Humanoid robots are suddenly everywhere online—but there’s one problem: some of the most convincing ones don’t actually exist. 🤖
• 🎭 Viral AI videos are making imaginary robots look ready for your home • 📦 Real humanoids are already getting surprisingly close to human workers • 🏃 Robots are running, jumping, sorting packages—and occasionally crashing spectacularly • 👀 The bigger question may not be what robots can do, but what they can see and hear • 🏠 And if robots eventually handle everything for us… what parts of human life should we refuse to outsource?
The humanoid era may not be here yet. But it’s already rehearsing.
Last week, I watched a robot walk a golden retriever through a quiet neighborhood.
It held a leash, waited at the crosswalk and then went home,
folded laundry and trimmed the hedge just like a dad.
And I thought, finally, where do I buy one?
Well, there was only one problem, you can't.
The robot wasn't real, AI generated the whole thing and millions watched it like breaking news.
So how much of the humanoid revolution is real and how much is just a very good video?
And this is what my feed looks like now.
A Tesla-looking humanoid walks the dog, loads the dishwasher,
folds a fitted sheet, already suspicious, and cleans the house without complaining.
Then there's my favorite one, a humanoid dental hygienist.
Metal fingers, you know, sharp instrument directly inside your mouth.
Well, sleep tight, everyone.
Some clips are real demonstrations, others are AI generated.
On a phone, though, at 11 at night, they can look identical.
A software startup called Qualia proved that in June.
It posted a beautiful video of a humanoid doing manual work
while announcing that Qualia had joined a Google DeepMind robotics program.
People assumed that they were watching Qualia's robots.
Well, they were not.
The founder admitted that the humanoid is not a real robot.
Qualia builds training software, but not hardware.
Then he added, got your attention, though?
Well, yes.
So does a fire alarm.
And attention matters.
Goldman Sachs estimates the humanoid market could reach $38 billion by 2035.
When that much money is chasing the future,
a video only has to make investors afraid of missing out.
Humanoid robots are not fake.
Some of the real progress is astonishing.
Tesla's Optimus has served popcorn at the Tesla diner in Hollywood.
Tesla has also shown it picking up trash, wiping tables.
Real robot, real popcorn, and real customers.
But Elon Musk acknowledged that the Optimus was
not yet being used in Tesla factories in a material way.
The robots were mainly there to learn.
Well, a successful demonstration is not the same as a dependable employee.
Then there is figure AI.
Figure says three humanoid completed an endurance test sorting packages.
It was supposed to last eight hours.
It ran for roughly 200 hours, more than eight days,
and processed nearly a quarter million packages.
According to Figure, there was no teleoperation.
When one robot needed power, another took over.
The company reported zero hardware failures.
And also in a separate 10-hour contest,
a human intern sorted 12,924 packages, and the robot sorted 12,732.
They lost by 192 boxes.
Well, the intern, though, finished with aching arms,
and the robot did not need an ice pack or an email to HR.
So this is the near-term story.
Not a robot raising your children,
but one repeating an exhausting task without getting tired.
And then there was Beijing.
Last month, China filled an Olympic arena
with more than 2,000 humanoid robots from 666 teams and 16 countries.
I mean, what a number.
They sprinted, jumped, lifted weights, played soccer, and performed practical tasks.
One robot ran the 100 meters in 8.64 seconds faster on paper than Usain Bolt.
Although the conditions were not directly comparable, right?
Well, another reportedly cleared 2.88 meters in a standing high jump,
higher than any human ever has.
A very uncomfortable Olympics.
But robots also crashed, struggled to stop, and failed during basic tasks.
At the previous games, one sprinter knocked over his human or its human handler.
This is robotics right now.
Give a machine a straight track and one goal, and it may beat us.
Give it a wet floor, a laundry basket, and a child running past, and things get complicated.
These machines are becoming extraordinary at individual tasks.
What they still struggle with is life.
But that gap will not stay open forever.
Eventually, these machines will leave the arena and enter factories, offices, and homes.
Then the question changes from can they do it?
To who controls them?
In July, the FCC moved to block new foreign-produced humanoid robots and robot dogs
from receiving the authorization normally required to enter the American market,
while previously approved models were not automatically removed.
The fear was not a robot uprising.
It was data.
Humanoids carry cameras, microphones, connections, and sensors.
A household robot could see your rooms, hear your conversations, and learn your routine.
So forget the Terminator.
The immediate fear isn't that your robot will turn against you.
It's that your robot may be taking notes.
And underneath that is a more unsettling question.
If a machine can cook, clean, walk the dog, and read to your children,
what happens to the small responsibilities that once held the family together?
Sitting with your grandma, teaching your son to tie his shoes,
doing dishes beside your wife while you both complain about the day.
Those things may look like work, but sometimes the work is where the relationship lives.
Well, I would happily outsource cleaning the bathroom tomorrow, but a home is not a warehouse.
A family is not a workflow to optimize.
So if machines can eventually do almost everything for us,
which parts of life should we refuse to outsource?
Tell me what you think because the humanoid era may not arrive next week,
but it is already rehearsing.
That's all for today.
Thanks for watching and I'll see you in the next one.