders of the Obama administration, most of the Democrat Party, in fact, all of them did this. And if you ever get a law and order leader coming in who wants some good old-fashioned vengeance, they can charge, use these exact same charges against them, and throw them in prison for the rest of their lives, which is a dumb move on behalf of the Democrats, because this is a politicized charge, let's be honest with ourselves. A dumb move on behalf of them, making up new crimes and setting notably precedents in order to roll these out. They're basically making it so that they can, in the future, be charged for the exact same things, and notably be charged in a way that actually would align with reality, unlike what they're doing to Trump. But let me explain. Now, Republicans are claiming that this criminalizes the act of questioning the outcome of an election, and of questioning the deep state. They're saying that essentially what the Democrats are doing is they're making it so it is a criminal, prosecutable crime where you can go to prison for the rest of your life. If an elected leader, a president, a mayor, any elected position questions the outcome of an election. And they're saying as well that even doubting the power of the deep state, even questioning their legitimacy publicly, if that leads to protest and so on, that this is now criminalized. You could go to prison for 500 years. Now, the indictment itself, I read the whole thing yesterday, the indictment itself suggests that it's only legal. It's only legal to question or challenge an election within certain legal boundaries. They're saying that you can call for a recount, you can call for an audit. But they're saying that actions beyond that, then you're in unknown territory. And if that leads to protests, if it leads to you trying to get dueling electors, if it leads to you doing these other things that you're alleging Trump did, well, then you're committing a crime. Let me explain a bit more. I wanna go into this a bit. Real quick, by the way, I'm gonna be doing a live broadcast later today with my colleague, Steve Lance at NTD for the Trump indictment. So we'll be broadcasting from 3.30 to 5.30 p.m. live. That'll replace tonight's show, but they'll re-air it as well. So tune in live again, 3.30 to 5.30. We'll be covering this whole thing as it happens, and I'll give you all updates. And of course, we'll have a lot more time. We can go in depth into it. I'll give more of my opinions. But let me continue this. Trump has indicted on four counts on the 2020 election case, basically. And this is how they're charging him. This is how they're making their case. They're cobbling together several different instances. Now, remember, we were expecting Trump to face charges in addition to everything else, right? Classified documents, the fake Stormy Daniels thing. You know, who knows what else they might come out with. Maybe he spoke angrily at his dog one time. You know, who knows? Who knows what they might try to charge him with? But this is how they're doing it, okay? They're taking several of these charges and cobbling them together to create the illusion of a conspiracy. And so they're taking his, for example, the Georgia case, the J6 case, they're taking these things and they're cobbling them together. The way they're doing it is they're saying, it's the charge, for example, one, that Trump knowingly lied. And that's actually gonna be one thing they're gonna have to prove. They're gonna have to prove that Trump did this knowingly. I should note, they're probably gonna find him guilty because the judge is a political hack. The judge should recuse herself under any normal circumstance. And it's frankly ridiculous that the Justice Department is allowing this to go forward with the judge they've chosen. They're gonna find him guilty no matter what, I'll tell you right now. There's almost no possible way Trump is gonna get a fair trial. Almost no possibility with this, given the established political bias and personal bias that the judge has, which should lead her to recuse herself. And I doubt she's gonna do it. Even then, with the current Justice Department, it's doubtful whether anything would happen. Although Trump will probably appeal it and you're gonna watch this drag on for probably like a couple years, realistically. Long enough at least to get past the 2024 elections. And then maybe they'll have whoever, if Trump doesn't get in, have whoever gets in, pardon him because the nation needs healing, watch. But this is how they're doing it. They had to prove that Trump knowingly lied. It can be very hard to do. They're gonna have to prove that Trump knowingly misled the nation about the election, claiming the election was rigged. And notably, according to the indictment, they claim that Trump, that his lie was that there was enough rigging or enough foul play to have changed the outcome of the elections. That's the technicality. So not only are they saying that, they're acknowledging that there was probably some anomalies and there were some issues and you hear Mike Pence saying this. You hear a lot of people saying it. They'll acknowledge, yes, there were problems with the election. Yes, it was a strange time of 2020 with COVID-19 and lockdowns, but there was not enough to have altered the outcome of the election. That's the narrative. They're gonna have to prove that Trump knew that and lied about it, claiming that there was enough to have altered the outcome of the elections. That's one. They had to say that Trump lied. Trump tried to deprive people of their right to vote by encouraging dueling electors, so after, of course, and also of launching investigations. So Trump's investigations are being framed as a crime. His calling for the Justice Department to launch investigations into the elections and so on, they're criminalizing that. They're saying that it is the dueling electors, because seven states had dueling electors, which notably there's Democrat-established precedence for. Actually, dueling electors have been accepted in the past, but they're making that a crime. And they're also saying that Trump tried to disrupt the counting of the Electoral College votes by encouraging the January 6th protests, thereby depriving, it was a conspiracy against rights, depriving people of their right to vote. And so they're combining these in order to create this big conspiracy case, essentially. That's how they're doing it. Let's jump over to Epoch TV exclusively, because when I'm talking about the elections and stuff like that, YouTube likes to ban me, and give me a strike, which they've done several times. If you get three at a time, they actually delete your whole channel. I've gone much further beyond that, I believe, but they clear after a certain amount of time. But I don't like getting them, because I can't post for a couple weeks. So let's jump over to Epoch TV, where we can say whatever the heck we want. And join me on Epoch TV again. We have flash sales going on. Watch the rest of this episode. We have our live broadcasts. We have Trump's speeches. We have stuff that I can't show you on YouTube, because they delete it. And I can show you evidence, ironically, of the thing that would prove Trump's innocence, which I cannot show you on YouTube, because they're part of the political hack system. Join us on Epoch TV, and I will see you there. Folks, thank you for being here.