Whistleblower Says Vaccines Break Blood-Brain Barrier: Dr. Samuel Sigoloff | CLIP | Crossroads

An ingredient allegedly used in the COVID-19 vaccines is patented to help medications break through the blood-brain barrier, and the presence of this ingredient could pose a threat to the health and safety of the U.S. military, according to Dr. Samuel Sigloff, a major in the U.S. Army and a whistleblower. We speak with Dr. Sigloff about his findings, his attempts to alert the U.S. military amid the vaccine mandates, and how he was punished for issuing his warnings. Hey, Dr. Sam Sigloff, thanks for being on Crossroads. Thank you for having me on, sir. I understand you've come out as a whistleblower in the military. Can you tell us what made you come forward? What was it that made you decide to take that step? Well, first I want to say that any opinion I express is held only by myself. It does not reflect the Department of the Army, does not reflect the DOD, nor the U.S. government. And so my story kind of starts back in July, almost a year ago now, actually more than a year ago now, where I started issuing medical exemptions for service members that did not want to be coerced into taking this home-emergency shot. What was your position at that time? So I recently PCS'd or moved across the country to a new duty station, and I did that so that I would be the medical director at this new facility at Fort Huachuca, Arizona. I see. So you were the medical director and you began issuing some of these exemptions, I understand, right? Tell me about this. What happened? Yes, sir. So my medical exemption was based on the fact that, and these were all done legitimately, legally, following all the rules in place at the time. But the basic reason was the medical shot, the Comirnaty has these lipid nanoparticles in them. And if you look at these lipid nanoparticles, they're not made for human use. They're not validated for medical use. In fact, one of the three lipid nanoparticles says that it's not even for veterinary use. Yet they're in these shots called Comirnaty. So what are these lipid nanoparticles you found? So lipid nanoparticles, they're often called these cholesterol that's in with the medication. It's allegedly in there to help it, I guess, get into you better. And that's true. It was specifically designed to get into the brain. There's a patent from 2017. DSBC and DSBE were patented by Moderna, the company, to get it through the blood-brain barrier, whatever it is that it's carrying, through the blood-brain barrier into the brain. And then if you do something as simple as looking up the Material Safety Data Sheet, or SDS, most people, where they work, there's that huge orange book that would hang on the wall that shows all the chemicals and compounds that they work with and tells them how to interact with it. If you look that up, that's where it says that these compounds are not validated for medical use. Many of the toxicology reports on these reports are classified. Now, who is the authority to classify these when we're putting them into people all over the United States, especially the soldiers? So you found these lipid nanoparticles. You decided that these things are not safe. I mean, what was it that made you concerned about that? Like, what was your concerned outcome if people were to take that? What does it mean if it can break the blood-brain barrier? What does that actually mean? So your body has what they call a blood-brain barrier, and there's a couple other barriers in the body where the blood has very tight... So normally, like, between cells, there's a little bit of space. Well, in the brain, the vessels have no space. Because whatever's floating around in the blood, we don't want that to get into the brain. That could be a big problem. You know, bacteria, virus, things like that could get through. And so this medication has been designed to squeeze through those spaces and carry something with it to go into the brain's space. Now, why would they target that? That's a good question. I don't know why. That seems very strange for what is basically a flu vaccine. They're claiming that COVID is, of course, a type of coronavirus. Why would you need that for a coronavirus vaccine? Well, we've never had a coronavirus vaccine in the past, ever. But I did an episode, episode 33, and it can be found on Rumble, and it's called the Bioweapon Part 1. And in there, I go through every document. I show it in the background behind me. And I show you how I believe that the lipid nanoparticle is a bioweapon developed by China. And I show all the business interactions between Fosun Pharmaceutical and BioNTech. How Fosun Pharmaceutical, or basically the Chinese government, gave BioNTech $135 million. And then shortly after that, BioNTech, or now an extension of the Chinese government, made an agreement with Pfizer to develop 300 million doses of this shot. And how now it's being coerced into the soldiers, to be given to the soldiers. Have you seen any adverse effects from these that may suggest the brain is being affected? There are many effects. I've personally talked to a patient on the phone who, a beneficiary, not a soldier, but developed MS. What is that? It's an autoimmune disease where you have problems where you kind of have this... You may have difficulty with one eye. You may have difficulty with thought process for a short period of time. You may have difficulty with speech or with walking. And then it resolves and comes back and resolves and comes back. And it gets worse and worse as time goes by. So you were this director in charge of this medical facility. You're with the military. You find something that is of serious concern to you, and you decide that you should issue exemptions. What happens then? So I issued a few. And then I received an email from a patient and he said, Sir, I'm sorry. Didn't mean to get you in trouble. And then maybe a half hour later, I get a text message from my boss. He's on leave. He comes in. My boss is the top doctor in charge of the entire facility. And then above him is the hospital commander or clinic commander. It's a very tiny clinic. It's not a hospital. And so he was told by his boss, who was an RN, a nurse, that he was to come in on leave, was to reprimand me, have me retract all of my exemptions, and then tell me to stop giving them. And in the very next day... But from what I understand, the way the military works, you would be legally allowed to issue those exemptions. Right. From my understanding. Because having researched medical exemptions in the military, you need the doctor to sign off on it. Why was that not seen as official in this case? Well, there was actually heavy email traffic from my hospital commander and another commander on post where the hospital commander belittles me. She says, oh, well, he believes that these aren't working. He believes these aren't good. I mean, it doesn't matter what I believe. I'm exposing the truth. And the truth is, we don't know. I warned the patients that it could cause problems with DNA. We don't know. There is, you know, reverse transcription. RNA does affect DNA. I would warn patients about these things. I warned them that it could cause problems with breastfeeding. It could cause problems with pregnancy, carrying to term, could cause problems with a baby. You know, I warned about all these things. And I actually have a different investigation through the medical part of the military, where they are getting mad at me for warning people about those things when all of those things have been proven to be true. Geez. So, you know, legally, normally, you would be able to issue those exemptions. They did not believe you should. What happened from there? So on September 13th, I was called up into my commander's office. I was suspended for allegedly going against the Secretary of Defense guidance. Guidance is non-legally binding. Policy is legally binding. On the 14th is when the Secretary of Defense came out with this policy. And everything I did in retrospect was completely legal. And then on the 16th of September, my hospital commander or clinic commander, she issued a memo stating that she would be the final authority signature line for any medical exemptions. So already she's been in a position where she's practiced medicine three times. She invalidated my medical exemptions, which is illegal for her to do. That's practicing medicine without a license. She banned the off-label use of ivermectin. And I was the only one at her facility prescribing ivermectin. And then she made herself the final approval authority.