[VIỆT SUB] THÀNH VIÊN HẠ VIỆN BANG PENNSYLVANIA CHẤT VẤN DOMINION

14 counties, mine being one of them in York County, utilized the Dominion software. And Pennsylvanians deserve to know exactly how Dominion systems worked, as well as what software was utilized in our election process, and the security measures that they had in place, so that we can give voters the confidence on the election outcomes. Most of us would agree here that we trust the workers in our polling places, and we trust the workers in our counties. There are neighbors, and there are people that we elected. But what we don't know, and therefore we can't trust, is the role of third-party companies, right? So when Dominion said they would come in and answer the question, this was an opportunity for them to demonstrate who they were, the services they were providing, the products that they were selling us, and how they were being utilized, and give the voters the confidence that they're looking for. Unfortunately, rescinding their acceptance of participation in our committee hearing robbed our voters of that information. Questions that we had, did Dominion play a role in the tabulation of the votes cast? We don't know. And was it the same in all the counties? We don't know. Did Dominion program the software in the equipment that was used at the 12 counties? We don't know. It's what we're hearing they're doing in other states, but are they doing it here? We don't know. Was there direct county oversight? Was there expertise in that oversight? You could put anybody to oversee it, but if you don't know how it operates or why it operates, is that oversight? Were test runs done, conducted before the election? Were they done after the election? How do we know? Does Dominion use open-source software so that observers can go in and they can see exactly what switches are being turned on and turned off? We don't know. Transparency is key. So if they're doing this, if they used open-source software, right, we would know what's going on there. The average observer could take a look to see what that process is. Unfortunately, last evening, Dominion Voting Systems lawyered up and backed out of their commitment to the people of Pennsylvania to provide their input in a public format and discuss their voting systems of which 1.3 Pennsylvanians entrusted. Instead of running towards the light of honesty and integrity, Dominion Voting Systems retreated to the darkness. Why? Why would a vendor of public goods fear discussing their products sold to the public for the public good? If Dominion's products were successful and operated as they were supposed to, why wouldn't Dominion take the opportunity to publicly review its success? How hard is it to say our ballot machines worked exactly as promised and they are 100% accurate? Why, after weeks of accusations, has Dominion Voting Systems not released any analysis of the success of their voting machines to the public in order to stop their accusers in their tracks? They have nothing to hide. Why are they hiding from us? Today, I am saddened to report to the taxpayers of Pennsylvania and the 1.3 million voters who trusted Dominion Voting Systems with their ballots that Dominion Voting Systems has hung you out to dry and slapped you in your faces. Not only are Pennsylvanians more skeptical, but the actions of Dominion Voting Systems last night have led credibility to their accusers' accusations.